assigned into three groups that viewed two example problems either by: (a) video lecture presentation; (b)static HTML webpage delivery; or (3) interactive animated modules featuring high quality, three dimensionalgraphics created with Macromedia Flash software. This paper reports the details of this experiment and the results.I. IntroductionConsiderable time, money, and effort have gone into the development of learning technologiesfor engineering education in recent years due to the wide availability of capable computers, theworld wide web, and powerful authoring environments. Unfortunately, a substantial number ofthese technology-based learning innovations have been developed with little thought given todesign issues or to their systematic
and assessment are major criteria included in the Accreditation Board of Engineeringand Technology (ABET) 2000 criteria. This is further substantiated by the many recenteducation related conferences which include assessment as a key subject area. Recently the IEEETransactions on Education devoted a complete special issue on assessment (McGourty andKerns 6 ). The issue contains papers on development, implementation, and institutionalization ofeducational assessment in engineering education. A number of assessment instruments thatassess multiple dimensions of learning are also available (for example, see FLAG7 ) to faculty inscience, mathematics, and engineering. In addition, over the past several years, considerableeffort has been devoted to
variable rate technologyfor precision farming. This transfer of technology has enabled us to develop even strongerlinkages with industry.The overall objective is to provide opportunities for students with varying engineeringbackgrounds to gain knowledge and experience in the design and implementation of real-timeembedded systems, and to advance the state-of-the-art in design methodologies and real-time Page 7.188.2 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationapplications. This paper presents the novel
body to present advanced engineering technologies, innovativedemonstrations, and hands-on activities at a level that the individual student canunderstand and appreciate.A trend was noticed from the latest “Digest of Education Statistics”, a National Centerfor Education Statistics publication. It showed that between the 2003/04 to 2007/08academic cycles the total number of bachelor’s degrees granted had risen by nearly 12%,while the number of Engineering and Computer Science bachelor’s degrees dropped bynearly the same percentage. OU- ECE also showed significant reductions in studentsduring this timeframe. From the fall of 2004 to the fall of 2008 the ECE undergraduateenrollment numbers at our university dropped an average of 9% per year. After
Paper ID #37827Thinking Beyond the Service Course Model: IntentionalIntegration of Technical Communication Courses in a BMEUndergraduate CurriculumJulie Stella Julie Stella is a Visiting Lecturer in the Technology Leadership and Communication de- partment of the IUPUI School of Engineering and Technology. She teaches writing and communication to undergraduate engineering students at IUPUI. She has also taught courses at the graduate level in education technology, usable interface design, and ed- ucation public policy. Her background is fairly diverse, though it centers on writing and teaching. Ms. Stella spent 11
Technology Center at the University of California, Berkeley. She managed undergraduate research programs to recruit and retain underrepresented students in science and engineering and also outreach to pre-college students to introduce them to science and engineering career opportunities. Ms. Marlor joined University of California, Berkeley in 2013. She has a B.S. in Materials Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.Dr. Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan Dr. Cynthia Finelli is Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Professor of Education, and Director and Graduate Chair for Engineering Education Research Programs at University of Michigan (U-M). Dr. Finelli is a fellow in the American
and supervised its team that took part in the 16th Annual NASA Great Moonbuggy Races in April 2009.Zbigniew Prusak, Central Connecticut State University Dr. Prusak is a Professor in the Department of Engineering at Central Connecticut State University in New Britain, CT. He teaches courses in Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing Engineering Technology and Mechanical Engineering Technology programs. He has over 10 years of international industrial and research experience in the fields of precision manufacturing, design of mechanical and manufacturing systems and metrology. Dr. Prusak received M.S. Mechanical Engineering from Technical University of Krakow and his Ph.D. in
an Outstanding Research Award from PSES and an NSF YoungInvestigator Award. Prior to joining Penn State, Dr. Litzinger had four years of industrial experience with GeneralElectric in power systems, and completed his Ph. D. studies at Princeton. He may be reached at tal2@psu.edu.JOHN WISEJohn Wise is Director of Engineering Instructional Services at Penn State. In this capacity, he provides assistanceto faculty members and teaching assistants in the areas of teaching, learning, and instructional technology. Hereceived his B.A. in Liberal Arts from The University of the State of New York and his M.S. in InstructionalSystems from Penn State. He is currently completing his dissertation research on intellectual development ofengineering students
this course, students learn about the uses, capabilities, and limitations of wireless embeddedsystems in the C6 environment. Based on a set of requirements and preliminary specifications,students will a system-level design language and work in cross-functional groups (e.g.,communications, human factors, performance, software engineering, electronics) to prototypeselected hardware, software, and interfaces.Real-time software engineeringCurrently there is no course in the Computer Engineering curriculum at Iowa State Universitythat covers software development issues for real-time (or time-critical) applications and how todesign software to survive rapidly changing underlying technology. This knowledge is criticalfor any Computer Engineering
traditional lecture-basedteaching, which mainly focuses on theoretical aspects of the technology and lacks hands-onexperiences, would not keep students motivated, meet their needs, or lead to enhanced learning.Pedagogical research in engineering education supports this project-based, student-centeredapproach to teaching [12]. Student-centered approaches have consistently been found to be equallyor more effective than traditional approaches, improving learning outcomes and key competencieslike teamwork, critical thinking, and problem solving [12,13]. More specifically, project-basedlearning has been shown to lead to higher student motivation and better understanding of how toapply learning to realistic problems [14]. Therefore, the instructor designed
Professor of Mechanical Engineering Technology and Associate Dean for Graduate Studies in College of Technology at Purdue University Northwest. He holds Bachelor Degree in Mechanical Engineering from Southern Illinois University, MS in Structural Engineering and PhD in Engineering Mechanics, both from University of Illinois at Chicago. Mohammad joined Purdue Univer- sity Calumet in 1989 and was the Head of the Manufacturing Engineering Technologies and Supervision Department from 1996 through 2007. He was also acting head of Electrical and Computer Engineer- ing Technology Department from 2000 through December 2006. Mohammad is currently PI and Co-PI, working on several NSF and one DOL grant, totaling over three and half
Direct Versus Indirect Assessment Methodologies Steve Menhart Department of Engineering Technology University of Arkansas at Little RockAbstractThe paper discusses direct and indirect student assessment methods, used by the Department ofEngineering Technology at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock (UALR), and their possibleapplications, including the limitations of their use. Faculty members are familiar with the directassessment of their students via exams, quizzes, and reports etc. Indirect assessment methodsinclude surveys and questionnaires. At the conclusion of almost every college-level coursestudents are asked to
statistical data analysis. As an electrical and biomedical engineering scientist, he conducted research in computer modeling of the brain, cranial electrical stimulation (CES), electrical impedance tomography, electrode design, and EMG and muscle action potentials and ions channels simulation & modeling. His technical research interests include digital systems, embedded, systems, computer architecture, adaptive and system identification, modeling and simulation, and signal and image processing. His clinical research interests include impacts of chronic diseases in elderly (such as Alzheimer’s disease, cancer, and diabetes), innovative technology for drug addiction treatment and prevention, medical records, comparative
, J.S. An Iterative Learning Control of Robot Manipulators, IEEE Transaction ofRobotic and Automation, vol. 7, No. 6, pp.835-841, (1991).2. Goodwin, G.C. and Sin, K.S. Adaptive Filtering Prediction and Control, pp. 58-69,Prentice-Hall, NJ (1984).3. Rahrooh, A. and Hartley, T. Adaptive Matrix Integration for Real-Time Simulation. IEEE Transaction onIndustrial Electronics, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 18-24, (1989).ALIREZA RAHROOHAlireza Rahrooh is an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering Technology at the University of CentralFlorida. He received the B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from the Univ. of Akron, in 1979,1986, and 1990, respectively. His research interests include digital simulation, nonlinear dynamics, chaos
and use of the ARCS model of motivational design. Journal of InstructionalDevelopment, 10(3), 2-11.5 Page 7.1109.6 Georgia Institute of Technology. 1999. Objectives specification tool. [On line]. Available:http://mime1.marc.gatech.edu/MM_Tools/OST.html. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2002, American Society for Engineering Education6 Gray, S. 1998. Web-based instructional tools. Syllabus 12(2). [On line]. Available:http://syllabus.com/sep98_magfea2.html.7Morkes, J. and Nielsen, J. 1997. Concise, scannable and objective: How
batteries to several dc power levels supplyingthe proper power the many chips inside the electronics. In the electrical engineering field, PowerElectronics is an engineering discipline that deals with these types of conversion. Morespecifically, power electronics is enabling technology allowing us to convert energy from ac todc, ac to ac, dc to dc, and dc to ac. Power electronics has become increasingly importantnowadays where billions of kilo-watts of electric power are being re-processed every day toprovide the appropriate type and level of power needed by loads1. Due to the rapid growth inpower electronics technology, there has been an increasing demand from industry for electricalengineers that possess power electronic background. This has been
University, joining Purdue in August 2014. He has been teaching mechanics for over 20 years, and has worked extensively on the integration and assessment of specific technology interventions in mechanics classes. He was one of the co-leaders in 2013-2014 of the ASEE Virtual Community of Practice (VCP) for mechanics educators across the country. His current research focuses on student problem-solving pro- cesses and use of worked examples, change models and evidence-based teaching practices in engineering curricula, and the role of non-cognitive and affective factors in student academic outcomes and overall success.Prof. Jennifer DeBoer, Purdue University at West Lafayette Jennifer DeBoer is currently Assistant Professor
global and societal impact assessment module. At the end ofthe first session, students were asked to develop a set of specific procedures which practicingengineers can use to ensure that unintended consequences are limited, that society is informed ofthe tradeoffs involved in an engineering solution, and that society gives approval before thesolution is implemented. At the end of the second session, students were asked to prepare a shortpresentation discussing the positive and negative, intended and unintended consequences of aspecific technological development that the instructor selected from a list prepared in an in-classexercise in the first session. The presentations were given in the third session, and the group andaudience were asked to
. The ExcEEd (Excellence in Engineering Education)workshops were jointly sponsored by ASCE, the American Society of Mechanical Engineers(ASME), the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), and the Institute of Electricaland Electronics Engineers (IEEE). While the teaching workshop covers a variety of topics thatinclude learning objectives, communication skills, and teaching with technology, the two topicsthat participants have consistently reported as most valuable are board notes and questioningtechniques. Board notes provide a systematic means of organizing a class that helps ensurestudents will leave with good notes, lesson objectives will be met, the class will finish on time,disparate topics will be linked by transitions, physical
areas examined, engineering has much lower online representation compared to others.One reason for this slow adoption of online teaching pedagogies in US engineering programs canbe attributed to the perception by some engineering faculty and administrators that onlinecourses are not equivalent in content and rigor when compared to the traditional, face-to-facecourses. This paper presents the results of a study comparing the performance of on-campus andonline students in a sophomore-level Circuits Analysis course in a public two-year institution. Inthis introductory course for all engineering majors, content is delivered simultaneously to on-campus students and online students (dual delivery mode) using a combination of Tablet PCfunctionality
Institute of Technology School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, "Faculty Profile:Christina Bourgeois," Georgia Institute of Technology,http://www.ece.gatech.edu/faculty/fac_profiles/bio.php?empno=504860 (accessed February 23, 2004).6. University of Texas at Austin Mechanical Engineering Department, "O. Christene Moore," University ofTexas at Austin, http://www.me.utexas.edu/faculty/people/moore.shtml (accessed February 23, 2004).7. Christy Moore, personal communication to author, March, 2003.8. Richard Bannerot, Ross Kastor, and Paul Ruchhoeft, “Interdisciplinary Capstone Design at the Universityof Houston” (paper presented at the 2003 Annual Conference of the ASEE Gulf Southwest Section, March 19-21,2003, Arlington, TX).9
toengineering concepts without scaring students away from engineering. The projects offeredwere: Robotics with Matlab & Lego NXT, Analytical & Experimental Evaluation of aSMARTBEAM, Application of Acoustic Technologies, Fuel Cell Electric Car, ArtificialKidney: Improving the Current Dialysis System, Aerodynamics of Vehicles. The goal of theseprojects was to excite the students about engineering, provide an understanding of whatengineers do, and give a basic understanding of the level of independent learning andprofessionalism expected of an engineering student. At the beginning of the second semester,the students had a choice of a second mini-project (from the same six offered in the fall), afterwhich they are to select their major within
Paper ID #36702Results of 2021 Energy Education Stakeholder SurveyKenneth Walz Dr. Walz has been a faculty member at Madison Area Technical College since 2003, teaching science, engineering, and renewable energy technology. He completed his Ph.D. at the University of Wisconsin in Environmental Chemistry and Technology, while conducting electrochemical research on lithium-ion batteries with Argonne National Laboratory and Rayovac. Dr. Walz is an alumnus of the Department of Energy Academies Creating Teacher Scientists Program at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and he has also worked as a visiting
Paper ID #34784Work in Progress: Barriers Instructors Encounter when Using ActiveLearning in an Online Classroom SettingMs. Lea K. Marlor, University of Michigan Lea Marlor is a Ph.D. student at the University of Michigan, studying Engineering Education Research. She joined the University of Michigan in Sept 2019. Previously, she was the Associate Director for Education for the Center for Energy Efficient Electronics Science, a NSF-funded Science and Technology Center at the University of California, Berkeley. She managed undergraduate research programs to recruit and retain underrepresented students in science and
students to representation, and low persistence of U.S. students in Science,apply to participate. In 2015 we chose to focus the program Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) disciplines.on sophomores and juniors (rising juniors and seniors) in This project addresses the national need to increase the number oforder to maximize impact on STEM college major choices; high school students, particularly under-represented minorities and Proceedings of the 2018 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual Conference The University of Texas at Austin April 4-6, 2018those from underserved areas that will pursue STEM college
Session 2359 User-defined Electrical Experiments in a Remote Laboratory Ingvar Gustavsson Department of Telecommunications and Signal Processing Blekinge Institute of Technology, SwedenAbstractLaboratory exercises in electrical engineering courses can be performed remotely using realequipment. A number of user-defined experiments on electrical circuits have been conductedover the Internet at Blekinge Institute of Technology (BTH), Sweden; the experiments have beencarried out in different locations simultaneously using the same experimental hardware located
-day operation of the Lab hasresided with ISU’s Pappajohn Center for Entrepreneurship in the College of Business. Corporatefunding for the Laboratory was originally, and continues to be in large part, provided by 3M, aworldwide corporation well known for technological innovation. Prior to each semester, studentsare recruited and asked to submit applications and resumes for the upcoming semester. Second Page 7.348.1semester students review the applications and resumes and, with input from faculty and Proceeding of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2002, American
and Aerospace Technology at UDC. He is a Past President of DCSPE and is currently the Director of the Civil Engineering Program and the Chairman of the Professional Engineers in Higher Education (PEHE) of DCSPE. Over 30 years of teaching and engineering practice in Europe, Japan and the US. Page 13.1252.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 THE PEDAGOGY OF THE SURVEYING LABORATORY Abstract Surveying and surveying laboratory (field work) fifty years ago were standard fair for most engineering programs in all disciplines. Today, in the 21st Century, surveying is no longer an
Director of FL-ATE, the Florida Regional Center for Manufacturing Educationhoused at Hillsborough Community College. She earned a B.A. in Chemistry at Agnes Scott College, and both a B.S.in Engineering Science and a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from the University of South Florida. She has over 15 years Page 10.261.6of experience in developing curriculum in engineering and engineering technology and is a registered professionalengineer in the State of Florida. “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright© 2005, American Society for
ETD 2142 The Balancing Act for New Educators Donna J. Evanecky, JoDell Steuver, Michele Summers Purdue University College of Technology Kokomo/Columbus-SE Indiana/LafayetteAbstractTenure-track positions in the field of Engineering Technology give new faculty many advantagesincluding benefits, status, prestige, a say in governance, job security, legitimacy and academicfreedom. These positions make hard demands on personal relationships and family as the newfaculty member is asked to embrace his new passion—academe. Some have suggested