aspects of thesoftware artifacts produced by and the development process followed by their teams.3.3 Data collection methodsThis section describes the methods used to collect data related to the collaboration between theISD and SPM courses.3.3.1 Data Collection Methods for ISD CourseFinal grades. To quantitatively evaluate the correlation between student performance and whetherthey were on a managed team, we compared the final grades of students on managed teams withthe final grades of students on non-managed teams.End-of-semester survey. We designed two surveys. One was given to students who were on teamswith managers and the other to students who were on teams without managers. Both surveys(shown in Appendices A and B, respectively
Programs in Software Engineering" Integrated Software & Systems Engineering Curriculum Project Stevens Institute (2009)[6] Laird, L., “Strengthening the ‘Engineering’ in Software Engineering Education: A Software Engineering Bachelor of Engineering Program for the 21st Century,” submitted November 2015.[7] Gallois, B., Sheppard, K., “The Design Spine: Revision Of The Engineering Curriculum To Include A Design Experience Each Semester.” (2009) Paper presented at 1999 Annual Conference, Charlotte, North Carolina. https://peer.asee.org/755[8] Shackelford, R., Cross, J. II, Davies, G., Impagliazzo, J., Kamali, R., LeBlanc, R., Lunt, B., McGettrick, A., Sloan, R., Topi, H., “Computing Curricula 2005”, joint effort of the ACM and the
Paper ID #16525A Merged Software Requirements and Architecture CourseDr. J. Scott Hawker, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) Dr. Hawker graduated with a B.S. and M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Texas Tech University in Lub- bock, Texas, in 1981 and 1982, respectively. He graduated with a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Lehigh University in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, in 1990. He has over 15 years of industry experience developing large-scale, multi-agent information and control systems for diverse applications including manufacturing, combat pilot decision support and mission management, robotics, and
Paper ID #15728Work in Progress: A Student Activity Dashboard for Ensuring Project-basedLearning ComplianceSuhas Xavier, Arizona State UniversityChristian Murphy, Arizona State UniversityDr. Kevin A Gary, Arizona State University Dr. Gary is an Associate Professor in the School of Computing, Informatics, and Decision Systems Engineering of the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. His interests are broad and deep in all areas of the professorate: research, teaching, and service. His research interests are in software engineering education, web & mobile applications (specifically mHealth
deliverable schedule, therefore we did not want to interrupt their activities on other projects with continuous interruption of the interns for every little obstacle. In addition to project personnel discussed above, there were number of products and other resources that was available to the students to complete their project. The following are some of resources that was used for the project. • LulzBot TAZ 5 3D printer, and SOLIDWORKS D CAD software • Two RC vehicle chassis, including wheels and Lithium polymer (LiPo) batteries and charger • Three Raspberry Pi B+'s • A Ubiquiti Rocket M2 • LS20031 GPS Receiver • Electronics (PCB boards, wire of various gauges, a soldering iron, and miscellaneous electrical
understanding of the scope of his/her career (b) teach the students the impact theirsoftware engineering solutions have in a global context, including environmental and social (c)help develop critical thinking and (d) improve the motivation and involvement the students willhave with activities related to their future profession.Some examples of the themes developed this semester were:• Comparative analysis of the use of augmented reality for the teaching of mathematics in primary education: USA and Europe.• Comparative analysis of the use of augmented reality in projects of Architecture and Urbanism: Japan and Europe.• Comparative analysis of the use of ubiquitous computing in Medicine: USA and Latin America• Comparative analysis of
introductory software engineering course with integrated mobile application development. Annual ASEE Conference. 2014.4. Subbian V, Purdy C. Redesigning an advanced embedded systems course: A step towards interdisciplinary engineering education. IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference. 2013.5. Subbian V, Beyette F. Developing a new advanced microcontrollers course as a part of embedded systems curriculum. Frontiers in Education Conference. 2013:1462-1464.6. Inozemtseva L, Holmes R. Coverage is not strongly correlated with test suite effectiveness. Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering. 2014:435-445.7. Harder M, Morse B, Ernst MD. Specification coverage as a measure of test suite quality. ACM. 2001;25
, 1987. Identifying the salient facets of a model of student learning. International Journal of Educational,Vol. 11, pp. 187-212.3. D. Hounsell, 1987. Essay writing and the quality of feedback. Journal of Teacher Education, pp. 109-119.4. M. Lea and B. Street, 1998. Student writing in higher education: an academic. Studies in Higher Education, pp.157-172.5. G. Gibbs and C. Simpson, 2004. Does your assessment support your studens' learning? Journal of Teaching andLearning in Higher Education, Vol. 1, pp. 3-31.6. A. Rowe, L.Wood and P. Petocz, 2008. Engaging Students: Student preferences for feedback. Proceedings of the31st HERDSA Annual Conference.7. D. Nicol, 2010. From monologue to dialogue: improving written feedback processes in mass higher
General Topics Software Requirements – this is concerned with the elicitation, analysis, specification and validation of software requirements. This includes understanding of : The requirements process – How are the activities a. associated with software requirements are organized for 1 different projects and constraints. 8 1 1 b. Methods for eliciting requirements 1 5 4 1 c. Analysis of requirements 1 1 1 2 d. Specifying requirements clearly
., and Pilot, A. (2006). Design principles and outcomes of peer assessmentin higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 341-356.Wellington, P., Thomas, I., Powell, I., and Clarke, B. (2002). Authentic assessment applied to engineeringand business undergraduate consulting teams. International Journal of Engineering Education, 18(2),168-179.
Paper ID #17110Experiencing Real-world Multidisciplinary Software Systems Engineering throughAircraft Carrier SimulationProf. Dan Tappan, Eastern Washington University Dan Tappan is an Associate Professor of Computer Science at Eastern Washington University. He has been a professor of computer science and engineering for 11 years, before which he spent a decade in the defense industry as a software and systems engineer, mostly involved in the modeling and simulation of weapon systems. His main research areas are software and hardware systems engineering, especially for aviation and military applications with embedded
Paper ID #15189Long-Term Effects of Partner Programming in an Introductory ComputerScience Sequence (Work in Progress)Dr. Andrew DeOrio, University of Michigan Andrew DeOrio is a lecturer at the University of Michigan. His research interests are in ensuring the correctness of computer systems, including medical devices, internet of things devices, and digital hard- ware. In addition to teaching software and hardware courses, he teaches Creative Process and works with students on technology-driven creative projects.Mr. Andrew Giugliano, University of Michigan Andrew Giugliano is a student at the University of Michigan. His