Conference Session

Innovative and Impactful Engineering Leadership Pedagogy

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jena Shafai Asgarpoor, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Meg Handley, Pennsylvania State University; Alisha L. Sarang-Sieminski, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; John Brooks Slaughter P.E., University of Southern California; Meagan C. Pollock, Engineer Inclusion; Homero Murzi, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Monica Farmer Cox, Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development

Conference Session

CoNECD Session: Day 3 Slot 2 - Technical Session 4

Collection

2021 CoNECD

Authors

Agnieszka Miguel, Seattle University; J. McLean Sloughter, Seattle University; Jennifer M. Dorsey, University of Texas at Austin; Rebecca Hartley, Seattle University; Frank J. Shih, Seattle University; Joy Crevier, Seattle University

Tagged Topics

CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

, and achievement. They study stereotypes, biases, campusculture, classroom experiences, identity, and sense of belonging. They identify challenges andstrategies for persistence and give recommendations on how to create interventions that supportwomen of color. The authors call on institutions to generate a sense of belonging and providesocial and structural support that increase self-efficacy. While studying experiences of women ofcolor engineering students, Tate and Linn [12] found that students formulate multiple identitiesto help them persist in engineering studies. Three identities were most prevalent: academic,social, and intellectual. Academic identity is associated with being a student and success isrepresented through grades. Social

Conference Session

New Engineering Educators Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexandra Coso Strong, Georgia Institute of Technology; Mary Katherine Watson, The Citadel; Donna C. Llewellyn, Boise State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

: “This course had the greatest impact on be mainly because of the instructor. I decided to come to graduate school, and to pursue a career in academia, right after taking this class. The professors teaching style was so engaging that it made me want to learn more about the topics covered in class. Even though I am not specializing in the specific area of that class (fluid mechanics and water resources), this class introduced me to the notion of wanting to learn more than what is covered in textbooks.”Eight participants indicated the course’s impact on their own self-efficacy. Olivia remembers herIntroduction to Electrical Engineering course because of its impact on her mindset goingforward: “This course was

Conference Session

Engineering Student Involvement in K12 Programs

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jill Andrews, University of Michigan; Lorelle Meadows, University of Michigan; Joy Oguntebi, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

13.510.15Measuring progress is the primary responsibility of the College’s resident experts in engineeringeducation evaluation, who routinely provide assistance and expertise to conceptualize, develop,and carry out evaluations of educational innovations. The plan developed for this partnershipemploys short-term and long-term surveys, anecdotal questions, participant and student tracking,and performance measurement. In addition, joint assessment strategies focus on evaluating theexperiences of all participating individuals as well as the operational effectiveness of theprogram. For the first year, partners are evaluating YPSD secondary students’, FacultyAffiliates’, and Teaching Fellows’ experiences in learning, teaching, and mentoring. Over time,the annual

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division: Faculty and Gender Issues

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Canan Bilen-Green, North Dakota State University; Jenna P. Carpenter, Louisiana Tech University; Stacy Doore, University of Maine; Roger A. Green, North Dakota State University; Karen J. Horton P.E., University of Maine; Kristen L. Jellison, Lehigh University; Sharon Melissa Latimer, West Virginia University; Marci J. Levine, Lehigh University; D. Patrick O'Neal, Louisiana Tech University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

that considers the multiple environments central to one’s life andwork. The authors suggested that interventions be focused on 1) reducing role conflictsimposed by multiple environments, 2) providing continuity of training efforts, 3) creating apositive and rewarding mentoring culture, 4) and incorporating and evaluating efforts toincrease one’s research self-efficacy beliefs. Lent and Brown28 initially proposed a model forwork satisfaction that extends their scholarship on Social Cognitive Career Theory26. In thisprocess model, the authors posit that work satisfaction is influenced by 1) one’s affective traits,2) participation in goal-directed activities, 3) environmental supports and resources, 4) workself-efficacy and 5) both expected and

Collection

2015 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting

Authors

.................................................................595Hybrid Solar Updraft Tower Compost Waste Heat Solar Energy Co-Generation FacilitySponsored Industrial Project....................................................................................................... 596Computational Simulation of Local Blood Flow in The Human Carotid Artery .......................... 597Visualizing and Measuring Complexity of Introductory Physics Problems through GraphDiagrams ..................................................................................................................................... 598Vacc-In-ICE: Zoelite Adsorption Refrigerator.............................................................................. 599Outreach Program for High School Students in Cyber Security

Collection

2014 ASEE Zone 4 Conference

Authors

will benefit consumers and thesociety. Research results enhance undergraduate students' learning in such courses as Independent Studyand Senior Capstone Design. Training undergraduate students through the cooperative learning canincrease their chances to secure jobs in the field of advanced manufacturing.Materials and MethodsAll the materials used in this work were purchased from Alfa Aesar. Fig. 1(a) shows the schematic of theelectric force assisted nanocasting experimental set-up. A precision auto lapping/polishing machine wasused as the main part. This machine contains a rotating platform whose speed can be well controlled. AShimpo tachometer was used to measure its rotating speed. The TiO2 nanotube specimen was put at thetwo ends of a