Conference Session

Full Papers I

Collection

FYEE 2025 Conference

Authors

DeAnna Katey, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Terrance I Harris, Drexel University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, FYEE 2025

). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.[5] D. Yomtov, S. W. Plunkett, R. Efrat, and A. G. Marin, “Can peer mentors improve first-year experiences of university students?,” J. Coll. Stud. Retent. Res. Theory Pract., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 25-44, 2017.[6] V. Cornelius, L. Wood, and J. Lai, “Implementation and evaluation of a formal academic-peer-mentoring programme in higher education,” Active Learn. High. Educ., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 193-205, 2016.[7] J. Carragher and J. McGaughey, “The effectiveness of peer mentoring in promoting a positive transition to higher education for first-year undergraduate students: a mixed methods systematic review protocol,” Syst. Rev., vol. 5, pp. 1-9, 2016.[8] P. Collier, “Peer mentoring

Conference Session

Student Experiences and Development – Session 2

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Madeline Roth, Bucknell University; Elif Miskioglu, Bucknell University; Adam R. Carberry, Arizona State University; Kaela M. Martin, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Prescott

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

demographics are in Bolton [14] forthe early-career sample and Miskioğlu et al. [6] for the mid-to-late career sample. Allparticipants self-identified as women or men in an open-response text box.Data Collection is also described in detail in prior work [6], [14]. All interviews followed thesame previously tested protocol [1], [6], [14]. This protocol includes three main interviewsections: expertise, decision making, and intuition. In this paper, we are only interested in theintuition section of the interviews.Table 1 Pseudonyms categorized by years of experience with gender identity, racial/ethnicidentity, and degree discipline(s); tables adapted from Miskioglu et al. [6] and Bolton [14] Level of Reported Reported Years of

Conference Session

PCEE Technical Session 8: Engineering Design in Elementary School

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amber Simpson, State University of New York at Binghamton; Peter Knox, State University of New York at Binghamton

your problem ideas and why each one is a problem. Then discuss and pick ONE problem you would like to design a solution for as a team of engineers. 2. As a family, record and share your brainstorming conversation as it unfolds (i.e., in-the- moment). Then pick ONE design solution. 3. As a family, share your detailed plan(s). Walk us through how you made your decisions and the materials you will use.Each family recorded and shared their response to these prompts through Sibme, an app thataffords an exchange of videos and resources through a secure cloud. The amount of video datashared from each family varied from 1:30 (min:sec) to 39:48.In addition, each family attended both show-and-tell sessions that lasted

Conference Session

CIT Division Technical Session #2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robin Hensel, West Virginia University; Katerina Goseva-Popstojanova, West Virginia University

Curriculum and Instruction, focusing on STEM teaching in higher education, and B.S. and M.A. degrees in Mathematics. Prior to joining academia, she worked with engineering teams and in project management and administration as a Mathematician and Computer Systems Analyst for the U. S. Department of Energy. She has over 30 years of experience teaching mathematics, statistics, computer science, and fundamental engineering courses as well as serving in several administrative roles within higher education. Throughout her career, Hensel has created a childcare facility at a federal research lab, coached middle school MATHCOUNTS students, facilitated STEM K-12 teacher training, built an undergraduate first-year engineering program

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Erika Mosyjowski, University of Michigan; Kelley Dugan, University of Michigan; Shanna Daly, University of Michigan; Colleen Seifert, University of Michigan; Elizabeth Pollack

engineering in the new century. Washington, DC: National Academy of Engineering. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=10999[7] Sheppard, S., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. (2009). Educating engineers: Design for the future of the field. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.[8] Duderstadt, J. (2008). Engineering for a changing world: A roadmap to the future of engineering practice, research, and education. Ann Arbor, MI: The Millennium Project. Retrieved from http://milproj.dc.umich.edu/.[9] Lattuca, L., Terenzini, P., Ro, H. K., & Knight, D. (2014). America's Overlooked Engineers: Community Colleges and Diversity in Engineering Education.[10] Riley, D. (2008). Engineering and social

Conference Session

Reviewing Methods for Educational Research

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Xiaoye Yang, University of Massachusetts, Lowell; Hsien-Yuan Hsu, University of Massachusetts, Lowell; Giovanni Bautista, University of Massachusetts, Lowell; Yanfen Li, University of Massachusetts, Lowell

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

to be an important part of the life and activity of the class”. This definitionpresents SB as a unidimensional construct, which can be measured as a general SB.Alternatively, Freeman et al. [3] view SB as a multidimensional construct encompassing classbelonging, university belonging, professors’ pedagogical caring, and social acceptance,suggesting that measuring SB should be approached by asking questions that correspond to eachof these dimensions. Given the diversity of conceptual definitions of SB, it is reasonable toanticipate the presence of multiple measurement instruments for this construct. For example,Goodenow’s Psychological Sense of School Membership [PSSM] was created to measure ageneral SB, while William et al.’s Higher Education

Conference Session

Environmental Engineering Division Technical Session 2: Innovative Approaches for Teaching Environmental Engineering

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jean M. Andino, Arizona State University; Cameron N. Morgan, Arizona State University; Lizandra C. Godwin, University of New Mexico

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering

learning. Entrepreneurial Indicator Item(s) used Level of Proficiency Mindset for assessment “Parameter” Well Above Proficient Proficient Below Proficient Curiosity Exploring Porosity The student is able to The student is able The student is alternative calculations correctly calculate the to correctly able to correctly scenarios porosities of fabric calculate the calculate the materials greater than porosities of fabric porosities

Conference Session

ENT Division Technical Session: Creativity and Innovation

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Tess Hartog, University of Oklahoma; Megan Marshall, University of Oklahoma; Amin G. Alhashim, University of Oklahoma; Md Tanvir Ahad, University of Oklahoma; Zahed Siddique, University of Oklahoma

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

into engineeringeducation curriculum to promote creativity in engineers.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1561660 and 1726358, 1726811, and 1726884. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] K. H. Kim, “The Creativity Crisis: The Decrease in Creative Thinking Scores on the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking,” Creativity Research Journal, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 285–295, 2011.[2] K. H. Kim and R. A. Pierce, “Torrance’s innovator meter and the decline of creativity in America,” The Routledge

Collection

2020 ASEE North Central Section conference

Authors

Xinyu Zhang, West Virginia University; Liangcheng Yang, Illinois State University

, which could in return enhance school achievements; while negative outcomesof student employment mainly are the reduced time available for educational activity, lowereducational achievements, and possibly resulting school withdrawal.Geolocation informationThis work was done in Normal, Illinois and Raleigh, North Carolina in the USA.AcknowledgementThe authors appreciate the Office of the Cross Chair in the Scholarship of Teaching andLearning at Illinois State University for financial support.References[1] NCES, "College Student Employment ", N. C. f. E. Statistics, Ed., ed. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_ssa.asp, 2017.[2] S. Curtis and N. Shani, "The effect of taking paid employment during term-time on students

Conference Session

DEED Postcard Session 1

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

J. Blake Hylton, Ohio Northern University; John K. Estell, Ohio Northern University; Todd France, Ohio Northern University; Louis A. DiBerardino III, Ohio Northern University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

ATTRIBUTES.The design attributes currently listed as typical potential constraints in the CSM are shown inTable 1. These attributes are not meant to serve as an exhaustive list, but as a convenient startingpoint for performing a constraint analysis for a given problem. Note that each source has anassociated code for ease of identification and reference during later analysis. TABLE 1: ATTRIBUTES IDENTIFIED AS TYPICAL CONSTRAINTS IDENTIFIED IN THE CSM, GROUPED BY SOURCE CLASSIFICATION AREA Code Attribute Code Attribute S-1

Conference Session

Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (RED)

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego; Edward J. Berger, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Nadia N. Kellam, Arizona State University; Ella Lee Ingram, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Donna M. Riley, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Diane T. Rover, Iowa State University; Noah Salzman, Boise State University; James D. Sweeney, Oregon State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Education, Washington, DC: ASEE, 2012.6 See https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2014/nsf14602/nsf14602.htm7 Douglas, E., private communication, January 31, 2017.8 Jordan, S. and M. Lande, “Additive innovation in design thinking and making,” International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(3B), pp. 1438-1444, 2016.9 McKenna, A., N. Kellam, M. Lande, S. Brunhaver, S. Jordan, J. Bekki, A. Carberry, and J. London, “Instigating a Revolution of Additive Innovation: An Educational Ecosystem of Making and Risk Taking,” 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, June 2016.10 Kellam, N., B. Coley, and A. Boklage, “Story of change—Using experience-based critical event narrative analysis to understand an engineering program’s

Conference Session

Pre-college: Blending Computers, Computational Thinking, and Engineering Education

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrea Carneal Burrows Borowczak, University of Wyoming; Mike Borowczak, University of Wyoming

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

the pre/postassessment questions related to the fundamental CS theory. Table 1 contains the questions alongwith the CS concept(s) they assess. It is important to note that question seven, regarding theillustration of sequential operation, only contained graphical illustrations while all the remainingquestions were related to real code statements in one of three programming languages: C++,Python or Logo.Table 1. Assessment questions and corresponding CS concept(s).Question Session Assessment Question (Summary) CS Concept(s) Which command could be used to query aQ5 Baseline Syntax robot's joint state

Conference Session

Mathematics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shirley B. Pomeranz, The University of Tulsa; Peyton James Cook Ph.D., The University of Tulsa

Tagged Divisions

Mathematics

some data analysis to determine what trends, if any, may apply tovarious aspects of her calculus courses. The following graphics indicate the data and results.Figures 1, 2, and 3, respectively, display overviews of the total Calculus I, Differential Calculus,Math 2014 enrollments; Calculus II, Integral Calculus, Math 2024 enrollments; and Calculus III,Multivariable Calculus, Math 2073 enrollments, by semester, from spring (S) 2000 through fall(F) 2016. It can be observed that enrollments are larger for the traditionally “on-sequence”courses of Calculus I and Calculus III during the fall semesters and for Calculus II in the springsemesters. Also noted is a trend of increasing enrollments. There is a surge in the Calculus Ienrollments that

Conference Session

Military and Veterans Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angela Minichiello P.E., Utah State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Military and Veterans

, and veteran undergraduates in engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 The Methodological Promise of ‘Narrative Inquiry’ for Exploring Student Veteran and Service Member Experience as ‘People in Relation’AbstractStudent veterans and service members (SVSM) represent a significant, yet vastly underutilized,human resource for strengthening and diversifying the nation’s science, technology, engineering,and mathematics (STEM) workforce. It is estimated that, by the year 2020, over 5 million post9/11 service members will have transitioned out of the U. S. Armed Forces. Yet, despiteadvanced technical skills and training and access to unprecedented levels of educational benefits,today’s

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division Postcard Session 1: Retention and Student Success Strategies

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth R. Kurban, University of Maryland, College Park; Paige E. Smith, University of Maryland, College Park; Kurubel Belay, University of Maryland

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Year Summer Experience (FYSE) program is a three-week residential summerorientation program focused on the development and strengthening of math-intensiveengineering problem solving skills. All new students offered admission to the School ofEngineering and students who applied to engineering but were instead admitted to the Divisionof Letters and Sciences (L&S) were invited to participate in the program. Recruitment andselection of participants is geared toward inclusion of women, racial/ethnic minorities, first-generation college students, and engineering admits with relatively weak mathematicspreparation. Approximately 40-60 first-year students participate in the program each summer.The participants are required to live in the provided

Conference Session

Ethical Reasoning and Decision Making

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Rockwell Franklin Clancy III, University of Michigan-Shanghai Jiao Tong University Joint Institute

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

engineering ethics: Assessment of its influence on moral reasoning skills,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 29–34, 1998.[6] J. Henrich, S. J. Heine, and A. Norenzayan, “The Weirdest People in the World?,” Behav. Brain Sci., vol. 33, no. 2–3, pp. 61–83, 2010.[7] Q. Zhu, C. B. Zoltowski, M. K. Feister, P. M. Buzzanell, W. Oakes, and A. Mead, “The development of an instrument for assessing individual ethical decision-making in project-based design teams: Integrating quantitative and qualitative methods,” in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2014.[8] R. I. Murrugarra and W. A. Wallace, “A Cross Cultural Comparison of Engineering Ethics Education

Conference Session

Innovations in Biological/Agricultural Education-I

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kurt Rosentrater, USDA-ARS; Jerry Visser, South Dakota State University

Tagged Divisions

Biological & Agricultural

-1921. Proceedings of the 2006 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.12. Glatz, C., Narasimhan, B., Shanks, J., Huba, M., Saunders, K., Reilly, P., Mallapragada, S. 2004. Problem- based learning laboratories involving chemicals from biorenewables. Paper No. 589. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.13. Al-Dahhan, M., Picker, S., Weigand, C., Chen, A. 2000. Development of a biochemical experiment for the unit operations laboratory through an undergraduate research project. Paper No. 2578. Proceedings of the 2000 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition

Conference Session

Best of DEED

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julia Kramer, University of Michigan, College of Engineering; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Seda Yilmaz, Iowa State University; Colleen M. Seifert, Univ. of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

. Page 24.23.15References [1] Brophy, D.R. (2001). Comparing the attributes, activities, and performance of divergent, convergent, and combination thinkers. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3&4): p. 439-455. [2] Liu, Y.C., Bligh, T., & Chakrabarti, A. (2003). Towards an 'ideal' approach for concept generation. Design Studies, 24(4): p. 341-355. 1323251 [3] Cross, N. (2001). Design cognition: Results from protocol and other empirical studies of design activity. Design knowing and learning: Cognition in design education, 7, 9-103. [4] Ahmed, S., Wallace, K. M., & Blessing, L. T. (2003). Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks. Research in

Conference Session

Robotics in Education

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carlotta Berry, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

anoption. The reason was that programming at the bit level could be cumbersome and it took thestudents a long time to set hardware configurations, timers, interrupts, etc. There was asignificant amount of code and hardware preparation just to get the robot going. Therefore in2009, the controller was changed to the Robotics Connection Serializer that could beprogrammed with Visual C# using MSRS services54, 55. This format was actually moreappropriate because it moved the focus from components to higher level functions and behaviors.The object oriented programming in an IDE afforded the creation of a GUI to make it possible tovisualize the framework of the student‟s work. By changing to this software platform, studentswere able to accomplish more

Conference Session

Graduate Student Experience

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katherine E. Winters, Virginia Tech; Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies, Student

those feelings are actually enacted in teaching. Page 22.757.3Teacher AutonomyAutonomy is directly related to motivation 10, 11. Autonomy is when a person‟s “actions arefreely chosen and experienced as emanating from oneself” 12. While research on autonomy ineducation originally focuses on students, more recent research has shown the importance ofteachers‟ sense of autonomy. Pelletier et al. 13 found that teachers‟ perceptions of constraints inthe teaching environment as well as of their students‟ self determination influenced the teachers‟self determination, which finally lead to whether or not the teachers supported their students‟autonomy

Conference Session

Broadening Participation

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Meagan C. Ross, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

in going to college, and taking college-level mathematicscourses(Congressional Commission on the Advancement of Women and Minorities in ScienceEngineering and Technology Development, 2000). This contrast heralds that students do notunderstand the importance of, and requirements for, taking rigorous mathematics and sciencecourses in high school, pointing to the importance of encouraging exploration of a wide array ofcareer trajectories so that students do not inadvertently build roadblocks to certaincareers(Rudasill & Callahan, 2010; White Paper prepared for U. S. Secretary of EducationRichard W. Riley, 1997). Given this, it is imperative for counselors to be prepared to counselstudents about careers and how to prepare for these careers

Conference Session

TAC/ABET-related Outcome-based Assessment Methods and Models

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael J. Dyrenfurth, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Kathryne Newton, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

stages.Fortunately, both ABET and ATMAE accreditation procedures are amenable tonew/innovative programs, although the former’s requirement for the existence ofprogram graduates defers its accreditation decision until this requirement can bedemonstrated. Given that the ATMAE’s process does not have this requirement, theadvantage to the department is that there will not be a period during which any newprogram(s) might not be accredited.Based on the experience of the past years, it seems appropriate to recommend thatcolleagues considering multiple accreditations do pursue that path despite the resourcedemands in terms of faculty time, technology and money for professional development.However, the advantages of increased purposeful and collective reflection

Conference Session

FPD IX: Research on First-Year Programs and Students, Part II

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rachelle Reisberg, Northeastern University; Joseph A. Raelin, Northeastern University; Margaret B. Bailey, Rochester Institute of Technology; Jerry Carl Hamann, University of Wyoming; David L. Whitman, University of Wyoming; Leslie K. Pendleton, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

AC 2011-562: THE EFFECT OF CONTEXTUAL SUPPORT IN THE FIRSTYEAR ON SELF-EFFICACY IN UNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERING PRO-GRAMSRachelle Reisberg, Northeastern University Rachelle Reisberg is Director of Women in Engineering at Northeastern University. She received her bachelor’s and master’s degrees in Electrical Engineering from Rice University. She was President of a start-up software company before joining Northeastern.Joseph A Raelin, Northeastern University JOE RAELIN is an internationally-recognized scholar in the fields of work-based learning and leadership. He holds the Asa. S. Knowles Chair of Practice-Oriented Education at Northeastern University in Boston. He is author of the just released Leaderful Fieldbook

Conference Session

Novel Teaching Methods In Engineering Technology

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Edward E. Osakue, Texas Southern University; Jonathan J. Lewis, Texas Southern University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

standards are popular in the engineering andtechnological communities. Because English units system is used in training the vast majority ofour engineers, technologists, and technicians, they are probably ill equipped for the global stagewhere the SI units system is the measurement language of trade and science. For instance, whencompanies from different countries work on the same technical project(s), the use of a commonunit of measure is necessary. Since the SI units system is international, this is often the preferredchoice. According to Euler [5], all new USA standards (ASTM, ANSI, SAE, IEEE, ASME, etc.)are now written in metric. This is because, the lead engineers in these organizations recognizethe importance of trying to get the USA on track

Collection

2014 Fall ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference

Authors

Kyle V. Moses; W. Michael Petullo

as nmap, the de facto correspondence between transport-layer Application ports and services, and how to manage the robust composition Apply 3 Comprehension and operation of existing network products. Understand 2 Knowledge Remember 1 III. S HORTCOMINGS IN COMPUTER SECURITY EDUCATION What is limiting in the studies described above is that eachFig

Collection

2009 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting

Authors

Raman Menon Unnikrishnan; Ricardo V. Lopez

become “mutually dependent” so that advancement is done as acohesive unit with each member making contributions to the group (shared responsibility). Learning communities have some key parts of the successful Treisman’s Model.10 In theearly 1980’s Uri Treisman created programs that enlisted African-American students to excel inmathematics rather than a program created solely to help them evade failure. Like LCs,Treisman’s emphasis is on collaborative learning among the students through the use of “smallgroup teaching methods.” Students are not just expected to be remediated, but expectations areraised based on what Treiman observed to be the strength of some groups of students on hiscampus: their ability to merge academic and social lives

Conference Session

Track 6: Technical Session 4: WIP: investigate recruitment strategies used by engineering bridge and success programs to recruit underserved students

Collection

2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Xinyu Zhang, Purdue University; Lynette Michaluk, West Virginia University; N’Diya Harris, Wright State University; Ansley Lynn Shamblin, West Virginia University

Tagged Topics

2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

disabled students.To broaden participation and increase diversity in engineering and computing majors in 4-yearuniversities and colleges, bridge and success programs (also called intervention programs in someliterature) such as summer bridge, engineering scholar, and bootcamp have been used to supportstudents’ college transition and retention [1-8]. Some were initially created with federal fundingsupport from U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) Scholarships in Science, Engineering,Technology, and Mathematics Program (S-STEM) and Louis Stokes Alliances for MinorityParticipation Program (LSAMP) [9] and institutionalized later. Both S-STEM Scholars programand LSAMP Scholars program not only provide financial support to student participants but

Conference Session

LEES 6: Writing & Communication

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathryn Neeley, University of Virginia; Michael Alley, Pennsylvania State University

valid, they are outweighed by thevalue of being able to conceptualize engineering communication as a diverse collectiveenterprise with common goals. The next step in this work is to establish a means for connectingwith the two very different groups to whom these results are relevant: the administrators whomake decisions about the design and funding of engineering communication instruction andnewcomers to engineering communication who want to contribute through publishing on theirefforts and experiences.ReferencesAllen, N., & Benninghoff, S. T. (2004, March 1). TPC Program Snapshots: Developing Curricula and Addressing Challenges. Technical Communication Quarterly, 13(2), 157 - 185.Bauer, D. H. (2020, June), WIP: Integrating Writing

Conference Session

Student Feedback and Assessment in Design

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andreas Febrian, Utah State University, Engineering Education; Oenardi Lawanto, Utah State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

attach related design artifacts in their journal entrybecause it will be useful for the verification process. Figure 3. A sample of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering – Group 2’s journal entry. We verified the eJ entries by cross-referencing them against the design artifacts, otherverified entries, and additional qualitative data. Out of 212 entries, 83.02% were verified, where130 entries belonged to the BE groups and 46 entries belonged to MAE groups. The next stepswere segmenting and coding the verified entries based on Dym and Little’s design phases, designactivities, and project management aspects [15]. For this step, we used Table 1 and 2 as codingtables. The segmenting and coding processes were conducted independently for three

Conference Session

The Best in DEED

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amy E. Rechkemmer, University of Michigan; Maya Z. Makhlouf, University of Michigan; Jennifer M. Wenger, University of Michigan; Eli M. Silk, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Seda McKilligan, Iowa State University; Kathryn W. Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University, Great Valley

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

-preserving, resulting in anaverage idea score of 1.2. This is visually illustrated in Figure 6, which shows the sketches fromthe two sets of ideas generated by Participant 27.As shown on the left side of Figure 6, Participant 27’s initial set of ideas all had paradigm-modifying aspects to them. The most strongly paradigm-modifying solutions included a hoverboard (Idea 2) and a jetpack (Idea 5), both of which defy the constraint of physically having totravel on the snow. But even their ideas coded as paradigm-preserving had elements that are nottypically used to travel across the snow, including Idea 3 that utilized a giant snowball, and Idea4 that utilized a giant fan to propel the device. In contrast, Participant 27’s ideas generated withthe