Remote Wireless Control of a Bottling Process DAVID HERGERT, Ph.D. Professor, Engineering Technology Miami University-Hamilton 1601 University Blvd. Hamilton Ohio 45011 hergerd@muohio.edu 341 Remote Wireless Control of a Bottling ProcessAbstract:Over the last ten years, remote wireless monitoring and control has become an integral part ofindustrial automation systems. Remote monitoring is used in such diverse areas as automobileassembly, oil and process control, analyzing temperature in heat exchangers, deployment ofresources on a smart grid, and environmental measurements.This paper describes a remote wireless monitoring and control system used
roll should also be accounted for. Unlike the other scenarios, crush factorsmust be used to model the collision of the vehicle and cement pole. The crush factors for thisscenario were provided in a previous homework assignment. Proceedings of the 2011 PSW American Society for Engineering Education Zone IV Conference Copyright © 2011, American Society for Engineering Education 85 In Case B, a sedan and a cement truck collide at a controlled intersection. The collision occurs asthe cement truck is making a right turn
of the mechanical engineering technology department for hissupport and assistance with the independent study project.Special thanks to Innovation First Inc. for their willingness to help with the independent study.Bibliography 1. Jerry B. Weinberg, George L. Engel, Keqin Gu, Cem S. Karacal, Scott R. Smith, William W. White, and Xudong W. Yu (2001) A Multidisciplinary Model for Using Robotics in Engineering Education. American Society for Engineering Education. 2. David J. Mehrl, Micheal E. Parten, Darrell L. Vines, (1997) Robots Enhance Engineering Education, American Society for Engineering Education. 3. Standards-Based Robotics Competition Curriculum Development Framework, The proceedings of the
2015 ASEE Zone III Conference (Gulf Southwest – Midwest – North Midwest Sections) Developing a Sustainable ABET Continuous Improvement Plan Byron Garry South Dakota State UniversityAbstractA sustainable continuous improvement process was required for use in the ABET-ASAC andABET-ETAC accreditation process for our Operations Management, Construction Management,and Electronics Engineering Technology programs. Considering the state of assessmentrequirements in higher education, ABET accreditation standards, and the tools of quality andcontinuous improvement, our Department of Construction &
interesting conversations they had once they connected with a prospective student byphone.Bibliography1. McDonough, P. M. (2004). The School-to-College Transition: Challenges and Prospects. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.2. Young, L. D. (1991). Telemarkering as a vital part of enrollment management. Journal of College Admissions, 28-33.3. Wright, B. A. (1995). Admissions Recruitment: The First Step IN R. R. Dixon (ed.) Making Enrollment Management Work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.4. Hossler, D. (1999). Effective Admissions Recruitment (p. 15-3). IN G. H. Gaither (Ed.) Promising Practices in Recruitment, Remediation, and Retention. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.5. Sedwick, S
6 5 3 4 3 5 0 A B C D F Grades Figure 2: Grade distributionAs data from the recitation course is gathered, it will be compared to the baseline. Students withsimilar midterm 1 exam scores will be compared to measure the correlation between passingrates of those with and without the recitation course.Student SurveyA survey was
, People Styles at Work and Beyond (Second Edition), New York, NY: American Management Association, 2009.[22] M. Franklin, T. Botelho, and B. Graham, “Clarification through storytelling and storylistening using Onelifetools/Career Cycles Narrative Assessment System,” Career Development Network Journal, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 57-70, 2017.[23] B. Burnett and D. Evans, Designing Your Life: How to Build a Well-lived, Joyful Life, New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf, 2016.[24] “Search Inside Yourself .” Search Inside Yourself Leadership Institute. https://siyli.org/programs/search-inside-yourself [Accessed: Jan 6, 2021].
,Journal of College Science Teaching 35 no3 N/D 2005 34-38[5] Fend, H., and Scheel, K. (2006). Engaging Students, Journal of College Science Teaching, 35 no1 S 2005, 20-24 [6] Gordon, P. R., Rogers, A. M., Comfort, M., Gavula, N., and Mcgee B. P., (2001). A taste of problem-based Page 12.1404.12learning increases achievement of urban minority middle-school students. Educational Horizons, 79, 171-175.[7] Kolb, D. (1985). The Learning Style Inventory (2nd ed.), Boston, MA; McBer.[8] Krynock, K. B., and Robb, L., (1996). Is problem-based learning a problem for your curriculum? Illinois SchoolResearch and Development Journal, 33, 21-24[9
course sequence. Assessment showsthat students’ perceptions of their learning associated with key outcomes of the course areencouraging with respect to the goals of the course and its contribution to those of the designcourse sequence. Based on assessment, changes have been made for future operation of thecourse to try to improve teaching of LabVIEW, increase students’ recognition of the relevanceand importance of the content of the course and to further develop the effectiveness ofintroducing systems thinking early in the curriculum with its associated challenges for studentswith little contextual knowledge and experience.References1. Sheppard, K and Gallois, B., “The Design Spine: Revision of the Engineering Curriculum to Include a Design
, Honolulu, USA, June 2007.12. Clark, B. Creating entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation, 1998 (Oxford: Pergamon-Elsevier Science).13. Bharadwaj, S. and Menon, A. Makin innovation happen in organizations: individual creativity mechanisms, organizational creativity mechanisms or both? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2000, 17(6), 424- 434.14. High, A., Mann, C. and Lawrence, B. Problem solving and creativity experiences for freshman engineers. In: Proceedings of the 2005 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2005.15. Weaver, J. and Muci-Küchler, K. In-class creativity exercises for engineering students. In: Proceedings of the
the instructor has the right to overrule thestudents’ score in case of a disagreement (which has never occurred). This method helps keep Page 14.1132.10the instructor in tune with the expectations of the class, but also helps capture those situations inwhich the material was not properly tuned for the audience.Since 2005, 63% of students have received an A on the project, 31% a B and 6% a C. Nostudent achieved less than a ‘C’ on this assignment, which comprises 20-25% of the final gradein the course. The mean score was a 91% with a standard deviation of 5.3%. These numbers,which remain more or less consistent across all of the class years
ratingassociated with the grade reflects the variability of the productivity factor associated with thesupplier. For example, if an equipment is hired from Blue Diamond Supplier of grade ‘A’, thenthe resource would be able to complete one job unit of work in 20 minutes with a variation(plus/minus) of 4 minutes, amounting to 80% reliability. Table 3. Reliability rating and variability associated with grades for Blue Diamond Suppliers Grade Reliability Rating Variability A 80% 4 B 70% 6 C 60% 8
courses as pre-departure courses for Study Abroad.University of Michigan’s Program in Global Engineering’s two credit hour cross-cultural courseinterfacing culture and technology covered five main topics: A) Globalization of Technology: Academic/Industrial/Government Perspectives B) Culture, Academic, Business Practice of a Region (e.g. Mexico, China) C) US Cultural Values D) Crossing Cultures and Cultural Refractions E) Global Engineering and Art of learning from another culture Page 14.857.8The global engineering environment, cross-cultural issues when working internationally,differences in work environment, phenomenon of change or
presented at 2002 Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada. https://peer.asee.org/1072115. Linn, J. B., Mehta, M. B., and Sanders, J. H. (2011, June), Creating a New Four-Year Degree in Process & System Engineering Technology, 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC. https://peer.asee.org/1767316. Mohammed, J., Narang, R., and Albayyari, J. (2010, June), Developing A New Manufacturing Engineering Technology Curriculum Paper presented at 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky. https://peer.asee.org/1622517. Mullett, G. (2009, June), The New Electronics Technology, Circa 2015 Paper presented at 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, Texas. https
new technical skills outside of their engineering curriculum. And lastly, by providing aninterdisciplinary environment that contributes towards positively towards their soft andentrepreneurship skills.Reference1 Seaward, G. (2001, June), Converting Single Disciplinary Capstone Projects ToInterdisciplinary Experiences Paper presented at 2001 Annual Conference, Albuquerque, NewMexico.2 J. Wilbarger and S. Howe, "Current Practices in Engineering Capstone Education: FurtherResults from a 2005 Nationwide Survey," Proceedings. Frontiers in Education. 36th AnnualConference, San Diego, CA, 2006, pp. 5-10.3 Jones, B. D., Epler, C. M., Mokri, P., Bryant, L. H., & Paretti, M. C. (2013). The Effects of aCollaborative Problem-based Learning
the big rocks (i.e., conceptual must-haves) (b) Develop program goals (c) Develop program-level learning outcomes (d) Develop two to four proficiency levels for each learning outcome (e) Distribute the proficiency levels across the program's curricular and co-curricular elements, creating a curricular map / spreadsheet (f) Design the courses and co-curricular elements to ensure that the assigned proficiency levels are appropriately taught and assessed (g) Collect periodic quantitative program assessment data on aggregated student achievement of the proficiencies and qualitative feedback from instructors and students (h) Regularly analyze the collected data and revise program (courses, co
J. McGourty, "Engineering Faculty Development: A Multicoalition Perspective," in Annual Meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education, St. Louis, MO, 2000.[6] C. Bonwell and J. Eison, "Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom," ASHEERIC Higher Education Report No.1, Washington, DC, 1991.[7] B. Smith and J. MacGregor, "What is Collaborative Learning?," in Collaborative Learning: A Sourcebook for Higher Education, University Park, PA: National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment, 1992, pp. 9-22.[8] B. Millis and J. P. Cottell, "Cooperative Learning for Higher Education Faculty," ORYX Press, 1998.[9] A. Kwan, "Problem Based Learning," in The Routledge International Handbook of
, our design could maintainthe structural integrity that we desired so that a person can safely ride our bike and brake usingRE-Brake.Although we accomplished most of our goals as we progressed further into our project, uponfurther examination we realized that RE-Brake could be greatly improved. Although our RE-Brakesystem worked for us, it lacked portability and was not interchangeable between bikes. Wedesigned RE-Brake specifically for our bike and all the measurements that we took matched ourdesign and layout, however, our next goal would be to make RE-Brake more modular and to haveit easily fit on various bikes and models.Once the RE-Brake system was attached to the bike [Figure 2a-b], three different tests were run.The first test was
Undergraduate Students in Engineering through Freshman Courses, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Montreal, Quebec.2. Johnson, J., & Niemi, A. D. (2015). A First-year Attrition Survey: Why Do They Say They Are Still Leaving? ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, Washington.3. Meyer, M. & Marx, S., (2014). “Engineering dropouts: A qualitative examination of why undergraduates leave engineering”, Journal of engineering education, Vol. 103, Issue 4, Pages 525-548, October 20144. Skurla, C., Thomas, B., & Bradley, W., (2004). Teaching Freshman Using Design Projects and Laboratory Exercises to Increase Retention, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT.5. Hall, D., et al., (2008). “Living with the Lab
9/8/2014 Section Last Name Chambers 1 A √ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Gonzalez 1 A √ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Martinez 1 B √ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Abdulla 1 B √ 1 2 3
). Available from URL http://carbon.ucdenver.edu/~bwilson/training.html, accessed 18 December 2014.7. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., Holum, A., "Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible." American Educator 15 (3), 6-11 (1991). pp. 6-11.8. This description is paraphrased from the website of the American Modeling Teachers Association, URL http://modelinginstruction.org, accessed 18 December 2014.9. Redish, E. F., Saul, J. M., Steinberg, R. N., “Student Expectations in Introductory Physics,” Am. J. Phys. 66, 212-224 (1998).10. Kashdan, T. B., Rose, P., Fincham, F. D., “Curiosity and Exploration: Facilitating Positive Subjective Experiences and Personal Growth Opportunities,” Journal of Personality
, 2011. 111-128. 8. Hamon, C., and M. Dunlap Green. "B., Camburn, B, Crawford, R., Jensen, D., 2014 “Virtual or Physical Prototypes? Development and Testing of a Prototyping Planning Tool”." 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN June 15-18, (2014). Page 26.1318.11
learning). TABLE 1. ABET student outcomesABET student outcomes(a) An ability to apply knowledge of computing and mathematics appropriate to the program’sstudent outcomes and to the discipline(b) An ability to analyze a problem, and identify and define the computing requirementsappropriate to its solution(c) An ability to design, implement, and evaluate a computer-based system, process, component,or program to meet desired needs(d) An ability to function effectively on teams to accomplish a common goal(e) An understanding of professional, ethical, legal, security and social issues and responsibilities(f) An ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences(g) An ability to analyze the local and global
rather than asking their own questions. a. Do what they are told vs. plan and execute on their own. b. See the role of small tasks in the bigger picture.These challenges were not un-expected and were used as teaching moments to discussprofessional skills. To improve communication, students were allowed to determine the meansof communication that they felt most comfortable using and they settled on a free program calledSlack. The instructors focused on teaching students to write messages with specific objectivesand questions, providing a timeline for a response, directing the question to a person rather than agroup, and following up in a kind but timely manner.To improve individual ownership for tasks, team sizes were reduce to 2
. and Bavelier, D. (2003). Action video game modifies visual selectiveattention. Nature. 423, 534-537. Keighley, G.(n.d.). The perpetual observer. Gamespot. Retrieved December 08, 2003from http://www.gamespot.com/gamespot/features/pc/simsonline/Mayer, R.E. and Sims, V. K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words?Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of EducationalPsychology, 86(3), 389-401.Merzenich, M. M., Wright, B. A., Jenkins, W., Xerri, C., Byl, N., Miller, S., and Tallal,P. (2002). Cortical plasticity underlying perceptual, motor, and cognitive skilldevelopment: Implications for neurorehabilitation. In Johnson, M. H. and Munakata, Y.(Eds.), Brain development and cognition: A reader. Malden, MA
Conference on Structural Dynamics, Kissimmee, Florida, Feb. 2001.15. Granier, J.J., R.J. Hundhausen, G.E. Gaytan, “Passive Modal Damping with Piezoelectric Shunts,” Proceedings of the 20th IMAC Conference on Structural Dynamics, Los Angeles, CA, Feb. 2002.16. Kess, H.R., N.J. Rosnow, B.C. Sidle, “Effects of Bearing Surfaces on Lap Joint Energy Dissipation,” Proceedings of the 20th IMAC Conference on Structural Dynamics, Los Angeles, CA, Feb. 2002.Biomechanics17. Crowell, B.L., B. A. Stalcup, D. W. Stinemates, “Design of Personal Air Bag Spinal Protection Device,” Proceedings of the 19th IMAC Conference on Structural Dynamics, Kissimmee, Florida, Feb. 2001.18. Giardini, S., D. Laney, A.C. Rutherford, C.R. Farrar, “Monitoring Femoral
, December, 2004, pp. 549-558.15 Russell, Jeffrey S., Stouffer, W. B.,Survey of the National Civil Engineering Curriculum, Journal of ProfessionalIssues in Engineering Education & Practice, April, 2005, pp. 118-128.16 Koehn, Enno, Parthasarathy, Mandaleeka S.. Practitioner and Employer Assessment of ABET Outcome Criteria,Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education & Practice; October, 2005, pp. 231-237.17 Ibid.18 Karl. D. Stephan, “All This and Engineering Too: A History of Accreditation Requirements,” IEEE Technologyand Society Magazine, vol. 21, issue 3, pp. 8-16, Fall 2002.19 Kersten, Robert D., Engineering Education: Paragon or Paradox? Journal of Professional Issues in EngineeringEducation & Practice; October
design project determined by the faculty or students. The faculty expects a high levelof student performances as project managers, engineering designers, and technical professionals.3.2. Desired learning outcomesDesired learning outcome are defined based on ABET student outcomes. There are a number ofABET outcomes associated with the design course sequence as follows:The IRE students are required to apply engineering principals to achieve the best solutions thatmeet desire needs of their project (Outcome A). The students must design and conductexperiments to gain required knowledge of their project or to prove that their solution meet theneeds of project. (Outcome B). These experiments usually involve using modern engineeringtools and techniques
] −V (2)where V̂1, V ̂2 and V ̂3 are the unit vectors for the preceding z-axis, the current x-axis, and the nextz-axis respectively. Next, the scalar c is found in (3). Page 23.97.8 a [b] = [V]−1 [P3 − P1 ] (3) cThe point that describes the x axis is then computed in (4) ̂3 P2 = P3 + cV (4)where P3is the
Engineering in a Changing World, Arlington, VA, 1996, NSF-96.2. National Science Board, Science and Engineering Indicators – 1996, Washington, D.C., 1996, NSB-96.3. Bishop J., “Developing Students’ Spatial Ability”, The Science Teacher, vol. 45, 1978, pp. 20-3.4. Sorby, S. and B. Baartmans, “The Development and Assessment of a Course for Enhancing the 3-D Spatial Visualization Skills of First Year Engineering Students”, Journal of Engineering Education, July, 2000, pp. 301-7.5. Hsi, S., M. Linn, and J. Bell “The Role of Spatial Reasoning in Engineering and the Design of Spatial Instruction”, Journal of Engineering Education, April, 1997, pp. 151-8.6. Pleck, M., “Visual Literacy – An Important Aspect of Engineering Design”, Proceedings