, ethical and social justice considerations. This is a truly distinctive approach to our 1 Fall 2010 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, Villanova University, October 15-16, 2010program compared to existing, more traditional programs. To ensure the breadth of understanding thatwe wish to impart to our students, the core courses were structured so that the first two coursesprovide the technical education and the third course provides the broader context (although this is alsowoven into the first two courses as well).Our new inter-disciplinary Master’s degree in Sustainable Engineering was launched in December2010. The program is available to all engineering and science disciplines and is
of socialjustice concerns in organ transplantation. This work will be based on two primary domainsrelevant to science teaching and learning: socioscientific issues and the scaffolded knowledgeintegration framework.Socioscientific issuesA growing segment of educational practitioners have amplified research focused on expandinglearners’ sociopolitical consciousness in relation to the material they are learning within theirscience classes [1], [2]. As a consequence, socioscientific issues have become a focal point forresearch attention by experts in argumentation, ethics, and science education more broadly; anunsurprising development given the area’s potential to not only improve the conceptualunderstanding but also transform learners
assigned player roles. Such insights are crucial for understanding potential moraland ethical challenges they may encounter in their engineering careers. We also asked whetherthis game increased their understanding of flood risk governance. The average rating was a 3.54(n=13) on a scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely). Over half of the respondents (54.26%)rated their understanding as between 4 (very) and 5 (extremely), highlighting substantial learninggains in flood risk governance. One student commented: “When floods occur, communicationcan easily break down despite even the best efforts.”Lastly, we investigated RQ 2) Did students feel more engaged by the FRC game than bytraditional teaching techniques such as lecturing and reading
Teamworking 28 (7.4%) 34 (6.7%) 23 (4.7%) 9 (3.7%) 94 5.8 “Soft” Skills Project planning and design 44% 62 (16%) 58 (11%) 30 (6.1%) 19 (7.8%) 169 10 process Societal issues 72 (19%) 26 (5.1%) 30 (6.1%) 34 (14%) 162 10 Ethics, Safety, and 1 (0.3%) 22 (4.3%) 23 (4.7%) 6 (2.5%) 52 3.2 Professional practice
. standards.• Demonstrate writing and oral communicating techniques effectively ¾ Students will develop a written design report among team members, with technical and oral presentation for faculty and peers. advisors and peers. ¾ Students will demonstrate the importance of• Understand the importance of professional and ethical behavior in their professional and ethical behavior. written and oral presentations.Course DeliverablesEach team is required to prepare several documents, presentations, and the prototype of thedesigned system. The main deliverables are • Midterm
educational andin 5 weeks. professional goals. The WWII German Encryption System project is such a project.Before we undertake to explain how this isaccomplished we begin by highlighting the key Student projects conducted in a Socratic classroomaspects and benefits of a Socratic type method.. build passion, create a strong work ethic, cultivate an ability to rapidly assimilate new knowledge and finally2.0 The Socratic Practitioner increase self-confidence. We have seen thatSocratic pedagogy continues to be largely absent in cultivating
ethically and morally. Dr. Batouli received Harry Saxe Teaching award in 2022 based on students’ votes and students evaluation of instruction. His previous research has resulted in more than 30 referred journal and conference publications as well as five research reports. His past research received major awards and honors including a third-place best poster award from the construction research congress and a Dissertation Year Fellowship from Florida International University in 2016. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 The Case for a Separate FE Exam for Construction Engineering: Addressing Curriculum Discrepancies and Student PerformanceAbstractConstruction Engineering (CONE
Copyright © 2010, American Society for Engineering Education 104Why Teach the Holocaust?While from a pragmatic point of view, such instruction can help engineering educators addressABET outcomes that deal with professionalism, ethics, and the societal/global impact ofengineering, a deeper reason for studying this historical period involves the maintenance ofcivilized society in general. According to the Task Force for International Cooperation onHolocaust Education, Remembrance, and Research, founded in 1998 by Göran Persson, theSwedish prime minister, the Holocaust warrants continued study because ―it fundamentallychallenged the foundations
be more efficient by spending relatively less time on assessment of the awarenessskill. There also remains a potential for subjectivity in interpretation of these attributes and in thedevelopment of their assessment tools, which can be a source of poor deficiencies/weaknesses.As also noted by Koehn9, the practitioners believe that the same level of significance should notbe stressed on the awareness issue in an engineering curriculum.It may be noted that licensing requirements are solely based on technical competency except thatState of California requires a take home exam on ethics. However, ABET’s requirements aremuch more extensive. Granted that an engineer ought to be aware of global issues, societalconcerns, ethics and other issues per
, or projects setsstudents up to more readily carry those mindsets into their own engineering design processes.First-year engineering students are often excited and eager to begin their journey as engineers.As such, they are often so eager to put on the “problem solver” hat that they jump to a singledesign solution before fully considering and understanding all aspects of the problem they seekto solve as well as the ethical, societal, environmental, and economic impacts (value added /created or potential shortcomings / unintended consequences) of multiple possible solutions –skipping an important step in the engineering design process that is referred to as “problemscoping” at my current institution. We define problem scoping (which precedes
organizational and leadership issues that span across an ecosystem of partners within the following areas: defense, government, industry, community colleges, and universities. Dr. Linvill’s research is strategically designed to address organizational challenges and create novel solutions to those challenges. Her work has been presented at national and international conferences and has been published in The Routledge Handbook of Communication and Bullying and in Communication, relationships, and practices in virtual work (IGI Global). Dr. Linvill applies an or- ganizational communication lens to her classes on Business Principles, Ethics, Negotiation and Decision Making, Organizational Behavior, and Organizational Leadership
. 4 I consider different disciplinary, environmental, local and global perspectives to understand natural and human systems. 5 I examine the influence of power structures Cultural Diversity in society to understand inequalities among different groups. 6 I ask questions without making judgments about people from other cultures Personal and Social 7 I discuss the importance of ethics and moral Responsibility
differences draws attention to how engineered systems become part of moraleconomies in various contexts. As Arctic scholar Frank Sejersen writes, the introduction of neweconomies of practice will not only generate “new moral expectations between people but [...]also create new agencies, resource conceptualizations, imagined communities, conflicts andproblems” (2022: 164). Consequently, describing the design of integrated trusses as beingembedded in wider moral debates allows researchers to attend to the plasticity through whichknowledge on home construction in this region is currently emerging in response to wider socio-economic and environmental factors (Biehl and Locke 2017).Returning to the larger question about ethics in engineering, particularly
urbanplanning method. These approaches shift the power relationships traditionally established ininterview settings and allowed student participants to shape the direction of their interviews andstorytelling.In this paper, we first describe the central ethical and justice challenges to soliciting andengaging BIPOC students in research about their experiences. After describing the goals of thestudy, we explain two key strategies that allowed us to address these challenges in our datacollection: 1) Use of boundary objects to elicit participants narratives, and 2) the integration ofparticipatory urban planning methods.We show sample data sets to explain the ways our methods provided opportunities to learn morefrom students, to gain a comprehensive
humankind unique, both individually and as a species, remains unclear. Advances in neuroscience and computer science, as well as ethics, generate questions about the nature of intelligence, consciousness, and personhood and the rights and protections associated with being human. In this course students tackle classic readings from Descartes to modern ruminations on artificial intelligence, examine our relation to our creations and pets, and the way our various identities affect how our personhood is perceived and protected.Some basic information from the course syllabus is described below.Broad Topics covered 1. Basic neuroscience 2. Distinctions between humans and nonhumans 3. Emotional connection and dependencies between
consider the ethical and long-termconsequences of this particular application of AI in education 13 14 to ensure that it is achieving itsaim of supporting underserved and underrepresented students in STEM+C. 28 For example, weshould strive to ensure that AI-enabled platforms such as CPI minimize the negative impact ofalgorithmic bias, whether it is apparent or not 29 . Inviting input from educators and students fromdiverse backgrounds in the development of such systems may help to prevent the negative impactof algorithmic bias. 30 Further work in each of these areas has the potential to greatly improve theimpact CPI platform on student users’ knowledge of STEM+C as well as their future academicand career interests development at scale. These aims
investigated further. The demographics of the alumni respondents matched the expectations of the researchteam based on the demographics of Lipscomb [17] and the engineering field [18]. Additionally,because white males represent the majority of engineering jobs, data from this group will behighly useful to understanding inclusion perspectives in the workplace. Of note, however, is theimpact that underrepresented groups may have on inclusivity in engineering. McGee and Bentleydescribe how black and Latinx undergraduate STEM students develop an equity ethic or aconcern for social justice based on past suffering from inequities [19]. It’s possible thatunderrepresented groups in engineering feel a desire for inclusivity because of an equity ethic
Paper ID #38132“What’s getting in the way?” Personal and ProfessionalBarriers to Engineering LeadershipCindy Rottmann (Associate Director Research) Cindy Rottmann is the Associate Director, Research at the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering at the University of Toronto. She conducts research on engineering leadership, engineers' professional practice, and ethics and equity in engineering. She is currently the Program Chair of the ASEE LEAD division.Emily Moore Dr. Emily Moore is the Director of the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering at the University of Toronto
roles including Faculty Director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program (2014-2017), Director of the Environmental Engineering program (2006-2010), and ABET Assessment Coordinator for the CEAE Department (2008-2018). Bielefeldt is active in the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), serving on the Civil Engineering Program Criteria Task Committee (2019-2022) and the Body of Knowledge 3 Task Committee (2016-2018). She is the Senior Editor for the International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering (IJSLE) and a Deputy Editor for the ASCE Journal of Civil Engineering Education. Her research focuses on engineering education, including ethics, social responsibility, sustainable engineering, and
- assignments and term, 5-semester or 8- assessments) quarter weeks) 1. Why sustainability? 1. Why sustainability? 2. What is sustainability? Freshman – Sophomore 2. What is sustainability? 3. How to measure it 3. How to measure it? 4. Role of the engineer, 4. What is the triple-bottom line? ethics, and
Paper ID #37206Defining Harassment in Academic Engineering: A Study ofStudent, Faculty, and Staff PerceptionsAmir Hedayati Mehdiabadi Amir Hedayati-Mehdiabadi is an assistant professor in the Organization, Information & Learning Sciences program at the University of New Mexico. Hedayati has received a Ph.D. degree in Human Resource Development from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. In broad terms, his research focuses on issues of ethics and inclusion in talent and professional development. His research explores how we can enhance ethical decision-making among professionals by understanding
. Engineers with an eye toward value creation understand stakeholder needs, learn from failure, and habitually work to provide benefits while understanding the consequences of their actions.” (Melton & Kline, n.d.) “Human value is defined as ‘What is important to people in their lives, with a focus on ethics and morality.’” (Friedman & Hendry, 2019)The instructors selected four of the stakeholders identified by the class as examples. On a newJamboard, students listed possible values specific to those selected stakeholders. The next step was to discuss how societal norms are the way values are implemented orexpressed in a particular society. They can vary based on many factors such as the culture of theparticular
purpose of plans and how to assemblethem. Structural Steel Design is a required course for fourth-year students in the CivilEngineering Technology program. It involves the design of structural members and frames andtheir connections in steel structures. Topics include principles of structural design and the codeof ethics in engineering practices, structural loads and systems, steel grade and shapes, steelframing and deck design, tension members, compression members, non-composite beams, beam-columns, column base plates, bolted connections and welded connections.The EOP framework provides guiding principles for engineering educators to incorporatesustainability concepts into their courses. The aim of this study is to integrate the EOPframework
effective teaching ● Peer and Instructor Feedback ● Bring An Inclusive Mindset to Your Teaching ● Active Learning ● Ethical/Social Responsibility in the classroom ● How do we assess learning? ● Graduate Student lead Workshop - Peer Assessment ● Writing a Effective Teaching PhilosophyEngineering 397 (ENES 397): Advanced Topics of Teaching Fellow ScholarshipThis course is designed to continue to elevate the undergraduate teaching assistant knowledgeand understanding of the scholarly practices of teaching, learning and research. Throughout thesemester, students attend workshops and seminars that focus on the researched and applied bestpractices in the field of Engineering and Computing education.As more of a practitioner course, students
and considering global and environmental context in engineeringproblems. Specifically, this is stated in Student Outcome 2 (“an ability to apply engineeringdesign to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety,and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors”) andStudent Outcome 4 (“an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities inengineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact ofengineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts”)[5]. However,this emerging focus on sustainability poses a challenge to higher education institutions (HEIs). Ifengineers are expected to make large
ethical principles. 7.Analyze construction documents for planning and management of construction processes. 8.Analyze methods, materials and equipment used to construct projects. 9. Apply constructionmanagement skills as an effective member of a multi-disciplinary team. 10. Apply electronic-based technology to manage the construction process. 11. Apply basic surveying techniques forconstruction layout and control. 12. Understand different methods of project delivery and theroles and responsibilities of all constituencies involved in the design and construction process.13. Understand construction risk management. 14. Understand construction accounting and costcontrol. 15. Understand construction quality assurance and control. 16. Understand
, teamwork, andinterdisciplinary collaboration [3, 5-7]. Thus, participants in this NRT receive training on keytransferrable skills in a 3-credit hour 500-level course. This course offers participants theoreticaland practical training in key skills, including ethics, research, communication, teaching, fundingprocurement, entrepreneurship, management, teamwork, conflict resolution, mentoring,leadership, and outreach. In addition, wellness and well-being skills to not only survive, butthrive in graduate school and beyond are also covered. All trainees register for this course, whichis also open to other STEM graduate students and is co-taught by the faculty associated with theNRT as well as by guest lecturers with expertise in different areas. An
Residential Academic Program, a living-learning community where students learned about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in en- gineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Intersectional Complexities of Race/Ethnicity and Gender in Engineering Students’ Professional Social Responsibility AttitudesAbstractThis research examined the professional social responsibility attitudes among engineeringstudents from different demographic groups based on intersectional categories
national exemplar in teaching engineering ethics. Her book Extracting Accountability: Engineers and Corporate Social Responsibility will be published by The MIT Press in 2021. She is also the co-editor of Energy and Ethics? (Wiley-Blackwell, 2019) and the author of Mining Coal and Undermining Gender: Rhythms of Work and Family in the American West (Rutgers University Press, 2014). She regularly pub- lishes in peer-reviewed journals in anthropology, science and technology studies, engineering studies, and engineering education. Her research has been funded by the National Science Foundation, the National Endowment for the Humanities, and the British Academy.Dr. Juan C. Lucena, Colorado School of Mines Juan Lucena is
values, building codes, budgets, construction, design and architecture,repair, and ethics.3 Although Moll and colleagues did not explicitly connect these funds ofknowledge to engineering, many of these categories bear direct relevance to engineeringpractices, and for this reason, engineering may be an especially promising discipline forforegrounding Latinx students’ funds of knowledge.8 Under this assumption, we conducted aproject to better understand the engineering-related funds of knowledge of Latinx youth who hadbeen designated by their schools as ‘English learners.’9 Wilson et al. authored the firstpublication that stemmed from this work, which outlined funds of knowledge categories such asworkplaces; health of self and family