practiced with passion – justas our research. With time and experience though, the effort for offering this course decreases,especially if appropriate rubric sheets for marking/grading are used. In summary, we haveobserved an increase in both student engagement and learning. We are particularly pleased aboutpositive feedback from former students who are now in industry and appreciate and value ofwhat they experienced in this course. What is currently missing is a thorough long-termassessment of our approach. As part of our future work we intend to investigate what exactly thestudents actually take away from the course beyond the core technical design content.7. AcknowledgementsWe thank our industrial collaboration partners who, over the course of
biological sensing, electromechanical signal processing, and computing; the dynamics of parametrically-excited systems and coupled oscillators; the thermomechan- ics of energetic materials; additive manufacturing; and mechanics education. Dr. Rhoads is a Member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and a Fellow of the American Society of Me- chanical Engineers (ASME), where he serves on the Design Engineering Division’s Technical Committee on Vibration and Sound. Dr. Rhoads is a recipient of numerous research and teaching awards, includ- ing the National Science Foundation’s Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Award; the Purdue University School of Mechanical Engineering’s Harry L. Solberg Best
National Academy ofEngineering and the National Research Council. Some of the materials explicitly espouse thestudy of engineering in their titles, while others do not aspire to teach engineering but arenoteworthy because they utilize engineering contexts and design to make the core curriculummore authentic, interdisciplinary, or engaging for students.For the purposes of this research, engineering was operationally defined as “design underconstraint,”11 12 where the constraints include the laws of nature, cost, safety, reliability,environmental impact, manufacturability, and many other factors. While science attempts todiscover what is, engineering is concerned with what might be—with extending humancapability through modifying the natural world
engineering design projects that more meaningfully address course goals while incorporatingthe content from the modules. The eight characteristics are detailed as follows: Encourage a Realistic Engineering Design Process. One goal of EDSGN 100 design projects is to introduce students to the use of an engineering design process. To this end, it is crucial for instructors to scaffold the project so that students develop a connection between the engineering design process and the activities, lessons, and modules in the course. This can include i) working from an explicit design process and ii) demanding iteration. Previous research has demonstrated the importance of connecting engineering education with professional practice to form
2006-1932: YOU’VE BEEN SLIMED!: PROCESS AND PRODUCT DESIGNEXPERIENCES FOR RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION OF CHEMICAL ANDINDUSTRIAL ENGINEERSKaren High, Oklahoma State University KAREN HIGH earned her B.S. from the University of Michigan in 1985 and her M.S. in 1988 and Ph.D. in 1991 from the Pennsylvania State University. Dr. High is an Associate Professor in the School of Chemical Engineering at Oklahoma State University where she has been since 1991. Her main research interests are Sustainable Process Design, Industrial Catalysis, and Multicriteria Decision Making. Other scholarly activities include enhancing creativity in engineering practice and teaching science to education students and
parallel, there is a “dissatisfaction with the rate ofimplementation, adoption, and scale-up of research-based instructional strategies (RBIS)” [2, p. 221] thatis apparent in thought leaders and funding agencies. The lack of impact from RBIS driven change effortscreates a nearly circular effect - low impact suggests the need for more programs that have limited impact,which suggests the need for more programs. However, we know little about how faculty experience thesecalls for change or put them into practice. What we do know about the results of change efforts isillustrative. First, some faculty see coordinated efforts as disempowering when historically informalacademic systems are formalized [10]. Second, many, if not most, teaching changes are
the following themes: Black women have multiple identities that impact their experience in engineering. Some of Black women’s identities are accepted in academic and professional spaces; others are not. Recognizing the intersectionality of STEM, gender, and race identity. Preliminary strategies for cultivating environments where Black women’s multiple identities are equally accepted, including cultural capital.Next, the presenters will facilitate small group discussions of best practices to improve outcomesin the academic and professional lives of Black women in STEM and other marginalizedcommunities. There will be a special emphasis on developing an authentic understanding of
serves on the National Board of Governors of the Order of the Engineer.Craig N. Musselman, CMA Engineers, Inc. Craig N. Musselman, P.E. is a practicing civil and environmental engineer and is the Founder and Pres- ident of CMA Engineers, a consulting engineering firm with offices in New Hampshire and Maine. He holds B.S.C.E. and M.S.C.E. degrees from the University of Massachusetts and has more than 35 years experience in the planning, design and construction administration of public works facilities. Mussel- man is a former member of the New Hampshire Board of Licensure for Professional Engineers and was actively involved in the National Council of Examiners for Engineers and Surveyors (NCEES) through committee
is a Professor at the University of Wuppertal. He researches online and intercultural engineering education. His primary research focuses on the development, introduction, practical use, and educational value of online laboratories (remote, virtual, and cross-reality) and online experimentation in engineering and technical education. In his work, he focuses on developing broader educational strategies for de- signing and using online engineering equipment, putting these into practice, and providing the evidence base for further development efforts. Moreover, Dr. May is developing instructional concepts to bring students into international study contexts to experience intercultural collaboration and develop respective
students were presented with research papers onthe negative impact of performing on raked stages on a performer’s body. Lastly, the studentsanswered word problems in groups about designing inclined stages and also considered theethical impact of designing a raked stage for their performers. Students commented on theirimproved clarity in learning the material through this blended lecture and lab structure and werefurther inspired by the activity to tie the lab’s experimental setup to their final project in theclass.KeywordsInclined Plane, Normal Force, Design Ethics, non-STEM majorsIntroductionAt most liberal arts colleges in the United States, science, technology, engineering, and math(STEM) courses are often required as part of their core
see it in different courses, and helps students connect the various concepts they learn indifferent courses. It is in this capacity, that PLP facilitates the hardware-software connectionwhen it is used to teach hardware design, assembly programming, compilers, and operatingsystems.Figure 3: PLP’s New Homepage. This organization better reflects the different roles that PLP isexpected to play: an education tool for faculty and students, an engineering education research projectwith some unique methods of qualitative analysis, and a development environment for hobbyists andtinkerers. Page 24.87.5Communities of Practice: In PLP, a class is set
wives. All those withyoung children do.”The idea that academic life often assumes that a faculty member has a stay-at-home spousefrequently surfaced in the comments. “I am competing with men who have wives that stay athome. They can work late any night they want without consequence. I have to schedule latenights way in advance, or skip them altogether.” Similarly, “My lack of participation at nightevents or weekend events (recruiting, professional dinners) has been noted….I do not think thisis unique to my university, but an indication that the academic culture still revolves around malenorms and practices.” Several respondents noted that this was a concern for both members of adual-career couple, not just women. However, it impacts women
Inventory and a Chemistry Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge and change for intro- ductory materials science and chemistry classes. He is currently conducting research on an NSF faculty development program based on evidence-based teaching practices. The overall goal is to develop dis- ciplinary communities of practice across the college of engineering. The approach is being promoted through semester-long faculty workshops and then through a semester of supported implementation of faculty classroom innovations. Changes in faculty beliefs and classroom practice should positively im- pact student performance and retention. He was a coauthor for the best paper award at the FIE convention in 2009 and the
Paper ID #38331The State of the Practice Integrating Security in ABET AccreditedSoftware Engineering ProgramsDr. Walter W. Schilling Jr., Milwaukee School of Engineering Walter Schilling is a Professor in the Software Engineering program at the Milwaukee School of Engi- neering in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. He received his B.S.E.E. from Ohio Northern University and M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of Toledo. He worked for Ford Motor Company and Visteon as an Embedded Software Engineer for several years prior to returning for doctoral work. He has spent time at NASA Glenn Research Center in Cleveland, Ohio, and consulted for
underrepresented undergraduate engineering students and engineering educators. In addition to teaching undergraduate engineering courses and a graduate course on entrepreneurship, she also enjoys teaching qualitative research methods in engineering education in the Engineering Education Systems and Design PhD program at ASU. She is deputy editor of the Journal of Engineering Education.Dr. Audrey Boklage, University of Texas at Austin Audrey Boklage is research assistant in the Cockrell School of Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin. She is particularly interested in improving the culture and environment of undergraduate education experience for all students, particularly those from underrepresented groups. Audrey has
limited use to engineers and technologists who do not fullyunderstand fundamental graphics principles and 3-D modelling strategies. Increasinglytechnological education in our second level schools (high schools) is becoming more alignedto the real-world needs of business so as to better prepare students for entry into a moreskilled and technically oriented workplace. In this context there is a real need to develop acoherent and systematic taxonomy for parametric modelling within a coherent and soundpedagogical framework.The research entails developing a coherent theoretical framework and problem-solvingheuristic for best practice in CAD pedagogy for the effective use of Parametric Modellingsystems. The work encompasses cognitive psychology
of university-level graduate student learning assessment practicesFaculty-led, college-focused assessment practices already provide sound assessment of studentlearning in many areas, and we wanted to avoid redundancy in the university-level system.With national attention including more focus on graduate programs, implementation ofuniversity-level graduate student learning outcomes assessment was a high priority for theappointed Enhancing Graduate Education (EGE) committee. In parallel, in 2010 the standingfaculty Graduate & Research Committee (GRC) reviewed their charge as having responsibilityfor overseeing the quality of graduate programs and began discussing a possible framework forgraduate program review.As part of that effort, GRC
Michael Trevisan is Professor of Educational Leadership and Counseling Psychology and Director of the Assessment and Evaluation Center at Washington State University Page 12.293.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Assessments for Three Performance Areas in Capstone Engineering DesignAbstractCapstone engineering design courses occupy pivotal positions in every engineering baccalaureatedegree program. They are critical to preparing graduates with professional skills needed forinnovative, responsible practice in a global environment, and they provide vital assessment datafor ABET
towards the study and education of pre-college and collegeengineering. In a small population study taken during the second year of the program’simplementation, 65% of all students who completed the Infinity Project pre-collegecurriculum plan to pursue engineering in college. Only about 2% of all students whograduate from high school are interested in pursuing such degrees1. Teachers whocomplete a one-week-long training seminar designed to prepare them for teaching theyear-long course have also given positive comments towards the program – some of thesecomments include “Best training I have ever seen” and “My state needs this curriculumnow.” Additional details regarding the structure and outcomes of the Infinity Project canbe found in several
students will understand increasinglycomplex content and concepts by learning, practicing and applying engineering design, thinkingand skills.The three goals of the research are achieved through a three-year incremental deploymentcoordinated with the formative assessments. The ICE-HS framework, shown in figure 2,illustrates the major activities and the outcomes for each dimension. Page 22.1701.6Innovative Curriculum for Engineering in High School (ICE-HS) Activities Outcomes Course and
models for studentdevelopment [6–10], there is limited published research evidence to help transfer findings fromone project to another. As cohort programs continue to increase in popularity, there is a need todocument effective practices for engineering student support. Here we focus on a key componentof many cohort programs, the development of social capital within engineering. Social capital, orthe ways students’ relationships support their development as engineers, is an asset-basedframing that can help researchers explore equitable development and deploy social resources in acohort program [11–13]. Understanding how undergraduate engineering students make and userelationships allows for the institutional and programmatic changes that best
howeffectively the project helps students build critical systems-thinking skills, and the challenges ofadopting resources for fast-tracking the development of new laboratory projects.IntroductionThe notion of systems thinking is well-known, but views vary on its specific definition1,2. Forexample, the systems dynamics community emphasizes understanding the temporal dynamics ofinterconnected parts, including the effects of feedback and emergent behaviors, via conceptualand simulation models3. Others have emphasized design in a broader context, includingassessment of societal impacts and awareness of economic and societal goals4.In our practice-oriented view, systems thinking is already pervasive across engineeringdisciplines, highly valued in industry
of BME, she has also worked to revolutionize the future of graduate medical education serving as a founding member of the new Carle-Illinois College of Medicine, a first-of- its-kind engineering driven college of medicine. Amos is part of the Illinois NSF RED (Revolutionizing Engineering & Computer Science Departments) research team leading efforts to innovate assessment practices for engineering toward producing more holistic engineers. Amos has a decade’s worth of expe- rience leading curriculum reform and implementing robust assessment strategies at multiple institutions.Prof. Joe Bradley, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Joe Bradley is a Clinical Assistant Professor in Bioengineering, Health Innovation
, 2023 Writing in Discipline-Appropriate Ways: An Approach to Teaching Multilingual Graduate Students in Mechanical EngineeringIntroductionWritten communication is frequently addressed in talks on how to best prepare students forengineering practice. In surveys of employers and graduates [1]-[3], we witness a growingneed for enhancing writing abilities of future engineers. Naturally, research on engineeringwriting has explored ways to provide course-level writing support for engineering students,especially for undergraduates [4]. Given that in U.S., students graduating with a bachelor’sdegree in engineering are mostly domestic-born native speakers of English [5], the currentscholarship in Engineering Education has
drawn from student work and evaluated by a group of threeor four faculty members. The evaluation uses a rubric with metrics based on the desired writingabilities. Writing samples may include a portfolio, a lab report, a design report and one or more Page 22.125.4problem sets. The sampling takes place on the biennial cycle that matches assessment of coursematerial for ABET purposes.At periodic intervals, the curriculum committee reviews the department writing programresources such as the style guides, grading rubrics and instructor resources, and recommendschanges. A small sample of students in the major, department faculty and practicing
lecture hall and place it instead in the discovery environment ofthe laboratory, the design studio, or the experiential environment of practice.” Addressing thisneed and helping to define a path forward in determining how we should educate in the 21stCentury differently than was done in the 20th Century represents an over arching goal for the MDProgram.As an institution with strong emphasis on research, large student populations, and a graduate toundergraduate student ratio of approximately 1:2, this engineering program must address twoimportant challenges: (1) scalability: the CoE currently enrolls nearly 5500 undergraduatestudents, and (2) breadth of programs: the CoE currently offers 15 academic bachelor degrees.The Multidisciplinary Design
epistemic matter, faculty agency, and researcher identity.Daniel Patrick Mountain I have a background in chemical engineering, getting my Bachelor's in 2021 in this area. I am currently pursuing my Master's in Chemical Engineering, as well as an Engineering Education Graduate Certificate. I have done past research in engineering education, working with how the COVID-19 pandemic affected engineering students. My current research looks at how perceptions of engineering affect pre-service teachers' self-efficacy at teaching engineering. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comDevelopment of a Hybrid Community of Practice Course
Development Group. Page 24.873.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Long-distance collaboration, international perspective, and social responsibility through a shared interdisciplinary engineering design courseAbstractToday’s societal characteristics are compelling engineering graduates to have a broader range ofskills rather than the highly focused technical repertoire demanded of engineers in the past,including teamwork and communication skills1, as well as an awareness of the effects oftechnologies on cultures, societies, and economies2. In
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Successful Academic Partnership in the Development of an International Construction Practices CourseAbstractThe challenge of working effectively with multicultural teams will continue to grow inimportance. Students graduating from engineering and construction management programs needto be functional in this global environment. To address this need, this paper discusses asuccessful partnership among several international universities to develop a constructionpractices course designed to prepare engineers for the global workforce. The course specificallyfocuses on sharing global construction engineering and management practices and includespartnerships primarily with
of professional valuesand attitudes). According to Eaton et al. [1], some teaching activities in the online environmenthave “the potentials to cultivate deeper learning experiences, but they can fail to do so ifactivities are not designed and implemented properly.” The rapid switch to online instruction inMarch 2020 did not allow faculty members to train, plan and reflect upon the best teachingmodes for online instruction, unless they had previously taught an online class. Therefore, aswith many other researchers, we consider the Spring semester to be an example of remotelearning rather than planned online learning [3].In October 2020, the Chronicle of Higher Education conducted a survey among faculty membersin US institutions to gain