Students 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.14. Keating, S. & Gabb, R., 2006, PBL in engineering: Student expectations in 2006, Postcompulsory Education Centre, Victoria University.15. Shi, J., Mphande, C., Simcock, A., Ives, R. & Bronson, P., 2006, Communication in a Problem Based Learning Environment: Supporting the Teaching Team in the School of Electrical Engineering. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education, 10 - 13 December, Auckland, New Zealand. Page 12.281.8
://www.pdkintl.org/kappan/k0206sti.htm on February 21, 2007.5. Sanoff A.P. (2005). Measure for Measure, ASEE Prism, Vol. 14, No 5, January, pp. 36-40.6. Morrell, D., Roberts, C., Grondin, R., Kuo, C.Y., Hinks, R., Henderson, M., Sugar, T., & Danielson, S. (2006). Beyond Measurement: Designing Engineering Outcomes to Foster Student Achievement. In the 2006 Annual Conference Proceedings, American Society for Engineering Education, June 12-15, Chicago, IL. New York: American Society for Engineering Education. Page 12.63.9
sustain economic growth. Just asthe space race in the 1960’s motivated political, educational, business, and thepopulation to act, so must today’s global brain race create a sense of urgency toaddress this issue. Concrete steps must be taken to curtail the tide. A change inemphasis must be enacted in K-12 as well as higher education with all the playersin STEM working together. Numerous efforts are being implemented across theUnited States to address the concern in K-12 and post secondary education. Someefforts have had limited success while others are making a bigger impact.However, we are not seeing a significant national effort or an urgent concern tiedto any of these independent initiatives. Therefore, the challenge must be posed:Have we
Specialized in 2010,” IT Pro Published by the IEEE Computer Society,November/December 2004.[5] Zhang, L., Shao, S., Zeng, X., Cai, X., “Development of Remote Learn System on Mobile Internet,”Proceedings of the 4th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, June 10-14, 2002. Shanghai, China.[6] Ramirez, J., Segura, J.C., Gorriz, J.M., Benitez, C., Rubio, A., “GAIALAB: A Weblab Project for DigitalCommunications Distributed Learning,” ICASSP, 2006.[7] Sypin, E., Syvopliasov, A. A., “Statement of the Problem on Laboratory Work through Internet,” 4th SiberianRussian Workshop and Tutorials EDM’2003, Section III, 1-4 July, Erlagol.[8] Zhao, X., Zhong, Y., Matsumoto, M., “A Real-Time Interactive Shared System for Distance Learning,” Multi-Media
issue.III. Results As of this writing, we are in the early stages of analyzing the data from our first runs ofTESSE. We here present our current grasp of the results and their significance, but note thatthere is significant work to be done.* The principal texts for ETP was Engineering Ethics: Concepts and Cases (3rd edition) by Charles E. Harris, Jr.,Michael S. Pritchard, and Michael J. Rabins and Creative Problem-Solving in Ethics by Anthony Weston. Page 13.1270.5† The principal texts for the MT course were The Elements of Moral Philosophy by James Rachels (5th edition), andThe Right Thing to Do by James Rachels (4th edition
, PowerPoint, pictures (JPEG), video (MPEG) can2 highest be posted Files in English and Japanese can be posted and represented correctly3 highest (non-garbled) Posted threads can be classified/identified according to , for example,4 highest project theme, Q&A. Those, who registered for specific topic(s), can get a notice when a5 second target/specified topic is postedDuring the current academic year, the collaboration software has been used to foster interaction.At the US-based school, teams of students practice international videoconferencing by holdingmeetings with students and faculty at different locations on campus
touring based on photogrammetry.” Journal of CulturalHeritage, Volume 8, Issue 1, January-March 2007: 26-31.2 Karen J. Horton, Constance Holden, Ken Wild, Service Learning in the U. S. Virgin Islands National Park: AVirtual Preservation Project, Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education AnnualConference & Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education, 2005, http://www.asee.org/acPapers/2005-743_Final.pdf (accessed Jan. 17, 2008).3 Maxwell school of Syracuse University Anthropology Department Field School, Archaeological Survey andHistoric Site GIS,St. John, United States Virgin Islands,http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/anthro/archfield/virginislands/index.asp (accessed Jan. 17, 2008).4 MicroStation, Bentley
. Girouard, J., Milanovic, I. M., Eppes, A. T., “Creating Flexible and Distinct Engineering Technology Programs,” 2007 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Honolulu, Paper ASEE-2007-81.5. Lehto, S., “Transforming Engineering Education from the Maintaining Mode of Operation to the Development Mode of the Global Industry,” 2002, URL: http://www.iacee.org/newsletters/sefi-lehto.pdf. Page 13.186.9
Proceedings of the OakRidge Center for Advanced Studies (ORCAS) Workshop on K-12 Science and Math Education, The Do’s andDon’ts: Creating a Path to Impact Science and Math Literacy, 2006.12. http://dream.rice.edu , accessed February 29, 2008.13. DeGrazia, J.L., Sullivan, J.F., Carlson, L.E. and Carlson, D.W., A K-12/University Partnership: CreatingTomorrow’s Engineers. Journal of Engineering Education, 90 (4), 557-563, 2001.14. Poole, S.J., DeGrazia, J.L. and Sullivan, J.F., Assessing K-12 Pre-Engineering Outreach Programs. Journal ofEngineering Education, 90 (1), 43-48, 2001.15. Palmateer, G., Manz, D., Jurkovic, A., McInnis, R., Unger, S., Kwan, K.K. and Dutka, B.J., Toxicant andParasite Challenge of Manz Intermittent Slow Sand Filter
technology ventures. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, 2004. 46(4): p. 125-131.13. McGrath, R.N., S. Fedorovich, and A.W. Bonney. US educational programs integrating technology management and entrepreneurship. 2004. Singapore: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., Piscataway, NJ 08855-1331, United States.14. Clark, W.A., et al. Establishing a technology-based business incubator at a regional university: A conceptual framework and case-study. 2005. Portland, OR, United States: American Society for Engineering Education, Chantilly, VA 20153, United States.15. Ports, K., et al. Senior design project commercialization and entrepreneurship. 2005. Portland, OR, United States: American Society
is to eliminate or reduce bias in the user's measurement system relative to thereference base. The calibration procedure compares an "unknown" or test item(s) or instrumentwith reference standards according to a specific algorithm.” For manufacturing companies manytypes of measurements are critical to the creation of quality and reliable products. Among thoseare measurements of length, weight, torque, temperature and power. Calibration of the Page 13.742.2instruments making those measurements is critical to good business. The American Society ofQuality (ASQ) offers a program including a four-hour exam for technicians leading to thedesignation
subsequently decides to not pursue commercialization of the Intellectual Property it may be reassigned to the creator(s), upon request. The return to the university for a reassignment of ownership will be ten percent (10%) of the net revenue generated by the intellectual property.An “Innovation” committee was formed to advise the university about which intellectual property is worthprotecting and licensing. The committee is made up of faculty and administrators. The committee is chairedby the executive director of the West Michigan Science & Technology Initiative (WMSTI), an organizationdedicated to developing intellectual property from its member organizations in the region.Student InvolvementThe faculty supported the policy
machines include; power (measured in Watts),frequency (measured in Hertz), feed rate (measured in inches per minute (IMP) andmillimeters per second mm/s), and focal length (measured in inches and millimeters).This research includes all these parameters in a Design of Experiments (DOE) in order tostatistically find the optimum settings for engraving. The experiment aims at determiningoptimum engraving parameters for 20 gage stainless steel at 0.034” thickness and tostatistically compare the performance between the two machines. The same material willbe engraved on both machines. The statistical and quantitative data gathered during theexperiment provide both future researchers and users a guideline for engraving of not juststainless steel but other
University of Pennsylvania.11. O'Hare, S. (1995). Freshman women in engineering: Comparison of their backgrounds, abilities, values, and goals with science and humanities majors. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 2, 33- 47.12. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.13. Smith-Jackson, T. L. (2002, June 10-13). Child-Centered Safety Research Issues. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the XVI Annual International Occupational Ergonomics and Safety Conference, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, June 10-13.14. Martin, C. V. (2007). Usability of pictorial assembly instructions for young children. University Libraries
) QualificationsBased on the above it is obvious that the quality of the ASEM EM BoK depends greatly upon thequalifications of the EM faculty and industry experts. The ASEM EM BoK had a rating systemto qualify the reviewers. Requirements are similar to those used for accreditation and Promotionand Tenure decisions.Criteria include the following: - PhD in the subject field - Professor or at least Associate Professor level - Tenure Status - Refereed articles in field - Text(s) in the field - Funded research in the field - Practical experience at the executive levelOverall ratings were excellent and will be published in a journal article on this topic.Future Plans to Use EM BoKThere a number of other activities that is based on the approved
andmanagement.Bibliography1. The 3rd Generation Partnership Project, http://www.3gpp.org/specs/specs.htm.2. R. M. Ford and C. S. Coulston, Design for Electrical and Computer Engineers – Theory, Concept, and Practice, McGraw Hill, 2005.3. 3G TS 25.201 V3.1.0, Physical Layer – General Description, Release 1999, Jun. 2000.4. 3G TS 25.211 V3.5.0, Physical Channels and Mapping of Transport Channels onto Physical Channels (FDD), Release 1999, Dec. 2000.5. 3G TS 25.212 V3.5.0, Multiplexing and Channel Coding (FDD), Release 1999, Dec. 2000.6. 3G TS 25.213 V3.4.0, Spreading and Modulation (FDD), Release 1999, Dec. 2000.7. 3G TS 25.214 V3.5.0, Physical Layer Procedures (FDD), Release 1999, Dec. 2000
, Pete Sergi, Katie Iozzia and others at MoogAerospace for their generous gift. And without their support, this project would not have beenpossible.References 1. K. Ogata, Modern Control Engineering. S.l. : Prentice Hall, 2001. 2. S. Bennett,.A History of Control Engineering (1800 to 1930). s.l. : Institution of Electrical Engineers, 1986. 3. J. Fiene and G. Niemeyer, “ Toward Switching Motor Control,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics ,Vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 27-34, Februuary 2006. 4. E. Lee and J. Park, “ Bang-Bang Impact Control Using Hybrid Impedance/Time-Delay Control,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, Vol. 8, no 2, pp. 272-277, June 2003 5. L. R. Young and J. L
. In the summer of 2002, she had an internship in the company Gamesa Aeronautica, section Moasa Montajes, Spain where she worked in product distributed environment at manufacturing of aircraft wings and nacelles. After graduating with a Master of Science (M. S.) degree, in area of Industrial Engineering, specialization in Production Systems in 2006, M.S. Jovanovic subsequently continued to work towards her Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) degree at Purdue University, department of Mechanical Engineering Technology. She is currently working as a Graduate Teaching and Research Assistant in Product Lifecycle Management Center of Excellence Laboratory at Purdue University. As a graduate student
organizationsdescribed herein.Bibliography1. McGrath, E., “Efforts to Promote Engineering in K-12 Schools in New Jersey: A Case Study of Recent Professional Development, Capacity –Building, Awareness-Building and Policy Initiatives, National Academy of Engineering, 2007.2. Hotaling, L., McGrath, E., McKay, M., Cunningham, C., Lachappelle, C., Lowes, S., “Engineering Our Future NJ,” in Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual Conference, Honolulu, HI, June 24-27, 2007. Available: http://www.asee.org/acPapers/AC%202007Full1349.pdf3. BUILD IT Project. Stevens Institute of Technology. (2007). [Online]. Available: www.stevens.edu/ciese/buildit4. PISA Project. Stevens Institute of Technology. (2007). [Online]. Available: www.stevens.edu
Sciences. (S)he is positioned to perceivethe engineering problem as one of delivering technological services to humans, through socialinstitutions, creatively. Creativity is necessary with the service itself, with its technologicalbasis, and with its social realization.Foundational OutcomesIn order to recognize the importance of Mathematics, Natural Sciences, Humanities and SocialSciences in the education of future civil engineers, in BOK2 outcomes were consolidated,rearranged and two new outcomes, one for Humanities and one for Social Sciences have beenincluded. There is considerable freedom for educators to determine how these outcomes may befulfilled through contributions from various academic departments and disciplines. This freedompermits
). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Appendix Table 2-333. 2. The Business Roundtable. 2006. “Innovation and U.S. Competitiveness: Addressing the Talent Gap. Public Opinion Research.” January 12. Available at: http://www.businessroundtable.org/pdf/20060112Two-pager.pdf4. Savage, E.N. A Conceptual Framework for Technology Education: A Historical Perspective. Journal of Technology Studies, v28 n2 pp98-100 Sum-Fall 20025. Sorby, S. & Oberto, L. “A Program Combining Engineering and Teacher Certification”. Proceedings of the 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boston, MA, November 6-9, 2002.6. Johnson, T. “A New Engineering Degree Program for Secondary School Teachers”. Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE
problem as described above, students were expected to implement theintegrated design method, in which quantitative evaluation of initial solutions should inform anddirect subsequent design development(s). Quantitative evaluation of the environmentalperformance of the design schemes was based on the results of rigorous (and simplified)engineering methods. Calculations of both the passive heating and passive cooling systems wererequired. Figure 2 shows the calculation procedure to design the passive solar heating systems.Figure 3 shows the calculation procedure to design the natural ventilation systems.4.3 Design Development LoopIn this phase, each group developed its own conceptual design in the light of a simultaneousevaluation of its
. 1999 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition: Engineering: Education to Serve the World, 1999.12. Rowe, C.J. and A. Mahadevan-Jansen, Module-based Freshman Engineering Course Development. 2004 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition: Engineering Education Reaches New Heights, 2004.13. Katehi, L.P.B., et al., Preeminence in First-Year Engineering Programs. 2004 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition: Engineering Education Reaches New Heights, 2004.14. Hirsch, P.L., S.J. Bird, and M. D’Avila, Enriching the Research Experience for Undergraduates (REUs) in Biomedical Engineering. 2003 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition: Staying in Tune with Engineering Education, 2003.15. Okudan, G.E., S. Mohammed, and M
to act on. 30 N o . o f S tu d e n ts The post responses looking at ranks 1 & 2 show 25 a 43% increase in disagreement with the 20 question. This indicates that the students underwent a change in perception and felt that 15 something could be done to act upon global 10 warming. 5
especially if a project is outside the advisor’s technical expertise. • Evaluate technical progress and professional behavior of team members. • Provide analysis and associated grading to the course coordinator. • While it is the responsibility of the advisor to provide technical advice and suggestions, it is not his/her responsibility to make decisions for the team, provide answers to problems that a team is expected to solve, or tell a team when they have done enough work.Mentor(s) • Provide biomedical clinical and/or technical advice to a senior design team. • Provide an opportunity for teams to gain experience in a clinical or laboratory setting. • Commit to the project for nine (9) months. • Commit to
layout. The established B-24 bomber facility was assembling anairplane a day, and there was felt a need to increase production to 25 bombers a day. Sorensen,using his 35 years of experience in designing and building manufacturing plants was able toenvision how the plant should be structured after an overnight thinking spree on the day he andEdsel Ford visited the old bomber manufacturing facility. The proposed macro-flow of the plantwas created by Sorensen on a piece of paper, and was accepted and signed by Edsel Ford.Eventually, the US Government funded the two-hundred million dollar manufacturing plant fromwhich 8,800 B-24’s rolled off the assembly line in six years with over 34 thousand employeesworking at its peak employment level of what
IEEE International Conference onAdvanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2005, 2005, p 961-962.3. McIntyre, Charles, “Enhancing Student Learning - Students "Teaching" Students”, ASEE Annual ConferenceProceedings, 1999 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Engineering Education to Serve the World, 1999, p2191-2198.4. Shih, Chiang; Chandra, Namas; Hollis, Patrick Source; “Learning-Through-Teaching, a Collaborative LearningStrategy” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, ASEE 2004 Annual Conference and Exposition, "Engineering Page 12.1601.10Education Research: New Heights", 2004, p 8965-8974.5. S. Crown, "Web-Based Learning: Enhancing the
International Development: An Imperative for the U.S. Agency for International Development. Report.2. Bugliarello, G. 1998. Technological literacy. Editorial in The Bridge, National Academy of Engineering, 28(2, Summer).3. Jones, R. C., and T. Kumar. 1991. Technological literacy for non-engineers. In Proceedings, Frontiers in Education Conference, “Engineering Education in a New World Order,” 179–84. 21–24 September.4. Krupczak, J. J., Jr., D. Ollis, R. Pimmel, R. Seals, G. Pearson, and N. Fortenberry. 2005. Panel—The technological literacy of undergraduates: Identifying the research issues. In Proceedings, Frontiers in Education Conference, T3B–1-2. 19–22 October.5. Krupczak, J. J., Jr., S. VanderStoep, L. Wessman, N
are striving to emphasize entrepreneurship even more in all these courses, and toprovide students help in acquiring the resources they need to pursue their ideas. We drawupon the availability of faculty from business and commerce, and encourage our studentsto take courses in those schools. In addition, we now offer a business minor at ourengineering school. We share a commitment to innovation and entrepreneurship withcolleagues at many other schools, and hope for even greater emphasis in the engineering Page 12.422.9curriculum to help meet the challenges of the 21st Century.References1. Ulrich, K. T. and Eppinger, S. D. Product Design and Development
/December Issue. Page 10.13. Wilcox, S. & Brown, B. (2005). Responding to Security Incidents – Sooner or Later Your System will be Compromised. Journal of Health Care Compliance. March/April Issue. Pages 41 – 48.14. Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York, NY: Harper.15. McGregor, D. (1960). Human side of enterprise. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.16. Ouchi, W. (1981). Theory Z: How American Business Can Meet the Japanese Challenge. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.17. Gunn, B. (1995). Second versus third wave management. Total Quality Management. Volume 6, Issue 4. Pages 317 – 333.18. Katz, R. (2005). Motivating technical professional today. Research Technology Management, 48(6), 19-27