many GEs used in previous works,this focuses on the list of GEs that have been used in in the areas of CS and SE education. Basedon our literature review, we identified eleven commonly used GEs in the educational contexts.We have provided brief descriptions of each GE below.Points (Pt): These are the rewards that are assigned to the students for the completion ofa particular task. The point system is used as measure of success or an achievement.Badges (B): These are represented as a token of achievement. These are also rewards thatare assigned to students when they complete a particular task or when they reach a goal.Leaderboards (Lb): These create a competitive environment among the students. Aleaderboard is the board that displays the
Paper ID #24279A Re-look at the Introduction to Software Engineering CourseDr. James R Vallino, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) Jim Vallino has academic and industrial experience across a broad range of engineering disciplines. His academic training includes a B.E. in mechanical engineering, a M.S. in electrical and computer engineer- ing, and after more than 16 years in industry, received a M.S. and Ph.D. in computer science. While in industry, he worked in small and large companies doing product development and industrial research. His responsibilities included both hardware and software development at AT&T
Paper ID #23952Work in Progress: One Approach to Software Engineering Project Selectionfor Small Student PopulationsDr. Paul A Bender, Ohio Dominican University Paul Bender is an Assistant Professor of Software Engineering at Ohio Dominican University in Colum- bus,OH. He previously taught Computer Science at McNeese State University in Lake Charles, LA. He holds a B.S. in Computer Science from Missouri State University, Springfield, MO, an M.S. in Computa- tional Mathematics from Ohio University, Athens, OH, and a Ph.D. in Computer Science and Engineering from Wright State University, Dayton, OH. These degrees were
Paper ID #23289Crafting the Future of Computing Education in CC2020: A WorkshopDr. Stephen T Frezza, Gannon University Deacon Steve Frezza, PSEM is a professor of Software Engineering and chair of the Computer and In- formation Science department at Gannon University in Erie, PA. His research interests include Global Software Engineering, Affective Domain Learning, Engineering Education Research, as well as Philos- ophy of Engineering and Engineering Education. He is regularly involved in supporting the regional entrepreneurial ecosystem, as well as projects that serve the regional community. He is an active member
Paper ID #21837Measuring Broader Impact of NSF-funded Project on Software EngineeringEducationDr. Sushil Acharya, Robert Morris University Sushil Acharya, D.Eng. (Asian Institute of Technology) is the Assistant Provost for Research and Gradu- ate Studies. A Professor of Software Engineering, Dr. Acharya joined Robert Morris University in Spring 2005 after serving 15 years in the Software Industry. His teaching involvement and research interest are in the area of Software Engineering education, Software Verification & Validation, Software Security, Data Mining, Neural Networks, and Enterprise Resource Planning. He also
Paper ID #22449Why Educators Need to Team with Industry Professionals in Software Devel-opment EducationDr. Gregory Kulczycki, Virginia Tech Dr. Kulczycki has extensive experience in research and development both in academia and industry. He received his doctorate from Clemson University in 2004 and began working as a professor at Virginia Tech shortly thereafter. In 2011 he went to work for Battelle Memorial Institute as a cyber research scientist, while continuing to be involved in teaching. He is currently back in the computer science department at Virginia Tech as a professor of practice, where he teaches, designs
all the students and professionals, who participated in thesurvey.References1. Nuseibeh, B., Ariane 5: who dunnit? IEEE Software, 1997. 14(3): p. 15.2. Leveson, N.G. and C.S. Turner, An investigation of the Therac-25 accidents. Computer, 1993. 26(7): p. 18- 41.3. Alami, A., The UK e-Borders Project Failure. 2016.4. Charette, R.N., Why software fails. IEEE spectrum, 2005. 42(9): p. 36.5. Micro-Focus, Testing: IT's Invisible Giant. 2011, Micro Focus.6. Hashmi, M.T., High IT Failure Rate: A Management Prospect. 2006.7. Kaner, C., J. Bach, and B. Pettichord, Lessons learned in software testing. 2008: John Wiley & Sons.8. Burnstein, I., G. Saxena, and R. Grom, A testing maturity model for software test
Paper ID #21636Teaching Software Testing with Automated FeedbackJames PerrettaDr. Andrew DeOrio, University of Michigan Andrew DeOrio is a lecturer at the University of Michigan and a consultant for web, machine learning and hardware projects. His research interests are in ensuring the correctness of computer systems, including medical devices, internet of things (IOT) devices, and digital hardware. In addition to teaching software and hardware courses, he teaches Creative Process and works with students on technology-driven creative projects. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018
Paper ID #22442The Use of HFOSS Projects in the Grace Hopper Celebration of Women inComputing Open Source DayDr. Cam Macdonell, MacEwan University Cam Macdonell is an Assistant Professor of Computer Science at MacEwan University.Heidi J.C. Ellis, Western New England University Heidi Ellis is a Professor in the Computer Science and Information Technology department at Western New England University. Dr. Ellis has a long-time interest in software engineering education and has been interested in student participation in Humanitarian Free and Open Source Software (HFOSS) since 2006. She has received multiple NSF grants