Conference Session

Capstone Design I

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John K. Estell, Ohio Northern University; Juliet Hurtig, Ohio Northern University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

-nology.com 2005 [Online]. Available: http://www.teach- nology.com/tutorials/teaching/rubrics3. S. M. Blanchard, M. G. McCord, P. L. Mente, D. S. Lalush, C. F. Abrams, E. G. Loboa, H. T. Nagle, Rubrics Cubed: Tying Grades to Assessment to Reduce Faculty Workloads, Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.4. V. L. Young, D. Ridgeway, M. E. Prudich, D. J. Goetz, B. J. Stuart, Criterion-Based Grading for Learning and Assessment in Unit Observations Laboratory, Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.5. What is a Rubric? Relearning by Design, Inc., 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.relearning.org

Conference Session

Engineering Physics and Physics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jiliang Li P.E., Purdue University Northwest, Westville Campus, INDIANA, USA; Jinyuan Zhai, University of Akron

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

also be used to introduce thevertical strain concept which will be very helpful and utilized in consolidation settlementestimation. The difference of can be obtained from normal consolidated or over consolidatedsoil consolidation test curves. The original void ratio can be estimated from the followingthree phase diagram as well.Wa = 0 Air (a) Va = e – Va = e - wGs Vv = Va + Vw =Ww = wWs = w1Gs γw =wGs γw Water (w) Vw = Ww/ γw = wGs eWs = Vsγs = Vs Gs γw = 1Gs γw Solid (s) Vs = 1Wt = Ws + Ww + Wa Vt = Vs + Vw + Va = 1Gs γw + wGs γw + 0 =1 + e =(1+ w)Gs γw = Gs γw (1+ w

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship and Innovation: Beyond the University

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Roxanne Moore, Georgia Institute of Technology; Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology; Sunni Haag Newton, Georgia Institute of Technology; Anna Newsome Holcomb, Georgia Institute of Technology, CEISMC

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Conference Session

Integrating Liberal Education and Engineering

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David DiBiasio, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Paula Quinn, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Kristin Boudreau, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Laura A. Robinson, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; John M. Sullivan Jr, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; John Bergendahl, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Leslie Dodson, Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

what type of intervention(s) you would recommend.Our preliminary findings indicate a strong grounding in collaboration for all teams andindividuals; strong evidence of empathy among some (but not all) teams and individuals; andvarying degrees of learning that integrates the humanities and engineering. We summarize ourfindings below.Collaboration: All teams and individuals appeared to be engaged. Individuals seemed to haveroughly equal contributions in terms of time on task and specific contributions. All teamsdemonstrated appropriate teamwork. People listened to each other, responded to each otherappropriately, and seemed to value others’ contributions. There was little or no domination byany single person or pair of persons, no

Conference Session

Mechanics, Music, Meaning, and Mohr

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jakob C Bruhl P.E., U.S. Military Academy; James Ledlie Klosky, U.S. Military Academy; Joseph P. Hanus, U.S. Military Academy

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

Conference Session

Pre-College: Perceptions and Attitudes on the Pathway to Engineering (3)

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aimee Cloutier, Texas Tech University; Guo Zheng Yew, Texas Tech University; Siddhartha Gupta, Texas Tech University; C. Kalpani Dissanayake; Paula Ann Monaco, Texas Tech University; Susan A. Mengel, Texas Tech University; Audra N. Morse P.E., Michigan Technological University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

Conference Session

Nontraditional Teaching Approaches

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Waddah Akili, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

International

the faculty and the impression(s) arrived at by the author, leads oneto believe that it is highly unlikely that new more effective teaching-learning strategieswould be deployed any time soon, unless drastic measures are undertaken. The author ismore convinced now than ever, that classroom reformation, including deployment of activelearning strategies, would happen only if the institution mandates it!The Pros and Cons of the Lecture FormatWhen asked why he/she lectures, one faculty responded: “It is a tradition. It was part of mytraining, and seems to dwell in me and seems like what I should be doing. I feel guilty when Iam not lecturing” (13). This candid statement suggests one of the great dilemmas faced by allwho teach at the postsecondary

Conference Session

Division Experimentation and Lab-Oriented Studies - Pedagogy of Lab Courses

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John M. Santiago Jr, Colorado Technical University; Jing Guo, Colorado Technical University

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

Conference Session

Studies in Faculty Development

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Caitlin Ashley Keller, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Stacy L. Chiaramonte, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Beth Wilson, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Kate Beverage, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Rachel LeBlanc, Worcester PoIytechnic Institute; Terri A. Camesano, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Jody Reis, Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

Market ResearchUPCEA Hallmarks of Excellence in Online Leadership. The UPCEA Hallmarks of Excellencein Online Leadership was developed by the UPCEA National Task Force on Hallmarks ofExcellence in Online Leadership: Jay A. Halfond, Boston University & Senior Fellow UPCEACenter for Online Leadership and Strategy (chair); Andrew Casiello, Old Dominion Universiy;Dave Cillay, Washington State University; Nancy Coleman, PlattForm; Vickie Cook, Universityof Illinois Springfield; John LaBrie, Northeastern University; Mary Niemiec, University ofNebraska; and Witt Salley, Clemson University.Bauer, S., & Bastedo, K., November 17, 2016, Advanced Professional Development for Experienced Online Faculty. Lecture presented at Online Learning

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Design in the First Year

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Joseph Frank, Ohio State University; Kelly Lynn Kolotka, Ohio State University; Andrew H. Phillips, Ohio State University; Michael Schulz, The Ohio State University; Clare Rigney, Ohio State University, Engineering Education Department; Allen Benjamin Drown, Ohio State University; Robert G. Stricko III, Ohio State University; Kathleen A. Harper, Ohio State University; Richard J. Freuler, Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

is a senior lecturer in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. She received her M. S. in physics and B. S. in electrical engineering and applied physics from Case Western Reserve University, and her Ph. D. in physics from The Ohio State University. She has been on the staff of Ohio State’s University Center for the Advancement of Teaching, in addition to teaching in both the physics department and department of engineering education. Her research interests address a broad spectrum of educational topics, but her current foci are adapting problem-solving instructional techniques to first-year engineering and incorporating engineering elements into K-12 science courses.Dr. Richard J

Conference Session

Motivation and Engagement

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peter Rogers, The Ohio State University; Denny C. Davis, The Ohio State University; Sarah Winfree, The Ohio State University ; Kaycee Ash, The Ohio State University; Bashirah Ibrahim, Ohio State University; Lin Ding, The Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

discipline in some and multidisciplinary in others.Project sources varied across instructor-initiated, government or industry-sponsored, professionalorganization-sponsored, and student-initiated. Project focuses included research-driven,community service, design competition, and entrepreneurial product development. Table 12summarizes characteristics of classes participating in pilot testing of MTP assessments.Table 12. Description of Capstone Project Classes Included in Pilot Test of Prototype MTPClass Semesters Discipline(s) Students A 2 Multidisciplinary (beyond engineering) 66 B 1 Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering 135 C 2 Biomedical

Conference Session

Design Tools and Skill Development

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Annie Abell, Ohio State University; Kelly DeVore, Columbus College of Art and Design

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Conference Session

Graduate Education Model, Industry and Practitioner Experience - Graduate Studies Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Diane L. Peters, Kettering University; Molly H. Goldstein, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Joanne Lax, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

transition to academic writing moreeasily so that the costs of the transition do not undermine them.References1. D. L. Peters and S.R. Daly, “The challenge of returning: Transitioning from an engineering career to graduate school,” in 2011 Proc. ASEE.2. W. Schilling, “Issues affecting doctoral students returning to engineering education following extensive industrial experience,” in 2008 Proc. ASEE.3. D.L. Peters and S.R. Daly, S. R., “Why do professionals return to school for graduate degrees?” in 2012 Proc. ASEE.4. D.L. Peters and S.R. Daly, “Returning to graduate school: Expectations of success, values of the degree, and managing the costs,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 244-268, 2013.5. J.S. Eccles, “Subjective task

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Assessment

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brittany Ann Kos, University of Colorado, Boulder; Sarah Miller, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

country you’re going to and what courses internship. they offer.Table 2: Common feedback comments left on Week 6’s writing assignmentCreating a list of common feedback comments allowed our grading team to address students whohad similar questions or issues more efficiently since their feedback was copied directly from alist of pre-assembled comments. The students who brought up other issues in their assignmentswere given individual feedback that addressed their content of their homework more directly.IV. QualityOne of our concerns was that students would take advantage of the mass-grading and turn in poorquality work weekly. To combat this, the TAs would first hand-grade the assignments, so theycould monitor the quality of student work

Conference Session

Thinking Globally, Acting Locally: The Role of Engineering Education towards Attaining UN Sustainable Development Goals

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steven J. Burian, University of Utah; Mercedes Ward, University of Utah; Tariq Banuri, University of Utah; Sajjad Ahmad, University of Nevada, Las Vegas; Rasool Bux Mahar P.E., Mehran University, Pakistan; David Lawrence Stevenson, University of Utah; James A. VanDerslice, University of Utah; Kamran Ansari; Abdul Latif Qureshi

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering, Community Engagement Division, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Minorities in Engineering

Conference Session

Environmental Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Inez Hua, Purdue University; Loring Nies, Purdue University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering

.” Answer questions 1c and 1d with complete sentences. c. (25 points) Identify the public institutions(s) and private organizations responsible for managing air quality, and explain each entity’s role. d. (10 points) Identify the criteria pollutants that are being managed.Scoring Rubric:Excellent: All answers are complete and correct. Student demonstrates knowledge of allappropriate organizations and their role in managing air quality. All criteria pollutants beingmanaged are correctly identified.Acceptable: Most answers are complete and correct. Student shows partial misunderstanding ofroles of institutions. At least one of two criteria pollutants is correctly identified.Marginal: Student has no answer or is completely incorrect about most of the

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development: Theories, Models, Frameworks, and Tools

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mike Klassen, University of Toronto; Serhiy Kovalchuk, University of Toronto; Doug Reeve P.Eng., University of Toronto; Robin Sacks, University of Toronto

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

fromthose that were based on leadership as a process [13]. The former is based on traditional notionsof a leader as an individual with power and authority based on their position within anorganization or society. It was exactly this notion of leadership that was associated with theresistance encountered in our earlier studies. The latter, leadership as a process, has beenarticulated by many scholars, but we chose to use Northouse’s simple definition of leadership as“a process whereby an individual influences a group of individuals to achieve a common goal”(p.3) [13]. We also use Rottmann et al.’s orientations to engineering leadership: Technicalmastery - “shar[ing] their technical problem solving skills with others through informalmentorship” (p. 7

Conference Session

Design and Making

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexandra Vinson, Northwestern University; Pryce Davis, University of Nottingham; Reed Stevens, Northwestern University

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

ordered to follow stacking guidelines established by the engineeringdepartment.However, despite their detailed efforts to shape how forklift operators use the warehouse andforklift technology to maximize efficiency and profit, Supply Chain Management Company hadbeen experiencing problems with how the operators build the pallets. At one meeting, theengineering leadership debuted a new voice activated software program that would give verbalcommands to the forklift operator as s/he completed tasks. This was particularly designed tosolve the problems of pallet composition. As one engineer explained, simply providing operatorswith a list of products to be placed on each pallet had left them with too much control, and theoperators had begun to assemble

Conference Session

Key Educational & Professional Issues of Strategic Importance to the Civil Engineering Profession - and ASCE

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephen J. Ressler P.E., U.S. Military Academy; Thomas A. Lenox Dist.M.ASCE, F.ASEE, American Society of Civil Engineers

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

Conference Session

The Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge, 3rd Edition: Preparing the Future Civil Engineer

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenneth J. Fridley, University of Alabama; Decker B. Hains, Western Michigan University; Audra N. Morse P.E., Michigan Technological University; Leslie Nolen CAE, American Society of Civil Engineers

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

Conference Session

Military and Veterans Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder; Greg Rulifson P.E., Colorado School of Mines; Nathan E. Canney, CYS Structural Engineers Inc.

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Military and Veterans

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division: Design Teams

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacquelyn Kay Nagel, James Madison University; Christopher Stewart Rose, James Madison University; Ramana M. Pidaparti, University of Georgia; Elizabeth Marie Tafoya, James Madison University; Peyton Leigh Pittman; Wade Knaster, James Madison University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

, engineer). This approach is coupled with the AskNature.org website,which is a public database of biological information organized by a biomimicry taxonomy [37].The cognitive process of this approach is divided into the steps of scoping, discovering, creating,and evaluating (Fig. 2), and is structured around the search for particular biological insights tosolve a given problem. Scoping involves specifying the problem to be solved with operatingconditions, the functions that must be performed, and which life’s principles the design willincorporate. Discovering involves identifying biological systems that have evolved strategies tosolve the defined function(s) followed by abstracting those strategies into possible designprinciples. This step is often

Conference Session

Mathematics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Norha M. Villegas, Universidad Icesi, Colombia - University of Victoria, Canada; Stephanie Celis Gallego, Universidad Icesi; Ivonne María Suárez, Universidad Icesi; Juliana Jaramillo JJO, Universidad Icesi; Angelica Burbano, Universidad Icesi; Alvaro Pachon, Universidad Icesi; Diego Antonio Bohorquez, Universidad Icesi; Lina Marcela Quintero P.E., Universidad Icesi; Isabel Echeverri, Universidad Icesi; Lady K. Castillo; Cesár Augusto Cuartas Rodríguez, Universidad Icesi

Tagged Divisions

Mathematics

same students. The discussions were extensive in the discourse of the non-mentored professor; however, these were not part of a classroom experience design based on the critical reflection of the instructor, as it was the case for the mentored professor. TG students had access to computers to use GeoGebra to work individually and collectively. In contrast, in the CG, students had no access to computers, and although some accessed through their smartphones, most of the times was the instructor the only one using GeoGebra to make explanations to the students, while they listened passively.It is evident the positive impact that the redesign of the learning activities had on the learningenvironment from the perspective of the student´s particular

Conference Session

International Accreditation and Credentials: International Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Ming Li, Beijing Foreign Studies University

Tagged Divisions

International

following two questions: First, how did EC2000 affect the learning outcomes ofABET-accredited students? Second, what impact did EC2000 have on organizational policiesand practices, educational policies and practices that helped improve student learningoutcomes? A large amount of evidence collected in the research showed that theimplementation of the EC2000 had a positive impact on engineering programs, studentexperience, and student learning.In response to the enthusiastic attention of the China’s government and society to the qualityassurance in engineering education s, the Higher Education Teaching Evaluation Center ofthe Ministry of Education, together with the Beijing University of Aeronautics andAstronautics, and Tsinghua University, have

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dean Nieusma, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Mitch Cieminski, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Conference Session

Robotics

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Abhidipta Mallik, New York University; Sheila Borges Rajguru, New York University; Vikram Kapila, New York University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

Science and Engineering, (2011): 359-364. 4. Mataric, M.J., Koenig, N.P., and Feil-Seifer, D. “Materials for enabling hands-on robotics and STEM education,” Proc. AAAI Spring Symposium on Robots and Robot Venues: Resources for AI Education, (2007): 4 pages. 5. Norton, S.J., McRobbie, C.J., and Ginns, I.S. “Problem solving in a middle school robotics design classroom,” Research in Science Education, 37.3 (2007): 261-277. 6. Jamrisko, M., and Lu, W. “The U.S. Drops Out of the Top 10 in Innovation Ranking” 2018. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-01-22/south-korea-tops-global-innovation-ranking-again-as-u- s-falls.7. Palmer, D., Dixon, J., and Archer, J. “Changes in Science Teaching Self-Efficacy among Primary Teacher

Conference Session

Engineering Physics and Physics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Scott Alexander Kaiser, Utah Valley University; Reza Kamali, Utah Valley University; Paul Weber, Utah Valley University; Afsaneh Minaie, Utah Valley University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics and Physics

Raton: CNC Press, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.com/books?id=DiFMPmXSsLUC&pg=SA2- PA1#v=onepage&q&f=false [2] R. P. Feynman, “There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom,” Science and Engineering, pp. 22–36, 1960. [Online]. Available: http://calteches.library.caltech.edu/47/2/1960Bottom.pdf [3] M. Ruivenkamp and A. Rip, “Entanglement of Imaging and Imagining of Nanotechnology,” Nanoethics; Dordrecht, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 185–193, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://search-proquest- com.ezproxy.uvu.edu/docview/887465026/3ADDD4C0F5D0457BPQ/1?accountid=14779 [4] A. D. Derjaguin, B. V. and Titijevskaia, A. S. and Abricossova, I. I. and Malkina, “Investigations of the forces of interaction of

Conference Session

Integrity and the Problem of Cheating

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Teresa Ryan, East Carolina University; Bernd Steffensen, University of Applied Sciences Darmstadt; Colleen Janeiro, East Carolina University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

appearedheterogeneous in style and argumentation. A few checks revealed plagiarism and going into detailrevealed even more. 22 After contacting the S¨uddeutsche Zeitung (SZ), one of the importantGerman daily newspapers, the SZ published the story asking zu Guttenberg to comment theaccusation. His statement, which was a full denial, was part of the article which started the affair.A few days later the online platform Guttenplag Wiki was published, inviting the community toparticipate via swarm intelligence to search for more instances of plagiarism. 10 The results of 45days of searching is given in the two following pictures (see timestamp of 03 April 2011). Figure1 shows the more than 450 total pages of text indicating different degrees of plagiarism perpage

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brendon Lumgair P.Eng., University of Calgary

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

increase in the engagementratings for each of the four different presentation formats associated with the percentage of livewebinars a had student participated in. That means an increase in webinar participation wasassociated with an increase in their engagement ratings. Framed in the negative perspective,there was a decrease in the engagement ratings associated with a decrease in the number ofwebinars a student participated in. This study cannot deduce a causative relationship betweenwhether a student was disengaged because they did not (or could not) participate in a livewebinar, or did whether they chose to not participate in a live webinar because they weregenerally a disengaged learner, or if it was due to some other causal factor(s) (Lumgair

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hamid R. Piroozi J.D., Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis; Justin L. Hess, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis; Charles Feldhaus, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation