which the university will: become an anchorinstitution, demonstrate engaged scholarship, practice changemaking, advance access andinclusion, demonstrate care for our common home, and integrate our liberal arts education.In addition, the University Core curriculum recently underwent an overhaul with a new CoreCurriculum in place in Fall 2017. One significant outcome of the new Core reflects theUniversity’s commitment to Diversity, Inclusion and Social Justice (DISJ). Whereas studentspreviously were required to take a single Diversity course, the new Core requires students to taketwo Diversity, Inclusion, and Social Justice (DISJ) courses recognizing a developmental modelof achieving these outcomes. In addition, the DISJ designation is now based
Data Analytics: Final Project: Final MATLAB5: to define a Study the data Research & Project & How to use function to allow types in Development: Reflections MATLAB as a input to it when it MATLAB; how Final Project: on the sophisticated initiates its to produce Presentation & Camp: calculator, create execution and heterogeneous Report Writing: Individual plots. output from it collections of Teams will presentations when it is done. data via structs prepare a Power and reports. Matrices and and cells. Point Operators
capstone courses. • To provide a mechanism that requires students to work on keeping their portfolios up-to- date.The second innovation of the new curriculum is the portfolio requirement, in which the studentdemonstrates that he or she has attained the student learning outcomes (SLOs) of the program.For their portfolios, students are required to: ● Showcase their strongest work from a variety of classes, both in and outside of their major. ● Discuss the thought and effort that went into creating the work shown. ● Include written reflections that discuss the challenges faced, strengths and weaknesses, and what was learned from creating the work.Pedagogical advantages of portfolios have been discussed in the literature. The
anomalous sentences, novel metaphors, and conventional metaphors compared withliteral sentences. These findings were one of the first to contribute to a growing body of evidencesuggesting that the retrieval of stored conceptual knowledge about conventional and novelmetaphorical expressions involves greater cognitive effort (as reflected by more negative-goingN400 amplitudes) compared with literal sentences, yet not as much as compared with anomaloussentences (for similar findings, see [18, 22-24]).In most psycholinguistic experiments that explore phrase or sentence comprehension,participants are asked to make judgments about whether or not a word–pair or a sentence makessense. Coming back to our previous example, when presented with a sentence “the
political systems, which is combined with logistical issues and a lackof political learning across disciplines. Voting is not the only measure of student civicengagement, but it is fundamental and, now, can be objectively measured as a basis for lookingat civic engagement in higher education.This is reflected in the document A Crucible Moment (2012), issued by a National Task Force onCivic Learning and Democratic Engagement and containing a call to action warning that the stateof U.S. democracy was declining, and colleges and universities were failing to embraceeducating for democracy as an educational priority. Others have warned that higher education’scivic purpose has yet to be realized (Saltmarsh and Hartley, 2011). Part of the problem
theoretical ideas, (2) reflect important real-life problems, (3)give visual and acoustic sensation, (4) have a suitable timescale, (5) be nonhazardous, (6) beinexpensive, and (7) be easy to understand and use. With today’s technological advances,designing a laboratory course that addresses all of these constraints is more feasible than ever.However, many existing laboratory courses and off the shelf modules violate one or more ofthese constraints, and therefore fail to deliver an optimal lab experience.There are two opposing routes to take when designing an undergraduate controls laboratory: usecommercial off the shelf (COTS) hardware and accompanying software, or design the hardwareand use or design open source software. There are many advantages to
different views of SRL, in general SRLtheorists “view students as metacognitively, motivationally, and behaviorally active participantsin their own learning process” [5]. Thus, we can summarize most major SRL theories with thegeneralized framework of SRL, shown in Figure 1. Performance Phase Self-Control Self-Observation Forethought Phase Self-Reflection Phase Task Analysis Self-Judgment Self-Motivation Beliefs Self-Reaction Figure 1 Phases and Sub
their part of speech.We will be focusing on the Uber Index (Figure 3) developed by 5 that highlights certain featuresof communication of an individual as a reflection of lexical diversity. Lexical diversity can beseen as measure for how varied the structure of speech is and this category of assessment hassignificant research history within the field of linguistics. This indicator reflects lexical diversityby relating the total number of lexical words used (T) in a text sample with the number of uniquelexical words used (N). Figure 3: Uber Index 5.This index was chosen for analysis because the Uber Index is seen as as a better representation oflexical diversity for texts of varying length than other similarly
response to self-reported vulnerabilities and concerns of engineeringstudents. This paper presents data from practical efforts to identify and mitigate anxiety amongengineering students. A group of twenty-seven engineering and engineering technology studentswho were part of a scholarship program was asked to submit journal entries in which theyreflected on their fears and anxieties related to their participation in their degree program.Prominent themes which emerged from student reflection included time management and itseffects on academics and social activities, the likelihood of degree completion and success inengineering-specific coursework (e.g. senior capstone projects), and aspects of life followinggraduation such as handling accumulated
reported byrespondents was 7.63 discussions per term.Instructors were asked to indicate if the following occurred in their course: Students are asked to read/view material related to an upcoming class section (80.3% said yes, rubric value = 0). Students are asked to read/view material related to an upcoming class section AND to complete assignments or quizzes on the material shortly before class or at beginning of class. (47.5% said yes, rubric value =2). Students asked to complete reflective activity at end of class (briefly answering questions, reflecting on lecture and/or their learning, etc.). (36.1% said yes, rubric value = 1). Students give presentations (verbal or poster). (63.9% said
more deeply affect the level of agraduate’s workplace engagement and therefore productivity and overall well-being. While it isapparent how important experiential learning can be to the future success and well-being ofstudents, it is more difficult to measure all of the activities that can be labeled as experientiallearning and to define what constitutes a meaningful experiential learning opportunity.This paper will examine the results of a survey, given at Purdue University, used to measure theundergraduate engineering population’s involvement in experiential learning. The survey wasdistributed to 7712 undergraduate students. The results reflect that students are participating in awide variety of activities that could be considered
project's energy efficiency strategy, requiring daylighting in allperimeter occupied zones, glare mitigation strategies, automatic, continuous dimming, andcommissioning. Advanced controls strategies are also considered. This collaborativeenvironment was realized through coupled daylight and energy simulation, using simulatingrepresentative spaces in the Sensor Placement Optimization Tool (SPOT), a Radiance basedsoftware. Several design variations were considered and an optimum set was settled upon.A light louver system was added to the daylight glazing to bounce the light up the ceiling andeven deeper into the building's interior. Further, light reflectances were chosen for the interiorsurfaces. When coupled with low partition heights, this
discuss both whatthey thought would happen and what actually happened. Instructors can additionally lead aclassroom discussion to process any of their misconceptions about the expected materialbehavior and their observations of what actually happened in the simulation. By clearlyarticulating and capturing on paper what their initial concepts or misconceptions are, and thendiscussing the actual results in comparison with their initial ideas, students’ are more likely torecognize any previous misconceptions as incorrect understandings.Students need to be engaged in and monitor their own learning process, referred to as meta-cognition. Pre-lab and lab reports provide an opportunity to encourage student reflection on theirown learning. A section
were other subjects discussed during the second half of the project.Midterm Project AssessmentFor the midterm assessment, worth 5% of the course grade, students were asked to address threekey questions with their deliverables: • Is there a clear vision for the roller coaster design? • Are the technical skills necessary to complete the design being developed? • How can the time and resources remaining in the semester be budgeted to ensure a successful project outcome?Each of these big picture questions was explored in more detail by individual deliverables: aproject proposal, preliminary calculations, and reflections. No fixed format was specified foreach of these deliverables, but certain items needed to be included.In the
visions and responsible for their own experiences and decisions1. Self-authorship includes a number of different enrichment processes, which most higher educationinstitutions strive for their students to achieve1-4. The enrichment process for studentdevelopment focuses on intellectual, identity and relationship development5. Self–authorship isseen as growth from internal to external ideas1, 2. Starting the process of developing self-authorship for students at the freshman level will be beneficial in laying the groundwork forthem to continue the development throughout their undergraduate education1.To address this need, we modified an elective first year survey course, Engineering (Engr.) 110.This change reflects an initial effort to educate the
feedbackfor the student that would aid in his self-reflection and in charting a plan for incorporating habitsand activities into his daily life that would aid in the development of leadership traits. The next section of this paper offers formal coursework suggestions that would betterstudent leadership skills by taking advantage of classes in many different departments aroundcampus. However, the results of the personal leadership survey serves to recommend thatstudents to promote their own personal growth by joining strategic extracurricular activitiespromoting leadership. For example, since Ken needs work in his communication skills, perhapsthe Toastmaster’s club or other communication club might be an appropriate activity. Similarly,since
, proposing a conceptualmodel of the factors that influence global competency levels, and also identifies the baselinelevels of global competency for benchmarking. The resulting conceptual model and globalcompetency measures will be useful toward larger scale inquiries to evaluate how participationin study abroad programs, international experiences, culturally-relevant curricula, and otherrelated activities can contribute to changes in students’ ability to work in diverse environments.The Miville-Guzman Universality-Diversity Scale short form (MGUDS-S) measures the“universe-diverse orientation” construct, which “reflects an attitude of awareness of both thesimilarities and differences that exist among people”2. Higher MGUDS-S scores have
becoming a routine mode ofinteraction. Industries are evolving to multi-national and/or global-centric entities. Findingsfrom this student – centered collaborative experience are discussed and some of the uniquechallenges are identified.II. Literature ReviewThe literature pertaining to this field has grown rapidly and reflects a number of importantcharacteristics. The field spans topics on “Student reflections on the use of Collaborative Page 26.1186.4Technologies in a globally distributed student project” to "The design and implementation of alearning collaboratory” that focuses on the process of collaborative learning. A summary ofrelated research
undergraduate students in the course. This learning method promotestopic retention, as the student is required to be the expert on the topic. The students were onlyrequired to teach this one topic, which consisted of one class period (~2hrs). The results wereverified through in-course surveys, objectively comparing assignment grades from a professortaught PMS (Microsoft Project), and graduate student reflection summary. The results show thatthe graduate students not only enjoyed teaching the topic, but they feel that their comprehensionhad increased by the employed teaching method. Additionally, the results show that theundergraduates students’ learning was not adversely affected by having their fellow studentsprovide instruction on software usage. The
product; • LO-2: Articulate the impacts of product architecture, manufacturing processes, and supply chain decisions on the economic and environmental sustainability of a product; and • LO-3: Construct product design solutions that address technical requirements, in addition to economic and environmental sustainability goals. The details of each learning objective appear in Table 1. Constructionism is largely atheoretical model and we use Kolb’s model [13] to operationalize and organize our core learningoutcomes. Kolb’s experiential learning framework is an approach where students activelyexperiment and reflect. In Kolb’s model, knowledge construction is assumed to progress invarious stages, which are not
tasked to summarize a reading assignment, thenexplain how the reading connects to their personal life, explain how the reading connects toanother reading, course element, or curriculum, and finally describe a prompt, problem, or puzzlethat can be addressed with the comprehension of the reading. This technique has been describedas a form of metacognition, or “thinking about thinking,” in other words, an effort to get studentsto reflect on their own learning.1The research question we seek to address here is whether or not the non-traditional components(Personalize, Integrate, Thoughtful Puzzle) of the weekly engineering assignments correlate withstudent achievement on exams in the course.MethodsEach week, students were given a single prompt
integrates requiredcourses with career planning and support, followed by a paid internship with a partner company,completed by final reflection and placement. The net cash outlay for a participant is $4,400 withthe opportunity to earn the equivalent or more during the paid internship. We have developedtwo tracks for the program, one in Innovation and one in Technology. Each track shares severalfoundational courses and has been designed to meet the diverse needs and prior skills of ourtarget population.Courses/core curriculumManufacturing certificate programs are offered at MassBay Community College and are part ofthe engineering department offerings. The college is an open access institution and thecertificate programs do not have prerequisite
general, we interpreted student engagement with and case-study application of the E4SJcriteria as an indication students not only understood the criteria, but could also analyze andevaluate them well enough to argue for or against their inclusion/exclusion in the process ofdeciding which criteria were the most or least effectively engaged. Furthermore, student use andevaluation of the criteria to an actual engineering case study constitutes a form of sociotechnicalapplication, wherein students analyzed and reflected on the complex interplays of the social andthe technical. Overall, the E4SJ criteria evaluation process via case studies provided studentswith concrete, specific opportunities to evaluate the utility of the criteria and to understand
given multiple realisticconstraints, much like they would experience after they took their first engineering position 3.Most undergraduate engineering programs have now been through several iterations of theABET 2000 accreditation process, which normally occurs in six-year intervals. After fifteenplus years of functioning under the ABET 2000 criteria it seems appropriate to reflect upon thechanges and consider the results. This paper focuses on a review of the engineering curriculum,an overview of accreditation, the role of capstone in the curriculum and finally a new model forcapstone in relationship to the curriculum. A hierarchical ordering of student outcomes ispresented with examples of possible direct measures.2. Status of the Engineering
other points throughout the semester, we came up with a new definition. At the end, we compared all three of them to see how our definition of research changed throughout the semester, based on what we studied.The students said that their definition changed to reflect an understanding that the process is notlinear, and that it includes a dimension of contributing to society. Research does not just answerquestions; it also generates many more questions.The course spent considerable time teaching the students to understand how to identify and gainaccess to relevant literature. Several students said that they had relied mostly on Google in thepast, but that introductions to scientific databases and other academic services had taught
the case study method with an interactive approach intended to increase the realism ofthe experience and enhance student engagement. Data are presented from voluntary studentsurveys completed prior to and after completion of the activity. Results suggest that theinteractive approach is at least as effective as a traditional case study and provides anindividualized experience, even in a large-class setting.IntroductionCase studies are a preferred vehicle for professional ethics education and are used by bothacademic programs and professional societies. (Richards & Gorman, 2004) note that “Casestudies often reflect real world concerns, situations, and issues managers and engineers encounterin practice; they are often open-ended, with no
existand might never be found” [10]. What this lack of definability likely means is leadership ismultifaceted, needing to be defined and bounded within the context in which the process is beingexamined. As such, the literature on leadership within particular domains (like engineering) tendsto reflect consensus, in spite of a lack of broader consensus across the field of leadership.While definitions of leadership vary widely, they can largely be placed into one of two groups.The first group, include those definitions that look at leadership as a set of traits that the mostsuccessful leaders have, the trait theories [11]. These theories of leadership have largely fallen outof favor in western cultures over the past one – two generations [12]. During
[11]. Specifically, immersive virtual reality (IVR) provides an effective way of 3generating a first-person experience not limited by the constraints of reality, possessing theability to essentially create the impossible in a potentially transformative way. Virtualtechnologies are transforming our external experiences by focusing on the high level of personalefficacy and self-reflectiveness generated by their sense of presence and emotional engagement[12].The power of IVR is its ability to enable a person to change their body representation, i.e.gender, race, age, ability status, etc., in a process known as virtual embodiment. In IVR, whenthe
critical thinking activities. LCs first cameto our institution, City Tech, through a Title V Grant in 2000 and were adopted by the college in2005. The academic performance of students participating in LCs at City Tech reflects nationaltrends. When compared to the general population at the College, students in LC earn higherGPAs, have higher retention rates, and demonstrate greater satisfaction.In order to complement the community-building efforts within learning community classrooms,we, a cohort of faculty leaders and administrators of City Tech’s First Year LearningCommunities, a program offered through the college’s Office of First Year Programs, developed“Our Stories” digital writing project which extends the student’s network beyond the
and Self-management Relaxation exercise Learning misconceptions Teaching Practice Small Group Activity Course Learning Teaching Practice Individual Reflection Outcomes followed by review Bloom’s Taxonomy Teaching Practice Small Group Activity Effective Teaching Teaching Practice -- Course Design -Syllabus Course Planning -- Course Design – Session Course Planning Individual Reflection Plans, Good Questions followed by review Instructional Design Learning Theory -- Framework Active Learning Methods Active Learning Activity design in small