.212100005Baldwin, G. L., Booth Womack, V., LaRose, S. E., Stwalley, C. S., & Stwalley III, R. M. (2021b). Using broad spectrum technological projects to introduce diverse student populations to -9- Biological & Agricultural Engineering (BAE): a work in progress. 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (Long Beach). Washington, DC: ASEE. Retrieved from https://strategy.asee.org/37986Baldwin, G. L., Booth Womack, V., LaRose, S. E., Stwalley, C. S., & Stwalley III, R. M. (2021d). Using enhanced professional networks to increase overall student retention. 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (Long Beach). Washington, DC: ASEE. Retrieved from https
cmf270@psu.edu.Lucas Passmore, Pennsylvania State University Lucas Passmore is a PhD student and Instructor at Penn State. He received his B.S. in Engineering Science and Mechanics and has continued his studies at the University Park campus. He teaches introductory engineering courses and fundamental engineering mechanics courses. His primary research is in the semiconductor device physics field, and he is currently working on the incorporation of a design element to engineering technology strength of materials course.Christine B. Masters, Pennsylvania State University Christine B. Masters is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Science and Mechanics at The Pennsylvania State University
Paper ID #30691Student Relationships: A Social Network AnalysisDr. Noah Salzman, Boise State University Noah Salzman is an Assistant Professor at Boise State University, where he is a member of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department and IDoTeach, a pre-service STEM teacher preparation program. His work focuses on the transition from pre-college to university engineering programs, how exposure to engineering prior to matriculation affects the experiences of engineering students, and engineering in the K-12 classroom. He has worked as a high school science, mathematics, and engineering and technology teacher
American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationTERRY R. COLLINSTerry R. Collins, Ph.D., P.E., is an Assistant Professor in the Industrial Engineering department at the University ofArkansas. Dr. Collins is the Director and Chairman of Studies for the Masters of Science in OperationsManagement program, and Co-Director of the Arkansas Productivity Center. His focus in the teaching and researchareas is in Engineering and Technology Management. Dr. Collins also has 19 years experience in the Agriculture,Telecommunications, and Transportation industries.MANUEL D. ROSSETTIManuel Rossetti is an Associate Professor in the Industrial Engineering
,” Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.8. D. C. Miller, M. Anklam, R. S. Artigue, A. Carlson, D. G. Coronell, S. G. Sauer, and A. Serbezov, “Improving Student Learning in the ChE Laboratory,” Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.9. M. High, K. High, and P. Rossler, “Intellectual Property and Entrepreneurship Programs: How to Hold Onto Your Wallet As You Transfer Technology,” Proceedings of the 2006 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.10. D. Pape, “A Progressively Open Ended Laboratory to Promote Active Learning,” Proceedings of the 2006 American Society for
Chemical Engineering Division: Assessment of Teams, 3513 paper 832 An Approach to developing Student=s skill in Self Assessment Donald R. Woods and Heather D. Sheardown Department of Chemical Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton ON L8S 4L7Abstract: Self and peer assessment can be vital parts to any team assessment. Theassessment can be of the overall team or of the performance of team members.Assessment is a judgment as to the degree to which a goal has been achieved. Instudent self assessment, the judgment is made by the student. In this paper the fiveprinciples of assessment are summarized. Assessment is about performance notworth; is based on evidence not intuition
assessment process.Another advantage of formalizing the process in this way is that new faculty members can beintegrated into the teams seamlessly.Finally, since our department administers two programs, outcome portfolio assessment providesa useful tool to understand the differences between these programs. Such comparison highlightsopportunities for program improvement by drawing on the strengths of each program.Bibliography 1. ABET Continuous Program Improvement, Faculty Development Workshop, Montreal, Canada, June 2002. 2. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, “Engineering Criteria 2000”, in How do you measure success, ASEE Professional Books, 1998, pp. 13-16. 3. Soundarajan, Neelam, “Preparing for
Paper ID #15557RET in Functional MaterialsProf. Scott W Campbell, University of South Florida Dr. Scott Campbell has been on the faculty of the Department of Chemical & Biomedical Engineering at the University of South Florida since 1986. He currently serves as the department undergraduate advisor. Scott was a co-PI on an NSF STEP grant for the reform of the Engineering Calculus sequence at USF. This grant required him to build relationships with engineering faculty of other departments and also fac- ulty from the College of Arts and Sciences. Over the course of this grant, he advised over 500 individual calculus
state, withthe corresponding needs for graduates with science, technology, engineering and mathematics(STEM) degrees. The Citadel is located in Charleston, in the southeastern part of the state. TheUniversity of South Carolina (USC) is located in the middle of the state, and within walkingdistance of the state capital building. Clemson University is located the northwestern part of thestate, in Clemson, near Greenville, South Carolina. The Greenville area is important because ithas traditionally been home for much of the manufacturing activities in the state. USC andClemson are large research universities and offer opportunities for full-time students and localresidents to pursue advanced degrees in Engineering or related fields. The Citadel is
industry such as refiningand steel making, research the prevailing technology and move up the pollution prevention ladderbeginning with process substitution, to recycle, to end of the pipe treatment, to ZED. The studentsdefine what ZED means in the industry selected and determine the costs and benefits.Interestingly, students find that ZED is both technologically achievable and not unreasonablycostly. Students also figure out that there are multiple paths to ZED, depending on the mix oftactics. The process of conceptualizing sophisticated technologies as processes and systemsintegrates their knowledge base in environmental engineering, and provides a realistic basis forsetting and achieving the highest goals. Lastly, the students are prepared to
Paper ID #6558Nationwide Student Movement on Space Solar PowerProf. Peter J. Schubert, IUPUI Peter J. Schubert, Ph.D., P.E. is a professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at IUPUI, and serves as the director of the Richard G. Lugar Center for Renewable Energy. He has published 75 technical papers and ha 35 US patents. He has been the principal investigator on grants from NASA, DOE, DOD, USDA, and GSA. Page 23.923.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013
Department of Technology and Society. She is currently the Assistant Director of STEM Smart programs, which include programs S-STEM ASSETS, LSAMP, and NASA NY Space Grant. Lauren has had the opportunity to participate in many professional development programs, such as the first cohort of the Research Foundation Leadership Academy, and Research Foundation Mentoring Program. Lauren received her Master of Arts in Higher Education Ad- ministration from Stony Brook University in May 2017. Her current research analyzes the gender equity in higher education, with a focus of females in STEM. With her research background, Lauren is a Women in Science and Engineering (WISE) affiliated member, and instructs the course, Society and
Nebraska, Lincoln Tareq Daher earned his Bachelors in Computer Science from Mutah University in Jordan. He pursued a Master’s of Instructional Technology at the University of Nebraska –Lincoln while working as the co- ordinator for the Student Technology Program on the UNL campus. Currently, Dr. Daher works as the director for the Engineering and Computing Education Core (ECEC) at the University of Nebraska – Lincoln. Dr. Daher collaborates with engineering faculty to document and research the integration of in- novative instructional strategies and technologies in their classrooms and designs and delivers professional development programs for faculty in the college.Dr. Markeya S. Peteranetz, University of Nebraska
in the Department of Engineering & Public Policy at Carnegie Mellon University.Dr. Eden Fisher, Carnegie Mellon University Eden Fisher is the Director of the Masters Program in Engineering and Technology Innovation Man- agement (E&TIM) and Professor of the Practice at Carnegie Mellon University. She earned an AB in Chemistry from Princeton University and a Ph.D. in Engineering & Public Policy from Carnegie Mellon. She worked in industrial technology planning and innovation management for over 20 years.Dr. Indira Nair, Carnegie Mellon UniversityProf. Mitchell J. Small, Carnegie Mellon University Mitchell Small is the H. John Heinz III Professor of Environmental Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University
, specificallyelectrospun nanofiber manufacturing and application technologies for improving the biological performances ofimplant materials. Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, TX Copyright ã 2022, American Society for Engineering Education
Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI) (pp. 1711-1714). IEEE.9. Julien, H. (2008). Content analysis. In Given, L. (ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, SAGE Publications, 120-122.10. Deng, R., Benckendorff, P., & Gannaway, D. (2020). Learner engagement in MOOCs: Scale development and validation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(1), 245-262. Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, TX Copyright ã 2022, American Society for Engineering Education
Kettering University. Dr. Finelli’s current research interests include student resistance to active learning, faculty adoption of evidence-based teaching practices, and the use of technology and innovative pedagogies on student learn- ing and success. She also led a project to develop a taxonomy for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students.Prof. Stephen L DesJardins Stephen L. DesJardins teaches courses related to public policy in higher education, economics and fi- nances in postsecondary education, statistical methods, and institutional research and policy analysis. His research interests include student transitions from
in Ethiopia’ funded by NSF, ’Cooper- ative Hydrogeophysics and Water-Resources Research’ funded by USGS, and ’RED Innovation Beyond Accommodation: Leveraging Neurodiversity for Engineering Innovation’ funded by NSF.Dr. Maria Chrysochoou, University of Connecticut Maria Chrysochoou is a Professor and Head of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Connecticut. She obtained her BS in Physics at the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, her MS in Environmental Engineering at Technische Universit¨at Dresden in Germany and her Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering at Stevens Institute of Technology. She was hired as Assistant Professor at the University of Connecticut in 2007, promoted
thestudents as is.As a general takeaway from the student survey, it appears that students most enjoy and value theactivities that allow them to apply their engineering knowledge gained in the classroom in apractical setting which encourages interactions with others. This is consistent with what has beenfound in other programs [11]. The least enjoyment appears to come from times when they aremeeting with faculty and TAs, either for help or for the expected mentoring needed in the program.However, receiving help when needed through office hours appears to be highly valued by thosewho utilize the opportunity.Eleven of the PECS program scholars attended the 2020 Annual Emerging Researchers National(ERN) Conference in Science, Technology, Engineering and
Paper ID #21029*6 PAGE PAPER* Scaling for the Future: Development of a SustainableModel for Teaching MATLAB Programming to STEM StudentsMr. Bradley J. Sottile, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park Brad Sottile is Instructor of Computer Science and Engineering, and Aerospace Engineering in the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science within the Pennsylvania State University’s College of En- gineering. Since receiving his Master of Science degree in Aerospace Engineering, he has been teaching courses in Computer Science and in Aerospace Engineering for Penn State’s College of Engineering. His
AC 2007-666: DIFFICULTIES, FAILURES AND SUCCESSES IN RECRUITINGMEMBERS TO ASEECraig Gunn, Michigan State University Craig James Gunn is Director of the Communication Program in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Michigan State University. In this role he directs the integrated communication program in mechanical engineering while providing help to the cooperative engineering education division of the College of Engineering. He serves as editor for the CED Newsbriefs and MCCE Co-op Courier and is one of the co-authors of Engineering Your Future. Page 12.543.1© American Society for Engineering
AC 2008-2912: THE VALUE OF SCAVENGER HUNTS IN THE LIFE OF AFRESHMANCraig Gunn, Michigan State University Craig Gunn is the Director of the Communication Program in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Michigan State University. He integrates communication skill activity into all courses within the mechanical Engineering program. He is editor of the CED Newsbriefs and the MCCE Co-op Courier and has co-authored a textbook - Engineering Your Future. Page 13.1280.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 The Value of Scavenger Hunts in the Life of a FreshmanAbstractStudents
and each grouphas at least one mechanical engineering major and one electrical or computer engineering major.This type of grouping ensures that students are exposed to a multi-disciplinary workingexperience, which is one of the desired outcomes of this course. Preliminary assessment resultsabout the level of satisfaction that the students have about various components of the course arealso presented.IntroductionSince ancient times robotics has always been a fascinating topic and thus it can be used as avehicle to excite young people who are interested in engineering, science and technology. TheDepartment of Engineering at Indiana University - Purdue University Fort Wayne (IPFW) offersa junior level robotics course with a companion laboratory
2006-978: THE USE OF STUDENT-GENERATED LAB PLANS IN THE THERMALSCIENCESDavid Sawyers, Ohio Northern University DAVID R. SAWYERS, JR. is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Ohio Northern University, where he teaches courses in General Engineering and in the Thermal Sciences. He received a BSME degree from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology and the MS and PhD, both in Mechanical Engineering, from The University of Notre Dame.Jed Marquart, Ohio Northern University JED E. MARQUART is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Ohio Northern University, where he teaches courses in General Engineering and in the Thermal Sciences. He received a BSME degree from Ohio Northern
Paper ID #25896Teaching Mechanics Concepts Using a Motion Analysis SystemDr. Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Brian Self obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Engineering Mechanics from Virginia Tech, and his Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of Utah. He worked in the Air Force Research Laboratories before teaching at the U.S. Air Force Academy for seven years. Brian has taught in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo since 2006. During the 2011-2012 academic year he participated in a professor exchange, teaching at the Munich University of
assign them, whether to change groupsweekly or keep them the same all quarter (or semester) and whether to require students to submittheir work individually or as a group. This paper explores the effects of the method of groupassignment on the benefits and drawbacks of group work as perceived by students. Specifically,the paper presents the results of a group assignment survey given to students in severalundergraduate computer engineering courses that span sophomore to senior level and are taughtby different faculty.IntroductionGroup work is an important aspect of any undergraduate engineering program. The AccreditationBoard of Engineering and Technology (ABET) states that all ABET accredited programs shouldgive students “an ability to function
and activelearning. The use of technology can mitigate some of these issues as it can allow forvisualization of abstract and mathematical concepts. This also brings in the possibility for designwork, a core aspect of the Creativity thread within the RED project, in a way that was notpossible through traditional methods.Within the Creativity thread of the RED project, we consider MATLAB as one of the mostessential tools that all ECE students and future engineers should be able to use effectively.MATLAB® (by MathWorks, Inc.) is chosen not only for its very high quality and versatility, butbecause it represents a generally accepted standard in science and engineering educationworldwide. This work in progress paper presents inclusion of MATLAB
FidgetCars,” 2018 Annual Control Conference (ACC), Milwaukee, WI, June 27-29, 2018.[3] L. Springer, M. Stanne, S. Donovan, “Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates inScience Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis,” in Sage Publications,Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21-51, 1999.[4] National Academies, “Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and ImprovingLearning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering,” National Academies Press, 2012.[5] D. Brown, Tracker Video Analysis and Modeling Tool, https://physlets.org/tracker/,accessed February 2, 2018.[6] M. Bristow et al, “A Control Systems Concept Inventory Test Design and Assessment,”IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 203-212, May 2012.
Washington in 1999. His research interests include signal and image processing,embedded computer design, and ultrasound imaging. He is a member of ASEE, IEEE, and Tau Beta Pi. Page 9.1192.7Email: george.york@ieee.org Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ø 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationDANE F. FULLER is an Assistant Professor at the U.S. Air Force Academy. He received his Master of Science inElectrical Engineering from the Air Force Institute of Technology in 1997. His research interests include RADARTarget
Session 2220 On the Development, Simulation and Testing of a Mixed-Signal Flash ADC with Application to a Digital Voltmeter Cajetan M. Akujuobi Center of Excellence for Communication Systems Technology Research (CECSTR) Electrical Engineering Department, Prairie View A&M University P.O. Box 2117, Prairie View, Texas 77446 Cajetan_Akujuobi@pvamu.eduAbstractThe basic idea of a mixed signal system is explored in this work. A Flash Analog-to-Digital Converter(ADC) is developed, simulated and tested. Absolute accuracy