Asee peer logo
Well-matched quotation marks can be used to demarcate phrases, and the + and - operators can be used to require or exclude words respectively
Displaying all 8 results
Conference Session
Promoting Technological Literacy
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John Heywood, Trinity College-Dublin
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
. Page 24.375.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Designing a Stage of “Romance” for Programs in Technological Literacy.AbstractIn previous paper in these proceedings* it was argued (a) that a liberal education that takes no account ofengineering and technological literacy cannot be by definition liberal, and (b) that programs of engineering andtechnological literacy can be designed to bridge the academic-vocational divide inherent in reports such as thatundertaken for the National Governors Association. In support of this argument a model curriculum based on theepistemologies of Macmurray and Newman was presented. It was necessarily integrated and trans-disciplinary, andit was argued that it
Conference Session
Promoting Technological Literacy
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John Krupczak, Hope College; Lauren Aprill, Hope College; Daniel J. Langholz
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
Paper ID #10840Development of a Simplified Method for Representing Technological Systemsfor Non-EngineersDr. John Krupczak, Hope College Professor of Engineering, Hope College, Holland, Michigan. Former Chair of the ASEE Technologi- cal Literacy Division. Former Chair of the ASEE Liberal Education Division. Senior Fellow CASEE, National Academy of Engineering, 2008-2010.Lauren Aprill, Hope College Engineering Student, Hope College, Holland, Michigan 49423Daniel J Langholz Engineering student at Hope College, Holland, Michigan
Conference Session
Promoting Technological Literacy
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Daniel Raviv, Florida Atlantic University; George Roskovich, Florida Atlantic University
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
Paper ID #9187An Intuitive Approach to Teaching concepts in Engineering to a General Au-dienceDr. Daniel Raviv, Florida Atlantic UniversityMr. George Roskovich Page 24.172.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 An Intuitive Approach to Teaching Concepts in Engineering to a General Audience Daniel Raviv and George Roskovich Department of Computer & Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Florida Atlantic University
Conference Session
The Philosophy of Engineering and Technological Literacy
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mani Mina, Iowa State University
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
 and  personal  reflections  on  the  philosophical  basis  of     a. What  is  engineering?     b. How  can  we  train  engineers  for  the  ever-­‐changing  future  developments?     c. What  are  the  most  fundamental  concepts  and  skills  that  every  engineer   should  know?     d. What  are  the  discipline  specific  concepts  and  important  skills  that  students   need  to  acquire?     e. Is  it  possible  to  train  engineers  (with  all  of  the  skills,  concepts,  and   knowledge  base)  in  4  year  (perhaps  5  including  industrial  experiences
Conference Session
The Philosophy of Engineering and Technological Literacy
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
14 A. Knowledge 1. articulate the pervasiveness of technology in everyday life. 2. Define basic engineering concepts and terms, such as systems, constraints and trade-offs. 3. Describe the nature and limitations of the design process. 4. Explain some of the ways technology shapes human history and people shape technology. 5. Compare the benefits and risks that all technologies entail, some that can be anticipated and some that cannot. 6. Identify the effects of technology on the environment. B. Ability to engage. 7. Describe the development and use of technology and evaluate trade-offs including a balance of costs and benefits both economic and social. 8. Identify
Conference Session
The Philosophy of Engineering and Technological Literacy
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
William R. Loendorf, Eastern Washington University; Jason K Durfee P.E. P.E., Eastern Washington University
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
perspective of past technologies and how they were discovered and used. In thiscontext the two biggest technology drivers of agriculture and war are studied in detail.Throughout the course, numerous technologies are scrutinized and examined in terms of theircost versus benefit to society. The main objectives of the course were to: (a) promote awarenessof technological development, and (b) provide a rudimentary understanding of the social,political, economic, and cultural impact.The course content explores innovations and inventions associated with ancient as well as retrotechnologies in the fields of agriculture, weapons, time measurement, industrialization,transportation, communication, and the environment (Loendorf & Geyer14, 2009
Conference Session
Promoting Technological Literacy
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sean P. Brophy, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Thalia Anagnos, San Jose State University
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
Paper ID #10297Large Research Center Education and Outreach: Lessons from 5 years ofDistributed Collaborative Design, Development and ImplementationDr. Sean P Brophy, Purdue University, West LafayetteDr. Thalia Anagnos, San Jose State University Dr. Thalia Anagnos is a professor in the General Engineering Department at San Jose State University, where she has taught since 1984. She also serves as co-Leader of Education, Outreach, and Training for the George E. Brown, Jr. Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation, a consortium of 14 large-scale earthquake engineering experimental facilities
Conference Session
The Philosophy of Engineering and Technological Literacy
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alan Cheville, Bucknell University
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
Paper ID #9586Defining Engineering EducationDr. Alan Cheville, Bucknell University Alan Cheville studied optoelectronics and ultrafast optics at Rice University, followed by fourteen years as a faculty member at Oklahoma State University working on terahertz frequencies and engineering edu- cation. While at Oklahoma State he developed courses in photonics and engineering design. After serving for two and a half years as a program director in engineering education at the National Science Founda- tion, he took a chair position in electrical engineering at Bucknell University. He is currently interested in