and limitations are disseminated to other instructors in theupper division in a timely fashion. Thus the evolution of the introductory courses serves tomaintain high expectations for students, as well as pushing the technological advancement of theupper division coursework. Through the discussion of the assessment of these courses andrelated curriculum changes, an effective process is illustrated that has been used through twomajor ABET evaluations, and that highlights the changing nature of the requirements establishedby assessment criteria.An Introductory Sequence of Courses is EstablishedA three semester introductory sequence in aerospace engineering was implemented concurrentlywith the 1999 ABET evaluation under ABET 2000 criteria
a recent process of curriculum reformin an undergraduate engineering program. Curriculum continues to hold a prominent spacein discussions around engineering education, yet there are limited exemplars of full scalecurriculum reform around the globe. At the University of Cape Town (UCT) in South Africa,the design of the new chemical engineering curriculum drew on contemporary shifts inthinking about the engineering profession [1, 2], as well as a focus on widening access to thedegree and coupling this with success. Furthermore, engaging with current deliberations onthe problem-based curriculum, this design took on a problem-centered focus [3]. Thiscurriculum design demanded a far more integrated mode of course delivery than is typical ina
level. To address these objectives, a self-administered questionnaire was employed, adapted, and validated for the context of engineeringstudents in Chile. The questionnaire covers the perception of incorporating gender perspectivesin a higher education institution across three dimensions: (1) Institutional sensitivity to genderperspectives, (2) Integration of gender perspectives into the curriculum, and (3) Awareness ofgender inequalities in the classroom. The results allow for the characterization of the sample'sperception regarding incorporating gender perspectives into their engineering educationprograms. Furthermore, it is worth noting that statistically significant differences exist betweenthe perceptions of men and women concerning the
Design teams by integrating testingstandards in their approaches (Module 2). Students engaged well during Module 3 and 4activities and reportedly enjoyed the sessions. Each session necessitated extended activity timeand some simplification of technology to facilitate in-class discussion more rapidly.During summer 2024, we plan to prepare a new consensus standard revision (Module 3)approach using an activity-based round-robin testing methodology. Round-robin testing asksstakeholders to each conduct a protocol for the evaluation of a standard and to collaborativelydiscuss discrepancy among findings in the revision of the standard. Round-robin testing hasbeen used extensively across numerous disciplines and for varied testing purposes such as
at Georgia Tech completing her Ph.D. research as part of the Infrastructure Research Group (IRG). She also completed a teaching certificate and was actively involved with the Center for the En- hancement of Teaching and Learning (CETL) at Georgia Tech. Her academic interests focus on two primary areas of sustainable transportation: (1) community-based design and planning and (2) strategic planning and policy development. Dr. Barrella is also interested in investigating how to best integrate these research interests into classroom and project experiences for her students.Dr. Robert L. Nagel, James Madison University Dr. Robert Nagel is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering at James Madison University
supportive environment where role models and mentors foster can-do attitudestowards STEM. The WINS program is free. After a first-year curriculum in 9th grade, paidinternships with mentoring STEM professionals or other employment such as working asexplainers on the Museum floor are available to WINS enrollees in 10th-12th grades. EngWINSis an NSF funded project to expand WINS into the field of engineering and help train mentors toincrease the number of young women, especially Black and Latinx women going into the STEMfield.Program OverviewThere are two main components to the EngWINS project: the curriculum and the mentor trainingand experiences. Curriculum: Beginning in the summer before 9th grade, WINS students arewelcomed into the program for an
Paper ID #17774Employing Applied Creativity and the Engineering Design Process in the De-velopment of K-12 STE(A)M Curriculum (Work in Progress)Mr. Brett Doudican, University of Dayton Brett Doudican is the curriculum coach of the Ohio Miami Valley NSF RET program. He also is a full time math teacher and department chair at the Dayton Early College Academy, an urban school sponsored by the University of Dayton. Brett is involved in multiple levels of education from the Ohio Department of Education to teaching course to new teachers in alternative certification programs to managing a small curriculum and professional
Paper ID #15579Enhancing Curriculum in a First-Year Introduction to Engineering Courseto Assist Students in Choice of MajorDr. J. C. McNeil, University of Louisville Jacqueline McNeil is an Assistant Professor for the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at Univer- sity of Louisville. She is investigating nontraditional student pathways in engineering. She finished her Ph. D. in December 2014, titled, ”Engineering Faculty Views of Teaching Quality, Accreditation, and In- stitutional Climate and How They Influence Teaching Practices.” Her research is focused on engineering faculty perceptions of quality and on
content of the program. Using a format of informal seminars and workshops weengaged in a discovery period for the field of Public Affairs [9-13] leading us to identify criticalcharacteristics for an undergraduate minor in public affairs which have the potential forrecognition by both ABET and the Higher Learning Commission of the North CentralAssociation, and the National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration [9].We determined that critical characteristics of such a Program should include: • A core curriculum, which incorporates and helps students integrate the following topics: Economics; Finance and Budgeting; Statistics and Modeling Techniques; Public Policy and Policy Analysis; Ethics
of multi-disciplinary studies into the viability ofconverting used shipping containers into an Intermodal Steel Building Unit (ISBU) studentdormitory. Initial studies are slated to begin in January, 2010 and will follow upon those studiesnoted in this paper that were conducted at IUPUI.Students in the third year of the Architectural Engineering Technology program at CNA inCanada will be conducting detailed technical design studies in three key areas of this applicationunder cold climate conditions, while ensuring that all applicable codes and life-safety standardsare met. These particular studies include: ≠ Investigation into options for exterior cladding systems; ≠ Design and integration of all mechanical and
curriculum change in achemical engineering degree course (WIP)IntroductionA curriculum review can be an intricate and arduous process, made more complex due to amyriad of interwoven threads that inform the curriculum. This is often the case in chemicalengineering due in part to the accommodation of employer expectations, requirements fromaccreditation bodies and the multidisciplinary, integrative nature of an engineering degreewhich depends on students acquiring a wide range of attributes, and which focuses onapplication and relevancy [1], [2]. In this paper, we present our efforts to review the chemicalengineering curricula at a research-intensive higher education institution (HEI) in the UK.This review is being orchestrated by institutional
-Charlotte in 2010. She has teaching experience in both the formal educational settings as well as informal settings. She has taught 6th, 7th and 8th grade math, science, social studies and reading comprehension and high school physics and aerospace engineering in North Carolina public and private schools. During the sum- mers of 2013 and 2014, Leyf served as the Academic Director for the Middle School Summer Math Camp and Middle School and High School Biosciences and Engineering Camps at Duke University. Leyf has extensive experience in curriculum development as an editor for teachengineering.org and a lead developer for four Race to the Top courses on aerospace, automation and security. She has also served as a
information, and the use of real-time data acquisition, which helpsstudents to more easily associate physical behaviors with their graphical representations. As timehas passed, these techniques have become easier to use, as one might expect. 11The focus of this work is ultimately to integrate the use of advanced classroom technology—realtime sensors in this case—into a sound pedagogical framework. This means using this technologyalong with cooperative learning and other proven, effective pedagogies.12,13Pedagogical approaches to be used in these curriculum materialsToo often students are given too much direction in the learning process. For best results, studentsmust be coached, but not “directed” to the solution.14 Discovery learning is shown to
this to be an iterative research project wherein the curriculum design project isoffered in future summer offerings of MoM with integrated lessons learned from previousofferings. Identifying themes from this first round of five participants and subsequentparticipants will help inform how to continuously improve implementing such a project with thegoal that some of these lessons learned are informative for other educators wishing to offerstudent-led curriculum development projects in their engineering courses and contexts.Results As a work in progress, the plan is to continue collecting data from future MoM summerstudents to provide a richer description of the student experience with this project and toiteratively improve the
technology in teaching and learning. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019A New Curriculum to Teach System-Level Understanding to Sophomore Electrical EngineeringStudents using a Music-Following RobotI. AbstractElectrical Engineering students usually have to wait a long time before acquiring the mathematics andphysics prerequisites required to take their first technical courses and even when they take courses such ascircuits, electromagnetics and digital logic, they are not given an opportunity to develop a system-levelunderstanding about the interrelation of the topics that they study in these courses. In fact in many electricalengineering programs, students have to wait until their senior year before
. Christopher S. Greene, University of Saint Thomas Christopher Greene got his B.S. degree in electrical engineering at the University of Colorado, Boulder, and then did his master’s and Ph.D. at MIT, where he studied control theory. Following a 23-year career at Honeywell and another industrial company, he joined the University of St. Thomas School of Engineering. He is currently the Director of the Electrical Engineering program at St. Thomas and does research on the applications of control theory.Mr. Scott Edward MorganDr. Miguel Angelo Rodrigues Silvestre, University of Beira Interior Miguel Angelo Rodrigues Silvestre is an Assistant Professor at University of Beira Interior (UBI) in Portugal and an Integrated Researcher
with sensors and other devices attached. Allprojects were tested in a campus environment to collect data and share the knowledge gainedfrom the projects with other students. Students submitted reports for each project anddemonstrated their projects at the end of the course period. Student feedbacks were compiledabout the projects. All the details (course curriculum, student body, projects, and components)are shared in this paper.IntroductionA microcontroller is the brain of an electronic device. Most electronic and electromechanicaldevices such as an alarm clock, cell phone, printer, digital watch, or game console come with anintegrated microcontroller system. Microcontrollers manage interactions between the peripheralsof a device according to
been focused on teaching junior and senior engineering design classes as well as educational and curriculum development. He is coordinator of the first new ME-Practice course in the revised Mechanical Engineering curriculum and faculty advisor of the Mining INnovation Enterprise.Dr. Nancy B. Barr, Michigan Technological University As the Communications and Senior Design Program Advisor, Barr developed a multi-faceted technical communications program in the Mechanical Engineering-Engineering Mechanics Department at MTU. She delivers communication instruction to undergraduate and graduate students, assists faculty in crafting critical thinking/communication assignments, and trains GTAs and faculty in best practices in
Paper ID #29950Work in Progress – A Problem-Based Curriculum in Support of StructuredLearning Experiences to Prepare Ph.D. Candidates for Independent ResearchDr. Stephanie Cutler, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Stephanie Cutler has a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Her dissertation explored faculty adoption of research-based instructional strategies in the statics classroom. Currently, Dr. Cutler works as an assessment and instructional support specialist with the Leonhard Center for the Enhance- ment of Engineering Education at Penn State. She aids in the educational assessment of faculty
from the lecture component. While ourscheduling of studio time is like that of a laboratory, the studio format is actually quite differentfrom laboratory format in several ways. In particular, for an introductory microprocessorscourse, studio provides an effective means to get students active early in the semester. Insummary, we find that studio format helps greatly in teaching introductory microprocessor topicsand we are continuing to refine our use of studio format in this course.IntroductionDuring the fall 2002 semester a change in the electrical engineering curriculum required us toincrease the content in our introductory microprocessor course. The course is a requirement forall of our electrical engineering and computer engineering
communities of support andsuccess. One of the ways in which we seek to realize our mission and vision is through ourLiving and Learning Community (LLC) programs. Over the past year, we have revised, piloted,are in the process of implementing intentionally-crafted diversity and inclusion curriculum intoour LLC programs seminars. As we are currently on the ground navigating this ongoing processof curriculum development, we believe it is important to share with others our experiences thusfar in developing and implementing diversity and inclusion curriculum within our engineeringLLCs. This paper will provide an overview of our LLC programs and the goals of our curriculumdevelopment before describing the strategies and challenges faced. Furthermore, we
. The theory of the circuits was discussed along with theanticipated results. The learning objectives for the project were presented, as were the ABEToutcomes that would be satisfied. Post lesson student comments and ideas for additional studentactivities, and alternate assignments were also provided.REFERENCES[1] Kuh, G. D., “High Impact Educational Practices: What They Are, Who has Access to Them, and Why they matter, AAC&U, 2008.[2] Zhan, W., Wang, J., Vanajakumari,, M., “High impact activities to improve student learning”, 120th ASEE Annual conference, June 2013.[3] Parker, R., Buchanan, W. Circuit Simulators and Computer Algebra- An integrated Curriculum for Electronics Students, Proceedings of 1996, ASEE Annual Conference
, Page 11.546.2computing, and other science courses, and possibly an “Engineering Science” course. Oftenthere is little exposure to engineering professors and the practice of engineering in the lowerdivision course sequence.As students progress into the upper division courses within their department or program theymay take project-driven courses or courses with projects imbedded in them that are specific tothe subject. Often the relationship between science, engineering, science, mathematics, andengineering is not integrated, but remains veiled. Students proceed through fours years of studyin engineering learning fundamentals but little about the profession they are about to enter.Students who have a meaningful cooperative engineering experience
AC 2011-1643: THE IPT PROGRAM AT UAHUNTSVILLE AN INNOVA-TIVE APPROACH TO DESIGN EDUCATION AND STEM OUTREACHPhillip A. Farrington, University of Alabama, Huntsville Phillip A. Farrington, Ph.D. - is a Professor of Industrial and Systems Engineering and Engineering Man- agement at the University of Alabama in Huntsville. He holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in Industrial Engi- neering from the University of Missouri-Columbia and a Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering and Management from Oklahoma State University. He is a member of ASEE, ASQ, ASEM and IIE.Michael P.J. Benfield, The University of Alabama in Huntsville Dr. Michael P.J. Benfield is the Integrated Product Team (IPT) Deputy Program Manager at The Univer- sity of
2006-82: AN EXPERT SYSTEM FOR TEACHING PARTIAL DIFFERENTIALEQUATIONSArthur Snider, University of South FloridaSami Kadamani, Hillsborough Community College Dr. Kadamani is a Professor of Science at Hillsborough Community College Page 11.188.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 An Expert System for Partial Differential EquationsAbstractThe execution of the solution, by the separation of variables process, of the Poisson, diffusion,and wave equations (homogeneous or nonhomogeneous) in rectangular, cylindrical, or sphericalcoordinate systems, with Dirichlet, Neumann, Robin, singular, periodic, or Sommerfeld boundaryconditions
Session 1449 Development of a Competency-Based Introductory Course in Fluid Power Jan T. Lugowski Purdue UniversityAbstractA project to develop a novel curriculum for the associate degree in manufacturing engineeringtechnology has been funded by the National Science Foundation. The Sinclair CommunityCollege in Dayton, OH, coordinates the development work of the course. The focus of thecurriculum development process is to create an industry-driven, competency-based, modularlystructured, and integrated curriculum.One of the last modules to be developed is the fluid power module
Objective 2: To expand the companies offering experiential learning opportunities (co-ops, internships, senior project subjects) from at-least three companies in year one to at-least 5 companies in year two of the project. Objective 3: To assure that at least 40% of courses in the proposed curriculum include an experiential learning component. Objective 4: To conduct, through experiential learning opportunities and curriculum, at least six projects that effectively integrates the theoretical and practical aspects of mechatronics and industrial controls & manufacturing systems by the end of the second year. Objective 5: To serve as a resource center for university-industry collaboration, and
1793 Session Enhancing MET Curriculum with Applied Research Experience for Faculty - Parametric Study of Water Jet Cutting (WJC) Processes – A Case Study Alok K. Verma, Cheng Y. Lin Department of Engineering Technology Old Dominion University Carl J. Voglewede, Mike E. Tall Technology Development and Integration Branch NASA Langley Research CenterAbstract In today’s global competitive environment, the engineering technology curriculum must adoptand
past few decades, there has been a push for engineering curriculum to better engagewith the global, ethical, and societal impacts of the field and to prepare students to engage in amulticultural and diverse workspace and world. In an effort to introduce diversity in design andto troubleshoot the concept of the universal user, we adapted the display compatibilityquestionnaire from Smith’s study of display-control stereotype designs, and presented the samedesign questions to 21st century first-year engineering students, non-engineering students, andnon-engineering professionals. This work explores current societal impacts such as gender, age,and occupation on the user expectation of a control’s display and user-interface design.Additionally, the
Paper ID #38001An Engineering Course as a Design ObjectNicholas D. Fila (Research Assistant Professor)Corey T Schimpf (Assistant Professor) Corey Schimpf is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo, SUNY his lab focuses on engineering design, advancing research methods, and technology innovations to support learning in complex domains. Major research strands include: (1) analyzing how expertise develops in engineering design across the continuum from novice pre-college students to practicing engineers, (2) advancing engineering design research by integrating