American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Identifying Core Engineering Virtues: Relating competency and virtueto professional codes of ethicsAbstractThis work focuses on a single question: “Which virtues ought to be emphasized in the formationof engineering and computing professionals?” The authors assume that the ethical codesproposed and maintained by various engineering and computing (E/C) professional bodiesrepresent reasonable assertions as to the types of ethical considerations expected of E/Cprofessionals. It then attempts to bridge what the profession(s) assert to be good (e.g., within thevarious codes of ethics) to observable virtues/dispositions that can be connected to studentformation. This
Paper ID #48493Escalating Effects of Software Technical and Ethical Debt and ImprovementThrough Design Discipline and Social ConstructsMr. James Wessel, Franciscan University of Steubenville (FUS) James Wessel possesses over 40 years of major software development and acquisition management experience among varied DoD services and industry partners, providing expert consultation in software engineering best practice within major software intensive system program settings. This includes the emergent software engineering areas of the Cloud, Agile, Digital Engineering, DevSecOps and Cybersecurity. James Wessel has been a member
Paper ID #41924Empowering Students in Emerging Technology: A Framework for DevelopingHands-on Competency in Generative AI with Ethical ConsiderationsDr. Chun Kit Chui, University of Hong Kong Dr. Chun Kit Chui serves as the Director of the Tam Wing Fan Innovation Wing in the Faculty of Engineering at the University of Hong Kong (HKU). Innovation Wing aims to unleash students’ creativity by entrusting them to spearhead ambitious innovation and technology projects that will shape the future. The iconic facility is located at the heart of the campus, offering 2400m2 of space with state-of-the-art resources and a supportive
Paper ID #49504BOARD # 475: Enhancing AI Literacy Among University Students: ExploringTrust and Ethical Decision-Making through the Prisoner’s Dilemma in GameTheoryMr. Qixian Zhao, Nanyang Technological University Zhao Qixian is a currently a Year 2 Undergraduate student in Nanyang Technological University, majoring in Data Science & AI, minor in Business. He is devoted to AI applications in industries like education, engineering and social welfare, supported and guided by Dr. Ibrahim H. Yeter. Qixian’s research and entrepreneur idea aim to facilitate inclusive and ethical AI applications to shine lights on the neglected
study employs a comprehensive approach by incorporating both qualitative and quantitativesurvey questions to gather insights from faculty and students. It delves into various aspects suchas the extent to which educators embrace or oppose the use of genAI, specific use cases inteaching and research, and the ethical considerations surrounding the use of these technologies.Additionally, the research discusses students’ perspectives on the advantages and potentialmisuse of genAI tools in their education, providing a balanced view of the impact of thesetechnologies on engineering education. Through these two perspectives of educators and studentsanalysis, the study aims to contribute valuable insights into the evolving role of generative AI inthe
employed the Elo and Kyngäs inductive analysis approach, extracting data for publicationyear, study objectives, number of citations, authors’ related publications, stakeholders addressed,stakeholder perceptions, AI4K12 content coverage, and ethical considerations. We analyzed eachtopic, finding commonality and uniqueness among the articles. By analyzing the objectives, wefound these articles highlighted four primary themes: curriculum and program development,teaching and learning methods, student engagement and perceptions, and inclusion and diversityin education. We also found that there was a significant increase in publications of this sortpublished in 2022, with a decrease in publications in 2023.Using our other extracted data, we were able to
practices, and the broader impacts of digitaltechnology use, is a pressing issue in our modern world. By incorporating digital wellnesseducation into the engineering curriculum, educators can equip students with the tools requiredto create more ethically minded and user-centric technologies. This study explores datacollection surrounding the implementation and integration of digital wellness content inundergraduate engineering education at the University of Calgary's Schulich School ofEngineering. Multiple methods were used to determine average daily digital technology use anddigital wellness perceptions in students and educators. The results suggest that students andeducators spend a significant amount of time using technological devices yet
undergraduate education. Dr. Yao is a senior member of Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and an active IEEE volunteer. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Study Historical Cases, Learn Today’s Tools, and Prepare for the FutureThe rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) since the emergence of ChatGPT has beenoverwhelming. The swift transformation that such powerful and disruptive tools brought to theindustry urges engineering educators to prepare their graduates not only with the skills to usethese new tools, but with an understanding of the ethical and moral implications involved intheir applications. Inspired by Marcus Aurelius’ quote "To predict the future
organization’s coherence. For exampleTELPhE, which was originally focused on technological literacy, received a remit in philosophy,which intersects with other divisions’ areas, such as ethics and liberal education.The fundamental questions facing ASEE and its divisions are: is its primary function to hold anannual conference and publish journals? If so, is this enough to sustain and grow membership?Or is ASEE’s purpose to promote research in engineering education that will have a broadersocietal impact? These considerations also apply to TELPhE, which must determine if it ismerely an internal discussion forum or if it should actively promote technological citizenship andengage in public discourse.For both ASEE and TELPhE, the challenge lies in adapting
values among engineering talents. Engineering education in China hastraditionally focused more on the imparting of professional knowledge and skills, buthas not placed sufficient emphasis on the content related to engineering philosophy andculture. Particularly, in the "Washington Accord" which outlines the qualityrequirements for engineering graduates, aspects such as "Engineers and Society,""Professional Ethics," and "Environment and Sustainability" are relatively lacking.There is an almost complete absence of dedicated courses on these topics at theundergraduate level.Purpose: Consequently, Zhejiang University has introduced the "EngineeringPhilosophy and Culture" course for all first-year engineering students, making it the"first lesson" for
Paper ID #49512Discussion Lead Paper for TELPhE Session on AIDr. Jerry W. Gravander, Clarkson University JERRY W. GRAVANDER is past chair of Clarkson’s University’s Department of Humanities and Social Sciences and currently is the co-chair of Clarkson University’s Department of Arts, Culture and Technology. He has written and presented widely on liberal education for engineering students, as well as engineering ethics and the philosophy of engineering. He was the 1996 recipient of the Sterling Olmstead Award of ASEE’s Liberal Education Division. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025
a technological activity, and not one that engages inconversation about the impact of new (and, indeed ‘old’) technologies on society. It may beassumed that these can be safely left to the lawyers, government, and by no means least,parents. Questions of child suicide, for example, allegedly caused by social media, and othersimilar behavioural problems have not been matters for TELPhE or ASEE although they havea powerful impact on the mind. That is, before matters of the ethics of design of such systemsare considered. My friends in the Ethics Division will forgive me if I say this is not just amatter for them or TELPhE but ASEE as whole. Last year’s developments in AI with theintroduction of ChatboxGPT surely make this clear.The problems
ways, which supports the idea that there is not just one use forAI in the classroom. Based on the results of both surveys, AI could improve many parts of theeducational learning and teaching process. Addressing ethical considerations in the creation andapplication of AI tools in education is, of course, crucial. The findings of the Chegg pollhighlight the necessity for universities/colleges to have open policies that instruct students on theresponsible and productive use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the classroom.A study by MIT researchers examined the productivity effects of generative AI technology in thecontext of mid-level professional writing tasks [3]. In their experiment, they assigned writingtasks to college-educated
research interest in engineering education. Her technical expertise is computational intelligence and digital systems. Primary engineering education work includes infusing ethics into computing courses and enhancing transferable skills through active and universal design for learning methods. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Educational Infographics, A Review PaperAbstractThis paper endeavors to inspire educators and instructional designers to more fully embraceinfographics, leveraging their unique capabilities to enrich the teaching and learning landscape andprepare students for an increasingly visual world. To inspire, this review seeks to offer a coherentframework
. She holds graduate degrees in engineering and business administration from the University of Michigan, and began teDr. Katie Snyder, University of Michigan Dr. Snyder is a lecturer for the Program in Technical Communication at the University of Michigan. She teaches design, ethics, and technical communication as social justice to students in the College of Engineering.Sara Elizabeth Eskandari ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Connecting Campus and Community: applying virtual reality technologies to facilitate energy justice and emerging technology literacy Aditi Verma, Sara Eskandari, Kellie Grasman, Katie SnyderIntroductionThe history of energy technology
and the University of Virginia. William has degrees in literature and Science and Technology Studies, and has taught courses in English, philosophy, and sociology in universities in the USA and Mexico. His current research investigates the ethical and social implications of technology, including those related to artificial intelligence, automation, bioethics, machine ethics, and post and trans-humanism.Dr. Bryn Elizabeth Seabrook, University of Virginia Bryn Seabrook is an Assistant Professor in Science, Technology, and Society at the University of Virginia. She received her Bachelor of Arts in Humanities, Science and Environment with a minor in Vocal Performance in 2012, a Master of Science and TechnoloJoshua
between Bowers’suggestions and the complicated, technical lists of strategies to stop academic dishonesty in more modern papers (seeSection V for a discussion of this). A 1998 review of empirical cheating research provides several insights into the factors influencing collegiatecheating [22]. Below are presented some of the findings: • Males generally cheat more, though the difference was reported as diminishing over time • Lower G.P.A. students cheat more • Business major students cheat more than others • Personal moral/ethical guidelines affect cheating propensity and feelings about cheating • More surveillance corresponded with less cheating • Observing others cheating, knowing friends who cheat, and sitting next to
Deliberating Public Welfare in Engineering – The Capability ApproachAbstractThis paper addresses the theme of “the Moral and Ethical Responsibility of Engineers andEngineering”, particularly responding to the question of how to define or deliberate the meaningof ‘public welfare’ and ‘common good’ in engineering degree programs. Drawing from decadesof international work on human development, particularly in the global south, this paper reportson adapting the capability approach to an engineering degree program. Developed by AmartyaSen, the capability approach sought to replace GDP-based models of welfare economics byframing the goal of development as enabling individuals to live a life they value. The things aperson values, what they are and can do
Paper ID #37226Engineering or Physical Sciences: How to Choose? An Exploration of HowFirst-Year University Students Choose between Studying the PhysicalSciences and EngineeringDr. Janna Rosales, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada Janna Rosales works at the crossroads of the sciences and humanities, where she explores the intent, values, and needs that go into the decisions we make about technology. She teaches ethics and profes- sionalism in the Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science at Memorial University of Newfoundland. She collaborates with the Memorial University-based MetaKettle Project, which studies the
humankind unique, both individually and as a species, remains unclear. Advances in neuroscience and computer science, as well as ethics, generate questions about the nature of intelligence, consciousness, and personhood and the rights and protections associated with being human. In this course students tackle classic readings from Descartes to modern ruminations on artificial intelligence, examine our relation to our creations and pets, and the way our various identities affect how our personhood is perceived and protected.Some basic information from the course syllabus is described below.Broad Topics covered 1. Basic neuroscience 2. Distinctions between humans and nonhumans 3. Emotional connection and dependencies between
| Standard of living | Cost savings | Equal Profit | Economic opportunities Growth | R&D Socio-Economical: Business Ethics | Fair trade | Workers’ benefits Figure-1 The three major attributes of sustainability, and their interactionsFigure-1 shows the three major aspects of sustainable development
Department, Sheffield, 1991.living in an age of technology increased. There is a particular focus on the use of abuse insocial media and how to prevent it through legislation. But, this seems to be one of manyaspects of the social media that need to be controlled, so many people think. Each of usmakes an ethical judgement in response to the problem. Medical doctors come face to facewith the study of medical ethics during their training since they have to make life and deathdecisions. Engineers will have been told about their codes of practice. By and large, however,a curriculum that is focused on preparation for work gives little attention to ethics, which isnot perhaps surprising in a world that Hamilton-Paterson thinks has little or no conception
, analyze and interpret data, and use engineering judgment to drawconclusions. [8]” Comparison to objective b from the a-k criteria shows that a major componentwas added to this outcome – that students must demonstrate engineering judgement in drawingconclusions for experiments. This is significant due to the strong emphasis placed on engineeringjudgement by working engineers who cite such judgements as the ultimate guide to designdecisions [9]. The inclusion of engineering judgement in this student outcome, and nowhere elseexplicitly in the outcomes (except for possibly a reference to judgement in outcome 4 whichdeals with ethics) gives an indication of ABET’s views about the purpose of laboratories asgoing beyond practical necessities. It seems
promoting the philosophy of engineering education andgiven the success of two meetings on the topic at FIE (Frontiers in Education) conferenceshad obtained support from the ERM (Educational Research and Methods) division and theIEEE Education Society for a one-day workshop on ‘Exploring the Philosophies ofEngineering and Engineering Education”. The first attempt failed but the National ScienceFoundation (NSF) intervened and enabled a one-day meeting prior to FIE 2011 [42]. It wasalso successful, and NSF’s Ms Kemnitzer considered that all engineers should develop orhave a developed philosophy of engineering. Since ASEE did not cater for philosophy per se(it had an Ethics Division) it was thought that the Technological Literacy Division would be
©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Crafting Comprehensive Lab Reports: Techniques for Improved Technical Writing and Data Interpretation SkillsAbstractTeaching labs are a vital component of engineering education. They allow students to participatein all stages of experiential learning, beginning with conceptualization and exploration andprogressing to reflection, analysis, and data interpretation. Laboratories promote a variety ofabilities, including communication, knowledge, teamwork, ethics, and information acquisition,and they supplement lecture learning by improving students' understanding of theoretical topics.In addition, the importance of laboratories in engineering education is evident from two of
conceptual engineering. The goal is that non-engineers should be more informed users of technology and this information can be gained by people who are not necessarily STEM professionals. Division members have developed a considerable amount of research around this approach [1].• Responsible Citizenship: Some work emerging from TELPhE has advocated for technological literacy as a component of responsible citizenship. A key theme in this group is the idea that given the pervasive nature of technology as part of everyday life, technological and engineering literacy should include an ability to understand the social, political, economic, and ethical implications of technological developments [1].• Engineering Literacy for
correlation”, often didnot have (or lost) a required funding to continue their work in that area. Alster [7] referred to thewords of one of his interviewees: “There is no money to do research, and it is not going to comefrom government, because government is controlled by industry” (p. 28). Another reason thatcreates difficulty for deep quantitative research studies is impossibility of finding an appropriatepopulation for the ‘control groups’, those people who do not use cellphones for a significant periodof time, and do not live under any exposure of electromagnetic fields or wireless devices from anydirections or facilities. The text below is a direct quotation from the book [7] published by Centerfor Ethics, Harvard University: “Dr. Henry Lai
economical, environmental, and on developing interfaces; prototyping and ethical aspects of a proposed design. Main topics include: design for manufacturing. An idea of patents detailed design of a mechanical systems, modeling and and intellectual property, and economics of simulation in design, materials selection and materials in design, product design will be discussed. reliability/safety, economic decision making, and communicating the design and applications. Figure-1 Course descriptions of two of the design-stream coursesA typical set of activities involved in the engineering design process is shown in Fig-2. Design is