Conference Session

An International Perspective

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carmen Maldonado, University of Puerto Rico-Mayaguez; Tatiana Ramirez, University of Puerto Rico-Mayaguez; Idalis Vazques, University of Puerto Rico-Mayaguez; Alexandra Medina-Borja, University of Puerto Rico-Mayaguez

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

://www.nber.org/papers/w. National Bureau of Economic Research.24. S. Tobias, "Women in Science - Women and Science", JCST, March 1992, pp. 276-278.25. Society of Women Engineers Web site. URL. http://www.stanford.edu/dept/news/pr/2006/pr- swe-061406.htm, assessed January 5, 2007.26. Seymour, E., and N.M. Hewitt, Talking About Leaving. Factors Contributing To High Attrition Rates Among Science, Mathematics, & Engineering Undergraduate Majors: Final Report To The Alfred P. Sloan Foundation On An Ethnographic Inquiry At Seven Institutions, Bureau of Sociological Research, University of Colorado, Boulder, 1994, p. 1.27. Ref. 2328. NSERC/Nortel Joint Chair for Women in Science and Engineering in Ontario Web Site: http://www.carleton.ca

Conference Session

IE Program Design I

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Manuel Morales, University of Puerto Rico-Mayaguez; Alexandra Medina-Borja, University of Puerto Rico-Mayaguez

Tagged Divisions

Industrial Engineering

the selection process is made by the students.Like we saw in our results, the students’ motivators tend to change throughout the years, thismainly because of how they get to know their field, through enrolling specialized courses in theirmayor, and levels of maturity. All of these factors can and will be tabulated to get a betterunderstanding of how the students tend to think, when it comes to selecting a mayor.V. References 1. Kierkegaard, S. (1962). The Point of View for My Work as an Author: A Report to History. New York: Harper Torchbooks. 2. Gonzales-Barreto, D., Gonzales-Quevedo, A., Applicant’s Profile Study for Improving Undergraduate

Conference Session

Teaching Methods for the 21st Century: Part 2

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard Savage, California Polytechnic State University

Tagged Divisions

Materials

, pp. 917-924.7. Muryanto, S., “Concept Mapping: An Interesting and Useful Learning Tool forChemical Engineering Laboratories,” Int. J. Engng. Ed., Vol. 22, No. 5, 2006, pp. 979-985.8. Evans, D. L., McNeill, B. W. and Beakley, G. C., “Design in Engineering Education:Past views and future directions,” Engineering Education, July/August, 1990, pp. 517-522.9. Dym, C. L., Engineering Design: A Synthesis of Views, Cambridge University Press,New York, 1994.10. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook I: Cognitive Domain, Longman, NewYork, 1956.11. Safoutin, M. J., Atman, C. J., Adams, R., Rutar, T., Kramlich, J. C. and Fridley, J. L.,“A Design Attribute Framework for Course Planning and Learning Assessment,” IEEETransactions on Education, Vol

Conference Session

ChE Poster Session

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William Krantz, National University of Singapore

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

focus area. This should lead to the problem(s) that will be addressed inthe presentation. The specific objectives of the work usually are stated in the Introduction.Remember to define any special terminology such as acronyms that will be used.3e. Review of Prior Studies SectionNearly all technical presentations build upon prior studies. Prior studies can be summarized as achronological review of relevant papers, theses, patents, etc., or presented in a table summarizingthe principal contributions. Alternatively, papers can be cited via footnotes, which are helpfulwhen space is limited. Provide a critique at the end of the review of prior studies in which youcritically assess the state-of-the-art. An effective critique should provide strong

Conference Session

Experiential and Service Learning

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jim Chamberlain, Clemson University

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

, OR, June 2005.[9] Al-Khafaji, K., “Learning Sustainable Design through Service.” International Journal for ServiceLearning in Engineering. 1, no. 1 (2006): 1-10.[10] Grzelkowski, Kathryn P. “Merging the Theoretical and the Practical: A Community Action LearningModel.” Teaching Sociology. 14, no. 2 (1986): 110-118.[11] Kvam, Paul H. “The Effect of Active Learning Methods on Student Retention in EngineeringStatistics.” The American Statistician. 54, no. 2 (2000): 136-140.[12] Helle, L. et al., “Project-Based Learning in Post-Secondary Education – Theory, Practice and RubberSling Shots.” Higher Education. 51 (2006): 287-314.[13] Jahanian S. and J. M. Matthews. “Multidisciplinary Project: A Tool for Learning the Subject.”Journal of Engineering

Conference Session

FPD8 - Early Intervention & Retention

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mukul Shirvaikar, University of Texas at Tyler; David Beams, University of Texas at Tyler; Sagun Shrestha, University of Texas at Tyler

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

spring 2007 semesters is shown in the tablesbelow. The color coding indicates which tutor had responsibility for which subject(s). Thetutors designated "SI" held joint appointments with B2B and with Supplementary Instruction (SI)programs operating in Physics I, Chemistry I, and Calculus II.Table 1 Typical results demonstrating the effectiveness of tutoring supplemented by mentoring for Physics I in the spring semester. Spring 2006 Comparison of Tutored and Other Engineering Students (SI Class) Course: PHYS 2325 Tutored Group Other Group Total

Conference Session

Environmental Engineering Undergraduate Research

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Reisel, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering

School.” 2007 ASEE Annual Conference AC2007-617. Honolulu, HI. (2007).3. C. Ramseyer, “An Experiment in Undergraduate Research,” 2007 ASEE Annual Conference AC2007-1832. Honolulu, HI. (2007).4. C. Bott, “Undergraduate Research Experiences that Promote Recruitment into the Field of Environmental Engineering.” 2007 ASEE Annual Conference AC2007-485. Honolulu, HI. (2007).5. D. Lopatto (2004), “Survey of Undergraduate Research Experiences (SURE): First Findings.” Cell Bio. Educ., Page 13.1278.14 3, 270-277.6. E. Seymour, A.-B. Hunter, S. Laursen, and T. DeAntoni (2004). “Establishing the Benefits of Research Experiences for

Conference Session

Design: Content and Context

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard Melnyk, United States Military Academy; Daisie Boettner, United States Military Academy

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

even share based on the team size. For each major assignment a correspondingnumber of points was associated with the peer review. Each team member could receive more orless than this point value based on the results of the review. For example, on a team with four students each member should contribute 25% of theworkload. If one team member only contributes 20% of the workload, then that student wouldreceive 80% of the peer review points associated with the assignment. Since this method is azero-sum proposition, other team member(s) on this team would receive more than the allottedpoints because they would have contributed more than their theoretical share of the work. Thiswas a way to provide limited extra credit to those team members who

Conference Session

Teams and Teamwork in Design I

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Keith Sheppard, Stevens Institute of Technology; Peter Dominick, Stevens Institute of Technology; Edward Blicharz, Stevens Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

. Page 13.399.1117. Whetten, D.A. & Cameron, K.S., Developing Management Skills, 7th edition, (2007), Upper Saddle River, NJ. Pearson Prentice Hall. p. 58.18. Latham, G.P., & Frayne, C.A., “Self-management training for increasing job attendance: A follow-up and a replication”, Journal of Applied Psychology, (1989) Vol 74(3), Jun. pp. 411-416.19. Bandura, A.. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, (1986), Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.20. Dweck, C. S., “Motivational processes affecting learning”, American Psychologist, (1986), 41(10), pp. 1040- 1048. Page 13.399.12Appendix 1

Conference Session

Teams and Teamwork in Design II / Design for Special Services

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susan Conry, Clarkson University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

, and tactics can readily be adapted to other engineeringdisciplines as well.Bibliography1. 2006-07 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission,Baltimore, MD.2. P. Goodyear, “Pedagogical frameworks and action research in open and distance learning”, European Journal ofOpen, Distance, and E-Learning, 1999, http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/1999/goodyear/index.html3. R. E. Mayer, “Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methodsof instructions,: American Psychologist, Volume 59, Number 1, 2004, pp. 14-19. Page 12.622.134. W. S

Conference Session

ChE: Assessment

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ronald Terry, Brigham Young University; W. Vincent Wilding, Brigham Young University; Randy Lewis, Brigham Young University; Danny Olsen, Brigham Young University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

Brigham Young University. His research interests include thermophysical properties, phase equilibria, and environmental engineering. He received his B.S. degree in Chemical Engineering from Brigham Young University in 1981 and his Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from Rice University in 1985.Randy Lewis, Brigham Young University Randy S. Lewis is Professor of Chemical Engineering at Brigham Young University and an Adjunct Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oklahoma State University. He received his BS and PhD degrees in Chemical Engineering from Brigham Young University and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, respectively. His research interests include biomaterials development and the

Conference Session

Recruitment and Retention Topics

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susan Lord, University of San Diego; Michelle Camacho, University of San Diego

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

by Stacey Lane Tice, Nicolas Jackson, Leo M. Lambert, and Peter Englot; Syracuse, N.Y. : Syracuse University Press, 2005, p.89.8 Riley, Robin L. and D. Lyden Murphy, “The multidisciplinary possibilities of feminist pedagogy,” in University teaching : a reference guide for graduate students and faculty, edited by Stacey Lane Tice, Nicolas Jackson, Leo M. Lambert, and Peter Englot; Syracuse, N.Y. : Syracuse University Press, 2005, p. 91.9 Webb, L. M., K. L. Walker, and T. S. Bollis, “Feminist pedagogy in the teaching of research methods,” International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 7 (5), 2004, pp. 415-428.10 A Better Tomorrow: Transforming the Classroom through Feminist Pedagogy, a video available from Division

Conference Session

Women, Minorities and the New Engineering Educator

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cheryl Allendoerfer, University of Washington; Sharon Jones, Lafayette College; Jaime Hernandez, Texas State University-San Marcos; Rebecca Bates, Minnesota State University-Mankato; Robin Adams, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

, DC: The National Academies Press. [3] Banks, J. (1982). Teaching for social justice, diversity, and citizenship in a global world. Education Forum,vol. 68(4), pp. 296-305. [4] Grant, C. and Sleeter, C. (1986). Race, class and gender in education research: An argument for integrativeanalysis. Review of Educational Research, vol. 56(2), pp. 195-211. [5] Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American EducationalResearch Journal, vol. 32(3), pp. 464-491. [6] Malveaux, J. (2005). Dimensions of diversity. Diverse: Issues in Higher Education, vol. 22(19), pp. 31. [7] Jones, S., Bhandari, A., Clapp, L., Fennell, D., LaPara, T . and Tull, K. (2006). Diversity in environmentalengineering: The good and bad

Conference Session

Effective Learning Innovations in Civil Engineering Courses

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Ledlie Klosky; Decker Hains; Timothy Johnson, Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, USMA; Jakob Bruhl, US Military Academy, Dept of Civil & Mechanical Engineering; Jared B. Erickson, U.S. Military Academy; John Richards, D/CME, USMA

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

Engineering Current Status: Needs Design Comparison of Desired End State: Analysi s Alternatives What is? What should be? Value System Decision Design Implementation

Conference Session

Mathematics in Transition

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anne McClain, University of Alabama-Birmingham; Dale Feldman, University of Alabama-Birmingham; Lee Meadows, University of Alabama Birmingham

Tagged Divisions

Mathematics

of this task has been a stepin the right direction toward engaging students in mathematics used to help solve criticalproblems in applications of interest. Additional tasks are currently under development.For additional information on the Greater Birmingham Mathematics Partnership, please visit:http://www.math.uab.edu/GBMP/.For additional information on the Mathematics Education Collaborative (MEC), please visit:http://mec-math.org/.References[1] Greater Birmingham Mathematics Partnership, Five-Year Strategic Plan. July 2006.[2] Blue, C. E., Blevins, L. G., Carriere, P., Gabriele, G., Kemnitzer, S. (Group Leader), Rao, V., and Ulsoy, G., “The Engineering Workforce: Current State, Issues, and Recommendations”. Final Report to the

Conference Session

Introducing Active and Inductive Learning and Improving the Learning Curve in ME

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Olga Pierrakos, Virginia Tech; John Charonko, Virginia Tech; Alicia Williams, Virginia Tech; Satyaprakash Karri, Virginia Tech; Kelley Stewart, Virginia Tech; Pavlos Vlachos, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

of engineering students at the varying academic levels. The five main questions guiding this effort were: 1) What are the learning outcomes for these students during this experience? 2) Did this intervention aid in recruiting and retaining engineering students? 3) Did this intervention influence the engineering students to apply and get involved in undergraduate research? 4) Has this intervention influenced the career path of the students (i.e. graduate school or other research position)? 5) Is the intervention more effective at specific academic level(s)? In this effort, we have placed particular emphasis on transferring research to groups under-represented in

Conference Session

Assessment of K-12 Engineering Programs and Issues

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kelly Hutchinson, Purdue University; Shawn Stevens, University of Michigan; Namsoo Shin Hong, University of Michigan; Molly Yunker, University of Michigan; Cesar Delgado, University of Michigan; George Bodner, Purdue University; William Fornes, Purdue University; Nick Giordano, Purdue University; Joseph Krajcik, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

depending on the category. Bothpositive and negative student comments were given if both sets of comments existed in thecategory. Some student comments were found to fall into more than one category. If thisoccurred, the comment was coded in both categories.Table 2. Descriptions and examples of categories Category Description Example Statement(s) • [Kind-of interested in the Easy-Stir because] “I’m an artist and I know it had to do with paint and stuff, so…something that I do outside of Chemistry class, Items are

Conference Session

New trends in ECE education

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Agnieszka Miguel, Seattle University

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

. The department covered theprinting cost of the posters. The posters are currently on display in one of our labs.The final report was an opportunity for the students to document what they have learnedabout their particular topic, describe the details of the algorithm(s) that they haveimplemented, comment on their performance and results, and give conclusions andrecommendations for future work. Students were asked to convey their findings in a clearand concise manner and were given guidelines about the technical report format tofollow.The final project was a very successful aspect of the class. The author tried to expose thestudents to real-world digital image processing applications by asking them to applytheory learned in class to solve

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kevin Bowen, Rice University; Marcia O'Malley, William Marsh Rice University

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

Systems (HAPTICS’03), 2003.[9] P. Dalep, “LV as a Standard” Email posted to info_labview@pica.army.mil on September 1993, archived on ftp.pica.army.mil[10] G.B. King, R.D. Evans, D.P. DeWitt, and P.H. Meckl, “Curriculum-wide Systems Programming Environment for Mechanical Engineering Instructional Labs,” Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, pp. 233-236, 1994.[11] B. Kauler, “Dataflow and visual programming: The way ahead for engineers,” Education Conference, New Zealand, 1993.[12] O.A.A. Zeid and M.M. Tanyel, “Innovation in teaching mechanical engineering applications,” Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, pp. 82-86, 1994.[13] J.M. Weaver and S. Das, “Overhaul of an

Conference Session

Gender and Accessibility Issues in K-12 Engineering Education

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Uchechukwu Abanulo; Ananth Iyer; John Helferty, College of Engineering, Temple University; Joseph Fischgrund, The Pennsylvania School for the Deaf

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

American Secondary Schools”, Educational Researcher, 28, 26-37. 1999.14. Harry G. Lang, M. S. Stinson, F. Kavanagh, Y. Liu, and M. Basile, “Learning Styles of Deaf College Students and Instructors’ Teaching Emphases”, Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 4, 16-27. 1999.15. A. F. Grasha, “Teaching with style: A practical guide to enhancing leaning by understanding teaching and learning styles. Pittsburgh: Alliance Publishers. 1996. Page 12.659.14

Conference Session

What's New in Dynamics?

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Phillip Cornwell, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

integral was introduced by Gottfried Leibniz in 1675. The integral Page 12.806.5symbol he used, " ", was derived from an elongated letter S, standing for summa (Latin for "sum"or "total"). Newton was at times a very nasty man. Following the death of Leibniz, Newton isreported to have declared that he had taken great satisfaction in "breaking Leibniz's heart."Newton seemed to be characterized by a lack of publishing for much of his life. This may havebeen due to the fact that he was very sensitive to criticism. For example, the conflict he had withRobert Hooke over optics resulted in his ceasing all publications until after the death of Hooke

Conference Session

ECE Curriculum Innovations

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cynthia Furse, University of Utah; Behrouz Farhang-Boroujeny, University of Utah; Stephanie Richardson, University of Utah; Rohit Verma, University of Utah; April Kedrowicz, University of Utah; Bryan Stenquist, University of Utah

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

contributing to thedevelopment of these projects. Page 11.777.14Bibliography[1] www.ece.utah.edu/~cfurse/NSF[2] C. Furse, L. Griffiths, B. Farhang, G. Pasrija, “Integration of signals/systems and electromagnetics coursesthrough the design of a communication system for a cardiac pacemaker,” IEEE Antennas and PropagationMagazine, Volume 47, Issue 2, April 2005 Page(s):117 – 119[3] C.Furse, R.Woodward, M. Jensen, "Wireless Local Area Network Laboratory for Microwave EngineeringCourses," IEEE Trans. Education,Feb2004, pp.18-25[4] Frank Cassara, personal communication, Polytechnic University, 1999[5] Numerical Electromagnetics website, www.ece.utah.edu

Conference Session

Introducing Active Learning into ME Courses

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ali Al-Bahi, King Abdulaziz University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

Outcome Assessment,” Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2004.10. King, F.G. and Ilias, S. “Imbedding Assessment and Achievement of Course Learning Objectives with Periodic Reflection,” Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2003.11. McNeill, Barry W., and Bellamy, Lynn, Introduction to Engineering Design; The Workbook, 6th Edition, McGraw-Hill, Inc.,199812. Besterfield-Sacre, M., Shuman, L.J., Wolfe, H., Atman, C.J., McGourty, J., Miller, R.L, Olds, B.M. and Rogers, G.M., “Triangulating assessments,” Proceedings of the 2000 ASEE Annual Meeting, American Society for Engineering Education, 2000.13

Conference Session

Knowing Our Students II

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Turns, University of Washington; Steve Lappenbusch, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

. Page 11.1346.12AcknowledgementsThis work has been supported by the National Science Foundation through grant REC-0238392,Using portfolios to promote knowledge integration in engineering education. The authors wishto thank all members of the Laboratory for User-Centered Engineering Education for theinsightful reviews and comments that helped to shape this paper.References1. Lappenbusch, S., & Turns, J. (2005). Finding their place in TC: using a community of practice model to research emerging TC professionals. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Professional Communication, Limerick, Ireland.2. Guan, Z., Yellin, J.M., Turns, J., and Kumar, V. (2005). User-centered design of course-based portfolios for mechanical engineering

Conference Session

Intersdisciplinary Courses and Environmental Undergraduate Research

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Helene Hilger, University of North Carolina-Charlotte; Francis De Los Reyes, North Carolina State University; Warren DiBiase, University of North Carolina-Charlotte; Len Holmes, University of North Carolina - Pembroke; Stephanie Luster-Teasley, North Carolina A&T State University; Siva Mandjiny, University of North Carolina - Pembroke; Todd Steck, University of North Carolina-Charlotte; Keith Schimmel, North Carolina A&T State University; Chuang Wang, University of North Carolina-Charlotte

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering

(p<0.05) relative to lecture formatfirst PBL unit and with learning overall was generally supported in the student interviews (Table3), although it was also clear that students had difficulty discriminating between student-directedlearning and simply being asked to work in groups. Two of the four students interviewed at the endof the first PBL unit believed the unit was “lecture-based”. Some engineers reported feelingoverwhelmed by the biology course content at the end of the first two units, but it is also possibletheir assessment was colored by a certain temptation to default to the biology student(s) rather thanassume responsibility for the new content. Quiz scores at the end of the second unit did notindicate that the majority of

Conference Session

Capstone Design and Entrepreneurship

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Ochs, Lehigh University; Gerard Lennon, Lehigh University; Todd Watkins, Lehigh University; Graham Mitchell, Lehigh University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Integrated Product Development and the entrepreneurshipminor.Entrepreneurship teaching – undergraduate: Since the mid 1990’s Lehigh hasoffered an award winning cross-disciplinary program in Integrated Product Development(IPD) for students in engineering, business and the design arts. For the past eight yearsthe program has focused on technical entrepreneurship through new productdevelopment, with industry sponsorship of cross-disciplinary student teams2. The IPDprogram has also engaged local entrepreneurs and student entrepreneurs. Since theinception of the National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance (NCIIA), elevenLehigh teams have won national competitions for collegiate innovation andentrepreneurship (see www.NCIIA.org). The IPD program

Conference Session

Student Teams and Design Skills

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tamara Moore, Purdue University; Heidi Diefes-Dux, Purdue University; P.K. Imbrie, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

begin to look atwhich kinds of team characteristics are more likely to produce better solutions to MEAs and howto teach students to embody those characteristics as team members. These findings could havegreat impact on how we teach problem solving and teaming to our students.Bibliographic Information1. ABET (2002). Engineering Criteria 2002-2003. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, http://www.abet.org/criteria.html.2. Imbrie, P.K., Maller, S.J., and Immekus, J.C., “Assessing Team Effectiveness,” Proceedings from the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Portland, OR, 2005.3. Guzzo, R. A. (1986). “Group Decision Making and Group Effectiveness.” In Goodman, P. S. (Ed.). Designing Effective Work

Conference Session

Emerging Trends in Engineering Education Poster Session

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Charles Bunting, Oklahoma State University; Alan Cheville, Oklahoma State University

. (IEEE Press, New York, 1997).12 J. F. McClymer and L. Z. Knoles, Journal on Excellence in College Teaching 3, 33 (1992).13 D. R. Krathwohl, Theory into Practice 41 (4), 212 (2002).14 National Research Council, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. (National Academy Press, Washginton, DC, 2000).15 S. B. Feichtner and E. A. Davis, J. Organ. Behav. Teaching Soc. 9 (4), 58 (1984).16 R. L. Pimmel, IEEE Transactions on Education 46 (2), 273 (2003).17 G. Novak, A. Gavrin, W. Christian et al., Just-In-Time Teaching: Blending Active Learning with Web Technology (Series in Educational Innovation). (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1999).18 R. L. Mertz, IEEE Trans. Educ. 40 (1), 41 (1997).19

Conference Session

Capstone Design II

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenneth Soda, U.S. Air Force Academy; Gregory Toussaint, U.S. Air Force Academy; Albert Batten, U.S. Air Force Academy

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

soon madethem responsibility of the team’s Systems Engineer or Systems Engineering Manager.This assignment was generally welcomed by all team members. As we will demonstratebelow, traditional engineering students lacked familiarity with the products while SE andSEM students were less familiar with the technology of the projects. Most design teams used MS Project to develop and present their schedule. Theywere asked to identify the major milestones in the two semesters, major efforts in thedesign and fabrication process, individual(s) primarily responsible for each effort, startand stop dates, and time required. The level of detail in the schedule required of eachteam was tailored based on the number of cadets on the team and whether or

Conference Session

Student Learning and Teamwork

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

ramin Sadeghi, Power and Water University of Technology (PWUT); Saeid Moslehpour, University of Hartford

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

press). 5. Masullo, M.J., Calo, S., Nguyen, T., Willner, B., "Multimedia On-Demand and the Organization of Education Systems", Proceedings of IFIP WG 3.2 Conference on University Uses of Visualization, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, California, USA, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., July 2003. 6. Negroponte, N., Knopf, New York, USA, 2005. 7. Ruiz, A., Masullo, M.J., "A Universal and Global Education Infrastructure", UNESCO World Congress Moscow, Russia, July 2002 Page 11.490.16