sports with his wife, son, and dog.Dr. David B Knight, Virginia Tech David B. Knight is an Associate Professor and Assistant Department Head of Graduate Programs in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He is also Director of International Engagement in Engineering Education, directs the Rising Sophomore Abroad Program, and is affiliate faculty with the Higher Education Program. His research tends to be at the macro-scale, focused on a systems-level perspective of how engineering education can become more effective, efficient, and inclusive, tends to be data-driven by leveraging large-scale institutional, state, or national data sets, and considers the inter- section between policy and
subpopulations of students.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank the anonymous participants for their involvement in the researchas well as their research teams at Virginia Tech, GUIDE Research Group and the DEEP Lab, andat Purdue University, STRIDE. This work is supported by the U.S. National Science Foundationaward # 1704350. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] W. C. Lee and H. M. Matusovich, "A model of co‐curricular support for undergraduate engineering students," Journal of Engineering education, vol. 105, pp. 406-430, 2016.[2] B. E. Rincon and C. E. George-Jackson, "STEM
faculty members and twoeducation doctoral students.The project includes multiple data Ssources, including: (a) Participant observation – During 2016-2017, the research team conducted more than 45 hours of participant observation in the five sections of the pre-calculus workshop. Members of the research team wrote field notes using an observation protocol focusing on the interactional patterns, tools, and teaching/learning practices in the workshop. (b) Focus groups – In spring 2017, the research team conducted two focus groups: one with pre-calculus TAs and one with representatives from the math department (faculty and pre-calculus program coordinator). The focus groups lasted one hour and involved
Clemson University.Dr. David B Knight, Virginia Tech David B. Knight is an Associate Professor and Assistant Department Head of Graduate Programs in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He is also Director of International Engagement in Engineering Education, directs the Rising Sophomore Abroad Program, and is affiliate faculty with the Higher Education Program. His research tends to be at the macro-scale, focused on a systems-level perspective of how engineering education can become more effective, efficient, and inclusive, tends to be data-driven by leveraging large-scale institutional, state, or national data sets, and considers the inter- section between policy and organizational contexts. He
higher education. Greenwood Publishing Group, 2003.[6] B. R. Cohen, J. S. Rossmann, and K. S. Bernhardt, “Introducing engineering as a socio-technical process,” 2014.[7] T. D. Sadler, J. A. Foulk, and P. J. Friedrichsen, “Evolution of a model for socio-scientific issue teaching and learning,” Int. J. Educ. Math. Sci. Technol., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 75–87, 2017.[8] D. Beede, T. Julian, D. Langdon, G. McKittrick, B. Khan, and M. Doms, “Women in STEM: A Gender Gap to Innovation. ESA Issue Brief# 04-11.,” US Dep. Commer., 2011.[9] L. M. Avery, “Rural science education: Valuing local knowledge,” Theory Pract., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 28–35, 2013.[10] B. Wong, “Is Science for Us?,” in Science Education, Career
computer science and engineering departments on diversifying their undergraduate student population. She remains an active researcher, including studying academic policies, gender and ethnicity issues, transfers, and matriculation models with MIDFIELD as well as student veterans in engi- neering. Her evaluation work includes evaluating teamwork models, broadening participation initiatives, and S-STEM and LSAMP programs.Dr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Joyce B. Main is Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a Ph.D. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and
, Office of Legislative and Public Affairs, Division for Molecular and Cellular Biosciences, and Directorate for Biological Sciences, “Perspectives on broader impacts,” 2014.[3] B. A. Holloman, T. K., Lee, W. C., London, J. S., Hakiyo, A. B., Jew, G., & Watford, “A historical and policy perspective on broadening participation in STEM: Insights from national reports ( 1974-2016 ),” in American Society for Engineering Education, 2018.[4] T. E. Barry, “The development of the hierarchy of effects: An historical perspective current issues and research in advertising,” Curr. Issues Res. Advert., vol. 10, no. 1–2, pp. 251–295, 1987.[5] T. E. Barry and D. J. Howard, “A review and critique of the hierarchy
., intersections of race, gender, sexual orientation) within minority groups be supported with equity when a critical mass may or may not exist in the group/program? 15 ● How can programs balance the pressing need to support students in navigating engineering with the hope to transform departments and institutions altogether? ● How do new or existing structures (MEP, WIEP) adapt and account for the needs associated with axes of identity often not considered within their target population?In Appendix B, we suggest specific additional
provided feedback on our coding process, Noa Bruhis and Ieshya Anderson for theirperspective and advice, and the reviewers of this manuscript for their support and thoughtfulsuggestions.References[1] T. Church, “Returning Veterans on Campus with War Related Injuries and the Long Road Back Home,” J. Postsecond. Educ. Disabil., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 43–52, 2009.[2] L. Zinger and A. Cohen, “Classroom : How Can Colleges Be Better,” Contemp. Issues Educ. Res., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 39–52, 2010.[3] L. McBain, Y. Kim, B. Cook, and K. Snead, “From Soldier to Student II: Assessing Campus Programs for Veterans and Service Members,” 2012.[4] A. Shackelford, “Documenting the Needs of Student Veterans with Disabilities
Paper ID #24852Quantifying the Pool of Underrepresented Minority Students for EngineeringStudiesDr. Beth A Myers, University of Colorado Boulder Beth A. Myers is the Director of Analytics, Assessment and Accreditation at the University of Colorado Boulder. She holds a BA in biochemistry, ME in engineering management and PhD in civil engineering. Her interests are in quantitative and qualitative research and data analysis as related to equity in education.Dr. Angela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder (CU) in the Department of Civil
Paper ID #24920Texas A&M Engineering Academies: Impacts of Effective MarketingJon Carter Buchanan, Texas A&M University Mr. Buchanan has always had a passion for working with students. After spending many years in full-time ministry, he began working for Texas A&M University in 2009 as an Admissions Counselor. He served as lead transfer advisor for the Aggieland Prospective Student Center and was also the liaison for the Program for System Admission. From 2016-2018, he was Associate Director of Engineering Academies, spending the majority of his time on recruiting students for the program. He currently serves
Psychology at Miami University. She earned her Ph.D. in Psychology from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Dr. Summerville is a social psychologist whose research examines how thoughts of ”what might have been” affect emotion, motivation, and behavior. She is the PI of a grant from NSF’s EEC division investigating new interventions in engineering education that utilize social cognitive psychology.Dr. Brian P Kirkmeyer, Miami University Brian Kirkmeyer is the Karen Buchwald Wright Senior Assistant Dean for Student Success and Instructor in the College of Engineering and Computing at Miami University in Oxford, Ohio. His background includes BS, MS and PhD degrees in Materials Science and Engineering
Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 914-925, 2013.[4] P. A. Daempfle, "An Analysis of the High Attrition Rates Among First Year College Science, Math, and Engineering Majors," Journal College Student Retention, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 37-52, 2003.[5] R. M. Marra, K. A. Rodgers, D. Shen and B. Bogue, "Leaving Engineering: A Multi‐Year Single Institution Study," Journal of Engineering Education , vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 6-27, 2012.[6] M. Rose, B. Bogue, D. Shen and K. A. Rogers, "Those that Leave: Assessing Why Students Leave Engineering," in Proceedings of the 37th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Honolulu, 2007.[7] S. Haag, N. Hubele, A. Garcia and K. McBeath, "Engineering
Paper ID #24576CPP WE: Retaining & Graduating Women in Undergraduate EngineeringDr. Kristina Rigden, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Dr. Kristina Rigden is the Director of Outreach Programs and the Women in Engineering Program for the College of Engineering at California State Polytechnic University, Pomona (Cal Poly Pomona). In her position, she provides several different outreach programming events to engage K-12 female students to pursue STEM majors and/or careers. Dr. Rigden holds a B.A. in Liberal Studies from Cal Poly Pomona, a TESOL certificate, a M.A. in Teaching with a multiple-subject
Paper ID #24828Work-In-Progress: Applying Transition Theory to an Exploration of the HighSchool-to-College Transition Experiences of Students from UnderrepresentedEthnic/Racial GroupsMs. Karis Boyd-Sinkler, Virginia Tech Karis Boyd-Sinkler is a doctoral student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She also serves as support staff for the Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity where she is involved in the recruitment, outreach, and retention of engineering students. Her research interests include diversity in engineering and the role of engineering student support centers in regards to student attrition and