. Lwakabamba, R. J. Weber, D. Rover, C. Cruz-Neira, and J. A. Dickerson, "Lessons Learned: Installing a Wireless System in the C6 Virtual Reality Environment," presented at IEEE Virtual Reality 2002, Immersive Projection Technology Symposium, Orlando, FL, 2002.[2] R. Stuart, Design of Virtual Environments: Barricade Books, 2001.[3] M. M. Wloka, "Lag in Multiprocessor Virtual Reality," Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 4, pp. 50-63, 1996.[4] K. Park and R. Kenyon, "Effects of Network Characteristics on Human Performance in a Collaborative Virtual Environment," presented at IEEE VR `99, Houston, TX, 1999.[5] K. M. Stanney, R. R. Mourant, and R. S. Kennedy, "Human Factors Issues in Virtual
the atmosphere in the classroom is more conducive to learning. My teachingevaluations improved after ETW: although I gave tough exams, the students rated my teachingeffectiveness highly. Comments I see frequently see on my evaluations now is “veryenthusiastic” and “the instructor made the learning fun”. The students have also appreciated theorganization of the board notes: “the notes on the board are great”.Dave: I won the Department of Civil Engineering 's Outstanding Teacher Award for the 1999-2000 school year. This award was determined by votes from the junior and senior civilengineering undergraduate students. I found that learning the student’s first names was veryrewarding both for the students and myself. In fact, when I taught an
ofCalifornia at Berkeley. We especially want to acknowledge the contributions of Paul Gray, Co-Principal Investigator and Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost; Buford Price, Co-PrincipalInvestigator and Dean of Physical Sciences; David Auslander, Mechanical Engineering; BruceBirkett, Physics; Alan Weinstein, Mathematics; George Johnson, Mechanical Engineering; andRonald Gronsky, Material Science.Bibliography1. Gray, Paul, and Price, Buford, “Integrating Calculus, Chemistry, Physics and Engineering Education throughTechnology Enhanced Visualization, Simulation and Design Cases and Outcomes Assessment,” GE Fund Grant,1997.2. Synthesis Coalition, http://www.synthesis .org3. Aglan, H. and S. Ali, "Hands-On Experiences: An Integral Part of Engineering
a surface and the curve is the intersection of the two surfaces: F(x, y, z) = 0 G(x, y, z) = 0 ii. three equations, each displaying how a point, P(x, y, z) is controlled by a parameter: x = f(u) y = g(u) z = h(u)Here if u represents time, t, the three equations describe how the point, P(x, y, z) moves withtime. The parameter, u, sometimes is chosen to represent the distance s along the curve from afixed point P0(x0, y0, z0) to the moving point P(x, y, z
fallen cow 10—Launching “Stealth” craft 12—Aftermath of Instructor Baptism 11—Stability testing Page 6.545.7II. “Mission: Preposterous”Problem Presentation. This project was a take off on the Tom Cruise movie, “Mission:Impossible” (MI). On the assignment day, the instructor walked into class, gave eachgroup a videotape and left. Each group had to find a way to view the tape. The instructorwith the help of a teaching assistant made the tape. The tape mimicked the manner inwhich the 1960’s television show “Mission: Impossible” started. A tape was always given toa Mr. Phelps. He would play it and be
andemploying static equilibrium conditions to analyze internal reaction forces in multi-componentmechanical systems. By analyzing both the simple and the commercial pliers, students shouldgain insights into the relative advantages and disadvantages of vector vs. scalar solutiontechniques. Through the post-lab exercise, students are introduced to the concept of analyzing amechanism’s parameters individually (using MechANEX software) to determine whichparameter(s) has the most significant impact on a particular aspect of a design. For example, inthe post-lab assignment students vary the geometric dimensions of the pliers in an attempt tomaximize its mechanical advantage (defined here as clamping force divided by force applied atthe handle) while keeping
present study, the students in universities of technology hold somealternative conceptions in Electricity. Therefore, the physics teacher should think how to teachthe topics of electricity in an effective way. Furthermore, more research is need on developingmore effective teaching strategy to enhance UT students’ conception about electricity. Finally, itis found that the UT students did lack of the ability/intention in reasoning and explanation. It issuggested that physics teacher should encourage students and provide them more opportunities toengage in reasoning activities in physics course.AcknowledgementThe funding of this research work is provided by the National Science Council, Taiwan, ROC,under grant NSC 97-2511-S-259-008-MY3
constructive, effective study groups to maximizeeach person’s learning within the study group environment.References Cited:1 Brower, A. M. & Inkelas, K. K. (2010). Living Learning Programs: One High-Impact Educational PracticeWe Now Know a Lot About. Liberal Education, 96 (2).2 Inkelas, K. K., Zeller, W. J., Murphy, R. K., Hummel M. L. (2006) Learning Moves Home. About Campus,10 (6), 10-16.3 Pascarella, E. T., Terenzini, P. T., & Blimling, G. S. (1994). The impact of residential life on students. InC. L. Schroeder & P. Mable (Eds.), Realizing the Educational Potential of Residence Halls (pp. 22-52). SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass.4 Pike, G. R. (1990). The Effects of Residential Learning Communities and Traditional
Education, 94(1), pp. 41-56, 2005.8. Besterfield-Sacre, M. and LJ Shuman, “The Future of Assessment” (Chapter 12) in Spurlin, J., Rajala, S., & Lavelle, J. (2008) (eds.) Designing Better Engineering Education Through Assessment: A Practical Resource Page 22.836.12 for Faculty and Department Chairs on Using Assessment and ABET Criteria to Improve Student Learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing; pp. 307-327.9. Diefes-Dux, H.A., Moore, T., Zawojewski, J., Imbrie, P.K., & Follman, D. (2004). A framework for posing open-ended engineering problems: Model-eliciting activities. Proceedings of the 30th ASEE
. ―Learning to Navigate.‖ In Chaiklin, S. and J. Lave (Eds.) Understanding Practice: perspectives on activity and context. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. p. 35-63, 1996.15. Kusterer, Ken. Know-how on the Job: The Important Working Knowledge of “Unskilled” Workers. Westview Press, 1978.16. Lave, Jean and Etienne Wenger. Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, 1991.17. National Academy of Engineering. (NAE) The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. National Academies Press, 2004.18. Orr, Julian. Thinking about machines. Cornell University Press, 1996.19. Robbins, Philip and Murat Aydede. The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. Cambridge
, TR-83-3048, Oct. 1960 (Revised 1978).13. Husman, J., Lynch, C., Hilpert, J., and Duggan, M. A., "Validating measures of future time perspective for engineering students: Steps toward improving engineering education", presented at American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, HI, 2007.14. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & Mckeachie, W. , “Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Mslq)”, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1993, 53(3), 80115. Yasar, S., “Discourse in freshman engineering teams: The relationship between verbal persuasions, self-efficacy, and achievement”, 200816. Bandura, A., “Guide for
Work (SOW) a. Period of performance; minimum 8-14 weeks b. Research & development requirements c. Statement of Work agreed to by Corporate Partner, University Engineering Page 22.882.4 Department, and the Student d. Cost and Schedule requirements3 e. 2-3 presentations at corporate partner facility f. 1-2 presentations to university representative(s) g. Sr. Project Work log to indicate effort during paid time and personal time associated with Senior Project effort. h. A final presentation of work done and/or product demonstration i
languages. Limits in conceptual knowledge means that they are limited to solving well-defined tasks with specified tools. When faced with a more open-ended or complex problems, limits in conceptual knowledge will mean they will probably not be able to solve the problem. Proficiency The individual has some conceptual knowledge of both computing systems and their application domain. When presented with a problem, they are able select the appropriate tools(s), seek the necessary information, and present a solution. The regularly used technical skills are committed to memory and external information resources are
evolvedaccording to government and industry demand. Agriculture, the mechanical arts, andmanufacturing dominated the 19th century needs, resulting in the development of shop courseswhere students gained hands-on experience with machine tools for farming and manufacturing.1With the rise of electrical engineering in the early 1900’s, combined with increasing promotion Page 22.913.3of a scientific approach to practice and the desire to “professionalize”1 engineering and establish it as a credible academic discipline, laboratory experience became the norm for practicalexperiences within the engineering
is a sample ofrepresentative answers, categorized by theme. Student comments are verbatim andoccasionally contain grammatical errors, etc. Content statements I learned that laser colors are that because of the number of nanometers that the laser has Page 22.1323.7 On a mirror a laser reflects opposite direction on an angle Vocal cords don’t vibrate when you say “s” Careers Now I know the difference between a scientist and an engineer. I learned that to get into speech technology you just have to have a bachelor’s degree They are looking for engineers Relevance Many people
learners: active learners have the opportunity to “do” experiments, sequentiallearners follow step by step instructions revealing the concept(s) piece by piece, and summaryquestions are provided for reflective learners. An example experiment is shown in the Appendix. For the first time, students have remarked that the labs are fun (emotionally engaging),and the demonstrations have improved understanding of concepts as measured by targetedproblems and through formative assessment. 4 5 2
Statistics.4. Goodman Research Group (2002). Final report of the women’s experiences in college engineering (WECE) project, Cambridge, MA.5. Davis, C-S. & Finelli, C.J. (2007), Diversity and Retention in Engineering, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, v2007, n111, p63-7.6. Derlin, R.L. & McShannon, J.L. (2000), Faculty and Student Interaction and Learning Styles of Engineering Undergraduates, Retrieved May 10, 2008 from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/16/89/1d.pdf.7. Goldberg, J. & Sedlacek, W. (1996), Summer Study in Engineering for High School Women, Maryland University, College Park, Maryland.8. Pantano, J. (1994), Comprehensive Minority SEM Programs
effective for your learning. • It was perfectly fine. • They did well; I don’t see any way it could be improved. • Providing more examples that were mentioned through the non-SI sessions. Go over previous tests. Finally, maybe making the session longer. • All math classes should have SI sections. • It’s really good with this class, can’t say I would add anything to it. • I don’t know. • Nothing from my experience, it was the best way to become highly successful in the class. • I thought it was fine. Please indicate the reason(s) you did not attend SI sessions: • I didn’t feel it was
experience both the frustration and satisfactionof that experience. Such learning prepares them for professional practice in ways that a projectrequiring only a paper/computer design does not. For instance, students in the lower end designteam, while having some background due from their coursework, became much more proficientand confident in their understanding of design and machining. Students designed, programmed,setup, machined, and inspected complex CNC parts. They assembled the parts into a completemachine and successfully tested it. They were able to adapt their engineering skill sets to theproject at hand. This was a lifelong-learning experience the student will not soon forget.Bibliography 1 Sheppard, S., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., &
Austin, TX INDUSTRY 1 Lockheed-Martin Various Locations INDUSTRY 5 Master card O'Fallon, MO INDUSTRY 1 Nissan Canton, MS INDUSTRY 1 Raytheon Tucson, AZ INDUSTRY 4 SAKS New York New York, NY INDUSTRY 1 Union Pacific Omaha, NE INDUSTRY 2 U. S. Army MIL 1 Jackson State University Jackson, MS STATE
designsituations. With the conversation as a backdrop, students were then introduced to the notion of adesign rationale and asked to draft a sample design rationale as a way to introduce them to thisconcept.Case 2: Graduate multi-week projectThe journal landscape project was a multi-week project in a graduate level course entitledEmpirical Traditions in Human Centered Design and Engineering. Per the syllabus, the task was Page 22.1116.3as follows: “Working in teams of two or three, you and your teammate(s) will characterize oneyear of articles in a major journal in our field in terms of five to seven dimensions of yourchoosing and then prepare a summary of
). Online Delivery Management for Teaching and Learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31(2):237-246.51. Enriquez, A. (2010). Assessing the Effectiveness of Synchronous Content Delivery in an Online Introductory Circuits Analysis Course. Proceedings: 2009 American Society of Engineering Education Zone IV Meeting, Reno, NV, March 25-27, 2010..52. CCC Confer (n.d.). CCC Confer Products. Retrieved December 21, 2009 from http://www.cccconfer.org/products/products.aspx53. Kowalski, F., Kowalski, S., & Hoover. E. (2007). Using InkSurvey: A Free Web-Based Tool for Open-Ended Questioning to Promote Active Learning and Real-Time Formative Assessment of Tablet-PC-Equipped Engineering Students. Proceedings; 2007 American
. Developing Effective Leaders. Digital image.Http://fcs.okstate.edu/leadership/Power. Oklahoma State University, n.d. Web. 21 Nov. 2012. .Walker, Dianne. "Effective Leadership in the Workplace." Web log post. The Network Journal. N.p., 16 Nov. 2009. Web. 20 Nov. 2012. .Hart, Lois Borland., and Charlotte S. Waisman. The Leadership Training Activity Book: 50Exercises for Building Effective Leaders. New York: AMACOM, 2005. Print. Feiner, Michael. The Feiner Points of Leadership: The Fifty Basic Laws That Will Make People Want to Perform Better for You. New York: Warner Business, 2004. Print. Page 23.16.16
. vol. 2011: The Gale Group, 2009.[3] Gibbs R. Rural Education at a Glance. In: Service ER, editor. Washington DC: United States Department of Agriculture, 2003.[4] Bard J, Clark Gardener, Regi Wieland. Rural School Consolidation: History, Research Summary, Conclusions, and Recommendations. The Rural Educator, vol. Winter: National Rural Education Association, 2006.[5] Provasnik S, Angelina KewalRamani, Mary McLaughlin Coleman, Lauren Gilbertson, Will Herring, Qingshu Xie. Status of Education in Rural America. In: Education USDo, editor. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics, 2007.[6] United States Libraries: Our Approach. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, vol. 2011
), 86, 1995.3. Bartholomae, D., Petrosky, T., Ways of Reading: An Anthology for Writers, New York: Bedford, St. Martin’s,2011.4. X, X., (not identified to retain draft anonymity), E-mail to E/FEWP students, 2005.5. http://www.composition.X/SCstatement.pdf “University of X, Seminar in Composition,” Retrieved January,20126. Bartholomae, D., “Interchanges,” College Composition and Communication, 46(1), 86,1995.7. http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/Mestre_CommissionedPaper.pdf, Retrieved December , 2011.8. Tobias, S., They’re not dumb, they’re different: Stalking the second tier, Tucson: AZ, Research Corporation, 9,1990.9. Astin, A. W., Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in highereducation
-oriented vs. research-oriented approaches to scholarship. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 182-185.12. Regalado, S. New EWU Building Makes History. . .21st Century Style, Inland Northwest Catalyst magazine, Page 25.293.19 Dec/Jan 2006, 34-38.13. Turner, Fred (2008), BACnet® and Green, ASHRAE Journal, November 2008, 5.
needs to be conducted into the effect which an electronic portfolio hason learning. The relationship between electronic portfolios and how students’ reflect andpresent their learning is of interest to the researcher and it is envisaged that through futureresearch the answer to some key questions surrounding the value of electronic portfolios will Page 25.343.18be provided. Bibliography1. Lewis, T., Creativity in technology education: providing children with glimpses of their inventive potential. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2009. 19(3): p. 255-268.2. Atkinson, S
AC 2012-2991: DESIGN OF A ZERO ENERGY HOME AS A FIRST-YEARDESIGN PROJECTProf. Andrew Lau, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Andrew (Andy) S. Lau is Associate Professor of engineering and Coordinator of first-year seminars for the Penn State College of Engineering. Lau is a 1977 graduate of Penn State with a B.S.M.E. and was a Research Fellow and 1983 graduate of the University of Wisconsin, Madison, with an M.S.M.E. He has worked since 1977 as an engineer in the areas of solar energy applications in buildings, simulation of building energy use, and general consulting in the energy field. Most recently, his work has involved green buildings, engineering ethics, and sustainable design. He is a licensed
Conference on, 2007, pp. 1256-1261. 3. Elliot, M., Morris, W., Xiao, J., "City-Climber, a new generation of wall-climbing robots", in Video Proceedings of 2006 IEEE International Conference on attitude; The Robotics and Automation 2006 4. Adjustable DTS Guide Surgical Instrument – NuVasive (Laguette), Capstone Student Design Projects 2011-2012, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara. Web. . 5. Ostman, Sarah. "Patents, Awards Come Out of Senior Engineering Design Class."McCormick Northwestern Engineering. Northwestern University, 17 Oct. 2011. Web. . 6. Ehrlenspiel, K., Danner, S., Schlüter, A., “Verbindungsgestaltung für montagegerechte