the questions on the survey, the average response for the video recording wasnot substantially different from the average response for the faculty visitation program. Theparticipants’ comments also identify benefits that each program provides. A second conclusionis that both the faculty visitation program and the video recording seem to have certain strengths.This conclusion is born out in the questions where there was a large difference in the responsesas well as through the participants’ comments.McKenna, et al, describe the benefits to teaching provided by collaborative reflection.6 Each ofour participating instructors was invited to review their video with the school’s facultydevelopment center, though none took the opportunity. As was
strategies isstated in this paper. The effects of this redesign were measured through course evaluation andstudent feedback. This paper's goals are to a) provide a formwork to redesign undergraduate STEMcourses using backward design and active learning pedagogy b) reflect on the obstacles hinderingthe future application of these methods. Student feedback shows that the application of activelearning strategies for formative assessment increases students' engagement, improvescommunication, and provides the students with an opportunity to reflect on their understanding.Implementing the backward design method provides students with clear communication ofexpectations and what they are expected to learn throughout the course.KeywordsActive-learning
ensures that students not only practice mathematical techniques butalso see their direct application in solving engineering problems.The materials include a clear problem statement, historical or technical background, step-by-stepinstructions, and expected deliverables. For example, in the case-study on resource optimizationusing derivatives, students learn about distributing water to remote communities, applymathematical concepts to optimize delivery, and reflect on the societal and environmentalimpacts of their solutions. Similarly, the case study on electrification involves exploring integralsin utility distribution for population-dense areas. These activities emphasize both technicalproficiency and broader considerations such as resource
) learning systems [3], [5]. Someonline homework systems, that provide instant feedback, tutorial information and opportunitiesto repeat problems provide the opportunity for students who are willing to persevere and investthe time repeating problems they have missed. Students who give up, or resort to guessing maynot benefit as much from these systems. Some systems have penalties for repeating problemswhich discourages guessing. Explicit instruction to students on how to interact with thesesystems might be helpful. The author is now instructing his students to avoid guessing.Carroll’s model reflects his goal to give all students the opportunity to succeed. Bloom, inspiredby Carroll’s work, developed mastery learning with a goal of enabling a large
critical thinking skills,which further hinders their ability to grasp geometric concepts effectively [4]. Teaching andlearning geometry is challenging, with studies showing that students' attitudes and willingness toengage with the subject significantly impact their success [5].Gaining insight into characteristics of Gen Z learners can benefit mathematics teachers inestablishing classroom norms and designing instruction that helps students achieve highstandards. Gen Z students are constantly engaged with digital media and prefer interactive andtechnology-enhanced learning environments. They thrive in settings that offer immediatefeedback and opportunities for collaboration, reflecting their social and connected nature.Although Gen Z is the first
instruction. One instructor noted the challenge ofindividualizing instruction given that, for privacy and research-related reasons, they weredesigning materials for students with whom they would not interact directly: “I’m so used toknowing the individual from my work that it was a challenge for me to do that without sort of aclear …” understanding of the learners. Bridging this gap and providing individualized supportproved to be an ongoing challenge for instructors. Another instructor reflected on how the denseprogram with a compressed timeframe contributed to this difficulty: "So it was like too muchwork for them. We didn't expect that we are going to have to invest this amount of time in thisproject…”Balancing Conceptual and Technical
-MACHINE SYSTEMS COURSE AND ROLE OF AI Along with the assignment write-up, students were asked tooutline the advantages and drawbacks of using AI for such A. HMS Course Profileacademic work. Of the 56 respondents, there were 115 open-ended responses indicating the merits of using Gen AI for this Human-Machine Systems (HMS) is a 5-credit senior-leveltype of project and 121 responses outlining the less effective and engineering course at Northeastern University, with multipleconcerning aspects of its use. The primary categories of positive assignments and laboratory sessions over a 15-week semester.responses reflected how students felt AI benefited them in This course focuses on the science behind safe
required for developing students’ essential skills [2].Although students who used ChatGPT in project-based, reflective, critical thinking, and research-related writing assessments have faced some challenges and shortcomings, they managed to getsatisfactory results with proper training and input. Therefore, the success rate relies on the level ofstudents’ understanding of ChatGPT usage and expected output. However, there is always a riskassociated with mastering this technique that can alter the balance of risk and reward for students[3].Methodology:This case study involved the introduction of a new module regarding Artificial Intelligence inengineering classrooms by looking at the use of generative and non-generative AI in anengineering technical
-design a tool for theirclassrooms, they experience the collaborative inquiry process firsthand.There are several commonalities in how classroom instructional practice is structured in most inquiry approaches toscience learning. Mostly, students work in a group in which collaboration and communication are vital. As theyattempt to solve science problems, students are always expected to engage in written or pictorial record keeping. Inaddition to their individual accounts and reflections, students think about their designs as they engage in class-widediscussions. Students can also iteratively apply what they are learning by getting real feedback on and ongoingassessment of what they’ve done so far, receiving the guidance they need to explain what
. Theinformation is collected and presented in both specific readings for various cities or maps that areavailable per month and annual maps. The amount of radiation that a specific area receives isprimarily based upon the latitude and angle of the sun (which varies with the time of year). Anarea of the world that is near to the equator will receive a greater amount of radiation than that ofareas that are closer to the poles. As the sunlight passes through the earth’s layers of atmosphereand clouds a certain amount of radiation is diverted. In addition the there is a percentage ofenergy that is absorbed by earth with a percentage being reflected back into the sky7. The mapsthat are used are assembled and published by NREL6. Assumptions of the annual
subject factors and emotions to contribute to the assessment of the(12) call the IT artifact the "core subject matter" of the IS process. The steps and models of social informationfield. processing and aggressive behavior were researched. The author found and concluded that certain guidelines are necessary for an innovative artifact. Thedevelopmental factors like physiological and emotional may purpose of the establishment of the guidelines is to contributecause a deviation in the cognitive memory structure that, in to the work of researchers to properly understand andturn, may be reflected as deficiencies and aggressive biases in
of the department.Step 2. Forming the Search Committee(s)The Engineering Chair worked to form an appropriate and diverse search committee for eachposition. This diversity is reflected in disciplinary expertise, gender, rank, race, ethnicity, etc.Incredible intentionality was needed in this step with a recognition that inherent and unconsciousbiases may exist with search committees and committee members. If a search committee is allwhite men, the outcome will be the selection of a white man as the top candidate. Research hasshown this time and time again. I ensured that diversity in gender, race, ethnicity, and rankexisted in a search committee. When I was not able to bring enough diversity to the searchcommittee from within the department, I
systems thinking—core componentsof the entrepreneurial mindset. By focusing on these skills, the program aligns with broadereducational goals to prepare students for complex problem-solving in dynamic, real-worldcontexts.Since its inception, the KEEN Fellowship program has grown significantly, drawing participantsfrom various disciplines and institutions nationwide. Fellows undergo professional developmentthrough targeted workshops, such as Integrating Curriculum with Entrepreneurial Mindset (ICE)and Problem-Solving Studios (PSS), which equip them with pedagogical tools and frameworksthat foster active learning and cross-disciplinary applications. This growth reflects an increasingrecognition of the entrepreneurial mindset as essential for
reinforcement. The flipped model encourages students to take an active role in their learning by requiring them to present a specific topic in the next session. During their presentation, students ex- plain their approach, demonstrate their code, and justify their choices. This role reversal, where students become teachers, is grounded in researches [4–6]suggesting that teaching a concept significantly enhances understanding and motivation. In addition, quizzes are incorporated to maintain a level of productive pressure, ensuring students remain motivated. The combination of flipped learning and quiz practice fosters active participation and reflection, leading to deeper comprehension and long
cultures. Individual feedback sessions on theirdepartment’s Gallup Q12 results provided personalized guidance, promoting reflection onleadership practices.IntroductionA National Science Foundation ADVANCE adaptation award was received by a smallengineering, science, and technology university located in the US Midwest to developprogramming for faculty and research scientists to increase awareness of implicit biases andpromote pathways to faculty success. The university consists of thirteen departments, twelve ofwhich are Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). The university’sadministrative structure does not include Deans, just Department Heads that oversee academicdepartments and report directly to the Provost. As of 2024, there
]. [9] proposed four dimensions for designing learningenvironments based on this model: Content, Method, Sequencing, and Sociology.First, Content pertains to the types of knowledge learners need to develop expertise, includingdomain knowledge and heuristic strategies necessary for completing tasks. In this study, students`learned hardware security as domain knowledge by solving real-world problems andparticipating in internships.Second, Method refers to the various approaches that promote the development of learners'expertise, such as modeling, coaching, scaffolding, articulation, reflection, and exploration [10].The VETS-HASTE program utilized these methods throughout its activities. For instance,students could observe experts’ performance by
whether certain groups are systematically privileged over others,reflecting a dominator culture, or if power is equitably shared, indicative of a partnership culture.The construct of Relationships and Community aims to examine the social and collaborativeaspects of being a student in engineering education. Here, we are interested in evaluating howrelationships amongst students, faculty, and the institution foster a sense of belonging,cooperation and mutual support. CTT provides an efficient construct for this purpose; the‘dominator end’ of the spectrum often emphasizes competition and individualism, whereas the‘partnership end’ of the spectrum promotes collaboration and cooperation, which according toCTT, leads to collective success. The
document are those of the authors and do not reflect thepolicy or position of the U.S. Naval Academy, Department of the Navy, the Department ofDefense, or the U.S. Government.IntroductionAs the oldest of the 6 undergraduate Robotics Engineering degree programs in the United States,we reflect on national trends and program-level lessons learned since we modernized ourcurriculum a decade ago. After a brief overview of our program, we discuss changes in therobotics education landscape over the last ten years, including the proliferation of degreeprograms, issues in accreditation, challenges in hiring, the expectations of students andadministrative challenges. Some of the content is based on our own program observations andassessments, other data
direct consequences of the work of coalitions within society. As such, the PSAI isdesigned to empower the collaborations and the conversations that produce political legiti-macy for needed change. This is particularly important in AI because the consequences of getting it wrong arealready being felt in society (6; 7), and there are people with power who are mobilizingideological forces to work against public initiatives and inclusion in decision-making on howAI should be made, managed, and used (8).2 Work in Progress MethodsOur study employs grounded theory autoethnography as a qualitative research methodologyto explore the lived experiences and reflections of the research team throughout the project.Grounded Theory Autoethnography is a
slightly lowerrating of 3.83 for its support of Gannon's commitment to community outreach, it still affirmed itsrole in contributing to the university's service to the community, which was rated at 4. Theseratings reflect stakeholders' strong belief in SEECS as a valuable and integral component ofGannon University's mission, particularly in advancing student success and fostering communityengagement.When evaluating the alignment of the SEECS program with Gannon’s mission and goals,respondents felt it was well-aligned, contributing positively to the university’s broadereducational objectives. Regarding its impact on the local community, the program wasrecognized for increasing employability (66.67%), strengthening partnerships with
reflection,and concerted action to achieve meaningful change (Figure 1). Objective 1 leverages data fromclassroom practice and faculty engagement sessions to triangulate findings and provide an equitymetric for faculty to attempt to shift with their pedagogical design. Analysis across contrastinguniversity contexts (Objective 2) helps understand the particularities associated with supportingequity in those contexts while establishing the efficacy of the collaborative research process forinitiating change in university classrooms. In parallel the project builds capacity with thescholarly community for research focused on racial equity and utilizing action research methods(Objective 3) and disseminates resources for equity via a web resource called
educational benefits of teamwork are widely recognized in educational research, highlightingincreased motivation, enhanced creativity, and deeper reflection, along with the development ofcritical conceptual knowledge and communication skills [8], [9]. However, implementing effectiveteaming related learning environments can prove challenging in engineering education and maydiminish said benefits. Students can struggle with issues such as the unequal distribution ofworkload, difficulties in coordinating schedules, and conflicts arising from differences in workstyles or perspectives [10], [11].Instructors also face complex difficulties when designing, guiding, and evaluating teamworkactivities. They must navigate the complex task of structuring teamwork
Engineering was helping students to develop these skills for theirresearch thesis, as well as their career success within and outside academia. Through a survey ofChemical Engineering graduate alumni, meetings with graduate supervisors, and focus groupswith current graduate students we learnt that research skill training was not equitable:respondents reported that training was highly variable, supervisor dependent, and typicallydelivered via peer mentorship from senior graduate students. While the value of peer-to-peerlearning is reflected in the literature and is central to our course pedagogy [9], students wereconcerned about consistent quality and authority without commensurate engagement fromfaculty. Graduate students described seeking
engaged. When educators feelthe PD meets their needs, they are more likely to actively participate, reflect on their learning,and apply new ideas in their teaching. High satisfaction can boost motivation to implement whatthey've learned, as participants perceive the PD as valuable and relevant.2. BackgroundDeveloping effective scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) practices can help support theadoption of active learning practices, which continues to be a challenge in engineering education[10]. Moreover, adopting effective SoTL practices allows a gateway to improved studentlearning and broadening participation as engaging in SoTL requires faculty to think morecritically as they adopt and disseminate research-based practices. However, the
thatinclusion of incomplete data sets(missing questions) did not havean impact on the overall findings.Missing sets were normalized to Figure 4: Learning Preferences. The vertical line signifies the meanthe number of questions answered, score. Calculated based on results from the visual and verbal section in Felder Solomon’s Index of Learning Styles. Data are collected from theto reflect a comparable value. initial trial with 10 control participants and 5 study participants.There were no more than 33% ofquestions missing for all data sets used. In total, there are 10 participants from the control groupand 5 participants in the study group, with age ranges between 8
Paper ID #48203Work in Progress: From Curriculum to Competence: Exploring PedagogicalPractices in Engineering Entrepreneurship and Human Capital FormationDr. Helen L. Chen, Stanford University Helen L. Chen is a Research Scientist in the Designing Education Lab in Mechanical Engineering and co-founder of the Integrative Learning Portfolio Lab in Career Education at Stanford University. She earned her undergraduate degree from UCLA and her PhD in Communication with a minor in Psychology from Stanford. Her scholarship is focused on engineering and entrepreneurship education, portfolio pedagogy, reflective practices, non
players ‘take turns’ during the players interact in the game game, competition vs collaborative games, point systems and rewards, etc.Game Elements The “look and feel” of the game Game aesthetics and game themeGamification has been linked to motivational theories such as Self-Determination Theory (SDT)because of the extrinsic motivators (such as points, badges, and leaderboards) and intrinsicmotivators (such as group work and autonomy) provided in gamified environments [14], [15],[16]. More specifically, the game design we intend to implement involves the use of intrinsicmotivators such as stories, challenges, and avatars to enhance self-reflection skills [17
’ information experiences? 5. Is personal epistemology, specifically Women’s Ways of Knowing [13], a useful lens through which to examine women engineering students’ information experiences?This paper will share preliminary data and reflections on the methodology from the pilotstudy, which was conducted between October and December 2024.Literature reviewTo frame the context of this study, the literature reviewed in this paper focuses on researchinto the information behaviour and information literacy of engineering students. As littleresearch in this area has focused specifically on women’s information experiences, thisreview will discuss research into engineering students of all genders.The information behaviour of engineers has been widely
tool for improving students' technical understanding and developing creativecommunication skills essential for engineering [10]. Writing for laboratory courses is not justfor students to note down the steps performed in the lab and present the corresponding resultsof the experiments. Students should be able to synthesize data, relate their theoreticallearnings in a practical environment, and communicate their findings eloquently [11]. Theimplementation of frameworks such as Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC), Writing-to-Learn, and rubric-based assessments have ensured that students' writing experience ispurposeful and reflective of professional engineering standards[12], [13], [14]. Lab coursesthat have utilized such approaches in other
for students to connect with each other and connect with the instructor. Discussion boards,peer reviews, and group projects are just a few ways to create a sense of community. Theseinteractions help students feel less isolated and more involved in their coursework, which is crucialin an online environment. Assessments also play a role in engagement. Rather than focusing solelyon exams or final papers, it is helpful to have assessments throughout the course that offeropportunities for feedback and improvement. This could include quizzes, self-reflection exercises,or peer feedback sessions. In an asynchronous course, these assessments can provide timelyinsights into how students are progressing and where they might need extra help. 2. Case