. Page 24.375.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Designing a Stage of “Romance” for Programs in Technological Literacy.AbstractIn previous paper in these proceedings* it was argued (a) that a liberal education that takes no account ofengineering and technological literacy cannot be by definition liberal, and (b) that programs of engineering andtechnological literacy can be designed to bridge the academic-vocational divide inherent in reports such as thatundertaken for the National Governors Association. In support of this argument a model curriculum based on theepistemologies of Macmurray and Newman was presented. It was necessarily integrated and trans-disciplinary, andit was argued that it
Paper ID #10840Development of a Simplified Method for Representing Technological Systemsfor Non-EngineersDr. John Krupczak, Hope College Professor of Engineering, Hope College, Holland, Michigan. Former Chair of the ASEE Technologi- cal Literacy Division. Former Chair of the ASEE Liberal Education Division. Senior Fellow CASEE, National Academy of Engineering, 2008-2010.Lauren Aprill, Hope College Engineering Student, Hope College, Holland, Michigan 49423Daniel J Langholz Engineering student at Hope College, Holland, Michigan
Paper ID #9187An Intuitive Approach to Teaching concepts in Engineering to a General Au-dienceDr. Daniel Raviv, Florida Atlantic UniversityMr. George Roskovich Page 24.172.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 An Intuitive Approach to Teaching Concepts in Engineering to a General Audience Daniel Raviv and George Roskovich Department of Computer & Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Florida Atlantic University
and personal reflections on the philosophical basis of a. What is engineering? b. How can we train engineers for the ever-‐changing future developments? c. What are the most fundamental concepts and skills that every engineer should know? d. What are the discipline specific concepts and important skills that students need to acquire? e. Is it possible to train engineers (with all of the skills, concepts, and knowledge base) in 4 year (perhaps 5 including industrial experiences
14 A. Knowledge 1. articulate the pervasiveness of technology in everyday life. 2. Define basic engineering concepts and terms, such as systems, constraints and trade-offs. 3. Describe the nature and limitations of the design process. 4. Explain some of the ways technology shapes human history and people shape technology. 5. Compare the benefits and risks that all technologies entail, some that can be anticipated and some that cannot. 6. Identify the effects of technology on the environment. B. Ability to engage. 7. Describe the development and use of technology and evaluate trade-offs including a balance of costs and benefits both economic and social. 8. Identify
perspective of past technologies and how they were discovered and used. In thiscontext the two biggest technology drivers of agriculture and war are studied in detail.Throughout the course, numerous technologies are scrutinized and examined in terms of theircost versus benefit to society. The main objectives of the course were to: (a) promote awarenessof technological development, and (b) provide a rudimentary understanding of the social,political, economic, and cultural impact.The course content explores innovations and inventions associated with ancient as well as retrotechnologies in the fields of agriculture, weapons, time measurement, industrialization,transportation, communication, and the environment (Loendorf & Geyer14, 2009
Paper ID #10297Large Research Center Education and Outreach: Lessons from 5 years ofDistributed Collaborative Design, Development and ImplementationDr. Sean P Brophy, Purdue University, West LafayetteDr. Thalia Anagnos, San Jose State University Dr. Thalia Anagnos is a professor in the General Engineering Department at San Jose State University, where she has taught since 1984. She also serves as co-Leader of Education, Outreach, and Training for the George E. Brown, Jr. Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation, a consortium of 14 large-scale earthquake engineering experimental facilities
Paper ID #9586Defining Engineering EducationDr. Alan Cheville, Bucknell University Alan Cheville studied optoelectronics and ultrafast optics at Rice University, followed by fourteen years as a faculty member at Oklahoma State University working on terahertz frequencies and engineering edu- cation. While at Oklahoma State he developed courses in photonics and engineering design. After serving for two and a half years as a program director in engineering education at the National Science Founda- tion, he took a chair position in electrical engineering at Bucknell University. He is currently interested in