Paper ID #37189A Qualitative Study of Undergraduate Women in Engineering Project TeamsDr. Grace J. LiangDr. Rick Evans, Cornell University Sociolinguist and Director of the Engineering Communications Program in the College of Engineering at Cornell UniversityMojdeh AsadollahipajouhDr. Stacey E. Kulesza, P.E., Kansas State University Dr. Stacey Kulesza is an associate professor in the civil engineering department at Texas State University. Dr. Kulesza is a graduate of the American Society of Civil Engineers Excellence in Civil Engineering Education (ExCEED). She teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in geotechnical
Paper ID #41460Promoting Diversity in Welding Engineering Technology through the Mediumof ArtDr. Mary Foss, Weber State University Dr. Mary Foss is an Associate Professor in the Department of Manufacturing Systems Engineering. With a background in industry, she saw a disconnect between classroom learning and the real-world experience she needed once joining the workforce in the Aerospace Engineering industry. As a result of her industry experience she incorporates project-based learning throughout her curriculum and service and scholarship interests as a means of developing skills in problem solving, engagement, and
EPICS, he has developed extensive experience in the administration of community-engaged design programs. As part of the leadership team, he has led the EPICS program to be recognized with numerous awards, including the W.K. Kellogg Foundation Community Engagement Scholarship Award and Outstanding Experiential Education Program by the Society of Experiential Education.Nichole Ramirez, Purdue University Nichole Ramirez is the Assistant Director of the Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) program at Purdue University. Her research focuses on experiential education and mental health in engineering. She received her Ph.D. in Engineering Education and M.S. in Aviation and Aerospace Management from Purdue University,Dr
translate to many types of academic institutions, including creatingresearch opportunities with community college students. Our team has developed materials for mentortraining, recruiting students, and long-term funding strategies using templates for faculty grants. In ourfirst course offerings students have demonstrated a strong increase in research identity as observed instudent journal prompts and survey results.IntroductionThis research project is focused on developing and supporting equitable pathways to STEM graduateeducation for Women and Black, Latinx, and Indigenous students. Nationally, only 20% of undergraduateengineers and computer scientist degrees are awarded to women, and only 6% are women of color [1].Black/African American
called Living with the Lab offers animmersive, hands-on, project-based course sequence that focuses on problem-solving andbuilding a strong academic foundation for engineering fundamentals. Equipment like millingmachines, soldering irons, and drills are all used within the course sequence. The classroomsetup is strategically designed to encourage collaboration through a six-person table layout.Feedback was received that female engineering students often felt intimidated when entering theclassroom and underconfident while using the equipment. A workshop that provided femalestudents advanced access to the equipment by working through multiple hands-on activitieswhile also making connections with female faculty, engaging with upper-level female
through management and evaluation. Dr. Leggett-Robinson has more than 15 years of higher education experience which includes STEM academic and student success/support programming, strategic plan- ning, data analytics, and program evaluation. As a PI, she has garnered funds in excess of $3 million dollars from both NIH and NSF for broadening participation in STEM Undergraduate Education and as an Evaluator has worked on large projects with NSF (Big Data, BioGraph), Google CS-ER, and DOD STEM Student Success. Her distinguished record of STEM programmatic success (at HBCUs and PWIs) is well documented in publications and presentations. Dr. Leggett-Robinson’s latest publications, ”De- mystifying Promotion & Tenure: A
Paper ID #44454Empowering Latin American Women Engineers: Bridging the Gender GapThrough a Network of ChangeDr. Vianney Lara-Prieto, Tecnologico de Monterrey Vianney Lara graduated as Mechatronics Engineer from Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey Campus and holds a PhD in Smart Materials from Loughborough University in the UK. She worked in GE Healthcare as Manufacturing Process Engineer and Advanced Projects Engineer for Magnetic Resonance Imaging equipment. She joined Tecnologico de Monterrey as Program Head for the Mechatronics Engineering Program. Then, she was Academic Projects Director, Division Director, National Head
Post surveys to rate theirskills in a range of areas including, CAD, use of shop tools, communicating design ideas toteammates, and applying engineering theory to the project. The Intervention sections showedincreased PSVT:R scores over the Control section for the all students in the section with p=0.0019, and higher benefits for students who enter with low and mid level Pre-PSVT:R scores.There were significantly higher gains in PSVT:R for female students who entered with Low Pre-PSVT:R scores with an increase in 16% compared to 4% in the Control section, p = 0.0073. Thesurvey also showed statistically significant improvement in CAD ability among male students(p= 0.043) and female students (p= 0.013). In this study the higher amount of
complete and reflect upon the results of two implicit association testsperformed on their own through Project Implicit [25]. An additional third assignment requiredthe students to catalogue and reflect on instances of bias or discrimination that they observedthroughout the remaining half of the semester. At the end of the semester, SES led a finalsummary and in-class discussion of the content and reflections related to our educational module.Additionally, the importance of moving beyond individual bias and addressing systemic biaswithin institutional policies was communicated [20], [26] followed by an in-class brainstormingactivity asking students to identify academic policies at PSU that they believe maybe contributeto lack of diversity, equity
workforce. She is co ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Fostering Inclusive Department Climates: A Workshop for Department Chairs at the University of DelawareThis evidence-based practice paper describes the development and implementation of aninteractive workshop for department chairs focused on strategies to foster inclusive departmentclimates at the University of Delaware (UD). Literature on the underrepresentation of women inSTEM suggests climate is a key factor in women faculty’s lower levels of job satisfaction andhigher rates of turnover. Building on this scholarship, multiple research projects at UD motivatethe need for institutional efforts to improve climate and the
. Bartlett and J. D. Camba, “Isometric Projection as a Threat to Validity in the PSVT:R,” presented at the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Aug. 2022. Accessed: Feb. 04, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/isometric-projection-as-a-threat-to-validity-in-the-psvt-r[13] K. A. Bartlett and J. D. Camba, “Is the PSVT:R Suitable for Evaluating Spatial Skill in Design? A Critique,” in Design Computing and Cognition’22, J. S. Gero, Ed., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023, pp. 115–126. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-20418-0_8. 4
provide programs and spaces where minority studentscan foster higher self-confidence and positivity towards engineering.IntroductionReducing the gender gap in educational outcomes requires better recognizing the systemicbarriers that exist in higher education. Individual, group, institutional, and societal factors playan essential role in maintaining the gap in women's college attainment, particularly inengineering. According to the National Girls Collaborative Project [1], young women havesimilar abilities in mathematics and sciences but differ in their confidence, interest, andbelongingness to science-related fields, compared to young men. Historically, engineering hasbeen framed and perceived as a male-dominated discipline, emphasizing traits
engineeringhas increased from 18% to 21% [2], [3]. This 3% growth over a nearly two-decade period isindicative of larger social issues among institutions regarding women and other marginalizedstudents [4]. This observed lack of women and racial minority representation in STEM degreeattainment ultimately impacts representation in professional fields, which could lead to increasedgender and racial labor market inequality [4]. Minority retention research in engineeringeducation spaces is conducted to increase STEM graduation rates, which could be used as a toolin socioeconomic mobility for minority members [5]. This work in progress paper presents the preliminary results of a qualitative research andanalysis project conducted with the goal of
, “The overall goal of the project is to changefrom a culture of attrition to a culture of development and improve diversity and inclusion of SDMines faculty. The objectives of the project are: • Raise awareness of implicit bias • Improve campus culture to be more inclusive • Create a heightened sense of belonging and engagement of faculty • Develop pathways for success of faculty in all tracks and ranksThese objectives are directly in line with the vision of OFDA, “to cultivate and support a vibrantcampus culture where faculty members feel supported, valued, and challenged to grow bothpersonally and professionally from hire to retire5.” The programs have supported each other inefforts to create a supportive an equitable culture
women in engineering and has published numerous articles in ASEE conferences.Dr. Kimberly Stillmaker, P.E., California State University, Fresno Dr. Stillmaker is an Assistant Professor in the Civil Engineering Department at CSU, Fresno. She teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in structural engineering. She attained her PhD in Civil Engineering at UC Davis. Her research interests includeDr. Lizabeth L. Thompson, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Lizabeth is a professor at Cal Poly, SLO in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. She has been teaching for 22 years and has continued to develop innovative pedagogy such as project based, flipped classroom and competency grading. Through the
IEEE Power & Energy Society (PES), and a member of IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IES).Dr. Gloria Ma, Wentworth Institute of Technology Gloria Ma is a Professor in Mechanical Engineering program at Wentworth Institute of Technology. She has been teaching robotics with Lego Mindstorm to ME freshmen for several years. She is actively involved in community services of offering robotics workshops to middle- and high-school girls. Her research interests includes dynamics and system modeling, geometry modeling, project based engineering design, and robotics in manufacturing, and engineering education.Pilin Junsangsri, Wentworth Institute of TechnologyDr. Anuja Kamat, Wentworth Institute of Technology Anuja Kamat
Computing Education Research (CER) to advance personalized learning, specifically within the context of online learning and engagement, educational technologies, curriculum design which includes innovative and equitable pedagogical approaches, and support programs that boost the academic success of different groups of students. She teaches in active learning environments, such as project-based learning and flipped classrooms. She aims to bring EE and CER into practice.Dr. Lilianny Virguez, University of Florida Lilianny Virguez is a Instructional Assistant Professor at the Engineering Education Department at Uni- versity of Florida. She holds a Masters’ degree in Management Systems Engineering and a Ph.D. in Engineering
, aiming for a UTA-to-student ratio of 1 to 20 in CS1, where students experience faculty lectures followed by practicalexercises.The authors of this paper created a study to determine if UTAs would be a critical componentthat increases the quality and inclusiveness of education for CS students. This study wasconducted at a public research institution and Hispanic serving institution (HSI) in theSoutheastern US region. The study included hiring UTAs and recruiting faculty to participate inthe project. During this process, the faculty and coordinator were focused on UTAs beingapproachable, patient, and willing to engage in a diverse learning community. The long-termobjective is to address the crucial need for computer science classes that maintain
programs. This line of research also seeks to understand the nuances and complexities of participation and persistence in these fields and develop new models for explaining such phenomena. Her secondary research strand focuses on the participation and achievement of Black students and professionals in higher education. She is the PI or co-PI on several grant-funded research projects including the national Black Doctoral Women Study (BDWS), the Women in Engineering Study (WIES), and Bulls-Engineering Youth Experience for Promoting Relationships, Identity Development, & Empowerment (Bulls-EYE PRIDE).Dr. Johnny C. Woods Jr., Virginia Tech Johnny C. Woods, Jr. is a Postdoctoral Associate in the School of Education at
Pennsylvania Brett Frankel received his Ph.D. in mathematics in 2016 from the University of Pennsylvania. After an instructionally-focused postdoctoral position at Northwestern University, he returned to Penn as a senior lecturer. Dr. Frankel was a 2009-2010 Fulbright fellow to Budapest, Hungary studying mathematics and mathematics pedagogy, and a 2017-2018 Project NExT fellow. He served as a graduate assistant to the Penn Emerging Scholars Program, and co-founded the Northwestern Emerging Scholars Program to improve female retention in pipeline courses for the mathematics major. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Impact of an Emerging Scholars/Peer Led Team Learning program on
, Aerospace, Junior, White)Figure 8: Female students rate the degree to which they feel isolated in their engineering classes. Figure 9: Female students participants rate the frequency of being treated as if they were not competent while working with peers.The literature shows that women pursuing engineering often receive negative messages regardingtheir abilities [1]. Our female interview participants acknowledged this and indicated that acommon outcome is that women are often pushed towards non-technical roles in group projects.Our results show that 44% of our female participants are sometimes or often denied the opportunityto participate fully in group projects, as shown in Figure 10. A survey participant also
through a socialidentity lens, either feeling fortified in her engineering identity through her promotion and therecognition of her engineering leadership by her peers, or an erosion of her engineering identitywhen her career track and sociotechnical skillset is compared with “nuts and bolts” engineerswho graduated from her program. In our analysis, we will use these theories to identify andinterpret the different ways in which engineering graduates across an intersectional gender/racevariable understand their professional identities and the factors that influence them.Research MethodsData & Variables of InterestThis study uses data collected from a larger project titled “More than Recruitment & Retention:Tracking Inequity in Engineers
, participants noted that projects were the hardest part ofthe course due to their size relative to their other assignments. One participant stated, “We wouldhave like after every week on Sunday, we would have these little Python activities we had to dothat were like two lines long. But then we would have projects that were like 80 lines of code. Itwas just a lot”. Finally, the professors and their behaviors played a role as well. One participantnoted how the professor was not helpful in making the course easier because he only repeatedwhat was in the assigned videos, but failed to provide any new information. Another participantnoted that the professor’s behavior directly decreased her self confidence because he assumedthey knew material that she did
Paper ID #43309Board 181: Work in Progress: Language-based Dual Degree EngineeringProgram: Increasing Women in Engineering?Dr. Jorge Ivan Rodriguez-Devora, University of Georgia Dr. Rodriguez serves as the industry capstone project coordinator for the College of Engineering at the University of Georgia. He is a faculty member of the School of Environmental, Civil, Agricultural and Mechanical Engineering.David Emory Stooksbury, University of Georgia I am an atmospheric scientist with a background in agriculture, astrophysics, and applied statistics that turned up in an engineering program. My major engineering education
Nadia Sahila is a dedicated doctoral student at the University of Massachusetts Lowell, specializing in research and evaluation in education. She holds a Master of Education in Curriculum and Instruction and a Bachelor of Arts in Marketing and Management. Currently, Nadia is a graduate research assistant with the River Hawks Scholarship Academy and a teaching assistant for the Fulbright Teaching Excellence and Achievement program, as well as the Research, Academics, and Mentoring Pathways program. Her research interests focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion, particularly in educational settings. Recent projects have explored culturally responsive education and gender equity. Nadia has presented her research at
Paper ID #42347Gender Equity in Higher-Education Institutions: An Analysis of StudentPerceptions in an Engineering School in ChileProf. Camila Zapata-Casabon, Universidad Andres Bello, Chile Master in Marketing and Market Research from the University of Barcelona, Spain. Industrial Civil Engineer from the Universidad del B´ıo-B´ıo. She has three diplomas in the areas of coaching, digital marketing and equality and empowerment of women. Her professional experience is linked to higher education as a project engineer and university management in the public and private area. Teacher at different universities in matters of
component for innovation in theindustry [33]. Traditional engineering programs do not adequately prepare students to be designengineers. Despite advances in engineering education, there is a substantial disconnect betweenengineering education and the practice of engineering, that includes teamwork, collaboration,business and marketing skills in addition to traditional engineering skills [31], [33]. In the ABETCriteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, to prepare engineering students for industry,creativity was highlighted in the engineering curriculum, as a necessary element foraccreditation, where ABET defined engineering design as an iterative process leading to aproduct or solution of the highest possible quality [34].Project-based learning
. Having an understanding of what contributes to barriers to belongingness has helpedinform the scope and data analysis of this project. In summary, the three barriers to belongingdiscussed were faculty interaction with women students, negative interactions with men-identifying peers, and stereotype threat.Research Statement While the literature abounds with studies evaluating the impact of varying REU programson student participants, less attention has been placed on evaluating specifically the experiencesof women REU participants. It is important to ensure that these experiences are inclusive andcontribute to positive experiences for all students, including women students. The researchquestions for this study seek to investigate: (1) How
engagement projects, evaluation tools and tech- nology, and gender issues in STEM education. https://orcid.org/0000- 0002-0383-0179Prof. Marcela Silva, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile Marcela Silva is the Academic Director at the Engineering Faculty of the Andres Bello University in Campus Santiago. She works as a teacher in the Construction Engineering career and supports innovation and entrepreneurship courses. She obtained a BacheloDr. Carolina Alvarado, California State University, Chico Dr. Alvarado is currently an Associate Professor in the Department of Science Education at California State University, Chico. She holds a bachelor’s degree in Engineering Physics and a doctorate in Physics Education from
the students to determine one of two audiences first: Is this person trying to learn?Or is this person giving you grief? Either way a four-step heuristic script can help: (1) Optional graciousappreciation; (2) Return to the mission; (3) Provide some evidence; and (4) Offer to follow up. Afteroffering the heuristic, Author 1 provided a number of example scripts. “Thanks for that question. We see our mission as a problem-solving mission: to address the exclusion of particular groups of people from engineering and STEM more broadly. So, in terms of problem definition, particular end users fall outside of the specs for this project and organization because, simply put, not all end users face this problem. In the