Conference Session

Issues in Engineering Technology Education

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amy L Miller, University of Pittsburgh, Johnstown; Jerry W. Samples, University of Pittsburgh, Johnstown

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

problem with regard to scholarship was the fear of failure. Many of the faculty feltthat they had nothing to offer or that they were not capable of writing and presenting atconferences. This was resolved by asking for assistance reviewing a few ASEE papers. Theperson asked to help was a peer leader and if this person bought in, then the mentor model couldbe utilized. After reviewing the papers, the response was, "I could do this." And, that is exactlywhat happened. Papers were written, accepted and published: individually and in small groups.After confidence was gained, more efforts were made and others were included. When newfaculty were hired one or two of the tenured faculty were assigned to assist new faculty withtheir start and before long

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 5

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Haley Briel, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Deesha Chadha; Chris Dakes, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Erica Jean Hagen, University of Wisconsin, Madison; James Iain Campbell, Imperial College London; Umang Vinubhai Shah

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

ofAgriculture and Life Sciences (CALS).Returning TAs at UW-Madison attend a required training called ReTA, a much shorter programheld virtually for 1.5 hours to focus on lessons learned from prior experience. This focusempowers TAs to give each other advice rather than relying on facilitators as experts. NEO andReTA both have virtual courses through the University Learning Management System, Canvas,with quizzes, readings, and reflections that participants are expected to complete independentlybefore their synchronous sessions meet. They also maintain access to the resources after thetraining is completed for reference throughout the semester as needed.Both institutions have made peer feedback of presentations a priority, a useful skill for

Conference Session

Environmental Engineering Division (ENVIRON) Technical Session 3 - Innovative Pedagogy

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James N. Jensen, University at Buffalo

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering Division (ENVIRON)

advantage. Thishypothesis was tested in two ways. First, to test whether later-testing students did better thantheir peers, the correlation between exam scores and the order in which the students took theexam (hereafter, exam order) was determined. The exam order was recorded for 9 out of the 15years in this study. A typical profile is shown in Figure 6 for 2016. In all nine years, the 95%confidence interval (CI) for the slope of score versus exam order included zero.Second, a measure was calculated to see if students performed better on the oral exam thanexpected. This measure was Δ(rank) = rank in the course – rank on the oral exam. (The rank inthe course includes the oral exam.) The Δ(rank) values are plotted versus exam order in Figure 5for

Collection

2012 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference

Authors

Mauro J. Caputi; George DeMarco; Jacqueline Pierson; Brittney Schmidt; Evan Sick

of the Professor and Peer Teachers, but also the assistanceand cooperation from the other Teams within the Lab section as well. This expanded level of cooperation is an important factor for Teams working out theirgrowing teamwork and communication skills previously acquired through the DESIGN 15Lecture class content and Class Activities. A list of the GDC projects, adapted from The Fundamentals of Visualization, Modeling,and Graphics for Engineering Design by Dennis Lieu and Sheryl Sorry, follows with a briefdescription of each: GDC A – Escape Design and construct a mechanical system that will launch a hard-boiled egg into the air and have it land as far from the launch point as possible. The egg mustland totally intact (no

Collection

2011 Northeast Section Meeting

Authors

Sigrid Berka

inbuilt incentives like the faculty-led German Study Tour keep students enthusiastic aboutgiving it all, make them study harder than their engineering peers in the regular curriculum, andgenerate a feeling of belonging to a special group. It raises their slef-confidence and self-efficacy to stay on top of a demanding curriculum. During the study-tour, students can readilyapproach the two faculty leaders and explore the two contexts they are majoring in together,German history and culture and German engineering culture. According to Vogt [5] facultydistance or aloofness lowers self-efficacy, academic confidence and GPA, while academicintegration and faculty approachability has a positive effect on effort, confidence, and criticalthinking. It also

Collection

2012 ASEE Zone 1 Conference

Authors

Mauro J. Caputi; George DeMarco; Jacqueline Pierson; Brittney Schmidt; Evan Sick

of the Professor and Peer Teachers, but also the assistanceand cooperation from the other Teams within the Lab section as well. This expanded level of cooperation is an important factor for Teams working out theirgrowing teamwork and communication skills previously acquired through the DESIGN 15Lecture class content and Class Activities. A list of the GDC projects, adapted from The Fundamentals of Visualization, Modeling,and Graphics for Engineering Design by Dennis Lieu and Sheryl Sorry, follows with a briefdescription of each: GDC A – Escape Design and construct a mechanical system that will launch a hard-boiled egg into the air and have it land as far from the launch point as possible. The egg mustland totally intact (no

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM) Technical Session 16

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Catherine G. P. Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University; Julio Urbina, Pennsylvania State University; Reginald F. Hamilton, Pennsylvania State University; Catherine L. Cohan, Pennsylvania State University; Tonya L. Peeples, Pennsylvania State University; Cynthia Howard Reed, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

writing and communication; and methodological development.Dr. Julio Urbina, Pennsylvania State University JULIO V. URBINA, Ph.D. is a Professor in the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at The Pennsylvania State University. Dr. Julio Urbina received his BSEE degree from Universidad Nacional de Ingenieria, Lima, Peru, in 1990, and his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign in 1996 and 2002, respectively. He has worked at Jicamarca Radio Observatory, Arecibo Observatory, and University of Arkansas. Dr. Urbina’s research has used radio and radar technologies to study the Earth’s middle and upper atmosphere. He conducts research in RF and

Conference Session

Teaching Mechanics: Modes and Methods

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christopher Papadopoulos, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics Division (MECHS)

establish a weekly problem set of traditional textbookproblems, lead an opening discussion of how to approach them, and then allow students time towork on them in class, with opportunity to consult directly with me, a peer tutor, or with a fellowstudent. I aimed that students would ‘crack the egg’ of the fundamental ideas during theseworking periods, and then complete them for homework. Nevertheless, I still had the mentality“to cover the material” and “to show students how”. Thus, lectures would tend to migrate backto me serving as the central figure leading a class discussion on how to outline problemsolutions. True, I was not reciting lecture notes, and using a Socratic style, I would not show anyexplicit steps unless a student provided it. I

Conference Session

Innovation in Construction Engineering Education II

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gouranga Banik, Southern Polytechnic State University

Tagged Divisions

Construction

Management Department at Southern PolytechnicState University in Marietta, Georgia. Dr. Banik completed his Ph.D. in Civil and Construction Engineering fromIowa State University. He has eleven years working experience in both private and public sector as an engineerand/or construction manager. He is a registered professional engineer. Dr. Banik has twenty nine refereedpublications in the area of civil engineering and construction management. He presented some of his research inseveral well-known and peer reviewed conferences like ASEE, ASCE, ASC, WEFTEC and CIB, and publishedarticles in those conference proceedings. He presented his research all over the world including the United States,Canada, Greece, Italy, Brazil and the Philippines.APPENDIX

Conference Session

Critical Thinking and Creative Arts

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bill Genereux, Kansas State University, Salina; Elena Mangione-Lora, University of Notre Dame

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education

AC 2009-2124: ENHANCING STUDENT LEARNING WITH VIDEO PROJECTSBill Genereux, Kansas State University, SalinaElena Mangione-Lora, University of Notre Dame Page 14.572.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Enhancing Student Learning with Video ProjectsAbstractThis paper will explore the use of digital video as a teaching tool in college courses. Two verydifferent courses of potential interest to engineering educators are cited as examples. The first isa foreign language course offered at the University of Notre Dame which uses video technologyto encourage students to write, produce, and star in original Spanish language "telenovelas" orday-time dramas

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Endeavors: Engineering and Liberal Arts

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katie Evans, Louisiana Tech University; Kirk St.Amant, Louisiana Tech University

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Multidisciplinary Engineering

, and STEM education. She has published 20 peer-reviewed publications in these areas, and her research has been funded by the NSF, AFRL, and LA-BOR. She also serves as an Associate Editor for the American Control Conference and the Conference on Decision and Control, two premier conferences in the controls community. She is a member of the IEEE, SIAM, and ASEE.Prof. Kirk St.Amant, Louisiana Tech University Kirk St.Amant is a Professor and Eunice C. Williamson Endowed Chair in Technical Communication at Louisiana Tech University (USA) where he is also a Research Faculty member with Tech’s Center for Biomedical Engineering and Rehabilitation Science (CBERS). He researches how cognition affects usability and the

Conference Session

Environmental Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pablo K. Cornejo, California State University, Chico; Kevin Orner, University of South Florida

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering

, include student peer review of writing, and emphasize technical writing skills.Instructor Insights and Future RecommendationsFuture studies are needed to understand the importance of culturally-relevant pedagogy for localand international experiences in environmental engineering education. This could be done byexploring differences in student performance between groups that conduct in-country visits andgroups that do not. Alternatively, comparisons could be made to assess student performancewhile addressing local versus international environmental issues to better understand theimportance of global engagement. Local issues could focus on environmental problemsimpacting marginalized communities (e.g., water contamination issues in rural

Conference Session

Insights for Teaching ECE Courses

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jie Sheng, University of Washington, Tacoma

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

I2C question in TCES430 exam Fig. 2. A programming I2C question in exam checking Individual effortsOne feature of our teaching of µPs/µCs is that students are required to write to low level registers directlyinstead of calling existing library functions. Still using I2C lab as an example, students needed to generatethe right sequences of calling functions in transmitting/receiving data as shown below in Fig. 3, with allthe functions writing to low levels by referring to datasheets [12], as shown in Fig. 4. Fig. 3. Implementing I2C communication by calling functions in main() Fig. 4. Example code segments of developing I2C functions by writing to registers directlyWe note here that when the microcontroller

Conference Session

Manufacturing Curriculum and Course Innovations

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vishal R Mehta, Ohio Northern University; David R Mikesell P.E., Ohio Northern University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

, environmental, and societal impact of manufacturing.For this activity, students formed themselves into teams of 2-3 students. Part of the lecture timewas devoted in the beginning to explain students about the module, rubrics, assessments anddeliverables. A feedback on student progress was given in week 3 during in class lecture time.Module activities were performed out of class majority of the time. The project stages were asfollows: (i) Week 1-2- Types of Souvenirs-Manufacturing process decided and e-mailed.(ii) Week 3-4- the economic and environmental, impact of manufacturing –paper submission.(iii) Week 5- Report and Presentation. Guidelines about how to write a bid were also given [9].These are given in Appendix 1.To jump start student discussion

Conference Session

Assessment and Evaluation in Engineering Education I

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mysore Narayanan, Miami University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

of IEEE and is a member of ASME, SIAM, ASEE and AGU. He is actively involved in CELT activities and regularly participates and presents at the Lilly Conference. He has been the recipient of several Faculty Learning Community awards. He is also very active in assessment activities and has presented more than a dozen papers at various Assessment Institutes. His posters in the areas of Bloom’s Taxonomy and Socratic Inquisition have received widespread acclaim from several scholars in the area of Cognitive Science and Educational Methodologies. He has received the Assessment of Critical Thinking Award twice and is currently working towards incorporating writing assessments that enhance

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade: Outside Class

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Jason Keith

conference papers (both in your technical field andwithin ASEE). Expect mixed results. I personally have heard that they do not count, thatthey count for half a publication, and that they count as a full publication. Guessing thatthey do count for something, the author has tried to present a couple of technical andASEE conference papers per year. If anything, it gives you visibility among peers thatmay be called upon to write letters about your scholarly work.When you go up for your mid-term review, letters are usually written about you fromyour departmental tenure committee, department chair, college tenure committee, anddean. Find out how to get copies of those letters. They usually offer some advice that willhelp you revise your plan to get

Conference Session

Industry-Based Projects

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Paul Duesing; David Baumann; David McDonald

developed with the assistance of industrialrepresentatives and faculty that are teaching and administrating the senior design courses.IntroductionDuring the late 1980s and early 1990s significant attention was being given to products producedand manufacturing processes used in the United States. Seminars, class sessions, andpresentations were being given on methods to improve US products and processes. Industry waslearning and adapting Dr. W. Edwards Deming’s1 statistical methods and principles. Notedspeakers such as Tom Peters were writing books and providing lectures on “In Search ofExcellence,” 2,3 “A Passion for Excellence,”3 and “A Passion for Customers.”3 Similarlyengineering educational institutions were working to improve their curriculum

Conference Session

Rethinking Culture and Engineering

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Diana Dabby

trio of reading, writing, and arithmetic (or Italian high finance: how many silverpointpencils can you buy for 120 soldi? and why should you care!).I. IntroductionStarting with four seminal figures—Giorgio Vasari,1 Goethe, Freud, and Kenneth Clark 2—and afactual chronology of Leonardo’s life, the seminar examined LdV from five perspectives rangingfrom generally agreed-upon facts to a provocative “inside his head” approach. Subsequentcomparisons with passages in da Vinci’s Notebooks, the Florentine State Archives,contemporaneous letters, and eyewitness accounts helped shed light not only on the five slantsprovided above, but also on his creative process.A figure such as Leonardo can inspire students to view engineering as an expansive

Collection

1999 Annual Conference

Authors

Patricia M. Yaeger; Rose M. Marra; Francesco Costanzo; Gary L. Gray

the learning process.1.2 Interactive, Student-Centered Learning “Student-centered instruction is a broad teaching approach that in- cludes substituting active learning for lectures, holding students re- Page 4.91.2 sponsible for their learning, and using self-paced and/or coopera- tive (team-based) learning” (Felder and Brent, p. 43). [12]Meyers and Jones [13] describe active learning as a way to provide “opportunities for students totalk and listen, read, write, and reflect as they approach course content—all of which requirestudents to apply what they are learning” (p. 1

Conference Session

Mechanical and Architectural Engineering Laboratories

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nancy K Lape, Harvey Mudd College; David L Harris, Harvey Mudd College; Matthew Joseph Keeter, Harvey Mudd College; Madeleine S Ong, Harvey Mudd College; Zachary Dodds, Harvey Mudd College

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

to mechanical, chemical, electrical, andcomputer engineering, computer science, design, controls, and energy. Course goals includeexposing students to many facets of engineering and computer science to aid in major choice,developing practical technical skills relevant to subsequent projects, generating enthusiasm forfuture studies, and developing teamwork, design, presentation, and technical writing skills.Through a series of labs including drawing and 3D printing a robot chassis, soldering amicrocontroller circuit board, assembling a gear box, building sensor circuits, machining andcharacterizing hydrogen proton exchange membranes (PEM) fuel cells, C programming, andgenerating and detecting Gold codes, the students design, build, test, and

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division: Design Mental Frameworks

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Armando A. Rodriguez, Arizona State University; Nirangkush Das, Arizona State University; Brent Wallace, Arizona State University; Phil Blake McBride, Eastern Arizona College; Clark Vangilder, Central Arizona College; Tim S. Frank, Glendale Community College; John W. Griffith, Mesa Community College; Russell Cox, Mohave Community College; Eddie W. Ong, Phoenix College; Ernest Moulinet Villicana, Phoenix College Engineering; Celia . Jenkins, Cochise College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

. Despite this, the nation still struggles to produce the ENG talent it needs. Given this, programs to increase the number of ENGs that graduate have been promoted across the nation [1]-[3]. Such programs focus on recruitment [4], retention principles [5], persistence [6], as well as practices that help students with critical thinking [7]-[8], academics [9]-[10] and professional development [11]-[12]. The latter includes mentoring by faculty [13]-[14], peer mentoring [15], project-based learning [16]- [26], research experiences for undergraduates (REUs) [27]-[28], internships [29], preparing for graduate school [30], career planning [31], etc. We at Arizona State University’s (ASU’s) Fulton Schools of Engineering, have

Conference Session

K-12 Professional Development II

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

So Yoon Yoon, INSPIRE, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Yi Kong, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Johannes Strobel, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

solving”, “engage students in inquiry based learning”, “make connectionsbetween science and engineering”, “work on solving real-world problems”, “do design exerciseswith constraints”, and “write reflections in a notebook or journal” (p. 7). The results showed thatteachers felt that all the strategies they learned from the TPD were important, especially for the Page 23.838.3“write reflections in a notebook or journal” and “do design exercise with constrains” strategies.Teachers also felt that they were well prepared for the implement of all these strategies in theirclassrooms, especially for “make connections between science and engineering” and

Conference Session

Engineering Student Experiences

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Deborah Tihanyi, University of Toronto; Penny Kinnear, University of Toronto

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

client’s desire for a more succinct document.Students in CHE230 were also required to write two reflections on their process in executing theconsulting project. Here, we were able to identify some sites of peer IR (although these wereaccounts, rather than observations of the actual sites). The first reflection—written by Téa andher team—provides little in the way of specific descriptions of interactive response, although itdoes include reference to affirmation in the delivery of peer feedback: “team members have beenquite patient and encouraging of all possible ideas that may help enhance the overall quality ofall deliverables” and “we also hope to continue fostering a positive and encouragingenvironment.” The second reflection, however (written

Conference Session

Approaches to Teaching Ethics

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Heywood, Trinity College, Dublin

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

affective domain as it does to the cognitive.Recent research shows the importance of the peer group, together with interaction with faculty tobe the most important factors in student achievement and development. Faculty have a majorrole to play in helping engineering students overcome negative attitudes toward liberalism, asdoes mixing with students who have other interests. Enlargement of mind is helped by anacquaintance with the perennial problems of philosophy since the answers a person gives to theminfluence her/his thinking and behaviour. In the discussion that ends the paper, attention is drawnto recent research on the experience of students of their undergraduate education that supportssome of the contentions made in this paper.Recent

Conference Session

Knowing Ourselves: Research on Engineering Education Researchers

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Junaid A. Siddiqui, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Robin S. Adams, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Lorraine N. Fleming, Howard University; Alison A. Dingwall, Howard University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

the most usefulaspects of the workshop. The most cited aspect that participants found useful was interactionwith peers. As one participant responded: Working collaboratively with others to develop ajoint project - the interactive process helped to more quickly hone in on a research question.Participants also identified one-on-one interactions with workshop facilitators as very useful.One participant writes it succinctly: 1) Most important: Discussion with facilitators about mytopic 2) Second most important: Discussion with participants about my topic. Participants alsoappreciated the presentation on theoretical frameworks and the opportunity that the workshopprovided for developing their research questions. Common responses to the question

Collection

2011 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

Sohum Sohoni; David Fritz; Wira Mulia

certainly not allow. You will not share your program code in any way with someone who isnot your lab partner, or someone who is not on your team (if we form teams). You will not pass textmessages, or communicate in any way with your peers during quizzes or exams. You will not copy thesolution for a take-home assignment. It is your responsibility to prevent your work from being copied.Both the student doing the copying and the student allowing the copying will be punished to ensurefairness to those who don’t. I have written up students for violations of the academic integrity policyin the past. It is without a doubt, the most stressful and unpleasant part of my job as a faculty member.Please do not make me write you up. If you do, you will see my

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jelena Trajkovic, California State University, Long Beach ; Lisa M Martin-Hansen, California State University, Long Beach; Anna Bargagliotti, Loyola Marymount University; Christine Alvarado, University of California, San Diego; Cassandra M Guarino, University of California, Riverside; Janel Ancayan, California State University, Long Beach; Joseph Alex Chorbajian, California State University, Long Beach; Kent Vi, California State University, Long Beach

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

experiences at multiple stages of the major withdifferent support and preparation for a CS major (SES and first-generation status), or the studentswho are at risk of dropping out or who have already dropped out as they may reveal reasons andcircumstances for attrition.Literature ReviewOur team investigated the lived experiences of students on their trajectory to and throughComputer Science. According to Tinto’s “Model of Institutional Departure” [10], the best way tohave student persistence and retention in Computer Science is to integrate positive formal andinformal academic systems (such as academic performance and staff interactions) as well asformal and informal social systems (such as extracurricular activities and peer-group interaction).We

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

Judson Singer

(singer.kettering.edu/student_intros.htm ) and peer letters which recount theirexperiences (singer.kettering.edu/peerlet.htm). Through peer letters students have theopportunity at the end of the course to pass on useful information to their peers who will take thiscourse in the future. These future learners who read the peer letters will receive currentinformation about the course from those who have been through "the battle." Toward the end ofthis session students write a one and one half to two page type-written, double-spaced letter inwhich they will explain the topics that are covered in this course from their point of view. Further,they explain the course requirements, the importance and drawbacks of group projects/tests, thevalue of attending class, the

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ahmed Sayed, Milwaukee School of Engineering

2017 he worked at different health care facilities as a Medical Technology Consultant and as a Biomedical engineering lecturer at various Universities. Ahmed Sayed received his B.Sc. and M.Sc. degrees in systems and biomedical engineering from Cairo University, Egypt in 2003 and 2008, respectively. He is the author/co- author of 40 publications in international peer-reviewed journals and conferences. He is listed as a co-inventor on 9 granted US patents in the field of Bioinstrumentation. He serves as an expert reviewer for several top-tier journals including IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering and IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency. He is a member of ASEE, ARVO, and a senior IEEE member

Conference Session

Session 9 - Track 1: Weaving Students into Engineering, not Weeding Them Out

Collection

2023 Collaborative Network for Computing and Engineering Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Jenna P. Carpenter, Campbell University

Tagged Topics

CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity

Engineering Societies Education Pathways Roundtable Task Force on ways to partner• Engineering Research Visioning Alliance-sponsored Listening Session in October to hear the voices of engineering students• NSF-funded NAE-ASEE Conference in October to develop a framework of initiatives to support student success in recruiting/admissions, onboarding, skills development• Pursuit of additional funding to roll out the framework and engage engineering programs and organizations to implement nationally4 Brainstorming Sessions• Approximately 50 engineering education experts from around the country, nominated by their peers• Diverse range of institutions, roles, and areas of expertise represented• Participants provided feedback on the overview