Session 2425 A Just-In-Time Approach to Teaching Senior Design By: Thomas R. Grimm Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering Michigan Technological UniversityAbstractThe subject of this paper is the approach used to teach the senior design project course inthe Mechanical Engineering Department at Michigan Technological University. Theprimary objective in the development of the required two semester senior designsequence was to insure a positive experience in mechanical engineering design whileeliminating the procrastination that can be prevalent in long term
sound and practical solutions for facultygrowth. Moreover, using industry to meet the professional development needs of faculty is ahighly viable solution.5I. IntroductionThe half-life of an engineer’s technical skills - how long it takes for half of everything anengineer knows about his or her field to become obsolete - is strikingly short. According to theNational University Continuing Education Association, for mechanical engineers it is 7.5 years;for electrical engineers it is 5 years; for software engineers, a mere 2.5 years.6 Keeping in mindthe pace of change and growth since these estimates were developed almost 10 years ago, thesehalf-life figures are undoubtedly even shorter today. So as technological changes gain
Paper ID #11870Measuring Community College Students’ Self-Efficacy toward Circuit Anal-ysisDr. Carl Whitesel, Mesa Community College Carl Whitesel has spent his career teaching Engineering Technology, and has taught in the community college setting since 2007. He is currently teaching Robotics and Automated Systems within the Arizona Advanced Manufacturing Institute at Mesa Community College. His teaching focus is primarily on circuit analysis, electronics, motors and sensors. He earned his Ph.D. in Engineering Education - Curriculum and Instruction, from Arizona State University in 2014. His primary research interests are
engineering press, and invited speaker internationally. Received medical device achievement award in 2003 from Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI).Ms. Jennifer Chen Lee, University of Michigan Jennifer Lee is a third-year student pursuing biomedical engineering student at the University of Michigan. She is currently a research assistant at the Laboratory of Innovation in Global Health Technology. Her research interests include areas of global health technologies and engineering design. She is also currently a facilitator for the Medical Device Sandbox at University of Michigan and a member of Tau Beta Pi.Prof. Jan P Stegemann, University of Michigan Jan Stegemann is a Professor in the Department
allows faculty and course administrators to determine if a particular topic needs to be addressed in a different fashion or in greater depth during class. • A similar analysis can be made concerning common answers to generate statistics concerning possible cases of collusion or cheating.The detriments of common time testing are also numerous: • Security of original exam is more critical • Advances in technology makes in-class cheating more possible • Common tests may not test those topics of importance to, and stressed by, individual instructors • The committee approach to generating a common test can be logistically, administratively and politically painful.The Division of Engineering Fundamentals, which
, along with results of this activity with the Mathematics,Science, and Technology program. We continue this paper by suggesting some mechanisms for Page 7.122.1 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationusing these components as an outreach program, which will include staffing ideas and means toestablish ties between colleges and middle schools.Proposed Outreach StructureIn this section we propose an organizational structure for this outreach program. Each universityhas a different
ThermodynamicsThe definition of a computer didactic model for Engineering Thermodynamics includes the use oftraditional teaching methods adapted to new technologies by means of a combination ofcourseware materials, developed according to constructivist principles. Such an approach leads toa wholly computerized, interactive, teaching-learning, open environment. The coursewarematerials developed to combine with the corresponding methodologies are as follows.• Unimedia Materials: multimedia-type presentations including images, animations, video etc. They are prepared with some presentation tool such or are more elaborate created with an authoring tool such as Director. These software tools are sometimes combined with commercial programs, specific
endeavor,whether graduate studies or engineering practice. Clearly, this outcome goal is entirely desirable. The challenge in developing realistic education outcome goals has become increasingly difficult asthe body of knowledge required to be conversant, much less master, a field has grown at an increasingrate over the past century.3 To illustrate, the fields of geotechnical engineering, electrical engineering,environmental engineering, and biological engineering, to name a few, were all created in the past 90years. In addition to new fields of endeavor, the introduction of technology, especially the personalcomputer, has greatly expanded the opportunities for exploration, testing, and publishing in all fields ofscience, technology
endeavor,whether graduate studies or engineering practice. Clearly, this outcome goal is entirely desirable. The challenge in developing realistic education outcome goals has become increasingly difficult asthe body of knowledge required to be conversant, much less master, a field has grown at an increasingrate over the past century.3 To illustrate, the fields of geotechnical engineering, electrical engineering,environmental engineering, and biological engineering, to name a few, were all created in the past 90years. In addition to new fields of endeavor, the introduction of technology, especially the personalcomputer, has greatly expanded the opportunities for exploration, testing, and publishing in all fields ofscience, technology
endeavor,whether graduate studies or engineering practice. Clearly, this outcome goal is entirely desirable. The challenge in developing realistic education outcome goals has become increasingly difficult asthe body of knowledge required to be conversant, much less master, a field has grown at an increasingrate over the past century.3 To illustrate, the fields of geotechnical engineering, electrical engineering,environmental engineering, and biological engineering, to name a few, were all created in the past 90years. In addition to new fields of endeavor, the introduction of technology, especially the personalcomputer, has greatly expanded the opportunities for exploration, testing, and publishing in all fields ofscience, technology
Experiences in Research. He is passionate about student success and finding ways to use research experiences to promote student growth, learning, and support.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Lisa D. McNair is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she also serves as Deputy Executive Director of the Institute for Creativity, Arts, and Technology (ICAT).Dr. David Gray, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Gray receieved his B.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Virginia Tech in 2000. He then earned a M.S. and a Ph.D. in Materials Science and Engineering from Virginia Tech in 2002 and 2010, respectively. Much of his graduate education
Paper ID #37971Introducing Deep Learning on Edge Devices Using A LineFollower RobotBassam Alshammari Bassam has received his bachelor's degree in Mechatronics Engineering Technology at Purdue University Calumet, Indiana. He is currently pursuing his master's degree at Pittsburg State University in Kansas. He is an instructor at Technical and Vocational Training Corporation in Saudi Arabia.Erik A. Mayer (Professor) Erik Mayer is a Professor at Pittsburg State University in Kansas where he has been instrumental in forming the Computer and Embedded Systems emphasis in the Electronics Engineering Technology
content of the subjects they teach. Aparticular challenge in a graduate program for secondary mathematics and science teachers ishow to provide teacher candidates with subject matter content, on a graduate level, that does notreplicate undergraduate courses.The School of Education and School of Engineering at University of Bridgeport designed theEDMM 600D- STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) for TeacherEducators course for students of the School of Education. Designed course uses audio and imageprocessing techniques and technologies to teach fundamental STEM concepts to secondary pre-and in- service mathematics and science teachers. Designed to enrich the teaching and learningexperience, the course activities include: (a
of such devices. Personnel requirements not only include material scientists and engineers but a host of competent support people who together will implement the technology roadmap for this industry. The task at hand is to develop a workforce that must have a new skill set which has not previously been the focus of any existing organized technical curriculum. This paper will address one approach to presenting the important process steps in microdevice fabrication to a non-materials major audience. Particular attention will be spent on the problems and challenges associated with introducing what the technical demands and expectations of the industry will be, presenting the material
Paper ID #28427NSF INCLUDES: Leveraging Precollege STEM Programs for BroadeningParticipation in Undergraduate STEMDr. Alaine M Allen, University of Pittsburgh Dr. Alaine M. Allen is an educator who opens doors for students, particularly individuals from groups historically marginalized in science, technology, engineering and mathematics, and she is committed to creating a culture of inclusive excellence in STEM environments. Dr. Allen is the director of K-12 Out- reach and Community Engagement in the University of Pittsburgh, Swanson School of Engineering and a co-director of the Broadening Equity in STEM Center at
under-represented minorities pursuingbaccalaureate degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Page 8.391.1 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education Table 1. Historical UTEP Student Demographics. Fall Semester Percent Caucasian Percent Hispanic 1975 54.4 34.8 1983 43.8 45.5 2002
performance arediscussed.I. IntroductionThe mechanics of materials course is one of the core courses for students in civil, mechanical,aerospace, metallurgical, ceramic, geotechnical, and architectural engineering programs. Thecourse is also included in architecture, engineering mechanics, engineering physics, engineeringmanagement, and engineering technology curricula. The course is typically taken during thesophomore or junior years after students complete their general mathematics and sciencepreparation. The mechanics of materials course introduces students to the principles involved indesigning typical components found in machines and structures such as drive shafts; floor beams,pressure tanks, and bolted connections. The course explores various
ratings as is seen in the secondsemester results. In this case, a better understanding of the skills and behaviors and therating process was precipitated by a special class session on the importance of accuratepeer and self-assessment that was presented during the second course. By the thirdcourse, the student ratings are now founded on a more realistic base. Therefore studentsare able to assess their skill levels more accurately. Now if real learning occurs, the selfand peer ratings should reflect the increase level of competency. In our experiment, this isthe case across all three skills.References1. Durfee, W.K. (1994). “Engineering Education Gets Real,” Technology Review, 97(2), 42-51
information on practices in place for the current visit cycle; what are the latestissues, how evaluators are looking at materials, and so on.There is no substitute for experience and all engineering administrators should considervolunteering as an ABET evaluator.19 One of the keys to ABETs’ past and future success ishaving a cadre of effective evaluators. ABET is focusing a great deal of its current improvementefforts on improving the performance of program evaluators.20ABET has a long history of conducting faculty workshops first to introduce faculty to EC 2000and today to provide information on how to do assessment.Rose Hulman Institute of Technology has been holding an annual symposium on assessmentsince 1997. The 2007 symposium is entitled “Best
response to a national concern in the early 1990s about poor retention of students inengineering combined with a real, or some would say critical, need for more engineers, The OhioState University (OSU) worked with nine other schools to form the Gateway EngineeringEducation Coalition. This need for engineers was and currently is driven by society's ever-increasing consumption of technology. The Coalition, led by Drexel University, was establishedas a result of the creation of an Engineering Education Coalitions program by the NationalScience Foundation. These schools agreed to adopt or adapt Drexel's E4 program1-2 forfreshmen and sophomores which put engineering "up-front" and specifically included hands-onlabs and incorporated design projects
157 Why Do They Come, Why Do They Not Return Stuart Kellogg South Dakota School of Mines and TechnologyAbstractDeclining interest in engineering in high school students exacerbated by traditionally high studentdropout rates in engineering have led to steep enrollment decreases in many engineeringprograms. While there is substantial research evidence to the contrary, many engineering facultymembers continue to view the attrition positively, believing that most students who leaveengineering do so either because of poor academic preparation, a lack of commitment
. Papadopoulos has diverse research and teaching interests in structural mechanics and bioconstruction (with emphasis in bamboo); appropriate technology; engineering ethics; and mechanics education. He has served as PI of several NSF-sponsored research projects and is co-author of Lying by Approximation: The Truth about Finite Element Analysis. He is active in the Mechanics Division.Eric Davishahl, Whatcom Community College Eric Davishahl holds an MS degree in mechanical engineering and serves as associate professor and engineering program coordinator at Whatcom Community College. His teaching and research interests include developing, implementing and assessing active learning instructional strategies and auto-graded online
hasadded both flexibility and capability to the engineering experimentation curriculum in achievingthese goals. The coupling of numerical simulation and experimentation for demonstration andcomparison purposes is widely used. New technologies also allow experiments to be controlledover the Internet in a remote or distance education format. However, the most recent laboratoryincarnation, virtual experimentation, is the use of numerical techniques to simulate the entireexperimentation process (equipment and data).Virtual experimentation generates reactions of great enthusiasm and trepidation amongengineering educators. Many educators see wide ranging applications of these techniques withadvantages in terms of learning pedagogies, equipment costs
Session 2147 Remote Data Acquisition using Bluetooth David R. Loker, P.E. Collin G. Frampton, Titan J. McElhaney, Jonathan R. Mook, Anthony M. Sansone Penn State Erie, The Behrend CollegeAbstractIn this paper, a remote data acquisition project using Bluetooth technology is presented for asenior technical elective telecommunications course in the Electrical Engineering TechnologyBaccalaureate Program at Penn State Erie, The Behrend College. There are several noteworthycharacteristics of this project
AcceleratedEntry Program (LEAP), a program that prepares students with non-engineering degrees, fromany geographic location, for entry into master degree programs in engineering. It was decidedthat eliminating constraints to the learning environment, such as proximity to campus, wouldmake the program or courses more attractive to potential students outside the Boston area 2.The goal of the pilot study was to redesign a specific engineering course through a challengingapplication of distance education technologies and distributed learning pedagogies, with theultimate purpose of raising the entire LEAP program to a higher level. At a time when it takes
a PhD student in Engineering Education Systems and Design at Arizona State University. Mr. Halkiyo Bachelor of Science from Hawassa University, and Masters of Science in Civil Engineering from Arba Minch University, both in Ethiopia. Mr. Halkiyo uses mixed methods to study his primary research interest: broadening the participation of Engineering Education in Ethiopian universities to in- crease the diversity, inclusivity, equity and quality of Engineering Education. He studies how different student-groups such as women and men, rich and poor, student from rural and urban, technologically literate and less literate can have quality and equitable learning experiences to not only thrive in their performances
Society for Engineering EducationEach term, The University of Dayton offers a Project Management course, which theEngineering Technology Department requires of all its majors. The primary goal of thiscourse is to familiarize Sophomore and Junior level students with the tools and techniquesnecessary to manage a project. The course also seeks to expose students to the real lifecomplexities of managing a large-scale project. Students will use their projectmanagement skills in managing projects in other courses, notably the Senior Designcapstone course. Project management concepts can be taught to students in a traditionallecture format, but unless the students have previously been involved in a project as aleader or member of a team, they tend to
institutions. They are most commonly taught at anintroductory level to community college students in technology programs. In engineering pro-grams it is uncommon to find a course that focusses only on PLCs, they are often a topic withinautomated/integrated manufacturing systems courses. High quality texts that can support intro-ductory PLC courses are available2,5,6,8,9 and these can support higher level courses with supple-mentary material. Other high quality texts are available that discuss integrated manufacturingsystems with chapters on PLCs1,3. You can find an example of a complete logical controls systemcourse at http://claymore.engineer.gvsu.edu/eod/egr450.html.At Grand Valley State University we designed a logical controls course entitled
(game nights, cheering for her kids’ sports teams, and puzzling), traveling, and volunteering.Dr. Fred Richard Beyette Jr., University of Georgia Fred R. Beyette Jr. has been teaching and performing research in areas related to Mixed Technology Embedded Systems since 1988. From 1988 to 1995, his efforts contributed to the work of materials, device and systems specialists at the NSF Engineering ResDr. Julie P Martin, University of Georgia Julie P. Martin is the Director of the Engineering Education Transformations Institute at University of Georgia. Julie is a Fellow of ASEE, a member of ASEE’s Hall of Fame. She is the editor-in-chief of Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, where her mission to
in meaningful learning [1].With the adoption of recent science standards (i.e., NGSS); teachers are faced with the task ofintegrating engineering design into their science instructions and making connections betweenScience, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) disciplines in their instructions.This is partly daunting for elementary teachers, given their minimal preparation in engineering[3]. While STEM education is recognized by educators and research communities asimportant, there is no common understanding or agreement on the nature of STEM education asan integrated endeavor. Consequently, K-12 teachers have limited guidelines and teachingmodels to follow regarding how to teach integrated STEM [4].Without clear