. Excellent 6 b. Above Average 7 c. Fair 5 d. Below Average 0 e. Poor 0 2) Overall rating of instructor: a. Excellent 6 b. Above Average 6 c. Fair 4 d. Below Average 2 e. Poor 0 3) I learned a great deal in this course. a. Strongly Agree 6 b. Agree 9 c. Neutral 1 d. Disagree 2 e. Strongly Disagree 0
23.1198.7 (b) Example of a free body diagram entered which is missing a horizontal reaction on the fixed connection. The system requires that students include the reaction and then specify that it has zero magnitude. (c) A free body diagram which correctly specifies reactions at A and B and includes the external applied load. Students were given homework assignments during the course of their introductory engineering staticscourse. These assignments contained problems which required students to produce free body diagrams. Thesystem analyzed and graded student free body
programs are analyzed, with summary reportsprovided in Appendices A and B. Suggestions and conclusions are made at the end of this paper.Definitions of Computer Simulation and Computer AnimationAlthough computer animation and simulation have been used to help students visualize a varietyof phenomena, the terms of “computer simulation” and “computer animation” are not explicitlywell defined in most of the studies that are examined in this paper. Only a few studies includeddefinitions of these two terms. According to Larvive 16, “animation” is a form of cartoon used tohelp one visualize a difficult concept, in place of a description of the concept in words; and“simulation” is a program that accepts inputs, and simulates experimentations via
, the student is free to draw any free body diagram they would like of the system. Forexample, they might select a particular bar within the system, Figure 6b, or they might decide tocreate a control volume and draw a free body diagram of this, Figure 6c. The system interpretsthe free body diagram to ensure that the forces have been properly placed in the system and flagsany missing or incorrect forces as appropriate. Page 23.952.7 a) b) c)Figure 6. (a) Sample truss system, (b) a free body diagram of a single bar within the system (incorrect forces are flagged by the system), (c
person meetings B Winter/ Yes No No No All volunteers, all Spring 2012 participants part of a cohort related to another topic, met weekly C Spring 2012 Yes No No No All volunteers, all participants part of
. Neresini, "Science and Public Participation," in The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, E. J. Hackett, et al., Eds. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 2008, pp. 449-472.[5] B. Wynne, "Public Understanding of Science," in Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, S. Jasanoff, et al., Eds.Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1995, pp. 361-388.[6] G. Rowe and L. J. Frewer, "Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation," Science, Technology & Human Values, vol. 25, pp. 3-29, 2000.[7] B. Wynne, "Sheep Farming after Chernobyl: A Case Study in Communicating Scientific Information," Environmental Magazine, vol. 31, pp. 33-40, 1989.[8] B. Wynne, "Knowledges in Context," Science, Technology & Human Values, vol. 16
the workof refining each rubric can be tedious, increasing the accuracy and uniformity of theseexpectations makes it worthwhile. Challenges to the process of forming rubrics include:a) reaching a collective faculty consensus on how to define each aspect of the engineeringprocess, as identified by each particular portfolio category, and b) describing theexpectation in a way that addresses multiple engineering concentrations and differingengineering practices. For example, while choosing a material property, constructing anelectrical circuit board, or coding a microprocessor may each qualify as an engineeringendeavor, each is governed by somewhat unique considerations. Though our process bycommittee of department faculty was relatively slow, we
about theresearch tasks for Team Memo #1: 1. Identify and articulate a research topic. 2. Write a research proposal, which includes a. An introduction to the technology and its use in society today. b. A discussion of how the technology is relevant to engineering and sustainability.She encourages students to go about research for this team memo the way they normally wouldbecause, as mentioned, she acknowledges that they come to the classroom with expertise. However,she also helps them to identify potential information resources, gives them criteria for evaluating thesources they find, and teaches them how to identify a scholarly source of information.It is important to note here that there is a relationship between reading
Analysis of Aerospace Engineering Students Who Repeat Degree Requirements David B. Lanning Jr. Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott, ArizonaAbstractThis work investigates enrollment statistics, cumulative grade-point averages (GPA), and overallsuccess of a cohort of undergraduate aerospace engineering (AE) students who repeated requiredcourses during their academic studies at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. Students retakecourses that they do not pass, or sometimes retake courses to improve upon their prior grade toraise their cumulative GPA. It has been informally observed that a number of students manageto persist in the degree program
Angle of Twist for Round and Square Torsion Specimen For the round specimen, from any text on Mechanics of Materials, such as, Reference [3] Which gives G = 3.94 x 106 psi For the square cross section, the determination of torsional stiffness requires consideration of warping which is available only in advanced texts on Mechanics of Materials, such as, Reference [4]. Stiffness for the square specimen, (2) This gives α = 0.138 which compares favorably with the analytical value of 0.1406 [4] CONCLUSIONS Warping has been demonstrated using (a) twisting Styrofoam specimens, (b) Membrane Analogy, and (c) Torsion experiments involving shafts of circular and square sections
as an interaction mode (TTouch+F), and Touch screen Tabletusing Stylus as an interaction mode (TTouch+S)- (see Figure 1). In addition, the modelingprogram SketchUp was selected as a representative modeling application with a low level ofdifficulty in which user interface does not vary between computing platforms or operatingsystems. The user interface for SketchUp is very consistent between the Windows operatingsystem and the Apple Mac OS X operating system used in the study. (a) DTouch+F (b) TTouch+F (c) TTouch+S Figure 1: The hardware used in the experimentA between-subjects experimental approach was used to investigate the effects of HCI mode andscreen size on student
the greater SL community, from the business, education, psychology, law, computerscience, occupational therapy, and sociology faculties.11-16 Projects included (a) event planning,(b) researching, (c) developing programs, (d) mentoring youth to build self-esteem, (e) traininganimals, (f) tutoring, and (g) providing occupational therapy.The following criteria were identified as critical in determining whether a COR developed apositive or negative view of the SL experience11-16: • whether objectives were clearly aligned and defined; • level of communication and preparation between the COR and faculty member; • amount of student motivation and conduct; and • whether the COR’s problem was resolved.Two of the studies that focused on the
is “a course based, credit-bearing, educationalexperience in which students (a) participate in an organized service activity that meets identifiedcommunity needs and (b) reflect on the service activity in such a way as to gain furtherunderstanding of course content, a broader appreciation of the discipline, and an enhanced senseof civic responsibility" [4]. This type of curricular community engagement has been shown tohave many benefits for undergraduates including: enhanced critical thinking and betterunderstanding of course material, cooperative learning and tolerance for diversity, self-efficacyand leadership, recruitment and retention of students, community-college connections andcitizenship [5, 6]. These community engagement activities
E_PQ 29.0 d_PQ 0.50 a 16.00 E_PR 29.0 d_PR 0.50 b 12.00 E_PS 29.0 d_PS 0.50 c 12.00 k/in deg in k_PQ 284.7 q_PQ 143.1 L_PQ 20.00 k_PR 474.5 q_PR 90.0 L_PR 12.00 k_PS 335.5 q_PS 45.0 L_PS 16.97 Results F_PQ 1.288 Equation Table F_PR 3.197 d _PQ d _PR d _PS d _x d _y load F_PS 1.457 Sum Fx -227.8 0.0
DfS Guidelines15.Alternatives to Incorporate Design for Safety into Engineering CurriculaTo those experienced with the introduction of new topics or courses into established engineeringcurricula, there are five obvious alternatives to increase the DfS knowledge of degreed engineers: A. In all engineering courses, safety hazards could be identified as the subject matter progresses, and could be noted to the students (with options for elimination/reduction) B. In all engineering design courses, only C. In all senior capstone design courses, as a criterion each design team must address in data collection, analysis, creation of alternatives, and evaluation of alternatives D. In a course on safety engineering E. In a course on
, Upper Saddle River, NJ.[3] Dues, J., and Le, N., 2006, “High Cycle Fatigue Tester,” Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, ASEE.[4] Sepahpour, B., and Chang, S.-R., 2005, “Low Cycle and Finite Life Fatigue Experiment,” Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, ASEE.[5] Hagigat, C.K., 2005, “Using Commercially Available Finite Element Software for Fatigue Analysis,” Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, ASEE.[6] Elahinia, M., and Ciocanel, C., 2006, “Redeveloping the Mechanics and Vibration Laboratory: A Problem Solving Approach,” Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, ASEE.[7] Ciocanel, C., and Elahinia, M., 2006, “A Problem Solving
College. Chapter written by Kremer, G. Designing to Make A Difference: Authentic Integration of Professional Skills in an Engineering Capstone Design Course. Indiana University Press, May 23, 20138. Sandmann, L., Kiely, R., and Grenier, R. Program Planning: The Neglected Dimension of Service-Learning, Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, Spring 2009, pp.17-339. Mooney, L., and Edwards, B. Experiential Learning in Sociology: Service Learning and other Community- Based Learning Initiatives, Teaching Sociology, V. 29, No. 2 (April 2001), American Sociological Association, pp. 181-19410. Carter, M., Rivero, E., Cadge, W., and Curran, S. Designing Your Community-Based Learning Project: Five Questions to ask
pennies.The materials used for this lab were supplied by the students and included a digital caliper and30 pennies.Lab 2: Allowable StressThe objectives of the second lab were to test the allowable shear stress in a simple connectionand to analyze normal strain in a multi-component cable. In the allowable stress experiment,students used a simple double lap connection (provided in the lab kits and shown in Figure 1)made of balsa wood to measure allowable shear stress. Students added an adhesive (such asdouble sided tape) to the Part B illustrated in Figure 1, and then suspended increasing weight toget to failure. In this lab, as well as many other labs, students were required to fashion a hangersystem and determine a means to accurately determine
):25-37.4. Zoltowski CB, Oakes WC, Cardella ME. Students' Ways of Experiencing Human-Centered Design. Journal of Engineering Education. 2012;101(1):28-59.5. Eyler J, Giles DE. Where's the Learning in Service-Learning? San Fransciso, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1999.6. Paton B, Dorst K. Briefing and reframing: A situated practice. Design Studies. 2011;32(6):573-587.7. Nolan R. Development Anthropology: Encounters in the Real World. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 2002.8. Schon D. Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Fransciso, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1987.9. Jarvis P. Towards a comprehensive theory of human learning. Vol 1. New York: Routledge; 2006.10. Kolb DA. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and
Paper ID #6767LabVIEW and Arduino as a gateway to PLC programmingDr. Wesley B. Williams P.E., University of North Carolina, Charlotte Dr. Wesley B. Williams is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Technology and Con- struction Management at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. Dr. Williams joined the de- partment in 2011, teaching courses in the mechanical engineering technology and electrical engineering technology undergraduate programs as well the facilities management graduate program. His research interests include additive manufacturing, instrumentation, controls, and lapping. His
Engineering Alumni, 10 and 15Year EngineeringAlumni, and members of the various Departmental and College Advisory Committees. Twoweb-based survey versions were developed and distributed with the use of Qualtrics softwarepackage. The first focused on 2 and 3 Yr Alumni. The second focused on 10 and 15Year Alumniand Advisory Committees. For both surveys and for each of the eight identified competencies,participants were first asked to rate A) the Importance – How important do you think this topic isto engineering education? (1= Not Important 5= extremely important, or No Opinion) and B)Preparation – How well have you [recent undergraduates for alumni and advisor] been preparedin these areas? (1 = Not prepared; 5 = Well Prepared; or No Opinion). Each
from faculty. This information may bevaluable to engineering educators as they seek to provide appropriate social support forunderrepresented STEM students.Bibliography1. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc.2. Berg, B. (2007). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. (6th Ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.3. Bonner, F. A., Alfred, M., Lewis, C. W., Nave, F. M., & Frizell, S. (2009). Historically black colleges and universities (HBCUs) and academically gifted black students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): Discovering the alchemy for success. Journal of Urban Education: Focus on Enrichment.4. Brooks-Gunn, J
Communication Quarterly, 69(1), 25-49, 2006.[4] L. Hasler-Waters & W. Napier, “Building and Supporting Student Team Collaboration in the Virtual Classroom”, Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(3), 345-352, 2002.[5] T. U. Daim, A. Ha, S. Reutiman, B. Hughes, U. Pathak, W. Bynum, & A. Bhatla, “Exploring the communication breakdown in global virtual teams”, International Journal of Project Management. Elsevier Ltd and IPMA, 2011. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.06.004.[6] N. Zakaria, A. Amelinckx, & D. Wilemon, “Working Together Apart? Building a Knowledge-Sharing Culture for Global Virtual Teams”. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13(1), 15-29, 2004. doi:10.1111/j.1467- 8691.2004.00290.x[7] L
similar ethnic and/or cultural backgrounds, and/or similareducational or socioeconomic backgrounds.I got here, and we had this African American symposium thing. And one of the things that stuckout to me was – one of the guys said, “Unlike in high school where the guys who are almostflunking are getting a tutor, the A and B students out here are the people who are in the tutoringclasses all the time.” And it only took me about a week to figure that out. But from then on, Iwas in the help lab and stuff for math, and it worked…And [The African American Symposium]helped me out as far as networking, because …I met all these people that were in my field. Andeven now, I still talk to those guys, so it kind of helped me out…Kind of jump-started
partners. Therefore, studies focusingon activities that educate students how to display global competency when working with those Page 23.1209.15from other cultures will benefit all involved.References 1. Al-Harthi, A. (2010). Cultural differences in transactional distance preference by Arab and American distance learners. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 11(4), 257-267. 2. Amadei, B., & Sandekian, R. (2010). Model of integrating humanitarian development into engineering education. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education & Practice, 136(2), 84-92. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943
. Hunter. “Knowledge, skills, attitudes, and experiences necessary to become globally competent,” Unpublished dissertation, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania. 6. B. Hunter, G.P. White, G. Godbey, “What Does it Mean to Be Globally Competent?” J. Studies in International Education. Fall 2006. 10(3) 267-285. 7. A. Parkinson. “The Rationale for Developing Global Competence,” Online Journal for Global Engineering Education. 2009 4(2) Article 2. Available at: http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/ojgee/vol4/iss2/2 8. A. Parkinson, J. Harb, S. Magleby, “Developing Global Competence in Engineers: What does it mean? What is most important?,” Paper 2009-571, Proceedings, 2009 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition
Science, University of California, Berkeley.13. Rogoff, B., C.G. Turkanis, and L. Bartlett, Learning Together: Children and Adults in a School Community. 2002: Oxford University Press.14. Jones, T.G. and W. Velez. Effects of Latino parent involvement on academic achievement. in Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. 1997. Chicago, IL.15. Shannon, S.M., Minority parental involvement: A Mexican mother's experience and a teacher's interpretation. Education and Urban Society, 1996. 29(1): p. 71- 84.16. Lopez, G.R., The value of hard work: Lessons on parent involvement from an (im)migrant household. Harvard Educational Review, 2001. 71(3): p. 416-43717. Moles, O.C., Collaboration between schools and
Paper ID #5872A Power Systems Protection Teaching Laboratory for Undergraduate andGraduate Power Engineering EducationJennifer Ferris, Portland State UniversityDr. Robert B Bass, Portland State University Dr. Robert Bass is an associate professor of power engineering in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Portland State University. His research interests pertain to electrical power sys- tems. Current and past projects include analyzing AMI data to evaluate the efficacy of utility-sponsored mini-split heat pump installations; evaluation of power quality at PSU’s ”Electric Avenue” EV Charging Stations
Paper ID #6277”Impact! Exploring Innovation Across Disciplines” - Engaging the Univer-sity Innovation Ecosystem Through a University-Wide CourseDr. Steven B. Shooter, Bucknell University Steve Shooter is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Bucknell University where he has taught for 18 years. He teaches classes such as senior design, exploring innovation, mechanical design, and mecha- tronics. His research is in information management in design, managing innovation and robotics. As a registered professional engineer in Pennsylvania he has consulted with dozens of companies on new product ventures and production
interpretive phenomenology.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette Carla B. Zoltowski, Ph.D., is Education Administrator of the EPICS Program at Purdue University. She received her B.S. and M.S. in electrical engineering and Ph.D. in engineering education, all from Purdue University. She has served as a lecturer in Purdue’s School of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Dr. Zoltowski’s academic and research interests include human-centered design learning and assessment, service-learning, ethical reasoning assessment, leadership, and assistive technology.Dr. William C. Oakes, Purdue University, West Lafayette William (Bill) Oakes is the Director of the EPICS Program and one of the founding faculty members