catastrophic or simply costly due to pump inefficiencies whenoperated outside of its intended operating range. Therefore, undergraduate mechanical engineersshould be well trained in this design or selection process through analytical and experimentalmethods learned in engineering science and experimental course work, respectively.In this light, to gain an understanding of the operation of the centrifugal pump4, first consider theenergy transfer of a pump by applying the steady state form of the energy equation as follows: Ç V2 Ç V2 Q% - W% s ? m% outlet Èh - - gz Ù / m% inlet Èh - - gz Ù (1) É 2 Ú
achieve similargoals as presented in this paper.Appropriate Taxonomies for AssessmentTo assess the effectiveness of an engineering course for non-engineers with the EDP requiresadopting a broader context of taxonomies than traditionally may be employed. A commonapproach is to utilize the work done by Benjamin Bloom’s 1950’s education committee. Thecommittee established a set of taxonomies in three learning domains: cognitive, affective andpsychomotor. The domains have been identified as, “arguably one of the most influentialeducation monographs of the past half century 4.” The taxonomies are a language that isproposed to describe the progressive development of an individual in each domain and aredefined as follows 5: • Cognitive: of
presentation on that subject. 3. Each student’s own (“modest”) image processing research project. – As late in the course as the sequence involved allows, each student selects and upon approval for appropriateness conducts an actual image processing project (normally, MATLAB Image Processing Toolbox-based) to test and/or compare the image processing effectiveness of some desired imaging processing algorithm(s). Again, each project’s results are written and presented to the class.The extra requirement for graduate credit for graduate student enrollees is related to thepresentations. While the expectations for the first presentation are about the same for all enrolledstudents, the second project (research literature) has a slightly higher
Peer Assessment,” Journal of Engineering Technology, Vol. 16, No. 1, Spring 1999, pp. 40-43.3. Leah M. Akins and Ellena E. Reda, “Implementation of an Integrated Project for the Electrical Engineering Technology Curriculum,” Journal of Engineering Technology, Vol. 15, No. 2, Fall 1998, pp. 38-43.4. Glen, C Gerhard, “Teaching Design with Behavior Modification Techniques in a Pseudocorporate Environment,” IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 42, No. 4, November 1999, pp. 255-260.5. Peter, J. Shull, “Collaborative Learning and Peer Assessment to Enhance Student Performance,” Journal of Engineering Technology, Vol. 22, No. 1, Spring 2005, pp. 10-15.6. Malgorzata, S. Zywno, “Using Collaborative Learning and Peer Assessment
fourchoices of membrane, varied in pore size and the tubing diameter (which are the sameparameters that the students will select from for their hemodialysis system design), and a rangeof flow rates for the blood and dialysate. The simulation provides practice for the actual designproject. From the simulation, the students should have a good idea of how these parametersaffect the efficiency of the dialysis, and they need to balance this with the major design factor,which is cost.A traditional membrane separation process has a fluid with component(s) that need to beremoved, and a membrane that can selectively remove those components, which pass through toa carrier fluid. In the design challenge, the students are given 0.5-L of simulated unfiltered
AC 2008-1023: THE WSU MODEL FOR ENGINEERING MATHEMATICSEDUCATION: A MULTIYEAR ASSESSMENT AND EXPANSION TOCOLLABORATING INSTITUTIONSNathan Klingbeil, Wright State University Nathan W. Klingbeil is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Robert J. Kegerreis Distinguished Professor of Teaching at Wright State University. He is the lead PI for WSU's National Model for Engineering Mathematics Education. He is the recipient of numerous awards for his work in engineering education, including the CASE Ohio Professor of the Year Award (2005) and the ASEE North Central Section Outstanding Teacher Award (2004).Kuldip Rattan, Wright State University Kuldip S. Rattan is a Professor in the
, “Looking Back: Lessons Learned from Ten Years of Training Teaching Assistants,” Proceedings, 1997 Annual ASEE Conference, ASEE, June 1997.3. T.M. Baber, D. Briedis, and R.M. Worden, “Teaching and Mentoring Training Programs at Michigan State University,” Chem. Engr. Education, 38(4), 250–253 (2004).4. S. Marikunte, F. Harackiewicz, J. Nicklow, and L. Chevalier, “Benefits and Challenges of Training Teaching Assistants,” Proceedings, 2006 Annual ASEE Conference, ASEE, June 2006.5. P.M. Norris and S.C. Palmer, “Effectiveness of the Woodruff School Doctoral Teaching Intern Program,” J. Engr. Education, 87(3), 223–226 (1998).6. M.J. Pavelich & R.A. Streveler, “An Active Learning, Student-Centered Approach to Training
semester surveys, students from both institutions wereenthusiastic about this idea and expressed no hesitation to travel to the other campus or a neutrallocation halfway in between. To alleviate scheduling problems, the joint meeting(s) will be heldin the evening. Previous experience in other classes shows that when the students have thisopportunity to interact informally, it facilitates interactions during videoconferencing classesthroughout the semester.Finally, changes to the NCSU curriculum will be implemented to provide better background toNCSU students, which will greatly ease the disparity between the two institutions. Page
, mentorship, and encouragement—that they sodesperately need and so richly deserve.References1. Ressler, S. J., C. H. Conley, and R. Gash, “Designing a Civil Engineering Program for the National MilitaryAcademy of Afghanistan,” Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, June 2008. Page 13.705.112. “Announcements - Afghan Merit Scholars at Ohio University,” accessed athttp://www.afghanequalityalliances.net/index.php?module=cms&action=page&id=gen12Srv35Nme0_84, January14, 2007. Page 13.705.12
satisfyenvironmental concerns, while promoting efficiency and innovation. Additionally, the authorsillustrate how case study discussions are used to help students understand the opportunitiescreated when implementing eco-friendly business practicesReferences1. Hughes, R., Ginnett, R, Curphy, G. (2002). Leadership: Enhancing The Lessons Of Experience. McGraw-Hill, New York.2. Caminiti, S. (2007). Adapting To Globalization. Fortune Magazine, Vol 156 (11), p. 110.3. Sirignano, J. ((2005). Is There A Green Movement In The Air. Fortune Magazine, Vol. 152 (12), pp. 152-163.4. Lumsdaine, E., Lumsdaine, M., Shelnutt, J. (1999). Creative Problem Solving and Engineering Design. McGraw-Hill, Inc. New York.5. Cohen, A. (2007). Sustaining The Future. Fortune
A464/A280 > 0.05Achieve “purity goal #2” $350 DsRed2 with A561/A280 > 0.6 EGFP with A488/A280 > 1.0 Page 13.316.10 Flavodoxin with A464/A280 > 0.10Appendix CFinal exam question on enzyme kinetics – negative control:The following data were recorded during a test of kinetics of an enzyme-catalyzed reaction at49.6 ºC. The enzyme concentration was 1.6 g/L. S [mmol/mL] 0.1 0.033 0.01 0.0067 0.005 V [mmol/(mL*min)] 5.13 3.70 1.89 1.43
Force, Computing Curricula 2001, Computer Science, December 2001. http://www.computer.org/education/cc2001/final/index.htm3. Schneider, S., “Developing an Introductory Software Programming Course for Engineering Students”, American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, June 2005.4. Loendorf, W., Brzoska, M., Koh, M., Rodriguez, E., “Implementing a Software Engineergin Technology Program within the Context of Experienced-Based Learning”, American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, June 2004.5. William Stallings, “Operating Systems: Internals and Design Principles”, Fifth Edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, 2005.6. Gary Nutt, “Operating System Projects using Windows NT”, Addison
Network (PSN) and associateddata/voice channels over simulated leased lines (e.g. T1’s), they will learn how the real-worldPSN and its components invariably affect network speed and integrity between two distant Page 13.363.9locations. They will learn programming of routers for end-to-end connectivity of LANs andWANs over a PSN. They will learn the basic mechanisms of programming the routers viaAccess Control Lists for permitting or denying certain type of network traffic.NDPL-161: Routing AlgorithmsThe students will learn different types of routing algorithms. They will start with static routingmechanism. They will be exposed to CISCO and non
. 2005.3. Dutch, B.J., and Allen, D.E., and White, H.B. (1998). Problem-based Learning: Preparing Students to Succeed in the 21st Century. “Essays on Teaching Excellence”. Center for Teaching, University of Southern Maine. Vol. 9, No 7, 1997 – 1998.4. Bound, D. & Feletti, G. (1991). The Challenge of Problem-Based Learning (p. 13). New York: St. Martin’s Press.5. Albanese, M.A. & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-Based Learning: A Review of Literature on Its Outcomes and Implementation Issues. Academic Medicine, 68. 52-81.6. Michaelsen, L., (1998). Three Keys to Using Learning Groups Effectively. “Essays on Teaching Excellence”. Center for Teaching, University of Southern Maine. Vol. 9, No 5, 1998.7. Price, P.C., (2006). Are You as
(Eds.), The algebracolloquium. (Vol. 2, p. 53-67). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.2. Pelavin, S., & Kane, M. (1998). Minority participation in higher education. Washington DC: U.S. Department ofEducation.3. Pearson, Greg (2004), Technically Speaking: Why all Americans Need to Know More about Technology,Washington DC: National Academy Press.4. CORD (1999). Teaching mathematics contextually. Retrieved April 10, 2007 fromhttp://www.cord.org/uploadedfiles/Teaching_Math_Contextually.pdf5. CORD (1999). Teaching science contextually. Retrieved April 10, 2007 fromhttp://www.cord.org/uploadedfiles/Teaching_Science_Contextually.pdf6. Crawford, M.L. (2001). Teaching contextually: Research, rationale, and techniques for improving
the National Science Foundation Industry/UniversityCooperative Research Centers Program grant number IIP-0733386.References1. Needy, K., L., Ingalls, R. G., Mason, S., Hunsaker, B., Norman, B. A., Gokhan, N. M., Cornejo, M., “Design for Supply Chain – A Collaborative Research Project Between Institutions and Between Centers,” submitted to Industrial Engineering Research Conference Proceedings, Vancouver, BC, Canada, May 2008.2. Gökhan, N. M., “Development of a Simultaneous Design for Supply Chain Process for the Optimization of the Product Design and Supply Chain Configuration Problem,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, December 2007.3. Ingalls, R.G., B.L. Foote and A. Krishnamoorthy. “Reducing the Bullwhip Effect in
. Page 13.733.1016. Pai, S., N.J. Gunja, E.L. Dupak, N.L. McMahon, J.C. Coburn, J.F. Lalikos, R.M. Dunn, N. Fancalancia, G.D. Pins, and K.L. Billiar, A mechanical study of rigid plate configurations for sternal fixation. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2007. 35: p. 808-816.17. Liu, Y., A.M. Gallardo-Moreno, P.A. Pinzon-Arango, Y.R. Reynolds, G., and T.A. Camesano, Cranberry changes the physicochemical surface properties of E. coli and adhesion with uroepithelial cells. submitted for publication. Page 13.733.11
of control. New York: W.H. Freeman11. Eccles, Jacquelynne S, & Wigfield, Allen (2002). Motivational beliefs, values and goals. Annual Review ofPsychology, 53, 109-32.12. Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk taking behavior, Psychological Review, 64, 359-372.13. Eccles (Parsons), J., Adler T., & Meece, J. (1984). Sex differences in achievement: a test of alternatetheories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 26-43.14. Eccles, J. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement andachievement motives (pp. 75-146). San Francisco: Freeman15. Parsons, J.E., J.L. Meece, T.F. Adler and C.M. Kaczala, Sex differences in attributions and learned helplessness,Sex Roles 8
R.K. Wats, “Developing Soft Skills in Students,” International Journal of Learning, pp. 1-10, 15 (12), 2009.[5] S. Chikumba, “Development of Soft Engineering Skills for Industrial Engineering Technologists through Effective Mentoring,” WACE 17th World Conference on Cooperative & Work-Integrated Education, Philadelphia, PA, 2011. Available: http://www.waceinc.org/philly2011/conference_proceedings/Refereed%20Papers/South %20Africa/STEADY~1.PDF. [Accessed Oct. 8, 2021][6] J.S. Brown, A. Collins and P. Duguid, “Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning,” Educational researcher, 18 (1), pp. 32-42, 1989.[7] L.S. Vygotsky, “Socio-cultural Theory,” Mind in Society, 6, pp
. Drake, “The role of academic advising in student retention and persistence,”About Campus, vol. 16 (3), pp. 8-12, Jul-Aug 2011[5] T. Feghali, I.J. Zbib, and S. Hallal, “A Web-based decision support tool for academic advising,” Educational Technology & Society, vol. 14(1), pp. 82-94, January 2011[6] M.S. Laghari, “A Priority based course planning system for electrical engineering department,” International Journal of Information and Education Technology, vol. 7(11), pp. 818-824, November 2017[7] Y. Shen and A. T. Bahill, “An in depth study of an expert system that helps evaluate graduate study programs, and a statistical summary of 25 little expert systems,” Proceedings of the 1988 IEEE International Conference on Systems
. 87, No. 3, pp 219 – 222.6. Todd, R. H., Sorensen, C. D., Magelby, S. P., 1993, “Designing a Senior Capstone Course to Satisfy Industrial Customers,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 82, No. 2, pp 92 – 100.7. http://www.sae.org/students/minibaja.htm8. http://www.asce.org/inside/stud_stbridge.cfm9. Louisiana Revised Statutes, 37:681 and 37:682.10. Rules of the Louisiana Professional Engineering and Land Surveying Board, “Title 46 Professional and Occupational Standards, Part LXI, Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors, Subpart 1, Rules”, Section 105, Definitions, under Practice of Engineering, Paragraph 2.11. Rules of the Louisiana Professional Engineering and Land Surveying Board, “Title 46 Professional and
. Hoboken, New Jersey.6. Friedrich, E., S. Pillay, and C.A. Buckley. 2007. The use of LCA in the water industry and the case for an environmental performance indicator. Water SA. 33(4): 443-451.7. Krarti, M. 2000. Energy Audit of Building Systems: An Engineering Approach. CRC Press. Boca Raton, FL.8. Kreith, F. and D.Y. Goswami. Handbook of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy. CRC Press. Boca Raton, FL.9. Kruger, P. 2006. Alternative Energy Resources: The Quest for Sustainable Energy. John Wiley & Sons. Hoboken, New Jersey.10. Manwell, J.F., J.G. McGowan, and A.L. Rogers. 2002. Wind Energy Explained: Theory, Design, & Application. John Wiley & Sons. West Sussex, England.11. Masters, G.M. 2004
., Proc. Of the Thirty-Sixth SIGCSE, pp.436.440, Feb. 23.27, 2005.[4] R. Hill and A. van den Hengel, Experiences with Simulated Robot Soccer as a Teaching Tool., Proc. of the ThirdICITA, pp. 387. 390, 2005.[5] J. W. Jeon, A Microprocessor Course: Designing and Implementing Personal Microcomputers, IEEETransactions on Education, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 426.433, Nov. 2000.[6] T. S. Margush, Using an 8-bit RISC Microcontroller in an Assembly Language Programming Course., Journal ofComputing Sciences in Colleges, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 15. 22, 2006.[7] D. R. Surma, Teaching Microprocessors Utilizing a Project-based Approach., Journal of Computing Sciences inColleges, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 104.112, Oct. 2003.[8] TekBots WebSite, Oregon State University http
Creativity from IDEO, America's Leading Design Firm, Currency, 2001.5. Brackin, P. and Sexton, S., 2008, “Robotics-Centered Curriculum: 2006-07 Annual Assessment Report.” Rose- Hulman Institute of Technology, 49 pages. Page 13.1375.12
. Page 13.995.5 Program Outcome Performance Courses to be Assessment Time of Data Assessment Evaluation of Criteria Courses Involved Assessed Method(s) Collection Coordinator Results Table 3. Program Outcome Worksheet.Faculty have been instrumental in assisting with completing these worksheets. Before theprocess could begin though, it was crucial that each of the columns be defined, so there was noambiguity. Performance criteria are specific, measurable statements identifying the performancerequired to meet the outcome. Three to four statements under performance criteria should besufficient. It is important that the
Electrical Communications”, 2nd edition, Prentice Hall, New Jersey 1988, pp. 233-250.10. Proakis, J.G. and Salehi, M., “Fundamentals of Communication Systems”, Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey 2005, pp. 169-179.11. Couch, L.W., “Digital and Analog Communication Systems”, 6th edition, Prentice Hall, New Jersey 2001, pp. 270-272.12. Haykin, S. and Moher, M., “Introduction to Analog and Digital Communications”, 2nd edition, John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey 2007, pp. 114-120.13. Lathi, B.P., “Modern Digital and Analog Communication Systems”, 3rd edition, Oxford University Press, New York 1998, pp. 514-522. Page 13.367.17
orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography1. Hall, R.H., et al., Evaluation of a Prototype GIS Learning System to Teach Civil Engineering Concepts. Proceedings of the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia, & Telecommunications, 2005: p. 3569-3574. Page 13.808.112. Holliday-Darr, K., D. Blasko, and C. Dwyer, Improving Cognitive Visualization with a Web-Based Interactive Assessment and Training Program. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 2000. 64: p. 4-9.3. Morris, J.M., et al., Developing
or project director, then themanagement team steps in to have the issue(s) addressed.The results presented in Table 3 indicate that the NNIN is meeting its primary objectives: • Providing advanced research project – 4.14 • Learning to use advanced equipment and processes – 4.16 • Exciting participants about graduate school – 4.48 • Providing information on nano careers – 4.08 • Enhancing presentation and writing skills – 4.25 • Exposing participants to the breadth of nano – 4.22We use the information gained from these post-surveys and external evaluations to makechanges to our program. For example, in 2006 many students indicated that the NNIN REU didnot provide them with enough information about careers in nanotechnology with
) improve students’ retention in the current engineering program. Page 13.601.10AcknowledgementsThe authors of this paper would like to thank their colleagues in the Electrical and ComputerEngineering Department at Rose Hulman Institute of Technology who have been instrumental indeveloping the Digital Systems course in the past years.Bibliography1. S. Brown, Z. Vranesic, “Fundamentals of Digital Logic with Verilog Design”, Mc Grew Hills, 2nd edition,2007.2. Mihaela Radu, “Extensive Coverage of Functional Verification of Hardware Designs”, in the proceedings of2007 International Conference on Microelectronics Systems Education. MSE 07, 3-4 June
fuelfrom seeds of the Jatropha shrub, which grows in West Africa. The impact of this approach onstudent satisfaction and success is discussed.IntroductionA central focus of engineering education is the design process. Our goal as engineering educatorsis to ensure that graduating engineers have the ability to “design effective solutions that meetsocietal needs” 1. Traditionally, engineering education is built on a foundation of sciences andmathematics courses, with students taking engineering courses in their upper years, with fewstudents experiencing design outside of a focused course in their discipline. In the 1990’s, inresponse to accreditation criteria, most engineering schools added a “capstone” design project inthe final year. These projects