aerospace industry. He is a member of ASME, ASCE, ASEE, and an associate fellow of AIAA. He is a registered Professional Engineer (PE).William Moss, Clemson University William F. Moss is an Alumni Distinguished Professor of Mathematical Sciences at Clemson University. He has a BS in Electrical Engineering from MIT and a Ph.D. in Mathematics from the University of Delaware. He has 37 years of teaching and research experience at Lockheed Aircraft, the Naval Nuclear Power School, Georgia Institute of Technology, Old Dominion University, and Clemson University. His research involves mathematical modeling and the use of active learning strategies and technology to improve learning outcomes in
experiments, while an open-ended project may be introduced to require design, development, and testing of anexperiment once students are familiar with the laboratory and have gained theappropriate laboratory and analysis skills.Incorporating design projects in laboratory courses meets several criteria defined by theAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology for engineering programs [1]. Bycompleting such projects, students enhance their abilities to apply knowledge ofmathematics, science, and engineering (3a); analyze and interpret data (3b); design asystem, component, or process to meet desired needs (3c); function on multi-disciplinary teams (3d); identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (3e);communicate effectively (3g); and use
weeks. Background: On day one of my Engineering 101 class, I introduce myself as the CEO of afictitious company, Dangerous Toys LLC. The company mission is to “develop toys thatencourage Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics in children.” The company visionis to “enable children of all ages, genders, ethnicities, and abilities to engage in STEM ininnovative and fun ways.” Each class is assigned a toy they must build, which meets specificcriteria. These toys are fairly simple, like mouse trap cars, rock skippers, trebuchets, pressurerockets, or hot air balloons. The differences between these projects, and something typical HighSchool students may do, are the specific criteria students must meet, and the engineeringprocesses they
Paper ID #40948Motivations of Students in a Thermodynamics CourseNancy J. Moore PhD, North Carolina State University The author is a Teaching Associate Professor at North Carolina State University in the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department. She teaches undergraduate courses in the thermal-fluid sciences. She is the course coordinator for Thermodynamics I and has taught the course in the traditional lecture and flipped formats.Dr. Aaron Smith, Mississippi State University Aaron Smith is an Assistant Clinical Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Mississippi State University. He obtained his
students in engineering technology with a training course based on the aforementionedtechnology. This type of training can be introduced as an integrated required course for all thedisciplines of Engineering Technology (Civil, Electronics, Mechanical, and ChemicalEngineering Technology). In an effort to introduce the students to this computer-basedinstrumentation technique, the Department of Engineering Technology at Savannah StateUniversity has developed a course titled as Data Acquisition System.This paper will discuss the course outline, laboratory equipment and an example to illustrate theapplication of data acquisition system. This paper will also report on the hardware and LabViewvirtual instrument software developed by National
importantissue by reviewing some of the techniques for connecting with students that have been reportedby other engineering educators, followed by a review of the discussion and suggestions from arecent seminar/discussion held on this topic at the University of Arkansas (U of A). While theliterature suggests that better classroom organization is effective in reaching students, educatorsmust also realize that many different learning styles and preferences are represented by thestudents in our classes. Centering the class on an advanced technology or a theme, such as aplant trip or life cycle assessment, can help us better reach the students. However, sometimes thelittle things—getting to know the students, providing time for interaction or engaging
2017 ASEE Mid Atlantic SectionSpring Conference: Morgan State University, Baltimore, Maryland Apr 7 Paper ID #20815A Look at ABET Accreditation – Understanding the BasicsDr. Rafic Bachnak, Pennsylvania State University, Harrisburg, The Capital College Rafic A. Bachnak is Professor of Electrical Engineering and Director of the School of Science, Engi- neering, and Technology at Penn State Harrisburg. Previously, Dr. Bachnak was on the faculty of Texas A&M International University, Texas A&M-Corpus Christi, Northwestern State University, and Franklin University. Dr. Bachnak received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in
skills. For example, NMSUcurrent and future learning. Likewise, it is of key importance to hosted this year’s Boosting Engineering Science andrecruit and retain a diverse student population. Technology (BEST) STEM competition challenge. Specifically, this year’s challenge was focused on the electric grid. HS and MS students had to design and built robots to restore and/or replace damaged conductor following a natural disaster. Photos from this competition
of Cincinnati, whitney.gaskins@uc.edu, burbansm@mail.uc.edu, jenkink4@mail.uc.edu Xavier University Louisiana, colatunj@xula.edu, mberger@xula.eduAbstract - The first year of college encompasses one of microaggression, conscious and unconscious biases arethe most challenging transitions a student may face sources of chronic stress and trauma that negatively impactduring their college career and/or lifetime. For minority their academic achievement [7]. Stereotype threat describesstudents in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math a condition in which students’ belonging to a group has(STEM), the transitioning experience may yield many been stereotyped causing
Paper ID #15105Engaging Young Students to ConstructionMr. Philip A. Dunn Jr. P.E., University of Maine Philip Dunn is a Professor in the Construction Management Technology Program at the University of Maine and serves as the coordinator of the program. He has been with the University for 13 years after having worked 20 years with the Maine Department of Transportation. He is very active in his community serving in several professional, fraternal, and community boards. He is a licensed Professional Engineer in Maine. He is married with 2 children. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016
ConclusionThis paper has discussed the objectives and outcomes we have achieved with a grant designed tosupport the retention and graduation of high-achieving, low-income STEM students with majorsin and related to engineering and computer science. The EAB Navigate platform was a pivotaltool in our efforts, intended to integrate student data for targeted support and interventions.Despite challenges, particularly with early detection and intervention for at-risk students, theproject has demonstrated the constructive role of technology when combined with thementorship from faculty and support staff. As we move to the final year of the project, we areexploring the potential of using Large Language Models (LLMs) which we view as a promisingavenue for
this project, several educational objectives are met: to develop creative andcritical thinking, to introduce design principles, to provide hands on experience, to developteamwork and communication skills, and to stimulate enthusiasm for engineering.IntroductionRowan University is pioneering a progressive and innovative Engineering program that usesinnovative methods of teaching and learning to prepare students better for a rapidly changing andhighly competitive marketplace, as recommended by ASEE [1]. Key features of the programinclude: (i) multidisciplinary education through collaborative laboratory and course work; (ii)teamwork as the necessary framework for solving complex problems; (iii) incorporation of state-of-the-art technologies
AC 2007-1707: MULTIMEDIA AIDED PROTOTYPE E-LEARNING (MAPEL)MODULES FOR TEACHING THE FUNDAMENTALS OF THE FINITE ELEMENTMETHODVenkata Seshada Aluri, University of Arkansas Venkata Aluri is currently working on his M.S. in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Arkansas. He received his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Osmania University in Hyderabad, India in 2004.Javed Alam, Youngstown State University Javed Alam is a professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Youngstown State University. He obtained his M.S. degree from Asian Institute of Technology and a Ph.D. degree from Case Western Reserve University. His research interests are in the area of Structural
Integrating professional TCAD simulation tools in undergraduate semiconductor device courses Julie Kenrow Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of the Pacific, Stockton, CaliforniaAbstractSemiconductor device theory and IC processing courses are becoming more important inundergraduate electrical engineering curricula due to the fast changing technologies andchallenges currently facing the semiconductor industry. However, in recent years manyundergraduate EE programs have cut back or discontinued courses in semiconductor devices,solid-state physics and IC processing due to the high operating costs involved
& biomedical data measurement, and educational robotics development. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 1 Session 1 Machine learning and Vision Based Embedded Linux System Education Byul Hur Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution Texas A&M University, College Station AbstractA course with practical applications of machine learning and vision processing can be stacked with thetraditional
Engineering from Karnatak University (1985), Master of Technology (M. Tech.) degree in Aeronautical Engineering from Indian Institute of technology, Bombay (1990), and Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) in Aerospace Engineering from Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore (1996). He worked as Scientist for one year before coming to the USA. After serving Tuskegee University for 21 years, he joined TAMUK in his current position in August 2018. Over last 23 years, He has led research efforts of over $31 M as PI and over $40 M as Co-PI. He has graduated 12 Ph.D. and 37 M.S. students and advised over 50 undergraduate students besides mentoring junior faculty members. He has authored or coauthored 4 books, 6 book chapters, 125
from Spelman College and a Bachelor's Degree in Mechanical Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology where she was a NASA Women in Science and Engineering Scholar. She also holds a Master's Degree in Mechanical Engineering from Stanford University.Lari Garrison, University of Washington Lari Garrison is a Ph.D. candidate in Cognitive Studies in Education at the University of Washington. Currently, she works as a Research Assistant for CAEE (Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education). She received a B.A. and a M.Ed. from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and taught high school mathematics for ten years before beginning work on her Ph.D. at
Electrical & Information Department of Engineering Engineering Technology Program Technology & Management University of Northern Iowa South Dakota State University Cedar Falls, IA 50614-0178 Brookings, SD 57007-0096 319-273-2598 605-688-6417 pecen@uni.edu teresa_hall@sdstate.eduAbstractModel Predictive Control (MPC) is an advanced control strategy for improving the control ofprocesses that display relatively large variations in system controlled output values incomparison to the system’s control set point, for processes with
as a platform to helphigh school students realize the value and importance of science, technology, engineering andmathematics (STEM). The program lectures, tours, and activities are designed to inspiresecondary school student interest in engineering and encourage them to enter college and studyin a STEM major after graduation from high school. In the four-week summer commuterprogram, the high school juniors and seniors, designated as Young Scholars, learn aboutrenewable energy via four programmatic facets. The class time primarily comprises interactivepresentations focused on the topics of electrical energy and renewables. To provide real worldengineering examples and to expand the students’ familiarity with various engineering branches
Session 3155 Bringing Practitioners (and Practice) into the Curriculum Walter W. Massie, MSc, P.E. Offshore Engineering Curriculum Leader Delft University of Technology Delft, The NetherlandsAbstractMany of the Delft University of Technology curricula have a rich history of bringing practice intothe classroom. The most common and most obvious way that this is done in Delft is to seekcandidates for full professorships almost universally from industry as opposed to having themprogress ‘up through the ranks’ as
, soldering irons, acetone treatment, etc. Student evaluations show thatstudents understand and accept 3D-printing technology with its capabilities, potentials, andlimitations. When dealing with partial failures and time limits, students prefer to correct smalldefects in complex objects and to reprint simple objects.Introduction The value of experiential learning through laboratory exercises in engineering educationand practice is immense and is well established through the Kolb’s experiential learning cycletheory1-3 where active experimentation occupies a prominent role4-7. Physical models andprototypes are integral parts of the engineering design process and are also well documented inengineering texts8,9 and engineering education
Session 1163 Strategies for Creating Web-based Engineering Case Studies Donald R. Falkenburg, Diane Schuch Miller Wayne State UniversityAbstractLinking academic learning with real-world experiences motivates students and significantlyimpacts depth of learning. The Greenfield Coalition is developing and deploying case studies tosupport its programs in manufacturing engineering and technology. This paper describes theGreenfield case methodology, and presents a four-step design process used to author anengineering case.Integrating LearningMost engineering problems are not like the problems at
AC 2010-742: EPLUM MODEL OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT: EXPANDINGNON-TRAVEL BASED GLOBAL AWARENESS, MULTI-DISCIPLINARYTEAMWORK AND ENTREPRENEURIAL MINDSET DEVELOPMENTKhanjan Mehta, Pennsylvania State University Khanjan Mehta is a Senior Research Associate in the Electronic and Computer Services (ECS) department and an affiliate faculty member in the School of Engineering Design, Technology and Professional Programs (SEDTAPP) in the College of Engineering at Penn State. His professional interests include innovative system integration, high-tech entrepreneurship and international social entrepreneurship. His research interests include social networks, application of cellphones for development, innovation in
Session 3448 Retention Through a Coordinated Spiral Curriculum Robert J. Herrick, James Michael Jacob, Jeffrey J. Richardson Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology Department Purdue UniversityAbstractThe Electrical Engineering Technology (EET) Program of Purdue University at West Lafayette,Indiana implemented significant curriculum change in the fall of 1996. The focus of the changewas to produce a relevant coordinated curriculum to optimize the students’ learning process andprovide a curriculum path that retained qualified students rather than filtering them
Technology, "Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics," February 2012. [Online]. Available: https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-engage-to- excelfinal_feb.pdf.[2] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, "Quality in the Undergraduate Experience: What Is It? How Is It Measured? Who Decides? Summary of a Workshop," The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2016.[3] National Science Foundation, "2009," Report of the NSF Workshop on Enhancing the Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Benefit, McLean, Virginia, Veterans' education for engineering and science.[4] B. Cook and Y. Kim, "From
2006-1074: DEVELOPMENT OF AN INTEGRATED LEARNING FRAMEWORKFOR STEM LEARNINGVeronica Burrows, Arizona State UniversityMichael Oehrtman, Arizona State University MICHAEL OEHRTMAN is Assistant Professor in the Department of Mathematics and Statistics at Arizona State University. He received his B.S. in Mathematics from the University of Texas at Austin in 1992, and his Ph.D. in Mathematics from Oklahoma State University in 2002. His research interests include mathematics education, calculus learning, and teacher development.Anton Lawson, Arizona State University ANTON LAWSON is Associate Director of the Center for Research on Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology and
thermodynamics of thermals, fuel cells, hydroelectric power production, marine steam and diesel propulsion, wind power, hybrid engine technology, drilling for oil in Alaska, space shuttle propulsion, the role of oceans in climate, space vehicle heating in re- entry, thermodynamics of metabolism, Scramjet engines, global warming, superconducting motors, nuclear power and the environment, heat transfer in neonates, alternative fuel solutions the Kyoto Protocol, power turbines, ramjet propulsion, snow ski manufacture, bus transportation and diesel fuels, ocean thermal energy conversion, nitrogen oxide emissions, energy-based design methods, gas turbine engines in aircraft, the Cassini Space Probe, fluid mechanics and thermodynamics, and
interactive simulations and animations was used to conduct ‘virtual experiments’, inwhich data collected from simulations was then used to convey physical concepts; and 2) real-time, formative, in class assessment. New principles of learning and instruction highlight the need to engage students in thoughtfuluse of knowledge. However, engaging individual engineering students in large classroomssimultaneously can be challenging. Technology such as classroom communication systemsencourages students to apply conceptual ideas during class, by allowing them to respond toquestions using hand held devices, and by displaying an aggregate of responses to the instructorand/or the class. This real time feedback provides a valuable way of measuring progress
. Agogino, A. and S. Shi. Scaffolding Knowledge Integration through Designing Multimedia Case Studies of Engineering Design. in Proceedings of the ASEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Content available at http://fie.engrng.pitt.edu/fie95/4d1/4d11/4d11.htm. 1995.15. Linn, M.C., Designing Computer Environments for Engineering and Computer Science: Scaffolded Knowledge Integration Framework. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 1995. 4(2).16. Wood, J.J., et al. Creating a Visually Rich, Active Learning Environment for Teaching Mechanics of Materials. in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference. 2002. Montreal, Quebec, Canada.Biographical InformationDR. JOHN J. WOOD is an Associate Professor of
baccalaureate engineeringprogram must include “an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences” [1]. Therequirements for accrediting baccalaureate engineering technology programs assert that graduatestudents must have “an ability to apply written, oral, and graphical communication in broadlydefined technical and non-technical environments” as well as “an ability to function effectively asa member and a leader on technical teams” [1]. Specifically, in aviation programs, according tothe Aviation Accreditation Board International (AABI), both baccalaureate and graduate degreesmust demonstrate that graduates are able to “work effectively on multi-disciplinary and diverseteams” and “communicate effectively, using written and oral