Conference Session

Social Identities and STEM Experiences: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lizabeth Thompson, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Andrew Chan, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Julia Cannon, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Jane Lehr, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

tomake a positive impact and minimize our unintended harms. We also describe individual storiesof this transformational process, examining our collective positionalities as “outsiders within”seeking to change an institution we are a part of but not entirely aligned with [4]. Finally, wedescribe the directions we are moving in to further encourage reflection and action to centersustainability and community agency in our efforts [5] [6].IntroductionThe authors on this paper are students, faculty and alumni who have dedicated multiple hours toEngineers Without Borders (EWB) at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo(Cal Poly, SLO). We care about each other and our partners across the globe, yet we have deepand almost existential

Conference Session

Technical Session 7 - Paper 2: Retaining a diverse group of undergraduate students in Engineering Technology Majors

Collection

2022 CoNECD (Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity)

Authors

Melanie Villatoro, New York City College of Technology

Tagged Topics

CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity

was delayed due to the pandemic.If census data is available prior to the presentation, demographic breakdown of USpopulation will be added. 5City Tech boasts a diverse student population reflective of the NYC demographic witha total enrollment of about 15,500. Our location makes us an affordable option forobtaining a valuable education. We are the technology college for CUNY and about40% of our students are enrolled in the School of Technology and Design. We areproud to be a Hispanic Serving Institution, with 34% Hispanic student enrollment.The National Science Foundation ranks colleges awarding associate degrees inscience and engineering by gender and

Collection

2023 ASEE North Central Section Conference

Authors

Jonathon Fagert P.E., Baldwin Wallace University; Jacqueline Rodriguez M.Ed., Baldwin Wallace University

, “Making Stress Your Friend” and “Feeling Supported”(which focused on identifying each students’ support network) were beneficial near the firstround of exams, and self-reflection activities near the end of the semester helped students toreflect on their first semester in college and what they can maintain/improve in the next semester.Second, the weekly emphasis on wellness reinforced the commitment of the instructors and theprogram to the wellness of the students and its importance in their academic and professionalcareers. To best leverage the individual strengths of the course instructors, the engineeringcomponents of the course were covered by the engineering faculty, and the weekly wellnessactivities were conducted by the Health Promotion

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Katie Evans, Louisiana Tech University; Mitzi Desselles, Louisiana Tech University; Marisa K. Orr, Clemson University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

both in-person and remote modalities. While it was expected that students would miss out on the planttour aspect of industry visits, a surprising observation was that the PI noticed the drive to andfrom each site had been an opportunity to get to know the students and discuss what they hadlearned. This organic conversation was hard to replicate in an online environment. On thepositive side, geography no longer limited which sites and companies participated in industryvisits. Further, the virtual format pushed the focus of the “visit” from specifics of productionprocesses towards more personal reflections of the speaker’s career trajectory in engineering.This was especially relevant as many of the speakers were Louisiana Tech alumni. We

Conference Session

Enhancing Teaching and Research

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Lisa Benson, Clemson University; Rebecca A. Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Karin Jensen, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Gary Lichtenstein, Arizona State University; Kelsey Watts, Clemson University; Evan Ko, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Balsam Albayati

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

researchers newto EER.EER PERT Project Goals Building on the JEE Mentored Reviewer Program, the broader EER PERT project seeksto develop peer review training for EER scholars and conduct research on how individualsdevelop mental models of the review process. The research goals of the project entail addressingthe following research questions: ● How do scholars develop schema for quality EER through collaboratively constructing peer reviews? ● How do reviewing skills in EER improve research skills?While we have already gained insights through the experiences and reflections from previousparticipants in the JEE Mentored Reviewer Program, we are exploring these questions moredeeply by including a research component. A later phase of

Conference Session

Project-based and Experiential Learning in Civil Engineering

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Matthew D. Lovell P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; J. Chris Carroll, Saint Louis University; Kyle Kershaw P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Alec C. Derks, Saint Louis University

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

smallstructural engineering laboratory. The room is equipped with flattop tables and is arranged in atraditional lecture format: chalkboard at the front of the room and tables in rows. The back ofthe room is equipped with a small load frame and tensile testing machine. The instructor usesactive learning techniques during class lectures. Each class meeting includes a short lectureintroduction to the content for the day supported by skeleton notes, then students work exampleproblems, engage in group reflections, or participate in a demonstration. While both institutionsincorporated some demonstrations in their classroom activities, prior to the 2019-2020 academicyear, neither institution was equipped with large-scale testing equipment. The

Conference Session

Teaching Interventions in Biomedical Engineering (Works in Progress) - June 22nd

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Vignesh Subbian, University of Arizona; Daniel B. Whitaker, University of Arizona

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering

as availability of instructional resources to support this initiative.The course involves a 10-week project, along with weekly engagement and reflection activitiesthat are designed to promote critical thinking and collaboration. Students were required toparticipate in a moderated discussion forum at least twice every week.• Discussion Forum: Each student was required to initiate a new topic of discussion (initiation thread) related to the overall theme of the week as well as engage in a discussion with posts from one or more peers (engagement thread). Both initiation and engagement threads were meant to allow for weekly reflection among students and low-stakes assessment by course facilitators. Measures such as number of posts

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: Design

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Steven Hoffenson, Stevens Institute of Technology; Nicole P. Pitterson, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University; Jessica Rose Driscoll, Stevens Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

, organizing, and integrating new information.MethodologyAligned with these constructivism principles, the research questions are addressed throughseveral exercises that took place with 130 third-year undergraduate engineering students in acourse called Engineering Design VI, as it is the sixth in an eight-course Design Spine sequence.The assessment tools include concept mapping exercises, in-class market simulation workshops,open-ended written reflections, and surveys, as well as the students’ term project reports. Thesetools are summarized with their connections to one another, the research questions, and theconstructivism principles in Figure 1. Figure 1: Research activities (white boxes) mapped to the research questions (grey boxes) that they

Conference Session

Computers in Education Division Technical Session 4: Digital Learning Part II

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kelly S. Steelman, Michigan Technological University; Michelle E. Jarvie-Eggart, Michigan Technological University; Kay L. Tislar, Michigan Technological University; Charles Wallace, Michigan Technological University; Nathan D. Manser, Michigan Technological University; Briana C Bettin, Michigan Technological University; Leo C. Ureel II, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

, and software developer drive his research exploring how humans can better understand, build, and use software. His work has been funded by the National Science Foundation, Google, Microsoft Research, and the U.S. Department of Defense. Dr. Wallace’s Agile Communicators project, supported by an NSF IUSE award, seeks to build an en- hanced curriculum for computing programs that emphasizes inquiry, critique and reflection, grounded in authentic software development settings. Tools in this project include process oriented guided inquiry learning, automated feedback to students through an intelligent tutoring system, case studies in software communication, and guided reflective exercises on team communication. As part

Collection

2020 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Pichayathida (Alice) Luanpaisanon, University of Virginia; Carter Kenneth McCullough, Human Machine Interface Research Lab; Ryan Van Der Zee, Caterpillar Inc.; Ruth Wertz P.E., Valparaiso University; Reva E. Johnson, Valparaiso University

algorithmic thinking.This study involved developing haptic learning tools for students using the Haply robot, a low-cost, commercially available haptic device. The device was programmed to generate two virtualmodels: 1) a static beam subjected to shear force and bending moment loads, and 2) a blocksubjected to acceleration and frictional force on contact surfaces. In response to user inputs, thesystem then returns force feedback to the user via the Haply manipulato r.The goal of this study was to examine the effects of an educational haptic device on the students’algorithmic thinking as well as intuitive and conceptual understanding. The haptic deviceprovided tactile information that reflected the real-world systems. Such hands-on learningexperience

Collection

2020 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Briana M Bouchard, Tufts University; Kristen B Wendell, Tufts University; Ethan E Danahy, Tufts University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

scaffolded reflection about engineering group work interactions. The moduleprovided students with the opportunity to assess and evaluate their own discussions for equityand inclusion as well as those of experienced engineers. Data were obtained in the form ofstudent written work and post-intervention in-class video of student group interactions.IntroductionGroup work is a fundamental component of undergraduate engineering programs and offersstudents the chance to practice student-to-student interactions within an engineering team. Notonly does the engineering studies literature emphasize that team interactions are central toprofessional engineering practice [1], [2], but also the engineering and science educationliterature has emphasized that group

Collection

2020 Gulf Southwest Section Conference

Authors

Maryamsadat Shokrekhodaei; Annatoma Arif; Robert Christopher Roberts

for the classand replaced the old modules to take advantage of the new format. In this paper, the authors will detailthe I2EE laboratory class, the original module format, and then detail their newly designed laboratorymodules and reporting format to improve student learning success. In order to have a qualityassessment, we conducted a survey to evaluate students’ satisfaction in terms of learning outcomesand their contentment from newly developed modules in comparison to three random old modules.The survey result shows that most of the students reflect positive feedback about newly developed labmodules.Keywords: Laboratory Format, Introduction to Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Circuits,Sensors, Student performance, Evaluation

Conference Session

CoNECD Session : Day 1 Slot 7 Technical Session 2

Collection

2021 CoNECD

Authors

Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington; Julia M. Williams, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Cara Margherio, University of Washington; Kerice Doten-Snitker, University of Washington; Sriram Mohan, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Eva Andrijcic, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

Engineering from the University of Madras and M.S and Ph.D. degrees in Computer Science from Indiana University. During his time at Rose-Hulman, Sriram has served as a consultant in Hadoop and NoSQL systems and has helped a variety of clients in the Media, Insurance, and Telecommunication sectors. In addition to his industrial consulting activities, Sriram maintains an active research profile in data science and education research that has led to over 30 publications or presentations. At Rose-Hulman, Sriram has focused on incorporat- ing reflection, and problem based learning activities in the Software Engineering curriculum. Sriram has been fundamental to the revamp of the entire software engineering program at Rose

Conference Session

CoNECD Session : Day 1 Slot 7 Technical Session 4

Collection

2021 CoNECD

Authors

David B. Knight, Virginia Tech; Jacob R. Grohs, Virginia Tech; Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Tech; Isabel S Bradburn, Virginia Tech; Cheryl Carrico P.E., E4S, LLC; Kai Jun Chew, Virginia Tech; Michelle D. Klopfer, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF.Who do we have in the room?Brainstorm:Who/what are gatekeepers tobroadening participation inengineering? Motivation“Consider a birdcage. If you look very closely at just one wire in the cage, youcannot see the other wires. . . It is only when you step back, stop looking at thewires one by one, microscopically, and take a macroscopic view of the wholecage, that you can see why the bird does not go anywhere . . . It is perfectlyobvious that the bird is surrounded by a network of systematically relatedbarriers, no one of which would be the least hindrance to its flight, but which, bytheir relations to each other, are as

Conference Session

CoNECD Session : Day 2 Slot 2 Technical Session 4

Collection

2021 CoNECD

Authors

Yousef Jalali, Virginia Tech ; Shernita Lee, Virginia Tech; Justin Grimes, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

participants’ experiences at the program, evaluate its effectiveness, and explorethe factors influencing the creation and persistence of inter-institutional partnerships.In this paper, we discuss the program as a model for facilitating inter-institutional partnershipand some preliminary results that capture the impact of the program with the focus on students’engagement and recruitment. In what follows, we elaborate on the importance of broadeningparticipation, as one of the major objectives of the program. Then, we present the backgroundand major elements of the summit. Next, we briefly describe the 2018 HBCU/MSI ResearchSummit, outline the details of our evaluation strategies and present the results for the year 2018.Finally, we reflect on our

Conference Session

The Role of Peers in Promoting Learning and Persistence

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Keilin Jahnke, University of Illinois Urbana - Champaign; Samantha Lindgren, University of Illinois Urbana - Champaign

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

engineering course in which this method originates, students prepare a 15-minute lesson to teach a small group of their peers. These lessons are not one-sided studentpresentations. Students must apply the creative process to an educational context and developlessons that include pertinent content in an engaging activity and a mechanism for summativeassessment (e.g., discussion, individual or group quiz, quality of activity outcome). To furtherunderstand the effectiveness of this instructional activity in terms of student engagement andoutcomes, student self- and peer-assessments are qualitatively analyzed. Findings indicate thatstudents were reflective, consistent, and fair graders who reported high levels of studentengagement both in their own, and

Collection

2021 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Amy Richardson P.E., Virginia Tech; Stephen Moyer, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; David B Knight, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

objective varied between facultygroups. CC faculty pointed to specific engineering fundamental content knowledge to fulfill thiscourse outcome as one faculty member articulates: Fundamental [concept]is force, free body diagrams, unit conversion, electric circuit, dynamics…. This is very important for them to have this kind of concept to be able to deal with the next classesIn contrast, COE faculty pointed to career exploration and the design process to help studentsdevelop an engineering identity. COE faculty scaffold activities, such as personal reflections,research papers, and team projects, for students to explore engineering disciplines.All CC participants also teach second-year engineering courses. They use topics and

Collection

2021 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Todd France, Ohio Northern University; J. Blake Hylton, Ohio Northern University; Patrick James Herak, The Ohio State University; Sherri Youssef, The Ohio State University

stakeholders’ impacts and the ensuing researchthat would further inform future design decisions. Attendees will also be introduced to fourproblem-framing tools (detailed below), and will receive these tools and supporting activityinstructions for use in their own classrooms.Problem Framing CanvasThis multi-layered worksheet is intended to help students organize their broader thoughts aboutthe problem framing process. Sections of this worksheet include space for identifying a specificopportunity to address (with consideration of stakeholders) and to reflect upon currentalternatives in the market. Students are also compelled to explicitly state future researchquestions, how they will evaluate the quality of their forthcoming designs, and the

Collection

2021 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Lesley M Berhan, The University of Toledo; Bryan Thomas Bosch, The University of Toledo

Tagged Topics

Diversity

studentpersistence at the University (2nd to 3rd year retention). These specific outcomes were comparedto two distinct controls to measure rate of success, outlined below.UNDT Population (Control One): Population of students who were admitted to the College ofEngineering, but not to their chosen major based on the admissions criteria outlined previously.Most students were not admitted to their major based on their ACT/SAT score.Exploratory Studies population (Control Two): These students were not admitted to the Collegeof Engineering based on their admissions criteria, and were enrolled in University College priorto the inception of the GEARSET program (comparative data to prior year outcomes).Tables 1 and 2 reflect the raw data for past cohorts within

Collection

Middle Atlantic ASEE Section Spring 2021 Conference

Authors

Eileen Haase PhD, The Johns Hopkins University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

submissions for the quizzes, but they were required to earn agrade of 80% in order to obtain credit for completion. Each of the four modules also required anindividual post-module reflection and a peer review in which students rated themselves and theirteammates.Teams were provided resources and guidance through a series of online videos and postedmaterial on the design process. Upper classmen mentoring was a critical aspect of the supportsystem [17], [18]. Not only were teams mentored during their Thursday sessions, each studentwas also emailed at least twice during the week to check if there were follow-up questions and toremind students about upcoming deadlines. Peer-instruction was an essential component of theproject since these topics were

Collection

2017 ASEE Mid Atlantic Section Spring Conference

Authors

Oludare Adegbola Owolabi P.E., Morgan State University

an online environment; teaching techniques and tools must becarefully selected. This paper describes how construction site tour was adopted as a high impactpedagogical technique to actively engage and enhance students’ performance in an online Staticsclass during a short mini-winter semester. It has been noted that students become more engagedwhen learning experiential, hands-on, inquiry–based and project oriented. The paper furtherreveals how this technique fosters direct hands-on experience where students are given theopportunity to learn in real-world settings (construction site) and reflect in a classroom setting.The online environment gave the students the opportunities to achieve the course objectives whileresiding in their home

Collection

2010 ERC

Authors

David Shaw

 Research Projects Technical Expertise  USDOT ­ Validate use of GIS ØGIS  and RS technologies for ØRemote Sensing  major corridor planning ØData/Image Visualization ØData/Sensor Fusion ØScientific Modeling ØHigh Performance Computing ØSystems Engineering  Pixel’s ØSatellite Engineering  Spectral  reflectance  Reflectance  Clutter Target

Conference Session

PCEE Resource Exchange

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christina Anlynette Alston, Rice University; Carolyn Nichol, Rice University

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

waterproofing materials on their hydrophobic testing sheet.3. Students will devise two ways to waterproof their chosen material. Students must develop a written plan for both methods. Students must modify and label at least two approaches Material A and Material B.4. Students will engineer and modify their 2 surfaces.5. Teams will then observe and diagram the drop profile/contact angle of a drop of water on their modified surface. a. Place a drop of water on the surface. b. Look at the drop from the side and sketch the drop profile or your worksheet. *Additional steps on full online versionWrap UpStudents will reflect upon their designs and test results. They will choose a spokesperson to communicate their results and futureimprovements

Conference Session

Biomedical Division Postcard Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Casey Jane Ankeny, Northwestern University; David P. O'Neill, Northwestern University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering

Outcome Feature and GradebookCanvas allows for real-time assessment of students’ progress towards mastery of a skill. Afterinputting the standards and associated descriptions as outcomes we created lab report rubricsusing these outcomes. All standards are scored on a scale from one to five where one equates to“novice” and five is “distinguished”. We set a level of “3” out of “5” as reflecting sufficientmastery for each skill. Then these scores are given various weightings to produce a final reportscore which directly comprises a percentage of the final grade. The four reports comprise 7.5%,10%, 12.5%, and 15% of the final grade respectively. Building the rubric with outcomesallowed for quick visual feedback regarding progression towards mastery

Conference Session

M1A: WIP - Learning experiences 1

Collection

2019 FYEE Conference

Authors

Jonathan Elliot Gaines, University of South Florida

Tagged Topics

FYEE Conference - Paper Submission

within people as connections are made toother knowledge. The academic theory of service-learning has been used for both types ofconnections. Service-learning connects people through the “service” that is done and currentexperiences to previous ones through reflection upon that service[1], [2]. It is through theseconnections that service-learning can be used to make STEM education less superficial.Oftentimes, STEM educators want to provide cross-cutting experiences and higher levels ofcognition—primarily because the nature of today’s world requires solutions to complexproblems. Instead of just remembering or understanding facts, experiences should lead toanalysis, evaluation, and creation. Connections between academic learners and practitioners

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth Gross, Kettering University; Diane L. Peters, Kettering University; Stacy Lynn Mann, Kettering University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

contributed to the students’ success in coursework. The followingare some responses that highlight perception of these skills. These first comments reflect theutility of professional skills and how work helps learners to learn them: DP1: “I am only a few weeks into my first course in my degree so the GPA is not reflective of my current progress. However, I do believe that having some experience in the work force has given me perspective on what I'm learning as well as having professionalism in emails and speaking with my professor. I also think that after working for a year, I have a better understanding in working with other people in a group setting.” DP2: “More comfortable asking questions; improved leadership

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jean S. VanderGheynst, University of California, Davis; Colleen Elizabeth Bronner, University of California, Davis; Alin Wakefield, University of California, Davis

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

United States moves toward minority-majority status, that change isnot reflected in the number of graduate degrees being awarded to underrepresented minorities.The Preparing Engineering Graduates Students for the 21st Century (PEGS21) project at UCDavis seeks to look at the transition from undergraduate to graduate study and extend priorresearch that identifies barriers to graduate degree attainment in first generation students.PEGS21 scholars participate in weekly seminars and a series of professional developmentworkshops in the UC Davis GradPathways program and are asked to reflect on the value of eachworkshop on their learning. Analysis of the results from these reflection assignments suggeststhat GradPathways workshops have the potential to

Conference Session

Biomedical Division Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Monica D. Okon, Ohio State University; Tanya M. Nocera, Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering

about themselves. Out of 119 behaviorsmentioned in the peer evaluation, 113 were positive behaviors. Similarly, 88 out of 92 behaviorswere positive in self-evaluation. The positive behaviors mentioned most often were beingdependable, cooperating and communicating with each other, as well as putting forth effort.However, students mostly discussed these behaviors in terms of accomplishing work, which maymean that some teams are merely dividing up work and not truly collaborating with one another.Additionally, since the surveys were conducted at the end of the course, teammates were notgiven an opportunity to reflect upon their behaviors.Ongoing WorkFor the reasons discussed above, students may need guidance on how to be an effective teammember

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Kadlowec, Rowan University; Tom Merrill, Rowan University; Robert Alan Hirsh, Cooper University Hospital; Sameer Sood, Rowan School of Osteopathic Medicine

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

deliverables: needsspecifications, project plans and posters, for three needs. These needs were chosen based onareas of clinical need, cost effectiveness, interest and feasibility for milestone completion incapstone design during the academic year. Scholars met with faculty to gauge potential solutionsfrom the basic science and clinical perspectives. The summer program ended with a finalScholar symposium of projects, reflections of the Scholar experiences and plans for academicyear projects. Table 1 summarizes the 2014 Rowan Bioengineering Scholars Program.  Table 1: Summer 2014 Rowan Bioengineering Scholars Program   Week   Topic   Deliverable   1   Overview of program and Basic physiology

Collection

2010 ERC

Authors

David Shaw

 Research Projects Technical Expertise  USDOT ­ Validate use of GIS ØGIS  and RS technologies for ØRemote Sensing  major corridor planning ØData/Image Visualization ØData/Sensor Fusion ØScientific Modeling ØHigh Performance Computing ØSystems Engineering  Pixel’s ØSatellite Engineering  Spectral  reflectance  Reflectance  Clutter Target