Service Learning," in Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering EducationAnnual Conference & Exposition, 2004.5 Merriam-Webster..Defintion of multidisciplinary. http://www.merriam-webster.com accessed January 27, 2015.6 Merriam-Webster..Defintion of interdisciplinary. http://www.merriam-webster.com accessed January 27, 2015.7 K. K. Perkins, W. K. Adams, S. J. Pollock, N. D. Finkelstein and C. E. Wieman, “Correlating Student Beliefs WithStudent Learning Using The Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Surve,” in Proceedings of the 2004 PhysicsEducation Research Conference. 2004 Page 26.1758.12
. in this course. In GNEG 1121, students continue to 8 I have no desire to change to another major (ex. biology, master basic skills needed to be successful in sophomore- English, chemistry, art, history, etc.). 17 My parent(s) are making me study engineering. level engineering courses and gain experience working 24 An engineering degree will guarantee me a job when I on hands-on, group projects. graduate. GNEG 1121H Honors Introduction to Engineering I: 32 Engineers need good communication and writing
,” International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 5(1), 45-61 (2014). Proceedings of the 2018 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual Conference The University of Texas at Austin April 4-6, 2018[3] Doolen, T.L. and Choomlucksana, J., “Using [7] Mirehei, S. M., Kuriger, G., Wan, H., and Chen, F.F.,Collaborative-Learning Activities to Introduce Lean “Enhancing Lean Training for the Office EnvironmentPrinciples and Methods in the Higher Education through Simulation and Gaming,” International Journal ofClassroom,” Industrial Engineering Research Conference, Learning and
factors in online collaboration and their relationship tosomething—not necessarily their actual ability. [5] The teamwork satisfaction. The Quarterly Review oftiming of this survey employment at the end of the fall Distance Education, 10(2). pp195-206. Information Agesemester is a very stressful time for first year engineering Publishing, Inc.students, and they may have a very low overall self- [3] Anderson, C. B., Lee, H. Y., Byars-Winston, A.,efficacy. Baldwin, C. D., Cameron, C., and Chang, S. (2016). Assessment of Scientific Communication Self-efficacy,4. Future Work
,consumers, food safety and the environment. Rome: FAO, 2001.6 Fox, M.W. Bringing life to ethics: global bioethics for a human society. Albany, NY: State University of NewYork, 2001.7 Nottingham, S. Eat your genes: how genetically modified food is entering our diet. New York Stephen Nottingham, 2003.8 Lurquin, P.F. High tech harvest: understanding genetically modified food plants. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2002.9 Fleddermann, C. B. Engineering Ethics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc., 2004. Page 12.854.1210 Clancy, E. A., P. Quinn, and J. E. Miller, “Assessment of a Case Study Laboratory to
specialist for the MEDB Women in Technology Project since 2004, lending her writing skills to WIT¹s broad range of programs statewide. As President and Owner of HomCreative, a creative marketing company, she knows firsthand the challenges and rewards of a women-owned business. She holds a B.A./Journalism from the University of Hawaii and an M.A./Journalism from the University of Oregon.Jenilynne Gaskin, Maui Economic Development Board Ms. Gaskin joined the MEDB Women in Technology Project in November 2003 as a program manager for student outreach. Since 2004, she serves as the manager and logistical coordinator for the Excite Camp program. She holds a baccalaureate degree in Business and
, S.K., Hanneman, L. F., Guardiola, R. & Brumm, T.J. (2001). Development of Workplace Competencies Sufficient to Measure ABET Outcomes. Conference Proceedings of Annual ASEE Conference and Exposition. Albuquerque, New Mexico.17. Bloom, B. S. (1984) Taxonomy of educational objectives. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA.18. Besterfield-Sacre, M. E., Shuman, L., Wolfe, L. & McGourty, J. (2000). Triangulating Assessments: Multi-Source Feedback Systems and Closed Form Surveys. Conference Proceedings of Annual ASEE Conference and Exposition. St. Louis, Missouri.19. NSF DUE Award Abstract #0206630 (PI McGourty): http://nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward.do?AwardNumber=0206630
Conference, pp. 112-121.4. Chewar, C. M., Huggins, K. L. and Blair, J. R. S. (2006). Avoiding the Pratfalls of Program Assessment. In The SIGSCE Bulletin, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp 29 – 33.5. Halpern, D. F. and Hakel, M. D. (2003). Applying the Science of Learning to the University and Beyond. In Change, July/August, pp, 36-41.6. Sanders, K. E. and McCartney, R. (2003). Program Assessment Tools in Computer Science: A Report from the Trenches. In Proceedings of the Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education, pp. 31-35.7. Soundarajan, N. (2001). Objectives, Outcomes, and Assessment Mechanisms for CS Programs. In Proceedings of the 31st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, pp. T2A17-T2A22
Press. 2004.7. D’Cruz, Carmo and T. O’Neal: “Turning Engineers Into Entrepreneurs” Proceedings of the ASEM National Conference. Tampa, Oct 2002.8. NCIIA. Advanced E-Team Proposal Guidelines. 2005. www.nciia,org.9. Marken Communications. Engineer to CEO: The Development of Balance - Mar 1997 http://www.markencom.com/docs/01mar19.htm10. Whittaker, John. “Engineers, Entrepreneurs and the Commercialization of Technology” – PICMET 01 Conference Proceedings, Portland, OR. July 2001.11. Gibb, Allan. “Entrepreneurship, Enterprise and Small Business: State of the Art ?” ed. Bohman and Pousette, Smaforetagsforskning 1 Tiden, 4th Nordic SME Research Conference, Umea Universitet, June 198612. Staub-French, S. “Entrepreneurship and Engineering
Proceedings, Portland, OR. July 2001.11. Gibb, Allan. “Entrepreneurship, Enterprise and Small Business: State of the Art ?” ed. Bohman and Pousette, Smaforetagsforskning 1 Tiden, 4th Nordic SME Research Conference, Umea Universitet, June 198612. Staub-French, S. “Entrepreneurship and Engineering Management” – Engineers in Law and Business Development – February, 200413. Kao, John J., The Entrepreneurial Organization (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1991).14. Edwards, Robert. Entrepreneurs in High Technology: Lessons from MIT and Beyond (New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991)15. Palmintera, D., J. Bannon, M. Levin and A. Pagan. “Developing High Technology Communities: San Diego”. Report produced under contract to Office of
, J.L., Seignort, H., and Goldman, E., (1997) “ Encouraging Engineering Students to Become Teachers”, Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference,June 1997.[19] Sanders, M., Lohani, V., Loganathan, G.V.,,and Magliaro, S., (2004) “Engineering Education: Bridges and Opportunities for Technology Education and Engineering at Virginia Tech”, Annual Conference of the ITEA, Albuquerque, NM, March 2004.[20] Baum, Dave, Definitive Guide to Lego-Mindstorms, APRESS, 2000.[21] Asimov, I., I, Robot (Runaround), Gnome Press, 1950[22] Doppelt, Y., (2005) “Assessment of Project-Based Learning in a MECHATRONICS context”, Journal of Technology Education, Vol. 16, No. 2, Spring 2005.[23] Nagchaudhuri, A., and
country’s export procedureswhich are the key part of delivery logistics. Figure 5 is one of the export operationprocedures from our students’ practice which are adopted by this US Company. Export Operate Procedures 5. Pick empty container to factory and vanning Container Shipper Yard 6. Deliver loaded container to Terminal ShangHai – Los Angles 1. Fax S/I, Inv, P/L
-0.0140 T-Value -1.84 -1.91 -2.07 P-Value 0.069 0.059 0.041 Activity No. 0.089 0.086 T-Value 1.78 1.74 P-Value 0.078 0.086 Group Category -0.081 T-Value -1.53 P-Value 0.128 S 0.556 0.550 0.544 0.540 R-Sq 7.03 10.03 12.80
. TIOBE's index on thepopularity of various programming languages can help businesses and schools make strategicdecisions regarding which language(s) to use.2 Scriptol.org provides a comparison table that listspopular programming languages, each with reasons why one should consider using it. 3Regardless of the actual language or tool selected, CIT's methodology for teaching concepts isalso different than that found at many other institutions. For example, as much as possible,programming assignments are geared towards solving business problems. If nothing else, theseassignments help familiarize CIT students with the jargon found in the business world. As statedearlier, most of these courses require an end-of-semester team programming project
& their • system losses design contributions • timeline of • multiplication • measurement • rate concepts • multiplica- • measure- • measurementconcepts scientific and • measurement • multiplication • complex tion ment • recovery %’s Math technological • graphing • division dimensions • large/ small advancements numbers • powers of
from the Boss?” Dave did look away from his screen. Theother three created a sound of clicking fury in the cubical area as they checked their email inunison. The email read as follows:To: Axle, Dave, Jeff, and CatalinaFrom: Bob CaudilloSubject: New ProjectI got this one handed down from above; we have a problem. Our consumer electronics division just received 1million temperature sensors for our company’s new digital thermometers that display degrees Celsius! Youneed to find a way to modify these temperature sensors to output Fahrenheit.Bob CaudilloSaved by the Bell, Inc.Lead EngineerM/S: GG75(702) 555 - 5555“Hey, I did this once before in school,” said Axle, “There is an equation to convert betweenCelsius and Fahrenheit. I’m going to Google
://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/tables/tabb-9.xls 8. Sullivan, Kieran, "Educational Assessment," a presentation by Dr. Sullivan at the NSF Workshop on Improvingand Assessing the Impact of Programs to Encourage Girls to Pursue Science, Technology, Engineering, andMathematics (STEM), available online at the workshop website: http://www.scu.edu/SCU/Projects/NSFWorkshop99/.9. Tabachnick, Barbara G. and Fidell, Linda S. Using Multivariate Statistics, 4th Edition. Needham Heights, MA:Allyn & Bacon . 2001. 10. Willemsen, Eleanor, "Motivating Girls to Persist in EMS," a presentation by Dr. Willemsen at the NSFWorkshop on Improving and Assessing the Impact of Programs to Encourage Girls to Pursue Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM
, 2001. 1[6] Dorf, R. C., and Byers, T. H., Technology Ventures – From Idea to Enterprise, McGraw-Hill Higher Education,2005.[7] Wolfe, H., “Issues in teaching entrepreneurship to heterogeneous groups of students,” In Proceedings of the2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition.[8] Kingon, A.I., S. Markham, R. Thomas, R. Debo, “Teaching high-tech entrepreneurship: does it differ fromteaching entrepreneurship? (And does it matter?),” In Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for EngineeringEducation Annual Conference and Exposition.[9] Nichols, S.P., N. Kaderlan, J.S. Butler, M.A. Rankin, “An interdisciplinary graduate course in technologyentrepreneurship,” In Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for
other students with similar backgrounds and interests Page 12.1451.13Bibliographic Information1. National Science Foundation. (2004). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. Retrieved September 15, 2006, from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/race.htm2. Davis, S., Jenkins, G., & Rameck, H. (2002). The Pact. New York: The Berkley Publishing Group. .3. Grose, T. K. (2006). Trouble on the horizon. PRISM, 16(2), 26-31.4. U.S. Department of Education National Center for Education Statistics (2007). Bachelor's degrees conferred by degree-granting institutions, by racial/ethnic group and
Middle School Parents 0.3 0.2 High School Parents 0.1 0 se r Fr e ep r Fa r S er R ing nd Te ild he he
to the community and society outside of IIT of this IPRO project changed since the beginning of the semester? Why or why not? What might be the counter argument to your view of the overall importance of the IPRO (i.e. the IPRO has no importance outside of IIT)? Can you be sure either argument is correct? How or why not?Reflections 3 1. Ethical issues in IPRO are of two types: those involving behaviors within the IPRO team and those involving the eventual application of IPRO output to the larger society. Please outline the most important ethical problems the team has encountered over the entire semester. What was the issue and what was the outcome? From your experience(s) this semester
ABET accreditation.1 Lohmann, J., “EC2000: The Georgia Tech Experience”, Journal of Engineering Education, July 1999, pp. 305 –310.2 Bailey, M., Floersheim, B. and Ressler, S., “Course Assessment Plan: A Tool for Integrated CurriculumManagement,” Journal of Engineering Education, October 2002, pp. 425 -434.3 Felder, R., and Brent, R., “Designing and Teaching Courses to Satisfy the ABET Engineering Criteria,” Journal ofEngineering Education, January 2003, pp. 7 – 25. Page 12.1314.13
Page 12.26.11Class Topic(s) In class Out-of-class assignment assignment1 & 2 Introduction of Syllabus; Make an appointment My Career Planning Situation for a one-on-one Questionnaire; resume critique with Information for resume writing Career Services (course experiences, during the week of software/hardware experience); September 5 – 12; Companies who have hired BSEMET Resume must be
Challenges to Engineering , New Jersey: Prentice Hall (2000).3. Lovins, A., Lovins, L., and Hawken, P., A Road Map for Natural Capitalism, Harvard Business Review, Reprint 99309 (May-June 1999)4. Beder, S., The New Engineer: Management and Professional Responsibility in a Changing World, South Yarra, Australia: MacMillan (1998).5. Lau, A.S., “Teaching Engineering Ethics to First-Year College Students,” Science and Engineering Ethics, Volume 10, Issue 2, April 2004, pp. 359-368.6. Barad, J., Robertson, E., The Ethics of Star Trek, New York: HarperCollins Publishers (2000).7. Kidder, R., Shared Values for a Troubled World: Conversations with Men and Women of Conscience, New York: Jossey-Bass (1994).8. “Academic Integrity: The Bridge to
authors wish to acknowledge the enthusiasm and support provided by various employees ofour industry partner for this problem-based learning experience. They greatly influenced theauthenticity and positive impact on student knowledge resulting from this experience.References1. Todd, R. H., C. D. Sorensen, and S. P. Magleby, Satisfy “Designing a Senior Capstone Course to Industrial Customers,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 82, No. 2, April 1993.2. Sageev, P. and C. J. Romanowski, “A Message from Recent Engineering Graduates in the Workplace: Results of a Survey on Technical Communication Skills,” Journal of Page 12.165.11
-based.AcknowledgementsGrant support from the National Science Foundation in the form a CAREER Award, BES-0238905 (AE) is gratefully acknowledged.Thirty of the data points were generously provided by Dr. Ed Doering from the Rose HulmanInstitute.Bibliography1. Levin, David S. and Ben-Jacob, Marion G, “Using Collaboration in Support of Distance Learning.” Webnet98 World Conference of the WWW, Internet, and Intranet Proceedings, Orlando, November 7, 1998.2. http://www.universityofphoenix.com/, University of Phoenix Online, 25 November 2006.3. Tuckman, Bruce W. Educational Psychology from Theory to application. Orlando, Florida: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., 1992.4. George A. Campbell, “Telephonic Intelligibility”, Philosophical Magazine, 19 (6), 158
of Engineering Education V. Assessing TeachingEffectiveness and Educational Scholarship. Chem. Eng. Ed., 34(3), 198-207.8. Felder, R.M., J.E. Stice & A. Rugarcia. 2000. The Future of Engineering Education VI. Making ReformHappen. Chem. Eng. Ed., 34(3), 208-215.9. Smith, K.A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D.W ., & Johnson, R.T. 2005. Pedagogies of Engagement:Classroom-Based Practices. Journal of Engineering Education Special Issue on the State of the Art and Practice ofEngineering Education Research, 94(1): 87-102.10. eInstructions homepage can be found at http://www.einstruction.com/11. Clancy, E. A., Quinn, P., and Miller, J.E. 2005. Assessment of a Case Study Laboratory to Increase Awarenessof Ethical Issues in Engineering. IEEE
10Performance on Final Exam. Each semester the department offers between eight and tensections of Statics and either seven or eight sections of Mechanics of Materials. All studentstake the same final exam at the same time during final exam week. Grading is divided so that thesame faculty member will grade the same problem(s) on the final for all students taking the finalexam. That is, faculty member A may be assigned to grade problems 1 and 2 for all studentstaking the final exam that semester. This insures that all of the finals are graded consistently.Performance on the common final is a good indicator of how well the students learned thematerial taught in the class. An average is generated each semester for each section of the class,and an overall
12.711.11http://www.sei.cmu.edu/pub/documents/99.reports/pdf/99tr032.pdf. Downloaded from the Web January 5, 2007.[6] M.L. Jaccheri, P. Lago, “Applying software process modeling and improvement in academic setting”, 10thConference on Software Engineering Education & Training (CSEET´97), 1997, IEEE Computer Society Press, pp:13-27.[7] B. Gannod, H. Koehnemann, K. Gary. “The Software Enterprise: Facilitating the Industry Preparedness ofSoftware Engineers”. Proceedings ASEE 2006, 2006.[8] B. Meyer, “Software engineering in the academy”, IEEE Computer, Vol. 34, Issue 5, May 2001, pp. 28-35.[9] http://www.asq.org/software/getcertified/index.html. Retrieved from the Web January 10, 2007.[10] B. S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Pearson
reading the material they individually take an on-line quiz to testtheir knowledge of the material. Once the quiz is passed the team or small groups ofstudents are taught one of the skills mentioned early by an expert (teaching assistant) thengiven a small project to complete independently which is then evaluated by the expertusing a rubric. If the student passes inspection then the student becomes certified in thatarea of skill.In the second step student teams use the acquired skills to contribute to the first project.The class acts as one large team trying to create a project which is created one step at atime as described previously. Each team completes their part of the project then passesinformation or products to the team(s) that are in