human-like concepts, such as knowledge, belief, intention, and emotion21.With capacity for reasoning, planning, natural language processing and other human intelligenceabilities, intelligent agents have been deployed in many domains to assist human’s work.Education, where teachers and learners struggle to cover more material while meeting risingexpectations and standards, is a ripe arena for intelligent agents to have a large impact on thepractices therein. Following this, intelligent agents for education have been extensivelyresearched over the past three decades. Perhaps the most well established and populareducational platforms that use intelligent agents are intelligent tutoring systems (ITS, e.g.22-23).ITS are computer programs that
-2018.Role Model InterventionsSince research indicated that an important aspect of mentoring was providing inspiration [61],[23], program modifications aimed at providing more opportunities for female engineers to sharepersonal narratives were implemented. In 2016, role models demonstrating engineering-relatedactivities were added for approximately one hour during a STEM-focused public exposition priorto the main IIBI event, and in 2017, additional time (30 minutes total) was carved out of theevent schedule for networking with the role models during the planned activities. In 2017, arelated item was also added to the girls’ survey for cross-validation: “The role models inspiredme to consider a career in engineering or technology”.This need to
Paper ID #15803Robotics in K-12 Formal and Informal Learning Environments: A Review ofLiteratureMr. Nicholas Alexander Bascou, University of Pittsburgh Graduated from the University of Pittsburgh in 2016 with a B.A. in Anthropology and a B.S. in Biology and Chemistry. Research experience includes the use of robotics in K-12 education at the University of Pittsburgh’s Learning Research and Development Center and research into neural pathways involved in the onset and treatment of Schizophrenia at the Anthony Grace Lab at the University of Pittsburgh. Future plans include the pursuit of an M.D. and PhD in biological
reviews each of the demos/videos,discuss how they are incorporated into the class, and describe how to fabricate/procure the demoequipment.1. Introduction In the last few years, there has been an increasing trend in the debate about the pros andcons of active learning in the classroom, and many have moved away from the traditional lectureformat.1 While active learning comes in several forms, most agree that activities that aredesigned to engage the students, pique their interest, and are carefully selected to coordinate andsupplement the lesson plans tend to improve students’ understanding and retention of keyconcepts.1 Although active or experiential learning has been highly promoted as of late, it hasbeen researched for several decades
, visualization and use of toolsMaking Connections: this category, like skills and tools, was organized into a subset of types,but overall, this group refers to making connections between the course material and other entity:themselves, another course, career or graduate school plans or the “real world”. Morespecifically: 1. Application to real world engineering/real problems (n=29): “I want my students to see that physics has direct connections to real world problems.” 2. Future career/graduate studies (n=18): “contribute meaningfully to the work of a structural engineering group, whether in industry or academia” 3. Integration with self/identity (n=18): “I want the students to gain confidence in their knowledge” 4
Engineering Strategic Plan of 2007 included as one of its strategic goals tomodernize the first year experience. Specifically, this goal was stated as, “All students in theSchool of Engineering will have a first-year Technology course that provides a small-class,hands-on, query-based learning experience that ties technology to society and engages studentsin engineering problem-solving.”Curriculum modernizationWhile ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc.,) specifically requiresthat engineers “meet a general education component that complements the technical content ofthe curriculum and is consistent with the program and institution objectives,” ABET alsosuggests a particular responsibility for engineers to study the social
the pros and cons of several possible designs. I learned that things often times don't work out, and you have to be able to adapt and change rapidly. Presentation was good for skill... It taught us teamwork... Unfortunately our cycle failed somewhat but that's part of the process as well We learned a lot about brainstorming, but did not really get a chance to prototype and learn from our mistakes through repetition. I had so much fun and learned so much from foam core. Going into this process I knew that it was essential to plan out our build time, and even with all the planning we did, we still basically ran out of time, which was definitely
understand what was required in technical Deleted: ¶ terms, including the scope of what was being planned The BCS Task Force drew 3. Organizational Skill #1: How to get about the business, and this implied that they knew the Deleted: of the business and the people well 4. Organizational Skill #2: How to get things done, possessing a set of excellent social skills—to listen, understand, negotiate and persuadePalmer emphasizes that “the hybrids were not operating in isolation” (p. 232), a nuance that was Deleted: isnot captured in the article in The Independent, which focuses on the hybrid or T-shape as a kindof person/individual
requirements remainedrelatively stable. We then summarize the lessons learned from these revisions and talk about howwe plan to manage changes in the future. Finally, we offer suggestions on how others might goabout industrializing their own software development projects.IntroductionIndustry and academic professionals continue to call for more collaboration in Computer Scienceand Information Technology education [1]. Project-Based Learning (PBL) [2] and ActiveLearning [3] are key instructional approaches that benefit from a strong industry connection. Inthis paper, we talk about our experience in injecting industry practice into the core of the project-based course: the project itself.One of the authors of this paper is a university professor; the
collegestudents whose high-school SAT math scores were at least 650 and who started their collegecareers in natural science, mathematics or engineering. The interviewees were selectedrandomly by the participating colleges and universities. Approximately half of those interviewedhad switched majors out of science-math-engineering (SME) programs by their senior years. Theother half of those interviewed were still SME majors as seniors and planned to graduate with adegree in natural science, mathematics or engineering. They found that the greatest contributionto the loss of students in Science, Math and Engineering fields was due to problems associatedwith the structure of the educational experience and the culture of the disciplines. They alsofound that
? • What do you plan to do with your engineering degree? Do you think females have different goals than males? • Female numbers in engineering remain relatively low, and have recently been on the decline in Canada. Why do you think this is the case? How can we attract more women to the field of engineering? • Do you think there are stereotypes about engineering, or about women, that detract women from pursuing engineering? • Do you think the experience as a student is different for males and females? If you could change something about your education as an engineer, what would it Page 12.295.4 • be
studyinghumans. The faculty provided stories of these challenges as well as the strategies theyused to overcome them. As Corey explains, “I wanted to find out how everyone dealtwith situations that I had difficulty in…I want to be prepared for my research, and Ifound it helpful to know obstacles are presented to all of us.” Similarly, Catherine shareshow toward “the middle of the semester, as we became more comfortable withmethodologies through other courses, I became more interested some of the issues withthe research that didn’t go as planned.” Molly and Emilie provide a broad overview ofthe kinds of “realities” faculty shared: “Getting to talk candidly with the authors of these papers made EER seem much more accessible, but also opened my eyes
undergraduateengineering curriculum to include more subjects…all within the confines of a sacrosanct four-year program. Arguments on all sides are unimpeachable but they are also mutuallyexclusive…The arguments could be reconciled in a plan for a pre-engineering undergraduateprogram followed by a professional school program… because of objections to the extra costs ofthis approach…the committee could not reach a consensus on this vexing problem.” (p. iv)Overall the definition of an engineer and engineering that emerges from “Engineering Educationand Practice in the United States” is both essential and pragmatic. Essential in that the roles andfunctions of the engineer need to be defined to place her in the context of a larger economic andsocial system, and
TEST BETA SYSTEM 3. FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS 9. MANUFACTURING SCALE UP 4. PREL. ANALYSIS ~~BLDINGS, TOOLING, ~~MRKT. STUDY STAFFING, SERVICE ~~ENGINEERING ANALYSIS ORGANIZATION, SALES & MARKETING 5. PREL. TECH. PROPOSAL ~~BUSINESS PLAN 10. PRODUCTION ~~ENG.G SCHEDULE & ~~BUDGET FOR LABOR/MATL.S 11. PRODUCT PHASE OUTThe answers to these questions can be
based on how well each is likely to meet the criteria and constraints of the problem. 3-5 ETS1-3: Plan and carry out fair tests in which variables are controlled and Which NGSS failure points are considered to identify aspects of a model or prototype that engineering can be improved performance MS ETS1-1: Define the criteria and constraints of a design problem with expectations are sufficient precision to ensure a successful solution taking into account relevant addressed in the scientific principles and potential impacts on people and the natural intervention
Engineers Without Borders–USA Student Chapters: The LafayetteThe Design Science/Global Solutions Lab College Experienceis a model for interdisciplinary problem and Joshua Smitha & David Brandesbproject-based research and learning. Students are Departments of aMechanical Engineering andbriefed by UN experts, learn a problem-solving b Civil and Environmental Engineeringand strategic design and planning methodology, Lafayette College, Easton, PA 18042and use that to develop real-world solutions
problem and Joshua Smitha & David Brandesbproject-based research and learning. Students are Departments of aMechanical Engineering andbriefed by UN experts, learn a problem-solving b Civil and Environmental Engineeringand strategic design and planning methodology, Lafayette College, Easton, PA 18042and use that to develop real-world solutions andimplementation strategies for solving real world The Lafayette College chapter of Engineersproblems. Participants are multidisciplinary and Without Borders–USA (EWB–LC) is afrom around the world. Output, developed by multidisciplinary service-learning organizationLab
Univer- sity. She has been involved in engineering education for over 20 years.Hyun Kyoung Ro, Penn State University Hyun has been working as a graduate assistant on the Engineer of 2020 research grants that the Center for the Study of Higher Education received from the National Science Foundation.Dr. Alexander Yin, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Alexander Yin is the Senior Planning Research Associate in the Office of Planning and Institutional As- sessment. Prior to his current appointment, Alex was on the staff of Penn State’s Center for the Study of Higher Education. In that position he worked for Drs. Lisa R. Lattuca and Patrick T. Terenzini as a Senior Project Associate for two NSF-funded studies
class is also imperative. It is difficult forstudents to effectively participate in classroom discussions if they are not familiar with thetopics. Again, attempting to teach workplace disciplines, an employee will rarely be expected toattend a design or construction meeting without first reviewing client preferences, plans,specifications, etc. relating to the project.In class, discussions focus more on the students’ experience with and feeling toward the topicthan on memorization of terms and definitions. Students are strongly encouraged to voice theiropinions on the topic. Students are further encouraged to disagree with each other, the text, andthe professor, as long as they do so respectfully. This is the primary rule in the classroom
planned for futurework for this project.Results & DiscussionEvaluation of Commercial Chatbots for Material and Energy Balance Concepts. We testedcommercial chatbots with our 16 Material and Energy Balances (MEB) concept inventoryquestions on Dec. 26 and 27, 2024 and against our customized MEB chatbot on Jan. 15, 2025.As these chatbots are always changing and being updated, our evaluation of these questionsagainst these chatbots may not necessarily be representative of future performance. We (twograders) independently evaluated outputs from the chatbots on an A–F scale, and the scores werenumerically averaged to evaluate the performance of these chatbots on our MEB questions, anddetermine how often the responses were misleading, contained
hadattempted to build in a f2f element.However, when the Story Circle went ahead, a lack of appropriate physical-space at IUGcombining internet link-up with flexible table-layout meant that there was only one (large)group of eight in Gaza, rather than the two smaller groups as planned. The resultingimbalance in group-sizes at each site meant that a tight timetable (key to an activity such asthis) proved impossible; in a Story Circle, each person must be given the same amount oftime to speak, and for this reason the Gazan group was unable to explore the Story Circlequestion to the same depth as participants at NU. Co-ordinating timings for the informal‘coffee-break’ at the midpoint proved a particular challenge. This had an affective impact,reducing
? A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Civil Engineers, Urban Planning, and Social Workers’ Perspectives,” National Institute for Transportation and Communities, Portland, OR: Transportation Research and Education Center (TREC), NITC-RR-1176, 2019. Accessed: Aug. 29, 2022. [Online].[5] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Human-AI Teaming: State-of- the-Art and Research Needs. 2021. doi: 10.17226/26355.[6] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2005. doi: 10.17226/11153.[7] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Imagining the Future of Undergraduate STEM Education: Proceedings of
responding withinthe semi-structured research interview was demanding for the novice interviewer. As a reflectivepractice, we compared the intended goals of the planned interview questions prescribed in theprotocol versus the content of the actual questions asked during the interview, finding that for themost part, the interviewer’s questions did align. However, in examining the underlying function,the IQRT illuminated a few instances where the interviewer introduced, sometimesunexpectedly, questions that detracted from the participant’s flow of thinking. For example, indiscussing the tenure expectations, the participant mentioned teaching, service, and raisingmoney—a ‘pillar’ of tenure that he repeatedly framed as ‘leverage’ for ‘threatening to