. (2016). Meet the Dean. Retrieved from https://engineering.tamu.edu/about/ovcd/dean 4. Paretti, Marie C., Pembridge, J. J., Brozina, S. C., Lutz, B. D., et al. (2013). "Mentoring team conflicts in capstone design: Problems and solutions." American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. 5. Sullivan, Brian T. and Karen L. Porter. (2016). “From One-shot Sessions to Embedded Librarian.” C&RL News, 77.1, 34-37. 6. Texas A&M University. (2013). Announces initiative to increase engineering enrollment. Retrieved from http://engineering.tamu.edu/news/2013/01/23/texas-am-announces- initiative-to-increase-engineering-enrollment-to-25-000-students 7. Tucci, Valerie K. (2011) “Faculty/Librarian
experience of new faculty can be leveraged to build a strongerconnection among students, classroom material, and professional skills requirements. A broadnetwork often built with industry experience can assist the new faculty member in supportingstudents in their job search, bringing guest speakers into class, and building student designprojects around real projects from industry partners. Teaching focused institutions in particularwill reap the benefits of hiring faculty with industry experience, and opportunities exist toimprove recruitment and orientation methods to assist new faculty with the transition.ReferencesAdams, Robin S., and Richard M. Felder. 2008. Reframing professional development: A systemsapproach to preparing engineering educators
: lessons from challenge-based innovation at CERN. European Journal ofEngineering Education, pp.1-15.Kurikka, J., Utriainen, T. and Repokari, L., 2016. Challenge based innovation: translatingfundamental research into societal applications. International Journal of Learning andChange, 8(3-4), pp.278-297.Kurikka, J. and Utriainen, T.M., 2014. Container Challenge–Prototyping DistributedCollaboration. In DS 78: Proceedings of the 16th International conference on Engineering andProduct Design Education (E&PDE14), Design Education and Human Technology Relations,University of Twente, The Netherlands, 04-05.09. 2014.Kriesi, C., Steinert, M., Aalto-Setaelae, L., Anvik, A., Balters, S., Baracchi, A., Bisballe Jensen,M., Bjørkli, L.E., Buzzaccaro, N
., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B. and Wong, B. (2010), “Doing” scienceversus “being” a scientist: Examining 10/11-year-old schoolchildren’s constructions of sciencethrough the lens of identity. Sci. Ed., 94: 617 – 639. Doi:10.1002/sce.20399Gottfredson, Linda S. (1981). Circumscription and compromise: A developmental theory ofoccupational aspirations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, Vol 28(6), 545 – 579.Hooley, T. (2017, February 01). Explainer: when should children start to think about theircareers? Retrieved February 11, 2017, from http://theconversation.com/explainer-when-should-children-start-to-think-about-their-careers-38264Moulton, V., Flouri, E., Joshi, H., & Sullivan, A. (2014). Fantasy, unrealistic and uncertainaspirations and
and Computer Engineering Building [press release]. Available: https://7 www.ece.illinois.edu/newsroom/article/9602 [accessed 31 Jan 2017]. SmithGroupJJR. Designing for the T-Shaped Student [website]. Available: http://www.smithgroupjjr.com/design_topics/8 designing-for-the-t-shaped-student#.WJFskBsrJEY [accessed 31 Jan 2017]. Oakland University. School of Engineering and Computer Science Homepage [website]. Available: https://oakland.edu/secs/9 [accessed 31 Jan 2017].10 Oakland University. New Engineering Building [website]. Available: https://oakland.edu/secs/new-engineering-building/ [accessed 31 Jan 2017].11 Roberts L., Lee S., et al. (22 Nov 2016). Promoting Peer to Peer Learning. Case Study: Oakland University-Engineering
] R. L. Brown, H. L. Helton, A. C. Williams, M. T. Shrove, M. Milošević and E. Jovanov, "Android Control Application for Nao Humanoid Robot," in Proc. of the International Conference on Frontiers in Education: Computer Science and Computer Engineering, 2013.[4] H. Ahn, H. Kim, Y. Oh and S. Oh, "Smartphone-Controlled Telerobotic Systems," in Cyber- Physical Systems, Networks, and Applications (CPSNA), 2014 IEEE International Conference on, Hong Kong, 2014.[5] I. Fette and A. Melnikov, "The WebSocket Protocol," [Online]. Available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6455. [Accessed 25 July 2016].[6] R. Fielding, J. Gettys, J. Mogul, H. Frystyk, L. Masinter, P. Leach and T. Berners-Lee, "Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1
California that offer a computer sciencedegree [16]. Of those, only 4 are accredited by ABET [1]. This means that 8% of private 4-yearcomputer science degrees in California are accredited by ABET.There are presumably a wide range of reasons that a computer science program would choose toforgo ABET accreditation. A detailed discussion of these reasons is beyond the scope of thispaper. What is of note here is that a substantial fraction of 4-year California universities choosenot to be ABET accredited. Hence for whatever reason(s), non-accreditation is considered aviable option for those universities, either by explicit choice or for some other reason such asinsufficient resources to devote to ABET.Conspicuously missing from the list of ABET
Stand-AloneWind/Photovoltaic/Fuel Cell Energy System. Ieee Transactions On EnergyConversion 23, 957-967 (2008).[8] M. Hosseini, I. Dincer, M.A. Rosen. Hybrid solar–fuel cell combined heat andpower systems for residential applications: Energy and exergy analyses. Journal OfPower Sources 221, 372-380 (2013).[9] P.A. Lehman, C.E. Chamberlin, G. Pauletto, M.A. Rocheleau. Operatingexperience with a photovoltaic-hydrogen energy system. International Journal OfHydrogen Energy 22, 465-470 (1997).[10] D. Shapiro, J. Duffy, M. Kimble, M. Pien. Solar-powered regenerative PEMelectrolyzer/fuel cell system. Solar Energy 79, 544-550 (2005).[11] D. Rekioua, S. Bensmail, N. Bettar. Development of hybrid photovoltaic-fuel cellsystem for stand-alone application
technical, complex topic. The authors plan to assess theeffectiveness of the learning tools in the near future, through a direct measurement of GD&Tknowledge acquisition and retention, in addition to self-reported satisfaction and self-efficacydata collection from the students. These data will be compared with a control group of a similarpopulation taught GD&T in a more traditional manner, such as through diagrammatic lecture-based delivery.References[1] S. A. Sorby, "Educational Research in Developing 3‐D Spatial Skills for Engineering Students," International Journal of Science Education, vol. 31, pp. 459-480, 2009/02/01 2009.[2] G. M. Bodner and R. B. Guay, "The Purdue visualization of rotations test," The Chemical
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Predictors for Success in Construction, Architecture and Architectural Engineering ProgramsAbstract:Universities and colleges with Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology (STEM)programs use standardized tests with a variety of names for student placement. The Assessmentand LEarning in Knowledge Spaces (ALEKS) is an assessment tool created by McGraw-Hillwith a mathematics placement module. Similarly, College Board’s Scholastic Aptitude Tests(SAT) and American College Testing (ACT) Inc.’s college entrance exams serve as a basis foradmissions into higher education. Since 2012, the university studied has collected data forEngineering, Architecture
of the United States to create new technology for cities,and 3) the National Academy of Engineering Grand Challenges - to Restore and Improve UrbanInfrastructure.References 1. Coyle, E. J. (2016, March), Systemic Reform of STEM Education: The Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) Consortium Paper presented at 2016 EDI, San Francisco, CA. https://peer.asee.org/27403 2. National Academy of Engineering. (2012). Infusing Real World Experiences into Engineering Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 3. Coyle, E. J., Krogmeier, J. V., Abler, R. T., Johnson, A., Marshall, S., & Gilchrist, B. E. (2014, October). The vertically-integrated projects (VIP) program—leveraging faculty research interests
.”Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2012). Puerto Rico Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries (CFOI).Clevenger, C., López del Puerto, C., and Glick, S. (2015). “Interactive BIM-enabled Safety Training Piloted Construction Education AND.” Advances in Engineering Education, 1–14.Excavations, 29 C.F.R. (1926). Subpart P, 366–403.Hallowell, M., and Gambatese, J. (2009). “Construction Safety Risk Mitigation.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 135(12), 1316–1323.OSHA. (1970). The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. AJN, American Journal of Nursing.OSHA. (2014). Fact Sheet: Trenching and Excavation Safety. U.S. Department of Labor.OSHA. (2015). Trenching and Excavation Safety.Rivera Olivencia, E., and Lopez del Puerto, C. (2016). “An Exploratory Study
, L.D. and Rosa, A.J., The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education”, Journal ofengineering education, pp. 121-130, January 2005.2. Thomas, J.W., A review of research on project-based learning. (2000): 2008.3. Waks, S. and N. Sabag, N., Technology Project Learning Versus Lab Experimentation, Journal of ScienceEducation and Technology, Volume 13, issue 3, pp. 333-342, Sep. 2004.4. Frank, M., Lavy, I., and Elata, D., “Implementing the Project-based Learning Approach in an AcademicEngineering Course”, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13, 273-288, 2003.5. Chua, K.J., Yang, W.M., and Leo, H.L., Enhanced and conventional project based learning in an engineeringdesign module, International Journal of
introduction to engineering course on improving retention." Journal of Engineering Education, January 1998, 79-85. 10. Laux, Chad M., Abram Walton, Amy S. Van Epps, Kimberly M. Deranek, Darrel L. Sandall, Rick L. Homkes, and Sarah E. Leach. "Gateway experiences to engineering technology: development of an introductory course ETD IT/IET Interest Group." Proceedings of the 2011 American Society for Engineering Education, June 2011.11. Rojas-Oviedo, Ruben, and X. Cathy Qian. "Improving retention of undergraduate students in engineering through freshman courses." Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education, June 2002.12. Narum, Jeanne. "Transforming undergraduate programs in science, technology
effective inleveling the playing field. In the example of the course presented in this paper, survey resultsshow great gains in learning as enabled by active learning, and great gains in attitude (e.g.,enthusiasm for the subject).AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant no.:1432426. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] ASEE (2012). “The Green Report – Engineering Education for a Changing World”,American Society for Engineering Education. https://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/The-Green-Report.pdf[2] NAE
Design Engineering Division and Lockheed Martin.Bibliography[1] C. Corbett and C. Hill, "Solving the equation: the variables for women’s success in engineering and computing," The American Association of University Women, Washington, D.C.2015.[2] U.S. Census Bureau. (2014, February 5, 2017). American Community Survey 1-year Estimates: Tables B24125 and B24126. Available: http://www.factfinder.census.gov[3] R. H. Tai, C. Q. Liu, A. V. Maltese, and X. Fan, "Planning early for careers in science," Science, vol. 312, 2006.[4] C. S. Hulleman and J. M. Harackiewicz, "Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes," Science, vol. 326, pp. 1410-1412, 2009.[5] A. Krishnamurthi, M. Ballard, and G. G. Noam, "Examining
agriculture, and community engagement.Disseminating Results & Planning Next Steps – As the project(s) progress, the research team willuse various medium to disseminate results to a wide audience. Thus, we will target not only peerreviewed publications, but other, more publicly accessible avenues such as social media,newsletters, community meetings, etc.3. Assessment of Learning and EngagementThe majority of efforts to date have been focused on developing partnerships, expandingcollaborations, and executing projects. This early work, focused on improving operations, waseasily quantifiable as most project results could be measured in dollars or time. For thisscholarship program to become truly “community-engaged”, more effort should focus on
the organization’s growth as it sought n ew funding sources and s ustainability . These factors were frequent topics of discussion, as many of the subprojects involved researching them to create selfsustaining solutions in the community. Viewed from an organizational level, this idea of mission creep could be viewed as improvisation of the entire organization in response to shifting funding sources, or conditions for achieving their goals. Apparent abandonment of core goals can appear in any organization as shortterm shifts are made in order to accommodate new expectations from funders
lectures,” presented at the 11th IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering and Application (SEA 2007), Cambridge, MA, 2007.[5] S. Deterding, D. Dixon, R. Khaled, and L. Nacke, “From Game Design Elements to Gamefulness: Defining ‘Gamification,’” in Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, New York, NY, USA, 2011, pp. 9–15.[6] J. Hamari, J. Koivisto, and H. Sarsa, “Does gamification work? — A literature review of empirical studies on gamification,” in System Sciences (HICSS), 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on, 2014.[7] C. Cheong, F. Cheong, and J. Filippou, “Quick Quiz: A gamified approach for enhancing learning,” in PACIS 2013
Arm.” B.S., Electrical Engineering University of El Mina Cairo, Egypt, May 2001.Prof. Craig Durwin Engle, Purdue University, Calumet (College of Technology) Craig D. Engle is clinical assistant professor of Mechatronics Engineering Technology and Mechanical Engineering Technology at Purdue University Northwest in Hammond campus located in Indiana. Craig’s industrial experience includes 23 years in the aerospace industry focusing on flight and missile simulations and electro optics system analysis. Craig has submitted approximately 31 patent applications, received notice of allowance on 24 applications and paid issue fees on seventeen applications resulting in seventeen U. S. Patent Awards so far. He received a
Conference Proceedings, 2010. 3. Merino, “Impact of ABET 2000 on Teaching Engineering Economics: What Subjects Define Economic Literacy for Engineers?,” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2000. 4. Rogers, K. J., Sattler, M. L., “”Life Cycle Sustainability Economics” Module”, ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2012. 5. Hartman, J. C., “Testing the “Art” of Engineering Economic Decision-Making,” ASEE Annual Conference, 2006. 6. Walter, S., “A Systems Approach to Engineering “Economics”,” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2008. 7. Bursic, K. M., “Applying Engineering Economic Analysis to Contemporary Problems with Global and Societal Implications,” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2006. 8. Brach, P
are planning to scale up similar competitions across thecampus community to empower learners to engage in transdisciplinary teams on collaborative ventures.References1. Wessner CW and W. AW, Committee on Comparative National Innovation Policies: BestPractice for the 21st Century. 2012: Washington, D.C.2. Case, S., M.S. Coleman, and G. Deshpande, The Innovative and Entrepreneurial University.2013, U.S. Department of Commerce.3. Signer, N. Universities Race to Nuture Startup Founders of the Future. The New York Times,December 28, 2015.4. Ortega Alvarez, A.M., M.T. Garcia Merino, and M.V. Santos Alvarez, Information: The sourceof entrepreneurial activity. Social Science Information, 2015. 54(3): p. 280-298.5
: Verification of the CLT via Repeated ConvolutionThe result is shown in the bottom graph of Figure 6. The theoretical result and the result fromct_conv overlap. f1(t) is the impulse response of a series RC circuit with a time constant of 1 s(the output is the voltage across the capacitor). The same result can be obtained from circuitsimulation software. Having the students obtain the result from circuit simulation helps toremind them that convolution provides useful results in the real world. The result from a circuitsimulation program (LTSpice4) is shown in Figure 7. Figure 6: Verification of Theoretical Convolution Figure 7: Corresponding Simulated Output From an RC CircuitAs another example consider convolving
the result for the samequestion in project I is excellent.The following steps can benefit the successful completion of such projects. 1. Faculty involvement with industry 2. Industry support and engagement 3. Demonstrating benefits to industry 4. College/ University support 5. Careful selection of students for right project 6. Faculty supervision and monitoring day-to-day progress 7. Fixing any occurring problem quickly and efficiently 8. Communicating with industry and students 9. Performing assessment 10. Providing written report to industry and acquiring their inputsREFERENCE 1. Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: 7 research-based
; Cayabyab, J. (2015). The Effect of Peer Tutoring on Achievement of Students in DiscreteStructures. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(5).4. Chen, C., & Liu, C. C. (2011). A case study of peer tutoring program in higher education. Research in HigherEducation Journal, 11, 1-10.5. Zhao, CM. & Kuh, G.D. (2004), Adding Value: Learning Communities and Student Engagement, Research inHigher Education, 45:1156. Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2005). Understanding student differences. Journal of engineering education, 94(1),57-72.7. Topping, K.J. (1996) The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: A typology and review ofthe literature, High Education (1996) 32: 321.8. Shapiro, N. S., & Levine, J. H
approach is Cognitive Apprenticeship Theory (CAT)introduced by Collins et al. (1991) and Rogoff (1991). As a social cognitive theory, CAT positsthat students learn from experts by observation, imitation, and modeling. The instructor(s) serveas coaches to bring tacit processes out in the open. In flipping the course described herein,students spent more time actively observing and learning from the instructor than was possible inthe traditional lecture format. Coaching was more targeted and problem solving became anexploration where strategies were learned, reflection was built in with student peers workingtogether, and informed inquiry prior to coming to class enabled scaffolding.Structure of the Flipped CourseDuring the flipped portion of the
the STEM Workforce, A Companion to Science and Engineering Indicators 2014, Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation (NSB- 2015-10).[3] Wendler, C., B. Bridgeman, F. Cline, C. Millet, J. Rock, N. Bell & P. McAllister. 2010. The Path Forward: The Future of Graduate Education in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.[4] Hancock, S. & Walsh, E. 2016. Beyond knowledge and skills: Rethinking the development of professional identity during the STEM doctorate. Studies in Higher Education, 41, 37-50.[5] Litalien, D. & F. Guay. 2015. Dropout intention in Ph.D. studies: A comprehensive model based on interpersonal relationships and motivational resources
activities on creating, implementing, and improving theactivities. In the future, the author plans to collect data on student opinions of these activitiesand analyze grades from exams/homework/labs to improve the student experience and maximizetheir learning.Bibliography[1] T. Bell, et al., “Computer Science Unplugged: School Students Doing Real Computing Without Computers,”Computing and Information Technology Research and Education, New Zealand (CITRENZ), vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 20-29, 2009.[2] T. Bell, et al., CS Unplugged: Computer Science without a Computer. www.csunplugged.org., 2015.[3] S. Coffman-Wolph, “Innovative Activities to Teach Computer Science Concepts Inside the Classroom and atOutreach Events”, Proceedings of the 123rd Annual ASEE
engineers in the workplaces remains relatively low. There has been a significantimprovement compared to the 1980's, during which only about 5.8% of engineers were woman,but the numbers remain relatively low with female engineers only making up about 14% of theengineering workforce within the United States. Suggested reasons for this phenomena includelack of female role models and young women having fewer technological problem solvingopportunities throughout K-12 than when compared to their male counterparts13.To attempt to combat the lack of female engineering students within an Engineering Technologydepartment at a University of Louisiana, the department developed a “Girls Who Draft”program, which is partially motivated by the Girls Who Code
on areas that theywere weak in based on performance on previous problems. Our hope was that this would helpdirect students’ study habits and improve overall learning. Also, for this semester the number ofin class quizzes was further reduced, with 4 quizzes for statics and 2 for dynamics. Also thestatics exam was given over 2 class periods, as a common time for both sections of students wasnot available due to the students’ schedules. Table 1: Description of courses included in the study ID Assessment Term Class Period Instructor(s) N* Homework Fall 2013 TR 8:00-10:45am A&B 37 TH Homework Spring 2014 TR 8