placed in theliberal arts category. Of the remaining courses, those in which at least 25% of the course gradewas determined by team-based activities (i.e. team-based labs, projects, etc.) as defined on thecourse syllabi were placed in the technical team-based group. Finally, the remaining courseswere placed in the technical lecture group. The course breakdown for each group can be seen inTable 1. Courses in the technical-team group met the criteria in different manners. IntroEngineering 1 and 2 have a heavy emphasis on team-based projects, Chemistry 1 and 2 have alarge in-lab component, while Intro Computer Science has an emphasis on in-lab, pairedprogramming work.Table 1. First Year Engineering Courses and their Assigned Group Technical Lecture
analysis have been developed or been the subject of studies. The intent ofthis study was to gain insight into and document how a physical truss manipulative affectsstudents’ understanding of internal forces. Some studies suggest that analysis of internal forces isdifficult for students – leading to a series of errors commonly made by students.16 The emphasiswas on seeking feedback from students to learn how they used the manipulative, rather thanseeking to quantify their improvements. This qualitative study contributes to the ongoingevidence-based research of physical manipulatives in engineering.Context of the StudyThe project was presented to the students in the statics class, and six volunteers were selectedrandomly from the statics courses
. Starting in 2000, Alan began to focus on supporting higher education partners in projects that address broadening participation in the sciences, graduate student development, curriculum innovation, instructional technology, teacher professional development and other education reforms. For the past five years, Alan has been the lead evaluator for Epicenter, an NSF-funded STEP Center focused on infusing entrepreneurship and innovation into undergraduate engineering education.Mr. Emanuel Costache, SageFox Consulting Group Since joining SageFox in 2009, Emanuel has worked on the evaluation team for a variety of NIH- and NSF-funded projects, including the National Center for Engineering Pathways to Innovation (Epicenter
Paper ID #16318Measuring the Effectiveness of an Intensive Math Preparation Program toEnhance the Success of Underrepresented Students in Engineering ˜Anna Marbella Camacho, Canada College As Project Director for a $5.9 million Hispanic-Serving Institution-STEM Grant (CalSTEP), Anna col- laboratively spearheaded the creation of The STEM Center, which promotes STEM education through programs, activities, academic/support services, and opportunities for students, faculty, staff, and the greater community. Anna Camacho joined Ca˜nada College in 2012 in the capacity of Assistant Project Director of
treat the airway dehydration present in patients with Cystic Fibrosis through mathematical modeling and systems engineering principles.Dr. Renee M Clark, University of Pittsburgh Dr. Renee Clark has 23 years of experience as an engineer and analyst. She currently serves as the Direc- tor of Assessment for the University of Pittsburgh’s Swanson School of Engineering and its Engineering Education Research Center (EERC), where her research focuses on assessment and evaluation of engi- neering education research projects and initiatives. She has most recently worked for Walgreens as a Sr. Data Analyst and General Motors/Delphi Automotive as a Sr. Applications Programmer and Manufactur- ing Quality Engineer. She received
information.7 Social media can alsoenable geographically dispersed design teams to complete projects using asynchronous andsynchronous communication.8Taking advantage of these functions requires scientists and engineers to communicatestrategically. The variety of social web tools available each offer different functions andutilities.4 Similarly, different altmetric tools measure the impact of different social web tools.Just as liaison librarians presented faculty members with journal based metrics and helped themto frame their impact for promotion and tenure cases, liaisons can also assist professors tounderstand the emerging social web and available article level altmetrics to strategically choosehow to disseminate their scholarly work in a way
Paper ID #16841Using Peer Mentoring to Enhance Student Experience and Increase Reten-tion in Mechanical EngineeringMr. Nicolas N. Brown, University of Utah Nicolas is a senior in the mechanical engineering department at the University of Utah. He is the peer mentoring coordinator for the Department of Mechanical Engineering, as well as an Undergraduate Re- search Assistant for the Ergonomics and Safety Lab. His current area of research involves designing and integrating control systems on recreational equipment for high-level spinal cord injury patients. Nicolas’ senior design project is the Rodent Tracker; a mechatronics
and build projects in traditionally analytical courses in the Engineering Mechanics sequence. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Using Stress Shielding in Hip Implants as a Case Study to Teach Loading of Composite BeamsAbstractA laboratory activity was developed in which the students modeled and analyzed the femoralportion of an artificial hip replacement as a composite beam. A historical challenge with artificialhip replacements has been that the stiffer artificial femoral component shields the surroundingbone from stresses during physiological activities. This phenomenon, known as “stressshielding,” results in bone resorption that can lead to implant failure
Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University, with a joint appointment in Bioengineering. Her research focuses on the interactions between student moti- vation and their learning experiences. Her projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers and scientists, and their problem solving processes. Other projects in the Benson group include effects of student-centered active learning, self-regulated learning, and incor- porating engineering into secondary science and mathematics classrooms. Her education includes a B.S. in Bioengineering from the University of Vermont, and M.S. and Ph.D. in Bioengineering from Clemson University. c
build all basic primitives for users with python-based scripts. Learners are notrequired to build basic objects by themselves, which allowing them to focus on learning principlesof solid modeling. To trace all learners’ operations, we built go back and restart functions. Booleanoperation functions are imported from FreeCAD library. For each goal 3D model, we applied asearch and planning algorithm, an AI approach, to compute all possible construction sequencesunder certain constraints.The tutorial system consists of five components: introduction, pre-test, training, post-test, andpost-survey. A flow chart of the tutorial process is shown in Figure 1.At the project introduction stage, the tutorial briefly introduces the overall tutorial process
under estimate on class size, files with more than two row gaps in the dataunderneath header will be unsuccessfully parsed.The schema inference model is able to successfully parse 77/80 testing files (a mixture ofsanitized real data submitted to the project and synthetic data). A file is parsed successfully if itidentified the header row and included all rows of student data. If the parser includesmiscellaneous columns of data, the test is allowed to pass as these columns can be excluded inpost processing; 23 tests were passed in this manner. The last three tests failed due to theassessment answer keys being included as part of the block of student data. This problem can besolved for templated files; however, for semi-structured files, we are
schools. She co-leads the ”ADVANCE Hispanic Women in STEM” project in Puerto Rico, and the Latin and Caribbean Consor- tium of Engineering Institutions’ (LACCEI) ”Women in STEM” forum. Tull was a finalist for the 2015 Global Engineering Deans Council/Airbus Diversity Award, and has presented on diversity in the US, Latin America, Europe, Australia, India. She is a Tau Beta Pi ”Eminent Engineer.”Dr. David A. Delaine, Universidade de S˜ao Paulo David A. Delaine is a progressive engineer who has strong interests in the intersections of engineering, education, and society. He has obtained a Ph.D. in electrical engineering from Drexel University, in Philadelphia, USA. He is currently serving his second term as an executive
softwareexperience, and library of courseware and tutorials provides an affordable tool that students canuse to learn important engineering concepts and develop real engineering projects. NI myRIOcomes with a dual-core ARM® Cortex™-A9 real-time processor and a 667 MHz Xilinx FPGAfor customizable I/O. Figure 2 shows the embedded architecture of NI myRIO and itsspecifications are as follows: ● Xilinx Zynq System on a Chip● Analog Input (10 Channels)● Analog Output (6 Channels)● Analog Input and Output also available through 3.5 mm Audio Jack● 40 Digital I/O Lines● Wireless Enabled● Accelerometer, LEDs, and Push Button Onboard● 6 V to 16 V, 14 W Power Requirement● Powered by NI LabView Figure 1: Components required for building the
each year.Dr. Joanna K. Garner, Old Dominion University Dr. Garner is a Research Associate Professor in The Center for Educational Partnerships at Old Dominion University, VA. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Engineering Ambassadors Network (EAN): Goals, Successes and Challenges in Growing the EAN The engineering field is facing a crisis. In order to solve today’s engineering challenges,we need a diverse workforce with strong technical and leadership skills. Unfortunately,workforce studies have shown that the number of students being educated in STEM (science,technology, engineering, and math) cannot meet projected demands.1 In addition
. Thirty-three percent of the student bodyis female. These data are typical for most of our peer technological institutions with similarofferings and is consistent with national data which indicate that 25.8% of first year womenintend on majoring in STEM disciplines, with a breakdown as follows: biological/agriculturalsciences (15.8%), mathematics and computer science (2.1%), physical sciences (2.1%), andengineering (5.8%) (National Science Board, 2016).In 2006, the National Research Council (NRC) Committee on Women in Science andEngineering recommended that universities extend outreach to potential students through avariety of programming including summer science and engineering camps, lecture series, careerdays, collaborative research projects
engage students in design thinking activities and discussion as a pre-cursorto discussing the science/math content that is relevant to their design project for that semester.In Fall 2011, when I first started teaching the Design Course, I reached out to my colleagues,Monica Cardella and Robin Adams, at Purdue University to share their instructional materials onengineering design, especially on how to introduce students to the notion of design. From thosematerials, I decided to use a prompt asking students to help solve a problem in the everydaycontext of long grocery store lines (credit for design of the original prompt: David Radcliffe,Robin Adams, and Monica Cardella at Purdue University). The prompt and how it was used inclass is shown in
details about my current research projects, check out my website: http://wauck2.web.engr.illinois.edu/Mr. James M. Leake, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign James M. Leake joined the Department of Industrial and Enterprise Systems (formerly General) Engineer- ing in August 1999. His educational background includes an M.S. in Mechanical Engineering (1993) from the University of Washington, a B.S. in Ocean Engineering (1980) from Florida Atlantic University, and a B.A. in Art History (1974) from Indiana University. His current research interests include engineering education, integration of CAD/CAE software in the engineering curriculum, building information mod- eling, spatial visualization, and reverse engineering
research is focused on mechatronics, digital manufacturing, digital thread, cyber physical systems, broadening participation, and engineering education. She is a Co-Director of Mechatronics and Digital Manufacturing Lab at ODU and a lead of Area of Specializa- tion Mechatronics Systems Design. She worked as a Visiting Researcher at Commonwealth Center for Advanced Manufacturing in Disputanta, VA on projects focusing on digital thread and cyber security of manufacturing systems. She has funded research in broadening participation efforts of underrepresented students in STEM funded by Office of Naval Research, focusing on mechatronic pathways. She is part of the ONR project related to the additive manufacturing training
, 2018 Lessons Learned from a Radio Spectrum Coexistence Competition: A Road Map to Engagement in Informal Education of Wireless Communication1. IntroductionThe U.S. Government is in the process of implementing 2012 recommendations by thePresident’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) [1] to share federalspectrum with non-federal users, a process that is projected to result in a Trillion dollars insocietal benefits as well as related employment for millions. Related competitions such asDARPA’s Spectrum Challenge and Spectrum Collaboration Challenge [2] encourage innovativeapproaches and help prepare the STEM professionals who will develop effective spectrumsharing radios and networks as
., University of Tennessee, Knoxville Dr. Retherford is an alumna of the University of Nebraska, Omaha, and received her graduate degrees from Vanderbilt University. She currently teaches a variety of courses supporting the department of Civil & Environmental Engineering at the University of Tennessee. Among many structural engineer- ing courses, Dr. Retherford manages the Senior Design Project course for all undergraduate seniors.Dr. David A. Saftner, University of Minnesota Duluth David Saftner is an Associate Professor at the University of Minnesota Duluth. He received a BS in Civil Engineering from the United States Military Academy and MS and Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from the University of Michigan
Ecological Paradigm,” Syst. Res. Behav. Sci., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 575–586, Aug. 2016.[24] K. Gramann, T.-P. Jung, D. P. Ferris, C.-T. Lin, and S. Makeig, Towards a New Cognitive Neuroscience: Modeling Natural Brain Dynamics. Frontiers E-books, 2014.[25] T. Shealy and M. Hu, “Evaluating the potential of neuroimaging methods to study engineering cognition and project-level decision making,” presented at the EPOC-MW Conference, Engineering Project Organization Society, Fallen Leaf Lake, CA USA, 2017.[26] T. Shealy, J. Grohs, M. Hu, D. Maczka, and R. Panneton, Investigating Design Cognition during Brainstorming Tasks with Freshmen and Senior Engineering Students using Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy. 2017.[27] M. Strait and M
from different universities,undeclared first-year students, and a few students in different majors, including students from theSustainable Urban Environments degree program who are required to take this class during theirfirst or second year,The objectives of the Introduction to Civil Engineering course are 1. List the subdisciplines of civil engineering, identify types of projects that engage each, and understand the multidisciplinary nature of most large infrastructure projects; 2. Explain the overall role of civil engineers in design and operation of urban infrastructure, with understanding of the range of typical day-to-day tasks and responsibilities; 3. Discuss the ethical responsibilities of engineers to their
Paper ID #25933A study of the Efficacy of Free-body Diagrams for the Solution of Frame-Type Mechanics Problems with Increasing Difficulty LevelDr. Jeffrey A. Davis, Grant MacEwan University Dr Davis obtained his PhD at ETH Zurich specializing in multiphase flows and thermal hydraulics in nuclear reactors. With a passion for teaching, Dr. Davis’ research focuses on pedagogical topics such as student engagement, active learning, and cognitive development. Projects he is currently working on include ”Development of a risk assessment model for the retention of students”, ”Development of Student Assessment Software”, and
University in Iran, Tehran. He has been official Technical Teacher at Ministry of Education in Iran from 2007 to 2018, and received many certificate in education such as Educational Planning, Developing Research Report, and Understanding School Culture. During these years, he has taught construction courses in several technical schools. Mr. Beigpourian currently works in the CATME project, which is NSF funding project, on optimizing team- work skills and assessing the quality of Peer Evaluations. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Analyzing Changes in the Individual Dimensions of a Behaviorally Anchored Scale for TeamworkAbstract
Management at Indiana State University. He has published over 45 articles in different journals and conference proceedings. He has served as an investigator for research projects sponsored by National Science Foundation, Ford Motor Company, and the US Army. Before working at Indiana State Univer- sity, he was a faculty in the University of Louisville for 10 years. He also has over four years of industrial experience. He received his D.Eng. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Lamar University (USA) in 1999, M.Sc. in Materials Engineering from Isfahan University of Technology (Iran) in 1991, and B.Sc. in Metallurgical Engineering from Tehran University (Iran) in 1988. He is a member of ASEE, ASME, SAE, and ATMAE
answer in what ways learners interact with advanced STEM MOOCs, we analyze learnerusage patterns across nine advanced STEM MOOCs offered by nanoHUB, a National ScienceFoundation supported project [22]. In this paper, we present early findings based on an analysisof three of these courses. nanoHUB is an online platform dedicated to “computationalnanotechnology research, education, and collaboration” [22] and partners with the MOOChosting platform edX to deliver nanoHUB courses online.DataThe individuals we include in this analysis are those we refer to as “live-mode learners.”Consistent with previous research [23], we define these live-mode learners as those individualswhose first recorded interaction with any course material occurred during the
and the ways in which this identity is influenced by students’ academic relationships, events, and expe- riences. Dr. McCall holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in Civil Engineering from the South Dakota School of Mines & Technology.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech Lisa D. McNair is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she also serves as Director of the Center for Research in SEAD Education at the Institute for Creativity, Arts, and Technology (ICAT). Her research interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include exploring disciplines as cultures
].Unfortunately, the epidemic is expanding into the Engineering fields where debt has beentraditionally minimized by such pursuits as internships, co-ops, and research projects that weresupported by scholarships, fellowship funds, and teaching assistantships. Engineering studentsexpect to make higher incomes than many other majors. That increase in expected earning powermay cause students to take out higher loans than they otherwise would have. MK Consulting [1]defines a 10% rule, that the amount of income that is typically needed for paying off this debtwithin 10 years has been around 10% of the borrowers’ income. Anything above this 10% isdefined as excessive debt [1]. Assuming an average debt of $50,000 at an interest rate of 4% for10 years, these
educational environments for diverse learners.Angela Goldenstein, Purdue University Angela Goldenstein is the Managing Director of MEERCat and comes to Purdue University with a decade of experience in the technology industry working for Google & Cisco. She has a BBA from the Stephen M. Ross School of Business at the University of Michigan and is an MBA Candidate at the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University. She excels at leading cross-functional projects, and on MEERCat, she drives the Center’s overall strategy, operations, and research-to-practice initiatives. At Purdue, Angela’s passionate about driving change in the School of Mechanical Engineering and making the experience even better for future
appropriate.Beth, also cited discomfort while observing sexist encounters in her lab: In lab settings he'll probably give cool projects and big responsibility to the men in his lab, and then he'll have all of his technicians be women, and there's another situation here that makes me feel really uncomfortable where there's a professor that only accepts generally attractive, young women in his lab, and he treats them sexist. Samantha, described several racially-charged encounters with a technician in her lab thatwas really infuriating: He would say little things, you know? Like little things...one day he came in and he said, "Samantha, I uh.." we were talking about an instrument, and he said, "I saw this thing on