team involving allparts of these programs -- students, industry members, and faculty. Another factor is that thestrong linkages with industry in developing and delivering the curriculum naturally lead tointeractions between teaching, practice, and research. Identified gaps of knowledge lead toideas for new research studies, and this and the overall work help set priorities for future work.The background of students the authors have taught in some of the subjects listed earlier differssubstantially from those found in a traditional aerospace engineering graduate program centeredon research degree tracks. On one end of the spectrum have been students who have justreceived a bachelors degree, many of whom have no industrial design experience, and
who are totally untrained in team research and often openly antagonistic to industrially relevant research. • The goal of the ERC education programs is to develop a team-based, research- inspired, and industrial practice-oriented culture for the education of graduate and undergraduate students that will produce engineering leaders for the future.We propose that our program is directed at doing exactly that – creating an Page 11.331.10interdisciplinary, team-oriented PhD program in which students will design theinnovative, sustainability related products needed for the future.6. AcknowledgementsThis research is being supported
various engineering, IT, and data analysis positions within academia and industry, including ten years of manufacturing experience at Delphi Automotive.Dr. Cheryl A Bodnar, University of Pittsburgh Cheryl A. Bodnar, PhD, CTDP is an Assistant Professor (Teaching Track) in the Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering at the Swanson School of Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. She obtained her certification as a Training and Development Professional (CTDP) from the Canadian Society for Training and Development (CSTD) in 2010, providing her with a solid background in instructional design, facilitation and evaluation. Dr. Bodnar’s research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques
progress through the various stages of the designloop. Student teams also had access to the mechanical engineering machine shop with adedicated staff member to assist with various fabrication tasks.The stated learning objectives of both the drill-powered vehicle project and the adapted tricycleproject were to: • Learn professional skills essential for engineering, including project management, working in a team, and technical design report writing • Plan and implement the stages of the design loop • Learn how to practically apply course concepts • Learn how to research information that is not explicitly given in a formal classroom settingPBL: Drill-powered Vehicle ProjectThe challenge presented to the students was to
management professionals at The Friday Institute. Prior to working at NC State, Ms. Collins was the Online Learning Project Manager for NC TEACH and Project Coordinator for NC TEACH II at the UNC Center for School Leadership Development. Ms. Collins is a graduate of Mur- doch University in Perth, Western Australia, with a Bachelor of Arts Degree in Communications and a Postgraduate Degree in Journalism.Dr. Eric N. Wiebe, North Carolina State University Dr. Wiebe is a Professor in the Department of STEM Education at NC State University and Senior Research Fellow at the Friday Institute for Educational Innovation. A focus of his research and outreach work has been the integration of multimedia and multimodal teaching and
Paper ID #27412Investigating Children with Autism’s Engagement in Engineering Practices:Problem Scoping (Fundamental)Ms. Hoda Ehsan, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Hoda is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education, Purdue. She received her B.S. in me- chanical engineering in Iran, and obtained her M.S. in Childhood Education and New York teaching certification from City College of New York (CUNY-CCNY). She is now a graduate research assistant on STEM+C project. Her research interests include designing informal setting for engineering learning, and promoting engineering
practice andhonest dialogue among the people who do it’” [10].While literature underscores the benefits of CoPs for faculty development, there is a lack ofshared understanding of what the term CoP means [11], [12]. This in turn has resulted insignificant variation in CoP implementations, from apprenticeships and small group convenings,to large-scale online networks and top-down knowledge management efforts [12], [13]. Thehomogenized use of the term serves to belie the variations of “knowing in action” [14] and cansubsequently leave faculty development practitioners unclear on how best to design their ownCoP initiative. Additionally, as Arthur [15] explains, “... if CoPs are self-defining and self-developing (as situated learning theory suggests
is raised on nuestro impacto (our impact) in thepractice of engineering education.IntroductionTo support higher education Faculty Development Programs (FDP), national entities,universities, and individual colleges invest large amounts of resources and money to train,mentor, support, and coach these faculty to learn about evidence-based practices for classroom-based activities and interventions (Borrego et al., 2013; Freeman et al., 2014; Prince, 2004).Even though faculty development programs are viewed as integral to support classroominnovation and the scholarship of teaching and learning, there is still a wealth of evidencesuggesting that its use and transfer into the classrooms are low (Berger et al., 2022; Laursen,2019; Stains et al
also provide asound basis for reliable peer assessment of teammate performances [31].Roles are not the same as responsibilities, but they are related. Both are important to teamperformance and to member self-efficacy [18]. Here we define roles and responsibilities as: • Roles are job titles or names given to the type of contribution a person makes (e.g., team leader, project manager, website developer, sponsor liaison) • Responsibilities are lists of tasks for which a person is held accountable (e.g., posting meeting minutes within 12 hours of meeting adjournment, coordinating design activities associated with power system design, oversight of market research
an overview of and assesses the relative utility of three emerging life cycle assessment tools(ATHENA, EC3, and TALLY) for comparing the carbon impact of timber, steel, and concrete as a building’sstructural system. It includes an exploration of incorporating these tools into the classroom to allow students toarrive at a decision for the building structural system based on the total embodied carbon of the design. Toround-out its assessment, the paper includes a literature review of similar research being incorporated intoundergraduate education.A case study that forms the backdrop of this research is the work of a student in our Graduate CertificateProgram (first author of this paper). He utilized a section of an existing project designed in
Society for Engineering Education, 2025 A Design-Based Research Course for Biomedical Engineering StudentsAbstractThis paper describes updates to an undergraduate and graduate-level soft robotics design courseintended to help students become aware of how research and design work occurs withinbioengineering fields, specifically aimed at exposing the hidden curriculum of research to buildstudent confidence. This soft robotics design course, an elective within a bioengineeringdepartment, concentrates on academic research and industry applications of robotics inhealthcare and health technology. Students were introduced to soft robotics through theengineering principles and material concepts alongside
experiences, and criterion-based course structures.Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis. From 1999-2008 she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, leading the Foundation’s engineering study (as reported in Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field). In addition, in 2011 Dr. Sheppard was named as co-PI of a national NSF innovation center (Epicenter), and
do.Health Systems LabIn Health Systems Lab, undergraduate Zoe was tasked with building an online dashboard toorganize large datasets that the other lab members would later analyze. The datasets were for astudy comparing participants’ activity levels, as measured by wearable sensors, with their healthoutcomes. Zoe worked closely with postdoctoral researcher Darius to design and program thedashboard. Although Darius is no longer a graduate student, he played the same mentoring rolethat graduate students often play for undergraduate researchers. Throughout their year-longlearning/teaching process, Zoe asked Darius numerous questions about the practical aspects ofdashboard-building as well as the epistemic meanings of the data they were working with
the degree program currently seen related to the content beyond advanced technologies.being developed at TAMU. Further, a brief assessment of The curriculum for the MSET at Wayne State Universitythe potential job market awaiting the graduates from this [4] incorporates problem solving skills with communicationprogram, as well as the expected student demand was and project management. The Purdue University onlinepresented. Future work includes continued refinement of Master of Science in Engineering Technology program [1]the curriculum and other program details by drawing upon emphasizes more general objectives such as “design andthe best attributes of currently offered similar programs. guide
Session 3232 Embedded Computer System Design: A Framework P. David Fisher, Michael Baladi Michigan State UniversityAbstractThe area of embedded (computer) systems represents a very fertile framework for electrical andcomputer engineering students to acquire their major design experience. Analog, digital, andmixed-signal technologies continue to evolve at a very rapid pace, with a large gap existingbetween fundamental topics covered in introductory courses and the integrated knowledge andskills needed by practicing engineers to design embedded systems. Consequently
posit these lead to lack of motivation to pursue cybersecurity as acareer [10]. Other researchers suggest that student employment and mentoring models can beused to successfully mentor women and other students underrepresented in the field [11].Building community among cybersecurity learners [12] and learning some of the technicalcontent of cybersecurity professions out of class [13] are suggested practices from the literatureon cybersecurity learning, which align with the notion of building a professional identity in atechnical field.Mountrouidou and colleagues [14] describe 2 gaps in the research literature regardingcybersecurity education that are addressed in this study—methods for mentoring minoritystudents in the field, and successful
Engineering from Alfred Univer- sity, and received his M.S. and Ph.D., both from Tufts University, in Chemistry and Engineering Education respectively. His research investigates the development of new classroom innovations, assessment tech- niques, and identifying new ways to empirically understand how engineering students and educators learn. He currently serves as the Graduate Program Chair for the Engineering Education Systems and Design Ph.D. program. He is also the immediate past chair of the Research in Engineering Education Network (REEN) and an associate editor for the Journal of Engineering Education (JEE). Prior to joining ASU he was a graduate student research assistant at the Tufts’ Center for
Paper ID #281022018 Best PIC IV Paper: Engineering Ethics Division: Faculty Perceptions ofChallenges to Educating Engineering and Computing Students About Ethicsand Societal ImpactsMs. Madeline Polmear, University of Colorado, Boulder Madeline Polmear is a PhD student in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engi- neering at the University of Colorado, Boulder. Her research interests include ethics education and the societal impacts of engineering and technology. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019
missile community are probably best met in some type of graduateprogram. Ideally, such a graduate program would be based upon an undergraduate program inaerospace engineering. However, government agencies and the missile industry employ a wide Page 10.56.3variety of engineers and scientists. The missile system design engineering model graduate Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright ©2005 by C.F. Newberry. Published by the American Society for Engineering Education with permission.curriculum should account for this wide variation in student background
-world applications (e.g., pharmaceutical engineering) into their high schoolscience curricula 18. As part of the program teachers developed instructional modules they coulduse to integrate engineering principles into their classroom teaching. The current paper describesan expansion of the project which focuses on helping the teachers refine their instructionalplanning skills while providing them with an effective protocol for developing standards-basedlesson plans.A process was introduced that allowed the development of curriculum modules based on eachteacher’s research. They start with a statement of their research practice and identify areas in thehigh school curricula into which the research best fits, then select specific activities to
followed a four-point protocol developed by the PI, based on formalmentorship “best practices”. This four-point protocol included (a) video representationthat is representative of a career in STEM, (b) field experience that offers the studentexposure to a STEM profession, (c) a design challenge to be solved using graphicssoftware, and (d) advising sessions where students are advised on college preparatory andother related topics (Denson & Hill, 2010). Telecommunication in the 21st Century To help provide structure and a framework for the eMentorship program a websitewas developed for student participants. The site was hosted on the university’s server andtemporary IDs were developed for student participants
through Engineering DesignGraduates that can frame problems and use a design-oriented approach with inquiry-based learning are needed in order to adapt to a rapidly changing society. Workforcedemands that students are able to diagnose and identify problems and design working Page 12.505.6solutions for ill-defined problems. The demand is magnified as disciplines merge andproblems become interdisciplinary, such as within the field of biotechnology, thuscreating a need for more inquiry-based learning at the undergraduate level. In order toprepare graduates for the global workforce, it is critical to develop a method to teachstudents creativity and
throughout theduration of the program. Parents ensured that the participants attended meetings and wereinvolved in either the design, build or marketing aspect of the robot. Parents also helped tofundraise money to get the teams specially designed shirts and gadgets with the team’s logoprinted on them. Representatives from local manufacturing industries provided mentorship toMS BEST hub teams by assisting teams in cutting and building parts from their hand drawn andcomputer-aided drafting designs (CAD), providing technical insight on mechanical designs andbuilds, as well as building the competition fields for the teams to practice and compete on. K-12 teachers, retirees, university faculty/staff, undergraduate and graduate students,along with
Paper ID #15378Attitudes that Students Believe Best Characterize EngineersDr. Angela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Envi- ronmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She serves as the ABET assessment coordinator for the department and its three accredited bachelor’s degrees. Professor Bielefeldt is the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living-learning community where inter- disciplinary students learn about and practice sustainability. Professor Bielefeldt’s
-157. 4. Brownell, J. E., & Swaner, L. E. (2009). High-impact practices: applying the learning outcomes literature to the development of successful campus programs. Peer Review, 11(2), 26. 5. Jones, M. T., Barlow, A. E., & Villarejo, M. (2010). Importance of undergraduate research for minority persistence and achievement in biology. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(1), 82-115. 6. Owerbach, D., & Oyekan, A. (2015). Undergraduate research experience aids progression, graduation rates at Texas Southern University, an HBCU. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 36(2), 28-32. 7. Lichtenstein, G., Chen, H. L., Smith, K. A., & Maldonado, T. A. (2014). Retention and persistence of
Bachelor of Science in Public Policy from Georgia Tech in 2008. After graduation Anna spent a year working for a private sector event firm before eagerly returning to her alma mater and joining the Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathemat- ics, and Computing in January 2010. Anna completed a Master of Science in Educational Research with a concentration in Research, Measurement, and Statistics from Georgia State University in May 2013.Ms. Marcela Nicole Moreno, CEISMC Marcela Moreno is an Educational Outreach Coordinator for three National Science Foundation projects, SLIDER (Science Learning Integrating Design, Engineering and Robotics), AMP-IT-UP (Advanced Man- ufacturing & Prototyping Integrated to
. His current research interests are focused in educational innovation and educational technologies. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Impact of the flipped classroom methodology on the development of argumentative skills and academic performance of engineering studentsAbstractAt the Tecnologico de Monterrey, we face two great challenges: working under a new student-centered educational model, which focuses on the development of skills and competencies; andon the other hand, the return to face-to-face learning after preventive isolation to which we weresubjected due to the Covid-19 contingency. In the classrooms we observed problems in theteaching-learning process such as lack of
Paper ID #15172Failure and Idea Evolution in an Elementary Engineering Workshop (Fun-damental)Chelsea Joy Andrews, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach Chelsea Andrews is a Ph.D. candidate at Tufts University in the STEM education program. She received a B.S. from Texas A&M University in ocean engineering and an S.M. from MIT in civil and environmen- tal engineering. Her current research includes investigating how children engage in engineering design through in-depth case study analysis. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Failure and Idea Evolution in an
. Hertzberg is currently Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at CU-Boulder. She teaches graduate and undergraduate courses in measurement techniques, thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, heat transfer, design and computer tools. She has pioneered a spectacular course on the art and physics of flow visualization, and is conducting research on the impact of the course with respect to visual perception and educational outcomes. Her disciplinary research centers around pulsatile, vortex dominated flows with applications in both combustion and bio-fluid dynamics. She is also interested in a variety of flow field measurement techniques. Current projects include electrospray atomization of jet fuel and velocity and
graduate Foundations I -Estimating, and the case involves the use of Togal.AI, ChatGPT, and MS Copilot forconstruction estimating solutions. This approach is suitable because it allows for in-depthexploration of students' perceptions, challenges, and the impact of AI tools on learningoutcomes. An IRB approval was obtained for the study.ParticipantsThe participants in this study are students enrolled in a graduate course (n=9). These studentswere assigned a semester project to explore and utilize various AI tools to complete constructionestimating tasks. Students provided individual submissions detailing their experiences,preliminary research, and reflections on using AI tools during the semester. Their variedbackgrounds, ranging from minimal