), 771- 784.23. Alonso, R. A. R., & Loui, M. C. (2011, October). Work in progress - Exploring the evolution of the mentoring relationship in a summer undergraduate research program. In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2011 (pp. T2F-1). IEEE.24. Dolan, E., & Johnson, D. (2009). Toward a holistic view of undergraduate research experiences: an exploratory study of impact on graduate/postdoctoral mentors. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(6), 487- 500.25. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications, Incorporated.26. Johnson, W. B. (2002). The intentional mentor: Strategies and guidelines for the practice of mentoring. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice
graduate mentor as less valuable than the experience ofbeing mentored that his mentee is experiencing, though they are two sides of the same coin. Hecontinues: With one student, it is assumed that the advising is continuous and direct observation of the student’s work…. thus fostering a closer relationship with the student where an interest [is] the outcome of your combined efforts…My interests were really that he learn as much as possible and that he gain a liking of graduate research and academics in general. So it was really that I had his best interests in mind.Here Nate emphasizes once more his focus on providing a positive experience for his menteewith graduate research and academics in general as part of
frequent interactions with the members of that community of practice. Thismentor’s situated learning experience was more complete, as he was able to observe and learnfrom the experts of that community.Because mentoring the undergraduate students in a research project was beneficial to theparticipating mentors in terms of their learning and development, faculty who advise graduatestudents can consider encouraging them to pursue these types of activities. Though not alldepartments will have a similar course in place, faculty can consider providing opportunitieswithin their own research projects for graduate students to mentor undergraduate students.Although graduate students are generally well prepared to conduct research, they are not as
(contentexperts) conceptualize science teaching and learning from an engineering perspective. To whatextent were engineering graduate students able to carry out inquiry-based practices and formulateengineering design tasks appropriate in context and level for middle and high school students?Research DesignConceptual FrameworkThe theoretical lens adapted for this study is a community of practice (CoP). Lave and Wenger19describe “[a] community of practice [as] a set of relations among persons, activities, and world,over time and in relation with other tangential and overlapping communities of practice” (p. 98).A community of practice is a set of practitioners characterized by common goals, actions, andresources that facilitate the shared practice.2 Figure
exploring the current state of translational work and Page 24.313.3describing the rhetorical foundations for the procedure we developed.Translational workA main purpose of graduate education is to prepare scholars to be effective producers andconsumers of research. A significant component of this preparation is scaffolding graduatestudents as they learn to make and articulate connections from research to action. As called forby Nyquist and Woodford, graduate students must have the capacity to connect their research toother research as well as to practice: “Leaders in business and industry argue that Ph.Ds. lackcollaborative ways of thinking
from outreach work31. The act of communicating specialist knowledge, inplain language to non-specialists, is a learning experience in and of itself. This communicationdeepens the understanding of both parties.Armed with university7 and financial support3, and cognizant of the personal and publicbenefits15,18, the only remaining question is of specifics. What work can be done? For those withan inclination to educational research, museums can provide an excellent laboratory for the studyof human learning. Many already are engaged in this sort of work31. There is also room forcontributions to the development and evalulation of the practices in the design of outreachprograms27. For those less directly involve in educational research, there are
Accessibility Caucus, Purdue’s Student ASEE Chapter, andGeorgia Institute of Technology’s Lean In Chapter will present their ideas on what helps create asuccessful graduate community. The common findings of all organizations are consolidated intocategories of funding, recruitment, evaluation of success, and best practices for graduate studentorganizations.Tulane University: Women+ in Science and EngineeringBackground and DevelopmentTulane University’s Women+ in Science and Engineering (WISE), a graduate student andpostdoctoral fellow initiative, will conclude its first full year in June 2017. At the ASEE 2016conference, two graduate students and a Tulane Assistant Professor identified a critical need forgraduate student and postdoctoral peer
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Practical Application of Robotics Competition for STEM EducationAbstractAs robots become an increasingly integral part of our society, the study of robotics has a greatpotential to influence Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) education.Robotics is a multidisciplinary field and requires an organic integration of resources andoptimized operation for its impact to be maximized. This paper presents the practice andsignificance of using a robotic submarine competition (Robosub competition) to improve theengineering education of STEM majors at California State University, Los Angeles (CSULA).The competition requires students to design and build a submarine robot to
, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) and Computer Science(CS) education. He is also interested in improving STEM+CS education for minorities. He has been volunteering in many education outreach programs including Science Fair and Robotics programs such as First Robotics competitions. Areas of research interest include engineering education, STEM+CS, and robotics in K-12 education. Kaya advocates his view that research, teaching and learning are best practiced as a unified enterprise that benefits students and society. He has received numerous teaching awards as well as grants for his research from several foundations. Kaya is an active member of AERA, ASEE, ASTE, NARST, NSTA, and CSTA, has presented at over 15 conferences
Paper ID #31978The Practicality and Scalability of Respooling 3-D printingThermoplastics A Multidisciplinary Research Project by the Canino Schoolof Engineering Technology at SUNY Canton (WIP)Mr. Matt Jamison Burnett, Matt Burnett is a native of the Adirondack Mountains of Northern NY state. Working in paint, video and environmental installation, Burnett’s work explores the history, paradoxes and environmental dilemmas of nature/culture relationships. Burnett is currently a Professor in the Graphic and Multimedia Design Program at the State University of New York Canton. In his ”Sustainability Lecture Series” at Canton
attended.During the 2009-2010 academic year, the focus was analytical skills, specifically the ability toidentify strengths and weaknesses in the analysis of a new scientific paper. The GraduateStudent Council members suggested five different fields, i.e., physics, chemistry, materialscience, biomedical, and polymer science. Graduate students selected one article for theirpresentation beyond articles related to their research work. The students also explained theirthought process when making the presentations. Each individual's presentation was peerreviewed and the individual was given suggestions for improvement. The Graduate StudentCouncil also conducted voting among the peers to select the best presenters. This professionaldevelopment program proved
Engineering Education Sympo- sium in 2013, awarded the American Society for Engineering Education Educational Research Methods Faculty Apprentice Award in 2014 and the Raymond W. Fahien Award for Outstanding Teaching Effec- tiveness and Educational Scholarship presented by American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Chemical Engineering Division in 2017.Dr. Courtney S Smith-Orr, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Courtney S. Smith,PhD is a Undergraduate Coordinator & Teaching Assistant Professor at UNC Char- lotte. Her research interests span the mentoring experiences of African American women in engineer- ing,minority recruitment and retention, and best practices for diversity and inclusion in the
2004, Time Magazine dubbed Dr. Edwards the ”Plumbing Professor” and listed him among the four most impor- tant ”innovators” in water from around the world. The White House awarded him a Presidential Faculty Fellowship in 1996. In 1994, 1995, 2005 and 2011 Edwards received Outstanding Paper Awards in the Journal of American Waterworks Association and he received the H.P. Eddy Medal in 1990 for best re- search publication by the Water Pollution Control Federation (currently Water Environment Federation). He was later awarded the Walter Huber Research Prize from the American Society of Civil Engineers in 2003, the State of Virginia Outstanding Faculty Award in 2006, a MacArthur Fellowship from 2008 to 2012, the
. The Integrative GraduateEducation Research and Traineeship on Magnetic and Nanostructured Materials (IGERT-MNM)is a collaboration between Purdue University, Cornell University, and Norfolk State Universityto train interdisciplinary science and engineering doctoral students for future roles as leaders inthe materials science and engineering fields. As part of this socialization into future careers,students proceed through a variety of modules. This paper specifically covers student learning ina pedagogy module, which introduces students to best practices in teaching and learning.Graduate student reflections on the development of high-school level student and teacher scienceand engineering activities were analyzed via thematic coding methods in
and as they graduate the goalis for them to continue developing their careers in STEM education and giving back to thecommunity. Also, we are glad to have almost half of our membership being females. In theSTEM fields, women can be underrepresented, however in our Jr. Chapter Program, womenclearly demystifies the current national statistics that women do not pursue STEM careers.Creation, Sustainability & Growth (i.e. Best Practices)In order to establish and develop a Jr. Chapter, a three-party agreement must be formed.Commitment from college member(s) to serve as Jr. Representative and be the bridge betweenthe college chapter and the Jr. Chapter. Secondly, obtaining support from the school staff andteacher(s) that would like to serve as
AC 2012-5183: EASING INTO ENGINEERING EDUCATION: AN ORIEN-TATION PROGRAM FOR GRADUATE STUDENTSStephanie Cutler, Virginia TechWalter Curtis Lee Jr., Virginia Tech Walter Lee is a Graduate Assistant and doctoral student in engineering education at Virginia Tech. His pri- mary research interests focus on diversity and student retention. He earned a B.S. in industrial engineering from Clemson University.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech Lisa McNair is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Her research includes interdisciplinary collaboration, communication studies, identity theory, and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include
AC 2012-3517: IN SEARCH OF MEANING AND IDENTITY: AN AUTOETHNOG-RAPHY OF A GRADUATE STUDENT NAVIGATING THE FIELD OF EN-GINEERING EDUCATIONRichard J. Aleong, Queen’s University Richard Aleong is a master’s of applied science candidate in the Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering at Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. His research interests are in engineering design, qualitative research methodology, and teaching and learning in higher education. Page 25.756.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 In Search of Meaning and Identity: An Autoethnography of a
faculty more time to conduct research, and secondarily to provide funding andteaching experience for graduate students 4. At many institutions the employment of GTAs hasbeen justified for cost saving reasons 5. GTAs often are new to the university, have littletraining, and can have conflicting identities as teachers and students 6. Therefore, the graduateteaching experience can be difficult for graduate students as they seek to find their place in Page 22.757.2academia.GTA experiences can also significantly impact students‟ experiences especially in terms ofclassroom climate. For example, a large, quantitative study exploring retention and
engineering. Her research interests address a broad spectrum of educational topics, but her specialty is in how people learn problem solving skills.Hannah Christine Zierden, The Ohio State UniversityMr. Kevin Robert Wegman Kevin is a first year graduate student studying Nuclear Engineering. He graduated last fall with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering. Kevin has taught with the EEIC for the past three years, twice as a UTA and once as a GTA.Dr. Rachel Louis Kajfez, Ohio State University Dr. Rachel Louis Kajfez is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Engineering Education Innovation Center and the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Geodetic Engineering at The Ohio State Univer- sity. She earned her B.S. and M.S
.[12] T. Verney, S. Holoviak, and A. Winter, “Enhancing the reliability of internship evaluations,” The Journal of Applied Business and Economics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 22-34, 2009.[13] R. Bachnak, R. Goonatilake, S. C. Maldonado and D. Mott, “Promoting student success in engineering and science through research and internship programs,” in Proceedings of 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA, June 2013. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/22386. [Accessed April 29, 2020].[14] “Going the Distance: Best Practices and Strategies for Retaining Engineering, Engineering Technology and Computing Students,” ASEE Retention Project, August 2012. [Online]. Available: [https://www.asee.org/retention-project
Paper ID #28576How to Be a Graduate Student (Before I Forget): A Collection ofExperiential WisdomDr. Stephen Secules, Florida International University Stephen is an Assistant Professor Engineering and Computing Education at Florida International Univer- sity. He has a prior academic and professional background in engineering, having worked professionally as an acoustical engineer. He has taught a number of courses on engineering and education, including courses on engineering design, systems in society, and learning theories. Stephen’s research interests include equity, culture, and the sociocultural dimensions of engineering
and instructor in the College of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Colorado Boulder. Her research focuses on ways to encourage more students, especially women and those from nontraditional demographic groups, to pursue interests in the eld of engineering. Janet assists in recruitment and retention efforts locally, nationally, and internationally, hoping to broaden the image of engineering, science, and technology to include new forms of communication and problem solving for emerging grand challenges. A second vein of Janet’s research seeks to identify the social and cultural impacts of technological choices made by engineers in the process of designing and creating new devices and systems. Her
Engineering Education, 2013 Exploring the Experience of Undergraduate Research: A Case Study Using FacebookIntroductionParticipating in research as an undergraduate can be a powerful learning experience, helpingstudents form connections with faculty, put classroom knowledge into practice, develop researchskills and prepare for graduate study. Undergraduate research is a “high impact” educationalpractice1 that can be particularly effective for engaging students from diverse backgrounds.2–5The NSF makes a substantial investment in undergraduate research experiences, which it views as“one of the most effective avenues for attracting talented undergraduates”6 and preparing them forgraduate study and careers in
. Cersonsky earned her PhD at the University of Michigan, and is currently working as a Postdoc- toral researcher at EPFL in Lausanne, Switzerland. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020Bringing Science Education and Research together to REACTAbstractThis “Innovation in Engineering Teaching Practices” paper will describe the student led co-curricular REACT (Research Education and Activities for Classroom Teachers) program at theUniversity of Michigan. REACT was formed in 2017 to bring K-12 math and science teachersfrom Michigan together for a one-day, interactive learning experience to help incorporate researchinto their classrooms. Teachers listen to graduate student talks, go on research lab tours and
pedagogicaltheories into practice through the development of a new online engineering course. As a second-semester student in an engineering education doctoral program I was given the opportunity todevelop a new graduate-level course for an online Master of Civil Engineering (MCE) program.Concurrently, I was enrolled in an Engineering Education course, Content, Assessment, andPedagogy: An Integrated Engineering Design Approach (CAP) and a Curriculum and Instructioncourse, Advanced Issues in Distance Education (AIDE). This combination of coursework andemployment provided an ideal opportunity to immediately apply course concepts to a real-worldproblem.The purpose of this paper is to reflect on the process of translating theoretical course concepts toa new
and directives to move courses entirely online createdchaos in the higher education ecosystem and collapsed many of the support structures studentshad taken for granted, such as campus communities, study groups, and regular routines. As aresult, this research project conducted during the initial months of the pandemic reflects notmerely the challenges of working online, but rather working online under social isolation.MethodsOur study was based on utilizing semi-structured interviews from a broad spectrum of subjects.The interviews I conducted were part of a paired study design: a postdoctoral fellow to theproject, later joined by a graduate research assistant to the project, interviewed engineeringeducators, ed tech executives, and
quantifytheir undergraduate experience. Students are able to track their progress, design their ownacademic path to graduation, and develop their own enrichment activity plan that best fits theirspecific interest. The engineering portfolio also assists students to prepare their resume for jobinterviews and, when used as a tool for interviewing, the portfolio highlights tangibleexperiences outside what is normally found in transcripts and conventional resumes.Our approach focuses on capturing the entire breath of each student’s educational experience,while setting the foundation for students to build an open-ended self-guided career plan thatdraws from their skills, experiences, and achievements that comprise their engineering portfolio
sessions aboutresumes were not included in the survey questions, several students left feedback about theselearning opportunities in response to open-ended questions about the “best” or most helpfulcomponents of the program.Concluding Discussion and Future WorkResume development activities are a common – and valuable – component of undergraduateengineering experiences. The key differences to the approach described here include: (1) theresume development activities focused on rising seniors participating in an intensiveundergraduate research program; (2) this project focused on helping students to prepareacademic resumes that would be appropriate to include in graduate school applications.Comparing “initial” and “revised” resumes for students who
reform effort risks being undermined by the curricular and cultural practices thatpervasively shape student experience and outcomes and drive away too many could-be engineerswith diverse interests, aptitudes, lived experiences, and values.PDI’s response to the bait-and-switch problem employs design-oriented logics of engagement inparallel with the fundamentals-first approach, which provides a partial corrective to the logic ofexclusion. This configuration offers educators new avenues for thinking about explicit andimplicit connections between the design-centric emphasis in K-12 and the content-driven modelof fundamentals first. Moving forward, we hope to conduct empirical research using participantobservation and interviews to compare students
approaches,” International Journal of Design, vol. 4, no. 3, 2010.26 S. Papert and I. Harel. "Situating constructionism." Constructionism36.2, 1-11, 1991.27 R. A. Finke, T. B. Ward, and S.M. Smith, “Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications.” 1992.28 M. Mani, J. Madan, J. H. Lee, K.W. Lyons, and S.K. Gupta, “Sustainability characterization for manufacturing processes,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 52 no. 20, pp. 5895-5912, 2014.29 Ye, Y., Jankovic, M., Kremer, G. E., Yannou, B., Leroy, Y., & J. C. Bocquet, “Integration of environmental impact estimation in system architecture and supplier identification,” Research in Engineering Design, vol. 27 no. 2, pp. 117-140, 2016.30 A. Al-Saffar