.[6] B. Zimmerman, "Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn," Contemporary EducationalPsychology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 82–91, 2000.[7] Z. S. Seidametova, "Hackathons in computer science education: Monitoring and evaluationof programming projects," Educational Technology Quarterly, vol. 2022, no. 1, pp. 20–34, 2022.[8] C. Rennick, G. Litster, C. Hulls, and A. Hurst, "Curricular hackathons for engineering designlearning: The case of engineering design days," TechRxiv Preprint, 2022.[9] I. Fronza, et al., "Keeping fun alive: An experience report on running online code camps," inProc. IEEE/ACM 44th Int. Conf. Softw. Eng.: Softw. Eng. Educ. Training (ICSE-SEET), 2022.[10] R. Hewitt, (2021). TigerCodeCamp. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com
and for the future,” U.S Department of Commerce, Economics Computer Physics Communications, 127, pp. 6-10, 2000and Statistics Administration, ESA Issue Brief #03-11, July 2011 [7] F. Esquembre, “Computers in physics education,” Computer Physics[2] S. Hambrusch, C. Hoffmann, J.T. Korb, M. Haugan, A.L. Hosking, “A Communications, 147, pp. 13-18, 2002multidisciplinary approach toward computational thinking for science [8] P. G. Hewitt, Conceptual Physics: The High School Physics Program, pp.majors,” ACM SIGCSE Bulletin - SIGCSE '09, Vol. 41 Issue 1, pp. 183-187, 149-150, Pearson Education Inc., 2009March 2009[3] R. L. Spencer, “Teaching computational physics as a laboratorysequence,”Am
6/2015. 6 Aikenhead, G. S. and Ryan, A. G, “The Development of a New Instrument: Views on Science— Technology—Society (VOSTS)” Sci. Ed., Vol. 76, 1992, pp. 477–491. 7 Mack, P.E., Campbell, T. and Abd-Hamid, N.H., “Issues in Survey Assessments of STS courses”, Bulletin of Science, Technology, and Society, October 2008, Vol. 28, pp. 408-413.Timothy Burg, Dept. Electrical and Computer Engineering, Kansas State UniversityDr. Burg has extensive experience in industrial applications of robotics and nonlinear controldesign techniques and the academic investigation of the basis and future directions of thesetechniques. He moved to Kansas State from Clemson University in 2014. Prior to that, heworked for Michelin
format, and previous history of taking online courses.Question Count PercentageWhat is (are) your primary reason(s) for taking this class online? Schedule conflict with regular class 12 57.1% Convenience 12 57.1% Commute (I live far from Cañada College) 8 38.1% I prefer online over face-to-face 3 14.3% Other Reasons 6 28.6
$9.20 4SAITO 180 Gas Engine Type: 4 stroke, single cylinder Displacement: 1.8 cu in $460.00 1 Horse power: 2.8 Hp RPM range : 2,000 – 10,000 RPM Weight: 2.21 lbsAXI 5345/14 Electric Motor RPM/V: 225 RPM/V Current capacity: 110 A/20 s $350.00 1 Weight: 31.6 oz No. of cells: 8-12 LiPoTASE DUO gimbal Slew rate: 200°/sec $40K 1 Pointing resolution: 0.05° Weight: 2.34 lbsMiscellaneous (Hardware, Other Materials) $500.00 1
, while focus on performance aims to do well compared to others. Additionally, students canfocus on s on achieving positive outcomes (success) or avoiding negative outcomes (failure)[14]. By combining these concepts, there are four types of achievement goals. • Mastery-Approach: Focused on achieving personal growth or mastering a task. • Performance-Approach: Focused on being better than others and gaining recognition. • Mastery-Avoidance: Focused on avoiding misunderstanding or failing to learn. • Performance-Avoidance: Focused on not being seen as worse than others.Feeling of inclusion A sense of inclusion refers to student’s perceptions of acceptance by others. However,underrepresented students face additional challenges
work in the computing industry is done by teams. There is normally fartoo much work for one person to design, develop and then implement an entire system. The ability tofunction effectively as a member of a team is a skill that is critical for every graduate and has a significantimpact on all of the four PEO #s. This ability is imperative for PEO #1. It is very difficult to be engagedin understanding and applying new ideas and technologies in computing without interacting effectivelywith others. SO #6 is a primary contributor to PEO #2 as well. Finally, the phrase “active participant”implies working with others. To be an active participant, an individual must interact with others in theircommunity and their profession in a team setting. SO #6
Colorado Water Supply Report." River Opperations, Boulder Canyon Operations Office.[3] Booker, J. F., and Young, R. A. (1994). "Modeling Intrastate and Interstate Markets for Colorado River Water Resources." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26(1), 66-87.[4] Freeman, G. (2008). "Securing Reliable Water Supplies for Southern California." Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation.[5] Freeman, G., Poghosyan, M., and Lee, M. (2008). "Where Will We Get the Water? Assessing Southern California’s Future Water Strategies." Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation.[6] Alexander, B. S., Davidson, G., and Mendell, G. H. (1874). Report of the Board of Commissioners on the irrigation of the San Joaquin
internships with the citythrough the program, one of whom was picked as 2012’s Best Volunteer and was subsequentlyhired as an engineer in 2013. Each engineer who took the course received a certificateacknowledging that they had completed the FE exam review course, and also received a signedaward from their state senator. The pride of the engineers and their families at the ceremonycelebrating the completion of the course was palpable. For many this was the first tangible steptoward regaining their status as an engineer in their new home country.In August 2012, an author of this paper put together a course outline and goals along with atextbook and course requirements. In this second cohort, 22 refugee engineers enrolled in thecourse to prepare for
Pneumatic Payload 2500 Vacuum SR Slot and Stäubli 20-100 Electrical series Key Stäubli S series Clamp 5-40 None Proceedings of the 2025 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX Copyright 2025, American Society for Engineering Education 6These tool changers allow for automatic alignment, repeatability, strength, and variety of pass-throughmodules that could
TRANSACTIONS ON EDUCATION, VOL. 57, NO. 2, p. 99-106. (2014)4. K. J. Reid, “Study of the Success or Failure of Changing Freshman Engineering Technology Courses to an Online Format: Did it Work?”, Proceedings of the 36th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 28 – 31, 2006, San Diego, CA. p. S1J-28 - S1J-33. (2006)5. S. Pisupati, J. Mathews, “Differences in teaching and learning outcomes in face-to-face, online and hybrid modes of energy conservation course”, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 22, 2008 - June 24, 2008. (2008)6. J. Douglas, “Comparing learning outcomes and content mastery in online and face-to-face engineering statics courses”, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and
., Seattle, WA, June14 to 17, 2015, Paper ID #11324.[3] S. E. Lee, K. J. Woods, K. K. Tonissen, “Writing Activities Embedded in BioscienceLaboratory Courses to Change Students’ Attitudes and Enhance their Scientific Writing,”Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, vo. 7, no. 3, March, 2011.[4] C. A. Hubka, E. Chi, Y. Chen, V. Svihla, J. Gomez, A. K. Datye, T. L. Mallette, “A Writingin the Disciplines Approach to Technical Report Writing in Chemical Engineering LaboratoryCourses,” Presented at the 126th ASEE Annu. Conf. & Expo., Tampa, FL, June 15 to 19, 2019,Paper ID #252222. Proceedings of the 2025 ASCE North Central Regional Conference © 2025American Society of Engineering
course, with a focus on providing clearer guidance, increasing collaborativeopportunities, and continuing to integrate real-world tools and applications into the labenvironment. By addressing these areas, the course can more effectively engage students andsupport their development into confident, capable engineers.References:[1] Ford, M., Fatehboroujeni S., Fisher E.M, Ritz H., “A Hands-on Guided-inquiry Materials Laboratory that Supports Student Agency,” Advances in Engineering Education. 11 (1). 2023. doi:10.18260/3-1-1153-36041[2] Persano Adorno D., Scardulla F., D’Acquisto L., Pizzolato N., “Design of an open-lab activity for engineering students: A case study,” International Journal of Mechanical Engineering
the first semester, the instructors encouraged students to use “DesignThinking” to guide their efforts in defining the elements in the exhibit (which correspond tostudent projects). The Design Thinking steps are: empathizing with the customer (i.e., theparticipant, in the case of the exhibit), defining the elements in the exhibit, ideating about how torealize the elements, and next to make and test low fidelity prototypes (that is, prototypes madewith a relatively small investment in time and energy and just good enough to be able to tell ifthe current approach is good). Design Thinking was developed in the late 1950’s through acollaboration of faculty from the departments of Mechanical Engineering and Art andArchitecture at Stanford
, Requirements, andProcedures System" in [company]-1-01, Management Policies, will be issued to formally grandfather the Page 14.8.16 15existing system of policies and procedures to ensure that the site continues its exemplary record ofcompliance with statutory requirements and customer commitments.Following the issuance of the interim policy, all company-level policies and procedures, source andcompliance documents and various program-specific procedure manuals will be assessed by their ownersand subject matter experts. [company]'s collection of policies, procedures and manuals will be revised
Page 14.637.13were impressed by the professional quality of the oral presentation skills of the students as wellas their teamwork. % of Teams Passing the Design Review 100 80 60 40 Figure 7 20 Improvement in the number of teams who passed the panel review “without 0 S 07 F 07 S 08 F 08 Class conditions”No formal assessment tools were used to evaluate the success of the capstone design course uponcompletion of the projects at the end of the second semester. However, achievements have beengauged by:a. Client/sponsor
during the comment period that questioned “theviability of single-sex programs such as an educational science program targeted at youngwomen and designed to encourage their interest in a profession in which they areunderrepresented,” these agencies did agree that “[s]uch courses may, under appropriatecircumstances, be permissible as part of a remedial or affirmative action program.”24Unfortunately, these agencies did not provide an explanation of what such “appropriatecircumstances” might be. Nevertheless, an educational institution that can clearly articulate asound rationale for offering an engineering outreach program for only young women can proceedwith some confidence that such a program likely will survive scrutiny under Title IX.Separate
Paper ID #19077Engineering Pathways Fellows: Four Years of Successful Retention Initia-tives, Including International CollaborationDr. Amy L. Freeman, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Amy L. Freeman holds a Master of Science degree in Engineering and a Ph.D. in Workforce Edu- cation. She has a been a practitioner of retention programming for over two decades and is a member of several organizations and networks that support her research interest: access and inclusion to STEM education. She is the primary PI for the NSF sponsored S-STEM award, ”Engineering Pathways: An Undergraduate Scholars Program.” Dr
learning.Out of a total of 40 students in the course, 33 consented to provide their information for the studyand also completed both the pre- and post-course surveys (an 82.5% completion rate). Changesin the self-efficacy scores were evaluated relative to student gender, ethnicity, and ACTcomposite score. These data were obtained with student consent from the office of the Registrar.A total of 17 female and 16 male students were surveyed. Ethnicities were divided into threesub-categories: (1) White (any students with White as their only race, N = 21), (2) Asian (anystudents with Asian or Asian and White listed as their race(s), N = 7), and (3) UnderrepresentedMinorities (URM, any students listed as Hispanic, Native American, Black, or Pacific Islander
Physics course designed to assist student s with the transition to post-secondary education. He is a Co-Director of the NYS STEP Program, IMPETUS which provides economically disadvantaged students the opportunity to pursue their interest in math and science though educational summer camps, workshops, school-year tutoring and mentoring programs. He has helped provide numerous students and teachers with the opportunity to integrate STEM disciplines using real-world problem solving strategies through teacher/coach training institutes and contest coordination. He is the Adirondack Regional Science Olympiad Coordinator.Robert Prout Jaspersohn, Clarkson University Robert Jaspersohn is a PhD candidate in Physics at Clarkson
education (especially in regards to the design of complex systems), student preparation for post-graduation careers, and innovations in research-to-practice.Dr. Robin Adams, Purdue University, West Lafayette Robin S. Adams is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University and holds a PhD in Education, an MS in Materials Science and Engineering, and a BS in Mechanical Engineering. She researches cross-disciplinarity ways of thinking, acting and being; design learning; and engineering education transformation.Dr. Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington Jennifer Turns is a Professor in the Department of Human Centered Design & Engineering at the Univer- sity of Washington. She is