Asee peer logo
Well-matched quotation marks can be used to demarcate phrases, and the + and - operators can be used to require or exclude words respectively
Displaying results 1 - 30 of 79 in total
Conference Session
Engineering Education Methods and Reflections
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Yi Cao, Virginia Tech; Andrea L. Schuman, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
Paper ID #46440A Reflective Essay: Lessons from Two Engineering Education QualitativeResearch DissertationsMiss Yi Cao, Virginia Tech CAO Yi is a PhD candidate at the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech with the guidance of Dr. Jennifer Case. She is also a research associate at the International Center for Higher Education Innovation(ICHEI), a UNESCO Category 2 CenterDr. Andrea L. Schuman, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Andrea Schuman is an assistant professor in the Department of Computer Engineering at Cal Poly. She holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education and an M.S. in Electrical
Conference Session
Engineering Education Methods and Reflections
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jad El Harake, Vanderbilt University; gina yu, Vanderbilt University; Kaden Jorge Tro; Jonathan Ehrman, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
discouraging them from exploring furtheropportunities. This exploratory study aims to better understand the experiences of undergraduateresearchers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields through a population ofundergraduate participants in a full-time multidisciplinary undergraduate research program.Student- and mentor-reported perceptions and scores were collected at the end of each summerterm to evaluate the students’ research performance and reflect on their experience and growth.Electronic (Google Form) surveys prompted students to self-evaluate their research performanceover the summer term as a numerical score between 1 (worst) and 5 (best), and to provide awritten justification for the selected score. Mentors scored their
Conference Session
Engineering Education Methods and Reflections
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Qiuxing Chen, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
particularresearch topic. Research gaps may come up in the literature when conducting the review, whichmay lead to a dissertation or research project. Most of what is known about systematic literature reviews and scoping reviews originatefrom the psychological, health, and social sciences fields [2], [3], and while there are existingframeworks for these two types of literature reviews, they may not be directly transferable to theengineering education field. This realization made evident that this process is likely a generalexperience among novice researchers. Therefore, the goal of this paper is to discuss theapplications of both types of literature reviews with reflections from a novice researcher,discussing the importance of engaging in literature
Conference Session
Engineering Education Methods and Reflections
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nina Kamath Telang, University of Texas at Austin; Brittney Outlaw, University of Texas at Austin
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
Conference Session
Engineering Education Methods and Reflections
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ruidong Ma, University of Washington; Renee M. Desing, University of Washington
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
Paper ID #48563Self-reflection: Lessons learned from three years of teaching as an internationalPh.D. student engineering instructorMr. Ruidong Ma, University of Washington Ruidong Ma is a fourth-year international Ph.D. student in the Mechanical Engineering Department and is dedicated to engineering teaching.Dr. Renee M. Desing, University of Washington Dr. Renee Desing is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Washington. Her research interests include diversity, equity, and inclusion in the engineering classrooms and workplaces. Dr. Desing graduated from Ohio
Conference Session
Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 1: Student Success and Mentoring
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kathryn Christopher, Grand Valley State University and Western Michigan University; C.J. Witherell, Grand Valley State University; Aziz Gram Sarhan
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
engineering education, universal design for learning, and improving first-year retention in engineering programs.C.J. Witherell, Grand Valley State University CJ Witherell is a graduate student studying Product Design and Manufacturing Engineering at Grand Valley State University. In both academic and industrial contexts, they have explored the Design Thinking methodology—specifically researching methods to improve the brainstorming and empathizing steps. As the 2022 Wisner Engineering Fellow, they are developing a new product for Gentex Corporation in Zeeland, Michigan.Aziz Gram Sarhan ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Reflection and Goal Setting: Methods for Improved
Conference Session
Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 1: Student Success and Mentoring
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alexander V Struck Jannini, Purdue University Library TSS
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
Paper ID #37185Reflections on Mentorship – Being the Change You Want to See inEngineering EducationAlexander Vincent Struck Jannini, Purdue University Library TSS ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Reflections on Mentorship – Being the Change You Want to See in Engineering EducationAbstractThe educational pathway of engineering is often fraught with obstacles and challenges. Whilestudents that participate in research labs get through with less difficulty, there can be instanceswhere students enter with both academic and personal issues. In this paper, I will specificallyhighlight one of my
Conference Session
Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 1: Student Success and Mentoring
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Duncan H. Mullins, State University of New York, Buffalo ; AraOluwa Adaramola, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
Paper ID #37913Reflections on the Process of Growing into Faculty: A CollaborativeExperience in Being ApprenticesMr. Duncan H. Mullins, State University of New York, BuffaloAraOluwa Adaramola, Purdue University, West Lafayette AraOluwa Adaramola is a graduate student in the Chemical Engineering PhD Program at Purdue Univer- sity. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Reflections on the Process of Growing into Faculty: A collaborative experience in being apprentices By: Duncan Mullins a
Conference Session
Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 2: Student Success and Resources
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Isabel Anne Boyd, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Chulin Chen, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Lorna Treffert, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Alexis Gillmore, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Courtney June Faber, University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
research methods that allow for deep investigations of constructs such as epistemic thinking, identity, and agency. Dr. Faber has a B.S. in Bioengineering and a Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education from Clemson University and a M.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Cornell University. Among other awards for her research, she was awarded a National Science Foundation CAREER Award in 2022 to study epistemic negotiations on interdisciplinary engineering education research teams. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 WIP: Developing an Ethnographic Observation and Reflection Template: An Example from Studying Epistemic Differences within EER
Conference Session
Student Division Technical Session 3: Student Experiences and Support
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sruthi Dasika, Purdue University; Anyerson Cuervo, Purdue University; Amena Shermadou, Purdue University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
Paper ID #43703Work in Progress: A Collaborative Reflection Exploring the Teaching Motivationand Identity Development for International Graduate Students in EngineeringSruthi Dasika, Purdue University Sruthi is a Ph.D. candidate in Environmental and Ecological Engineering at Purdue University, focusing her research on developing cost-effective drinking water test methods for underserved communities in the developing world. She earned an M.S. in Environmental and Ecological Engineering at Purdue and a B.E. in Civil Engineering from Ramaiah Institute of Technology, Bangalore. Sruthi has accrued extensive graduate teaching
Conference Session
Collaborative Learning in Engineering
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Audrey Boklage, University of Texas at Austin
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
opportunities for hands-on, project-based learning that nurtures creativity, problem-solving, and technical skill development. This study examines the role of an undergraduatestudent staff member in a university makerspace, focusing on how these experiences contributeto their professional and personal growth. Grounded in Kolb’s Experiential Learning Theory(ELT), this research explores how students traverse the four stages of experiential learning—concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualization, and activeexperimentation—within makerspaces. This study investigates the learning processes within these environments throughqualitative analysis of reflective narratives and project artifacts from an undergraduate
Conference Session
Collaborative Learning in Engineering
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Wylam Patrick DeSimone, University of Georgia; Parker Gavin Ferrer, University of Georgia; Sarah Jane Bork, University of Georgia
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Bridging the Gap: Autoethnographic Insights into Project-Based Learning in Electrical EngineeringAbstractProject experience is crucial to electrical and computer engineering (ECE) education. Despitethis, many students are limited to extracurricular involvement or secondary opportunities to gainproject experience. This lack of a project-based curriculum creates a clear divide between thosewith and without access outside the classroom. This study focuses on the self-reflectiveexperience of an electrical engineering undergraduate designing, building, and programming arobotics project. Through autoethnography and reflective journaling, the data from this studyaims to demonstrate
Conference Session
Student Division (STDT) Poster Session
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tahlia Altgold, The Ohio State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
such as climatechange, healthcare, and food insecurity [2]. To solve these complex problems, engineers must understandthe societal impacts of their engineering designs on multiple stakeholders. The importance of socialimpact in engineering is reflected in the required student outcomes set by the Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET). Student outcome two in the second criterion states that graduatesshould have “an ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs withconsideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, andeconomic factors” [3]. Engineering students can learn to incorporate these factors in their designs andconsider
Conference Session
Student Division Technical Session 1: Student Experiences and Support
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Katelyn Churakos, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Jayden Mitchell, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Jessica E S Swenson, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
examines the student perception and experience of solving open-endedmodeling problems (OEMPs) through an autoethnographic account of the student-authors’personal reflections about an OEMP completed during an introductory level statics course.Currently, the student perspective is not represented in literature about engineering problemsolving. This is significant as the student perspective is integral to understanding how studentslearn and develop an engineering mindset. By incorporating the student voice throughautoethnographic techniques, this study can begin to fill this gap and provide meaningful insightsabout the student experience and perceived benefits surrounding an OEMP.Autoethnography is an approach to research and writing that
Conference Session
Student Division Technical Session 3: Student Experiences and Support
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Maryann Renee Hebda, Baylor University; Morgan R Castillo, Baylor University; Tracey Sulak, Baylor University
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
engineering education, CBE provides a transition from universityto industry. Many parallels exist between CBE and industry practices, in particular thosesurrounding design-based concepts. In industry, new-product development (NPD) requiresattention to detail at the individual project, business, and systems level to create a successfulproduct launch [2], whereas university engineering design courses tend to focus on the individualproject level. Cooper’s [2] NPD success drivers often reflect the type of skills that are a focus inCBE. For individual new-product projects, overlapping concepts include voice-of-the-customer,pre-work, definition, and iterations. Building in the voice-of-the-customer may involve marketresearch for businesses, whereas
Conference Session
Student Division Technical Session 7: Teaching and Learning Practices
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Isabel A Boyd, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Kaitlyn Anne Thomas, University of Nevada, Reno; Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Kelly J Cross, Georgia Institute of Technology
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
different groups (such as race or gender) and the resulting psychological re-sponses. ICT identifies key conditions that enable positive contact between members of differentraces and genders in a group. For this exploratory analysis, we included all participants in the larger study who identifiedas African American and female; all were full-time undergraduate students enrolled in an engi-neering course with a team project. The nine participants represent a range of years in school andengineering majors. Data collection followed a three-interview sequence and included questionsabout participants’ background, their team project, and their reflections on the teaming experi-ence, respectively. In this paper, we present our initial exploration of
Conference Session
Collaborative Learning in Engineering
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Anna Engelke, NC State University / UNC-Chapel Hill; Zachary Wiebe; Daisy Huang, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Spencer Dougherty, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Margaret Elizabeth Ambrose
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
encompasses a mixture of technical skills, reflective practice, interpersonalnetworks, and self-directed learning. [1] The formation of a professional identity is described asan ongoing process that encompasses both person and context, where an individual has agencyto self-determine sub-identities that compose their overall professional identity. [2] At BeAM,the professional identity of a PA or a PS is often defined by how they perceive their ability toembody professional roles and their interactions with other makerspace staff. For example, PAsmust be able to safely operate makerspace equipment, teach makerspace users, perform routinemaintenance, and provide support to other makerspace staff. As staff become more confident inthese roles, they
Conference Session
Student Success and Support Mechanisms in Engineering Education
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jemal Bedane Halkiyo, Arizona State University; Abdisa Bedane Halkiyu, Bule Hora University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
that improve the educational experience. Data were collected through quantitativesurveys (n=59) and qualitative, semi-structured interviews (n=4) to investigate students'experiences, strategies, and obstacles to time management in online learning environments. Thestudy identified six factors that significantly affect online students' time management skills: (1)lack of sufficient time management training, (2) challenges in balancing school, work, andpersonal life, (3) limited knowledge of effective time management strategies, (4) inadequateplanning, (5) insufficient self-assessment or self-reflection, and (6) a tendency towardprocrastination. Results reveal significant variations in time management practices acrossdemographic groups of students
Conference Session
Motivation and Engagement in Engineering Students
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Hang Zhang, Jining Normal University,China; Hao He; Ming Li, Beijing Foreign Studies University
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
program accreditation is essentially a continuous improvementprocess. It requires the accredited program to establish an effective continuousimprovement mechanism.By looking back at history and combining the viewpoints of relevant research, thequality assurance practice of engineering education in American colleges anduniversities since the 1990s can be divided into three stages: the EC2000 pilot period(1995-1999), the EC2000 promotion period (2000-2007), and the EC2000transformation period (since 2008). During each stage, colleges and universities havemade new progress in quality assurance practices under the leadership of ABET, butalso exposed different quality assurance problems. The main problem in the EC2000transformation period is reflected
Conference Session
Tools, Identities, and Personality in Engineering Education
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Karen Elizabeth Nortz, University of Michigan; Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan; Susan M Lord, University of San Diego
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
and participated in a semi-structured interview to reflect on theirexperiences in the SEES cohort. Specifically, we aimed to evaluate two elements of the SEESProgram: ●​ How well supported did the SEES cohort feel by the program’s structure? ●​ What challenges did the SEES cohort encounter when developing their sociotechnical modules?In November, after the completion of the interview and submission of their final module, thegraduate students received a stipend for their participation.Data Collection and MethodsTo evaluate the program we collected two types of data. First, we created an end-of-programsurvey using a Google form. The survey assessed cohorts’ satisfaction with both the program andthe module development process, the level
Conference Session
Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 3: Student Innovative Practice
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Elyas Masrour
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
technology developed, which requires imagination and the skills to project atechnology into the future. These considerations can be challenging to track for each individualstory, which led to the genesis of this project. III. Methodology: The RRCD Framework The purpose of this project is to design a framework to allow an engineering instructor toquickly and easily integrate a piece of science fiction into their classroom for the purposes ofethical analysis. To accomplish this, we designed the RRCD framework. To begin with, RRCDstands for four question types: Recall, Reflect, Challenge, and Decide. When these questiontypes are answered as a sequence in relation to a piece of science fiction content, they aredesigned to encourage
Conference Session
Student Success and Support Mechanisms in Engineering Education
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
James Finn Morton, University of Georgia; Taiwo Raphael Feyijimi, University of Georgia; Sarah Jane Bork, University of Georgia
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
engineering coursework can be in high school [3]. Therefore,it is important to consider why aspects of engineering may resonate with this specific populationcompared to others.The following sections will first detail the framework we used to guide our study. We then detailthe Q-methodology, the method used in this study. We will present our current progress(development of Q-statements) before discussing our conclusions and future work. We will thenend with a self-reflection of the first author’s experience doing this work.Guiding Theoretical FrameworkThis work was guided by Eccle’s Expectancy Value’s Theory and Subjective Task Values (EVT-STV). EVT provides a robust framework for analyzing how students’ beliefs about their abilityto succeed
Conference Session
Student Division (STDT) Poster Session
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Narangoo Tumur, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville; Amardeep Kaur, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
use the lab manuals and other written or verbal instruction etc. We believethis led to clear instruction and student satisfaction with the overall experience.Course Under ConsiderationEngineering Electromagnetics is an undergraduate-level course at our university intended forElectrical Engineering students with Junior or Senior standing. The content primarily includeselectromagnetic wave propagation, transmission line propagation, voltage and currentwaveforms with multi-boundary reflections, Smith chart analysis, and application of Maxwell’sequations. The course is offered once a year with enrollment in recent years ranging between 30and 40 students. Over the last three years, we have tried to transition the course from a traditionallecture
Conference Session
Engineering Identity and Student Support (Features 2 papers of STDT)
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Danielle Usinski, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Alyndra Plagge, Trinity University; Emma Treadway, Trinity University; Jessica E S Swenson, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
engineering program at the time of enrollmentin the study. Participants completed a survey and interview at the end of each semester over thecourse of two years. During the interviews, participants were asked to reflect on theirexperiences and involvement in mathematics, science, and engineering. Questions in theinterview were geared towards understanding the participants’ identity and affect. Theseinterviews tended to last between 1 and 3 hours depending on the depth of the participants'responses.Preliminary AnalysisInterviews were professionally transcribed, and then the transcripts were analyzed using thematiccoding and discourse analysis. The transcripts were first coded for expression and regulation ofemotions regarding math, science and
Conference Session
Student Division (STDT) Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lindsey Pegram, "Be A Maker (BeAM)" Makerspace in the Department of Applied Physical Sciences at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill ; Maria Christine Palmtag; Anna Engelke, UNC-Chapel Hill / North Carolina State University
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
training in a specifictool area, participants are assessed using the corresponding rubric. This enables trainers andadministrators to gauge the level of competency of each participant and identify areas ofimprovement. The structure of the training program varied for each community, reflecting thefacilitator's approach and the specific equipment utilized. For example, the textiles communityfollowed a highly structured format with three weeks of co-learning sessions organized aroundshort practice projects, followed by three weeks dedicated to open-ended individual projects. Thewoodshop community took a more unstructured approach, providing “just-in-time” trainingwhile diving into open-ended individual projects from the first week
Conference Session
Student Division Technical Session 5: Self- Efficacy
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jeffrey Luke Morrison, University of South Florida; Chris S Ferekides, University of South Florida; Dhinesh Balaji Radhakrishnan, Purdue University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
engineering course Itook. In this course, students were put into groups and had to complete an engineering task (inmy case, build a simple robot); however, the class’s primary learning outcomes focused on non-technical concepts like engineering ethics, which made this course like a mini capstone wherestudents had to find the information themselves to complete their projects. Reflecting on thisproject, I realized that researching and building circuitry for robots was the primary reason forselecting Electrical Engineering. Therefore, when I look at the department’s RED program, I seea similar ideology: an attempt to teach students more about the professional side of engineeringand empower students to take responsibility for learning. I still have not
Conference Session
Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 6: Underserved Student Experiences
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nicole Adia Jefferson, Virginia Tech ; Jeremi S. London, Virginia Tech
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
to understand what this process may entail.According to some graduate education scholars, there are four core elements related to graduatestudents' development of an identity congruent with the norms and values of their field:knowledge acquisition, investment, involvement, and engagement (Weidman, 2006). Knowledgeacquisition describes how students learn skills and information that will help them perform wellin their new role as a Ph.D. student, as well as gain an understanding of what academic successentails. Through knowledge acquisition, students become aware of normative expectations of thePh.D. student role and can make a realistic assessment of their personal ability to pursue theirdesired career. The student's investment reflects their
Conference Session
Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 1: Student Success and Mentoring
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Cyra Anderson, University of Michigan; Joi-lynn Mondisa, University of Michigan; Nagash Clarke, University of Michigan
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
student development and impacted attendee awareness of the“hidden curriculum”, or the unstated enforcement of certain behavioral patterns, professional standards,and social beliefs (Miller & Seller, 1990). We also present insights about potential future opportunities forthese types of programs to potentially help students more easily navigate academic and socio-politicalcustoms needed for success. Literature ReviewMentoring and Professional DevelopmentMentoring reflects a unique relationship between individuals, one different from other interpersonalrelationships (Eby et al, 2007). Mentors provide coaching or guidance to assist mentees with careeradvancement while developing relationships to
Conference Session
Student Division Technical Session 1: Student Experiences and Support
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Laurel Lynn ONeill, Penn State University; Luis Delgado Jr., Penn State; Stephanie Cutler, Penn State University; Sarah E Zappe, Penn State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
al. [3]. Transformational resistance is defined as an action that reflects a critique of thesocial oppression at hand, rather than conformist resistance that does not challenge the structure athand. The structure of a panel puts graduate students in the seat of authority and allows them todirectly relay their experiences to the attendees. This challenges the structure by empoweringoverlapping disempowered groups, graduate students, and LGBTQ people. Members of the panelincluded both cis and trans people, individuals who are nonbinary, individuals who are gay orlesbian, and students on the neurodivergent and asexual spectrum. When creating the panel, it wasessential to ensure that a broad swath of identities were represented. There will
Conference Session
Student Division Technical Session 4: Project-based Learning
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Maryann Renee Hebda, Baylor University; Morgan R Castillo, Baylor University; Tracey Sulak, Baylor University
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
Education Experiential learning, most simply defined as learning by doing, can occur in multiplecontexts at the university level. For example, many undergraduates have opportunities for hands-on laboratory time, internships, and service-learning programs. Through these experiences,ideally four stages should occur: participating in the experience, reflecting about the experience,conceptualizing (understanding) what they experienced, and applying what they learned in asimilar setting [6]. When bringing experiential learning into the classroom, particularly within acourse focused on engineering design, it can integrate authentic learning experiences intostudents’ plan of study and daily lives [1]. A recent systematic review [7