Conference Session

Improving Student Entrepreneurial Skills

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Ferguson, Ohio Northern University; Michele Govekar, Ohio Northern University; Amanda Stype, Ohio Northern University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

examinedthe ratings of software processes for new ISO standards (Jung 2003). It also evolved practically in a university-level evaluation of individual college assessment plans within that author’s experience.Designation and use of a head-judge/s is an intervention that we have used within our events. Each head judgeis assigned a team of judges. Each team of judges is then assigned a set of participants that a certain number ofjudges must rate. For example, a team may consist of three to five judges, be assigned to rate 12 contestants,with each contestant rated by a minimum of three judges. The head judge determines the logistics required tofulfill these conditions. Also, the head judge fields questions about the criteria and the judging process. At

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nathan Klingbeil, Wright State University; Byron Newberry, Oklahoma Christian University of Science and Arts; Anthony Donaldson, California Baptist University; Joan Ozdogan, Chantilly High School Academy

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !"#$%"' ! N)! ! NK! ! NO! ! NM! ! NP! ! NQ! ! ?4.730HR!! +0.--! ! KBLM! CPI! KBLP! CSI! KB*S! CQI! KBLO! CLI! KBQS! C*I! OBP@! CKI!! +0.--! ! KBPQ! CSI! KBPQ! CSI! )B@@! C)I! KBKO! COI! KBLO! CMI! KBSQ! CQI!! D-84./H! ! KBKO! COI! )B*P! CKI! KBSO! CSI! )B*P! CKI! OB@@! C)I! KBMQ! COI!! T29/0.--! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! @! C)I! )B*P! CKI! ?4.730HR!! T29/0.--! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! "#$!%&'!! ()*K(! ! +,-./0-!&1+!23!45-!678.9-!:7

Conference Session

The New ABET CE Criteria - Program Development

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian Swenty, University of Evansville; Mark Valenzuela, University of Evansville; James Allen, University of Evansville; Immanuel Selvaraj, University of Evansville

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

., Baltimore, MD, 2009.3. How Are We Doing? Assessment Tips With Gloria Rogers, http://www.abet.org/Linked%20Documents- UPDATE/Assessment/Assessment%20Tips8.pdf, ABET, Inc., Baltimore, MD, 2009.4. Assessment Basics, ABET Program Evaluator Training-Pre Work, http://www.abet.org/_TrainingCD/index.htm, ABET, Inc. Baltimore, MD, 2010.5. Peterson, O, Williams, S, and Durant, E., “Understanding ABET Objectives and Outcomes,” Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Austin, TX, 2008.6. The Fact Book 2009-2010, University of Evansville, Evansville IN, 2009.7. Mission Statements, University of Evansville, http://www.evansville.edu/aboutue/mission.cfm, Evansville, IN 2010.8. Gravett, L. and

Conference Session

Frontiers in Engineering Economy

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ted Eschenbach, TGE Consulting

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy

. Lavelle, and Ted G. Eschenbach, “How Do Engineering Managers Teach Engineering Economy?” Proceedings of the 2008 ASEM National Conference, West Point, November 2008, CD.14. Newnan, Donald G., Jerome P. Lavelle, and Ted G. Eschenbach, Engineering Economic Analysis 10th, Oxford University Press, 2009.15. Newnan, Donald G., Ted G. Eschenbach, and Jerome P. Lavelle, Engineering Economic Analysis 11th, Oxford University Press, 2012 (in press).16. Park, Chan S. Contemporary Engineering Economic Analysis, 4th, Prentice Hall, 2007.17. Peterson, William R., “Spreadsheets as the Primary Means of Engineering Economy Education,” Proceedings of the 2009 IERC National Conference, Miami, June 2010, abstract on CD.18. Ross, Stephen A., Randolph W

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Outside the Classroom

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Bowler, Michigan Technological University; Susie Amato-Henderson, Michigan Technological University; Tom Drummer, Michigan Technological University; Joseph Holles, Michigan Technological University; Ted Lockhart, Michigan Technological University; Joanna Schreiber, Michigan Technological University; Debra Charlesworth, Michigan Technological University; Jingfang Ren, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

issueRecognition of possible 0 = No recognition in responseconsequences resulting from the 1 = Recognition of issue in responseaction.Recognition of the perpetrator’s 0 = No recognition in responseresponsibility or accountability for 1 = Recognition of issue in responsethe action.Recognition of the rights of the 0 = No recognition in responsevictim(s) of the action. 1 = Recognition of issue in responseRecognition of the duties and/or 0 = No recognition in responseobligations of the individuals 1 = Recognition of issue in responseinvolved in the action. Total Score Range per ethical 0 to 6 issueInter-Rater Reliability and Agreement AnalysisScores were totaled for each ethical

Conference Session

Ethics & HSS in Engineering

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

David Haws

. Hoover was a prolific (and sometimes eloquent) writer—often more coherent than like-minded contemporaries, such as Arthur Morgan. As engineering educators, we should befamiliar with two of his more important political tracts: American Individualism (1922) and TheChallenge to Liberty (1934). We should also be familiar with the first volume (of three) of hisMemoirs: Years of Adventure (1952). George H. Nash wrote an excellent, multi-volumebiography, the first volume of which, The Life of Herbert Hoover: The Engineer (1983) bears onHoover’s engineering career. Finally, the eighth chapter of Edwin T. Layton, Jr.’s The Revolt ofthe Engineers (1971) contains a fascinating analysis of Hoover’s participation in the attemptedreform of the American

Conference Session

Nontechnical Skills for Engineering Technology Students

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Hamid Khan

results have been undertaken to see theimpact of modular and case methods. A statistical treatment has been envisioned for the future to Page 9.1199.9 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education.comprehensively study the long term impact of interventions when more time and resources aremade available.References 1. BOATRIGHT, J. (2003) Ethics and the conduct of Business. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River. 2. KELMAN, S. (1994) Cost Benefit Analysis: An Ethical Critique in The Ford Pinto

Conference Session

Capstone Design II

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Ajay Agrawal; Zahed Siddique

accomplish the major targets. Identify the end product(s) of your efforts. The weekly individual plan must align with the weekly group plan. The group plan should support the strategic plan and the overall plan of action. Problems or Concerns/Achievements or Success Explain problems or concerns of your own division or department. List your achievements and successes. Figure 3 - Individual Weekly Progress Report Format• Each team meets weekly at a regularly scheduled time with the faculty advisor to review progress, plans, and to seek input. Additional meetings with the advisor may be arranged as necessary.• The team meets with the Project Liaison as necessary. At the minimum, a copy of

Conference Session

Emerging Trends in Engineering Education

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

John McGuire; John Kaplan; Kathleen Kaplan

. Romantic (1800 AD-1900 AD)The Romantic period was a time of independence from the simplification of the Classicalperiod. Composers expressed love in their music: love of nation, love of nature, love ofman, along with the spirits of immortality and independence. Interestingly, the pianobecame the most popular instrument.5.7. 20th Century and Modern Music (1900 AD-present)The music from the 1900’s to today has shown searches for new experiences. There hasbeen radical experimentation, deregulation, and permissiveness.6. Engineering HistoryThe term “engineering” is from a Latin word meaning ingenious [5]. The history ofengineering is rich, as rich as the history of music, with a great number of changesoccurring in the last few centuries.Some texts

Conference Session

Teaching about New Materials

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Rita Caso; Ibrahim Karaman; Jeff Froyd; Terry Creasy; Winfried Teizer

resistance against introducing newtopics and reach the largest number of students quickly. Work is continuing to assess the degreeto which students comprehend the new material that is being introduced.AcknowledgementsThe authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the Division of Engineering Education andCenters of the National Science Foundation under grant number EEC-0304049. Any opinions,findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthor(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliographic Information1. Morgan, J., Rinehart, J., and Froyd, J. (2001) Industry Case Studies at Texas A&M University, Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference2. Lasting

Conference Session

IE Outreach and Advancement

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Sandra Moore Furneaux; Randa Shehab; M Jayne Fleener; Kim Warram; Elizabeth Kvach; Betty Harris; Anne Reynolds; Teri Reed Rhoads; Susan Walden; Teri Murphy; Deborah Trytten

that." (female junior)In addition to the emphasis on helping people, participants also mentioned an emphasis onworking with people: "All engineerings involve going out and, at, at some degree, talking to people, gathering information, um, but I think industrial engineering does more of the social interaction with people to get their input …" (male junior)In fact, several students said that professional industrial engineers need to be goodcommunicator s, especially relative to other engineering disciplines: Page 9.2.4 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition

Conference Session

Lean Manufacturing Education

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Robert Seaker; Jignesh Rathod; Farouk Attia

for Engineering EducationBibliography: 1. Askin, Ronald G., J. B. Goldberg (2002) Design and Analysis of Lean Production Systems, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2. Evans, J. R., D. R. Anderson, D. J. Sweeney, T. A. Williams (1990), Applied production And Operations Management, West Publishing Company. 3. Klaas, Thorsten, Push vs. Pull concepts in logistics chains, CEMS Academic Conference, Louvain-la- Neuve, May 7-9, 1998. 4. Seaker, R., Farouk Attia, Jignesh Rathod (2004), Strategically Deployed WIP Inventory: Toward Flexible Low cost manufacturing, a Working Paper, College of Technology, University of Houston. 5. Slack, N., S. Chambers, R. Johnson (2001), Operations Management

Conference Session

Emerging Trends in Engineering Education

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Douglas Coffin; Catherine Almquist; Amit Shukla; Michael Bailey-Van Kuren; James Kiper; Christine Noble

Education”the possibility of a seminar series for all students in SEAS, which will further highlight therelationship between the theoretical foundations and real world engineering experience. Thread 1 Thread 2 Thread 3 (i.e. Design) EAS 101 EAS102 P S r e a MME2XX ECE 2XX PSE 2XX m c i

Conference Session

EM Skills and Real-World Concepts, Pt. 2

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Michelle Summers; Julie Phillips; Nathan Harter; Mark Dean; Donna Evanecky

keytheorists, namely Jay W. Forrester, W. Edwards Deming, Russell Ackoff, Peter Senge, andMargaret Wheatley, and outlining some of the central lessons that would enable a person familiarwith systems thinking to make a difference at an interpersonal, team, and organizational level.ForresterKnown and credited for being the creator of the field of systems dynamics in the mid 1950’s, JayForrester’s ideas about the behavior of systems began to emerge long before. Born in Nebraskaon July 14, 1918, Jay W. Forrester went on to received a B.S. degree in electrical engineeringfrom the University of Nebraska in 1939 and his M.S. degree from MIT in 1945. He stayed on tobecome director of MIT's Lincoln Digital Computer Laboratory until he changed his focus

Conference Session

Instructional Technology

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Ronald Welch

problem since they were absent fromthe site when the concrete was placed. Consequently, they later built up the near side of thebridge by anchoring stacked 2x6’s into the concrete footer to bring it back to level and to provideproper support and connection for the bridge.IV. AssessmentStudent web-based assessments at the end of the experience were extremely supportive ofdesign-build projects. Students responded to web-based statements using a scale of 1-5 (stronglydisagree – strongly agree). The responses (Table 1) for the project were compared to theaverages for USMA, the department, and the course depending on what level the statements weregenerated at.This design-build project was one of 20 separate capstone projects during the spring

Conference Session

ET Design Projects

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Harry Fox

this preliminary designphase, the grading scheme shown in Table 2 is used. Table 2. Grading scheme for Senior Design A Design Draft Report item to be completed – 10% for each item 1. Title page 2. Introduction 3. Progress reports, signed and dated (at least 4) Discussion of each of the following topic areas: 4. Chassis or body – type, material to be used, component layout sketch 5. Power source and specifications 6. Drive mechanism – problems and solutions 7. Motors – type(s), electrical and mechanical specifications 8. Sensors and interfaces – collision, light, sound; circuit schematics 9. Controller – microcontroller, manufacturer

Conference Session

Emerging Trends in Engineering Education

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Rodger Dalton; Paul Klenk; Gary Ybarra

. and Merdes, C.L. “Multimedia Teaching Modules in theEngineering K-PH.D. Program at Duke University.” Proceedings. Frontiers in Education Conference. 2001.2 deGrazia, J.L., Sullivan, J.F., Carlson, L.E. and Carlson, D.W. “Engineering in the K-12 Classroom: A Partnership that Works.” Proceedings. Frontiers in Education Conference. 2000.3 Villa, E.Q., Rios, L.D., Stafford, S. and Gandara, G. “K-16 Partnerships: Casting a Broad Net for filling the Critical Gaps in Engineering.” Proceedings. Frontiers in Education Conference. 2001.4 Kimmel, H. and Cano, R. “K-12 and Beyond: The Extended Engineering Pipeline.” Proceedings. Frontiers in Education Conference. 2001.5 Klenk, P.A., K. Barcus, and G.A. Ybarra

Conference Session

Curriculum Development in Information Technology

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Lunt Barry; C. Richard Helps; Joseph Ekstrom

: An Experimental Course in Web-Based Application Design, SIGCSE’02, Covington, Kentucky, USA,[10] Peterson, Larry L. and Davie Bruce S. Computer Networks: A Systems Approach, 3rdEd, San Francisco, CA, 2003[11] Lunt, Barry, et al., What Is the New Discipline of Information Technology? WhereDoes It Fit?, CIEC 2003, Tucson, AZ, Jan 28-31, 2003.JOSEPH J. EKSTROMJoseph J. Ekstrom (Ph. D. Computer Science, BYU 1992) has been Associate Professor of InformationTechnology at BYU since 2001. During 30 years of industrial experience he held positions from developerthrough senior management. His research interests include network and systems management, distributedcomputing, system modeling and architecture, system development, and IT curriculum and

Conference Session

Technology, Communications & Ethics

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Donald Carpenter; Honor Passow; Trevor Harding; Cynthia Finelli

Integrity in Honor Code and Non-Honor Code Environments: A Qualitative Investigation." Journal of Higher Education 70(2): 211-234.TREVOR S. HARDING is Associate Professor of Manufacturing Engineering at Kettering University, where heteaches courses in materials engineering and selection and manufacturing processes. He has been involved in theEducational Research and Methods Division of ASEE for several years. His research interests include academicdishonesty, wear behavior of orthopaedic implants and fatigue in aerospace materials. Page 9.1270.10DONALD D. CARPENTER is an Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering at Lawrence

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tina Hudson, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Shannon M. Sipes, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

significant data analysis to determine which noise source(s) is possibly causing thepoor measurement. This allows for practice with other critical thinking skills, including: (i) under-standing what the data tells them about the circuit performance and (ii) interpretation of thesemeasurements, while providing immediate feedback as to whether or not their interpretation ofthe data was correct. The professor/expert-student spends less and less time modeling critical Page 24.396.6thinking skills as the quarter progresses, allowing the students more opportunities to practice themin pairs, learning from one-another.In the final mini-project

Conference Session

FPD 2: Building Community

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Betsy F. Willis, Southern Methodist University; David A. Willis, Southern Methodist University; Mark Fontenot, Southern Methodist University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Lecture,” Hyperion, New York.9. W. Kamkwamba and B. Mealer, 2009, “The Boy Who Harnessed the Wind,” HarperCollins, New York.10. P. Lencioni, 2002, “The Five Dysfunctions of a Team: A Leadership Fable,” Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.11. P. Lencioni, 2007, “The Three Signs of a Miserable Job: A Fable for Managers (and Their Employees),” Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.12. M. Gladwell, 2008, “Outliers: The Story of Success,” Little, Brown and Company, New York.13. P.H. Diamandis and S. Kotler, 2012, “Abundance: The Future is Better Than You Think,” Free Press, NewYork.14. W.G. Bennis and R.J. Thomas, 2002, “Crucibles of Leadership,” Harvard Business Review, Boston.15. B. George, P. Sims, A.N. McLean, and D. Mayer, 2007, “Discovering Your Authentic

Conference Session

Enhancing Success/Peristence at Two-Year Colleges

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dan G. Dimitriu, San Antonio College; Jerry O'Connor, San Antonio College

Tagged Divisions

Two Year College Division

Lennartsson, ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Diego, CA, October 2006 13. The kiss of death? An alternative view of college remediation, by Adelman, C. (1998). National Crosstalk, 6(3). Retrieved from http://www.highereducation.org/crosstalk/ct0798/voices0798-adelman.shtml 14. New evidence on college remediation, by Attewell, P. A., Lavin, D. E., Domina, T., & Levey, T. (2006). Journal of Higher Education, 77(5), 886–924. 15. Summer bridge: Improving retention rates for underprepared students, by Garcia, P. (1991), Journal of the Freshman Year Experience, 3(2), 91–105. 16. The benefits of summer bridge programs for underrepresented and low-income students, by Ackermann, S. P. (1990, April

Conference Session

FPD 5: Course Delivery Methods and Issues

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathleen A. Ossman, University of Cincinnati; Gregory Warren Bucks, University of Cincinnati

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

read a short description of a concept then immediately write and test codein MATLAB®.AcknowledgmentThis work was supported, in part, through a MathWorks grant from the Curriculum DevelopmentProgram in spring 2013. A portion of the grant supported the purchase of the Adobe Captivatesoftware used to create the videos.Bibliography1. P. Heller, R. Keith, and S. Anderson, “Teaching Problem Solving Through Cooperative Grouping. Part 1: Group Versus Individual Problem Solving,” Am. J. Phys. 60, 627-636 (1992).2. D. R. Woods, A. N. Hrymak, R. R. Marshall, P. E. Wood, C. M. Crowe, T. W. Hoffman, J. D. Wright, P. A. Taylor, K. A. Woodhouse, and C. G. K. Bouchard, "Developing Problem Solving Skills: The McMaster Problem Solving Program," ASEE J

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jianyu Dong, California State University, Los Angeles; Huiping Guo, California State University, Los Angeles

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

. Active learning activities suchas team building and group discussion are very useful to enhance the pedagogical effectiveness.AcknowledgmentThis work is sponsored by NSF, Grant #0941839.Reference[1] A. Martinez-Mones, E. Gomes-Sanchez at el, “Multiple Case Studies to Enhance Project-based Learning in aComputer Architecture Course”, IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 48, No. 3, August, 2005[2] K. Smith, S. Sheppard, D. Johnson, and R. Johnson, “Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices,”Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94, No. 1, 2005, pp. 87-102.[3] B. A. Karanian, L. G. Chedid, M. Lande, G. Monaghan, “Work in Progress - Behavioral Aspects of StudentEngineering Design Experiences” in Proceedings of the 38th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Capstone Design

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amit Shashikant Jariwala, Georgia Institute of Technology; Sarvagya Vaish, Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology ; David W. Rosen, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

project portalDuring Spring 2013, the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs at the College of Engineering(CoE) at Georgia Tech invited faculty and administrators from various schools within theCollege to collaboratively discuss possible pathways for developing a CoE or Institute-wideCapstone Design program. The faculty discussed several challenges, ranging from differences incurriculum requirements for individual schools, incompatibility between Schools having multi-semester Capstone Design sequence v/s a single semester, adequate scoping of projects, facultyload-sharing, etc. (some of which were similar to the ones already presented by Bannerot et al.6).Given the extremely large enrollments (around 800 students take Capstone Design everysemester

Conference Session

Integrating Engineering Economy into Curricula

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joseph Wilck IV, East Carolina University; Paul C. Lynch, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA; Paul J. Kauffmann P.E., East Carolina University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy

: Student Survey Questions for Engineering Economics Course. Relevant Survey Questions 1. Which of the following economics courses did you take or are you currently taking? - Microeconomics - Macroeconomics 2. If you took one or both of the courses listed in the prior question, which of the following courses do you feel was more valuable for you? (Circle Only One) - Economics Course(s) - Engineering Economics Course 3. Do you feel as though every student (non-engineering and engineering) should take a course like engineering economics? (Circle Only One) - Yes - No 4. Do you feel as though a course like engineering economics would be a good course to offer as a General Education course available to all

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa Huettel, Duke University; Michael R. Gustafson II, Duke University; Joseph C. Nadeau, Duke University; David E. Schaad, Duke University; Michael M. Barger, Duke University; Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia, Michigan State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.17. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., and Cocking, R.R. (1999). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.18. Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L. Z., Anderman, E., Anderman, L., Freeman, K. E., et al. (2000). Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales (PALS). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan19. Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Durik, A. M., Conley, A. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Karabenick, S. A., and Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). Measuring situational interest in academic domains. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 647-671.20. Huettel, L.G., Brown, A.S., Coonley, K.D

Conference Session

Curriculum Development and Assessment in Chemical Engineering

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Debra M. Gilbuena, Oregon State University; Christina Smith, Oregon State University; Bill Jay Brooks, Oregon State University; Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

-158. 5. A. Elby, American Journal of Physics, 1999, S52. 6. R. M. Felder and R. Brent, Journal of Engineering Education, 2005, 57-72. 7. C. Crouch, J. Watkins, A. Fagen and E. Mazur, Research-Based Reform of University Physics, 2007. 8. A. Fagen, C. Crouch and E. Mazur, The Physics Teacher, 2002, 206-209. 9. M. D. Koretsky and B. J. Brooks, Chemical Engineering Education, 2012, 46, 289-297. 10. E. M. Rogers, Addictive behaviors, 2002, 27, 989-993. 11. M. Borrego, J. E. Froyd and T. Simin Hall, Journal of Engineering Education, 2010, 99, 185. 12. M. Borrego, S. Cutler, J. Froyd, M. Prince and C. Henderson, in Australasian Association for Engineering

Conference Session

Capstone Design

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bob Rhoads, The Ohio State University; Clifford A Whitfield, Ohio State University; Jacob T Allenstein, The Ohio State University; Peter Rogers, The Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

engineering population.The authors also discussed their continuous improvement concepts to help improve the student’scapstone experience and to better prepare them for their future professional careers. The authorsare introducing new curriculum delivery concepts, emphasizing design concepts and extending Page 24.560.12the length of the industry-sponsored project.References1. Howe, S., “Where Are We Now? Statistics on Capstone Courses Nationwide”, Advances in Engineering Education, Spring 20102. Rhoads, B., Rogers, P. “Multidisciplinary Capstone Design Guide”, Engineering Education Innovation Center, College of Engineering, The Ohio State

Conference Session

International Division Technical Session 9

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Scott C Streiner, University of Pittsburgh; Sydnie Cunningham Cunningham, University of Tulsa; Shaobo Huang, University of Southern California; Svetlana Levonisova, University of Southern California; Cheryl Matherly, The University of Tulsa; Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh; Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh; Gisele Ragusa, University of Southern California; Daria A Kotys-Schwartz, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Divisions

International

engineering: Lessons for engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 139-151.8. Machotka, M. and S. Spodek (2002). “Study Abroad: Preparing Engineering Students for Success in the Global Economy,” (CD) Proceedings, 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Conference.9. American Council on Education (2008). Survey on the State of Internationalization in Undergraduate Education (retrieved on line November 19, 2008 www.acenet.edu).10. Parkinson, A., “The Rationale for Developing Global Competence,” Online Journal for Global Engineering Education, 4(2), 2009.11. Deardorf, DK (2006), “Identification and Assessment of Intercultural Competence as a Student Outcome of Internationalization,” Journal of Studies