simulator orthe router(s). Since all three components, GNS3, Dynagen, and Dynamips are essentially beta-quality software and interdependent, identifying simulation-software related problems is noteasy. A number of simulations have simply terminated after starting successfully, the causeundetermined. Therefore, instructors must choose simulation topologies that are proven or basedon proven simulations to avoid unnecessary hardship on the students’ part.The development teams for GNS3, Dynagen, and Dynamips are small, and therefore unable torespond quickly with software updates. There is no guarantee that future updates will beavailable. Indeed, Dynamips emulates the particular processor hardware that is common betweenthe 1700, 2600, 3600, 3700, and
Mile Connecting Smartphones to the Service Cloud." 2009 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing. Bangalore, India., 2009. 80-87.9. Zualkernan, I, S Nikkhah and M Al-Sabah. "A Lightweight Distributed Implementation of IMS LD on Google's Andriod." The 9th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT2009). Riga, Latvia, 2009. 59-63. Page 15.180.13
. Page 15.365.11 ReferencesBoni, A.A., Weingart, L.R., & Evenson, S. (2009, September). Innovation in an academic setting: Designing and leading a business through market-focused, interdisciplinary teams. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(3): 407-417.Green, J.V. (2009, January). An overview of the Hinman CEOs Program. U.S. Association for Small Business & Entrepreneurship Annual Conference, Anaheim, CA.Green, J.V. & Johnson, G.A. (2008, June). A holistic performance measurement system for entrepreneurship education. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Pittsburgh, PA.Green, J.V. (2007, June). Discovering new
the recommendations ofthe students in this initial offering. More time will be used to introduce electrical engineeringmeasurement techniques and terminologies. Less classroom time will be used to discuss thefabrication process and this discussion will be moved to the laboratory sessions to fill downtimes during the processing. An overview lecture on electrical engineering will be developed andadded, along with more examples and discussions of electrical engineering job positions andskills. Page 15.745.14 12Bibliography1. www.montana.edu/msse.2. S
. Sanders, M., et al., Assessing interdisciplinary engineering capstone project. Proceedings for the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.9. Latane, B., K. Williams, and S. Harkins, Many hands make light work: the causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979. 37(6): p. 822-832.10. Milgrom, P. and J. Roberts, Economics, organization, and management. 1992, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.11. Strong, J.R. and R.E. Anderson, Free-riding in group projects: control mechanisms and preliminary data. Journal of Marketing Education, 1990. 12: p. 61-67
the Measure of Men: Science, Technology, and Ideologies of Western Dominance. Ithaca, Cornell University Press.Adas, M. (2006). Dominance by Design: Technological Imperatives and America's Civilizing Mission. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.Bridger, J. C. and A. E. Luloff (1999). "Toward an interactional approach to sustainable community development." Journal of Rural Studies 15: 377-387.Burkey, S. (1993). People first: A guide to self-reliant participatory rural development. London and New York, Zed Books.Diacon, T. A. (2004). Stringing Together a Nation: Candido Mariano da Silva Rondon and the Construction of a Modern Brazil, 1906-1930. Durham and London, Duke University Press.Downey, G. and J. Lucena
, humanities,business and social sciences.”17 The legacy of his guidance and vision live on at bothinstitutions.Bibliography1. National Academy of Engineering. The Engineer of 2020 – Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Page 15.1014.13 Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2004.2. National Academy of Engineering. Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2005.3. S.M. Blanchard, N. Egiebor, J.D. Sweeney, L. Zidek, C. Sechrist, S. Hulbert, J. Osborn, and R. O’Neill. Blank slate engineering at Florida Gulf Coast University – Innovative and
Grassroots level policy movements, professional associations and lobbying 10 1&2 Final Project PresentationReading Response Papers (3) – Short essays (minimum 2 pages double-spaced). May includereadings from textbook or from outside sources.Framing the Problem Papers (1) – Short essay (minimum 2 pages – Max 4 pages double-spaced) about an Engineering and Public Policy issue that you have been approved to writeabout. May include readings from textbook or from outside sources.Positional Papers (2) – Short arguments (minimum 3 pages double-spaced) For Positional Paper1, identify a situation, determine applicable decision-making framework(s), and argue oneposition for or against. For the second Positional Paper, write
appropriately, simulation can be used to wring the mostperformance out of engineered systems at an acceptable cost. A vivid example of this is the caseof the Speedo LZR swimsuit which was developed through a combination of simulation andphysical testing. Experts used FLUENT, a commercial computational fluid dynamics (CFD)software, to design modifications in the suit that led to a reduction in the water drag on thewearer. Swimmers wearing the LZR suit went on to claim 33 of the first 36 medals in the BeijingOlympic games and continue to break world records, as reported in the popular press6. If mostengineers, not just specialists with Ph.D.’s, are able to deploy simulation effectively, there wouldundoubtedly be significant improvements in the engineered
the students and faculty agree that this project has stimulatedstudent interest and has facilitated a more project orientated group of young engineers ready tocontinue their education.Bibliography1. M. Lowe, H. Moore, E. Langrall, and C. Gehrman, “Robots in the introductory physics laboratory,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 76, issue 10, pp. 895-902, Oct. 2008.2. K. C. Bower, T. E. Mays, and C. M. Miller, “Small Group, Self-Directed Problem Based Learning Development In A Traditional Engineering Program,” 34th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Session S1B, pp. 16-21, Oct. 2004.3. L. G. Huettel, A. S. Brown, K. D. Coonley, M. R. Gustafson, J. Kim, G. A. Ybarra, and L. M. Collins, “Fundamentals of
reuse of the CALS Horse Barn is a good example of the Next Generation SeniorCapstone Design project. This project derived from the College of Engineering’s collaborativerelationship with the campus FP&M office. This is a real project currently in the final planningstages within the campus architect’s office. With the Capstone student involvement, the campusbenefits from the design insight and reality check the student work provides while clientsbecome more engaged in the design process providing more clearly articulate needs, wants anddesires. The students benefit from real world project challenges and through interaction withtheir clients.The project encompassed the rehabilitation of an 1880’s era, 18,000 GSF barn into asocial/conference
. Page 24.1401.8Dissemination through conference presentation and conference proceedings articles The project PI, Co-PIs, key personnel, and participating students presented conference papers related to project activities at various conferences. Following is the list of papers. Fathizadeh, M. (Accepted for Publication, 2013 ). Implementation of a New Mechatronics Engineering Technology Degree Leveraging Industry. Technology Interface International Journal. Paper No.:T13-S-14 M. Fathizadeh, G. Cabrera, M. Werthman and G. Zawislak, (2013), “Implementing Industry Leverage to Establish a New Automation Equipment Training Center.” Conference Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Mid-Atlantic Section
engineering activities (Table 4, #5). Participants then engaged inan altered version of the sail engineering activity from Day 1, which we had modified to moreclosely align with Common Core Math Standards for Grade 2 (Table 4, #6). Specificimplementation of the math standards in the activity can be found in Table 7.Participants created a line plot to analyze their data from Day 1 to evaluate the success of thesails they had designed. This activity modeled meaningful integration of math and engineeringand demonstrated s that using math to evaluate the criteria for the success of a design canenhance an engineering activity (addressing Key Component 3).To further model for teachers how we planned the lesson to integrate the CCSS with theengineering
Research & Development, Vol. 26, Issue 4, 2007, pp. 425-442.7 Fu, K., Reid, T., Terpenny, J., Thurston, D., Vance, J., Finger, S., Wiens, G., Kazerounian, K., Allen, J.,and Jacobson, K., “Broadening Participation: A Report on a Series of Workshops Aimed at Building Community and Increasing the Number of Women and Minorities in Engineering Design,” 2013 ASEE Annual Conference and Exhibition, June 23 - 26, 2013 Atlanta, GA. Page 24.885.108 Collins, Lynn H., Joan C. Chrisler, and Kathryn Quina, eds. Career Strategies for Women in Academia: Arming Athena. Sage, 1998.9 Klenke, K., “Cinderella Stories Of Women
thiseducational effort can be expanded outside the classroom to involve the entire student body, inthe hopes of motivating students to enroll in elective courses in the future. The classroomstudents can then analyze the data obtained from this school wide challenge to determine ifmathematical models can be used to help understand human intuition. Ultimately, this week longexperience helps students realize the practical applications of mathematics, and demonstrates thata systematic analysis in lieu of intuition can give your bracket the statistical edge.References 1. Jacobson, S. H., Nikolaev, A. G., King, D.M., Lee, A. J., 2011, “Seed distributions for the NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament”, OMEGA, 39(6):719-724. 2. Lunardi, J
. & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-Based Learning: A Review of Literature on Its Outcomes andImplementation Issues. Academic Medicine, 68. 52-81.8. Marshall, J. and Marshall, J. (2007). In Search of Teaching Excellence. American Society for EngineeringEducators, June, 2007.9. National Joint Apprenticeship Training Commission (2008), Course 42, International Brotherhood of ElectricalWorkers.10. Michaelsen, L., (1998). Three Keys to Using Learning Groups Effectively. “Essays on Teaching Excellence”.Center for Teaching, University of Southern Maine. Vol. 9, No 5, 1998.11. Price, P.C., (2006). Are You as Good A Teacher as You Think? Thought & Action, Vol. 14, Fall 2006.12. Gibbs, G., (2001). Changing Student Learning Behavior Outside of Class
overall sitehits and time spent on the site with the final grade. Results are shown in Figures 8 and 9. Figure8 relates total site time in hours to final grade and showed a positive relationship (R2 = 0.1717) infigure 8 similar to Figure 6 (R2 = 0.182), final grade and number of chapter s with videosaccessed. Figure 9 relates final grade and the overall number of site log-ins and provided thebest relationship we found (R2 = 0.3123). In general, this may indicate that the level of overalluse of the various tools of the Blackboard site as represented by the total hits or log-ins docontribute to the final grade. The learning tools the course provided were sufficient to learn the materials (videos, respondus
program.References1.) Hirsch, P., and McKenna, A. “Using Reflection to Promote Teamwork in Engineering Design Education.” International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 24, 2008, 377-385.2.) Hirsch, P., Shwom, B., and McKenna, A. “Teaching and Assessing Teamwork: Implementing Continuous Quality Improvement.” Proceedings, Association for Business Communication, October 2003.3.) Carr, S., McKenna, A., Colgate, J.E., and Olson, G.B. “IDEA: Formalizing the Foundation for Engineering Design Education.” International Journal of Engineering Education. 22 (671-678), 2006.4.) Lencioni, P. “Overcoming the Five Dysfunctions of a Team: A Field Guide for Leaders, Managers, and Facilitators.” Jossey-Bass. San Francisco, CA. 2005.5
mechanics: adaptive eLearning tutorials. Proceedings, ICEE Conference, Australia. Page 24.1076.127. Prusty, B.G., Ho, O., and Ho, S., (2009). Adaptive tutorials using eLearning platform for solid mechanics course in engineering. Proceedings, AAEE Conference, Australia.8. Morin, B., Kecskemety, K., and Harper, K. (2013). The inverted classroom in a first-year engineering course. Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Atlanta, GA.9. Engineering Mechanics: Statics; Meriam, J. L. and Kraige, L. G., Seventh Edition, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 2012
recognized "core"of material that has been relatively stable for at least ten years. It has evolved in the field withoutany agency or body attempting to specify such a core. Unfortunately, it is difficult to look backto the early 70’s when the first programs were created to see the evolution to this point.However, the data presented here will provide a point of reference for studying the evolution ofthe undergraduate bioengineering curriculum in the future. Our analyses have emphasized commonalities across BME, but there is clearly alsoconsiderable diversity in BME undergraduate curricula. If we were to investigate certain otherbranches of engineering, at least five or six topics would be expected to be nearly 100%consistent across programs
Engineering Education. (2013). Transforming Undergraduate Education in Engineering (TUEE): Phase I: Synthesizing and Integrating Industry Perspectives. Arlington, VA3. National Academies Press, (2005). Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century: The National Academies Press.4. Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103-120.5. Felder, R. M., Sheppard, S. D., & Smith, K. A. (2005). A new journal for a field in transition. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 7-10.6. Prince, M. (2004). Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the REsearch
. “Inverting the Classroom: A Gateway to Creating an Inclusive Learning Page 24.1121.12 Environment,” The Journal of Economic Education, vol. 31, no. 1, Winter 2000.6. S. Zappe, R. Lieicht, J. Messner, T. Litzinger, and H. Woo Lee. “ ‘Flipping’ the classroom to explore active learning in a large undergraduate course.” in Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, 2009.7. R. Talbert. “Learning MATLAB in the Inverted Classroom.” in Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Society of Engineering Education, 2012.8. L.W. Anderson, et al. A Taxonomy for Learning
% Page 24.1170.9 Teams are asked to give a 10 minute presentation on their project during exam week. The following slides are suggested, but each team is free to vary this as they feel appropriate: Problem Description Alternatives Considered Final Design (CAD Model and S/W Flowchart) Video of Working Prototype (Approx. 2 Min) Results Problems Encountered/Overcome Lessons Learned Teams are asked to dress in business attire, as they would for an interview, and to make their slides on a CAD system or on PowerPoint. The rubric used for the presentation is shown in Table 4 below with typical results. Table 4: Presentation Rubric
., Small. R.V., and Marsden, J. (2003). op cit.20 Flesher, J., Leach, S. and Wesphal, L. (1996). “Creating effective internships.” Performance Improvement,35(10), 22-25.21 Hager, C.J., Pryor, C.R. and Bryant, J.A. (2003). “A comparison of four domain area standards for internships andimplications for utilization in undergraduate construction education internship programs.” Journal of ConstructionEducation, 8(3), 157-179. Page 24.1225.11
, and school. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.16. Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7 (17). Retrieved 12 June 2013. Page 24.1227.11
24.1290.10 Engineers; 2007: http://www.nspe.org/resources/pdfs/Ethics/CodeofEthics/Code-‐2007-‐July.pdf. 14. Shephard K. Higher education for sustainability: seeking affective learning outcomes. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 2008;9(1):87-‐98. 15. Parkin S, Johnston A, Buckland H, Brookes F, White E. Learning and Skills for Sustainable Development: Developing a Sustainability Literate Society. London: Higher Education Partnership for Sustainability (HEPS); 2004. 16. Mulder KF. Don't preach. Practice! Value laden statements in academic sustainability education. International Journal of
-assessment/ResearchPaperRubric.pdf, accessed March 2014.20. http://www.cornellcollege.edu/LIBRARY/faculty/focusing-on-assignments/tools-for-assessment/poster-presentation-rubric.pdf, accessed March 2014.21. Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., and Maisa, B. B., Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification ofEducational Goals, Handbook II, Affective Domain, David McKay Co. Inc, New York, 1964.22. Verzuh, E., The Fast Forward MBA in Project Management, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1999. Page 24.1323.12
Longitudinal Study,” in Journal of Engineering Education, January 2004.3. Starrett, S. and M. M. Morcos, “Hands-On, Minds-On Electric Power Education”, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 90, No. 1, pp 93-99, January 2001.4. Higley, K. A. and C. M. Marianno, “Making Engineering Education Fun,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 90, No.1, pp 105-107, January 2001.5. Gabelnik, F., MacGregor, J., Matthews, R.S., and Smith, B.L., editors, Learning Communities: Creating Connections Among Students, Faculty, and Disciplines, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, Jossey- Bass, 19906. Goodwin, T. & Hoagland, K. E. (1999). How to get started in research (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Council on Undergraduate Research.7. Karukstis, K
and Self-Regulated Learning for Freshmen Engineering Students”, Proceedings of the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference, Paper Number: AC 2011-1679, 2011.18. David T. Butterworth, “Teaching C/C++ Programming with Lego Mindstorms”, International Conference on Robotics in Education (RIE), 2012.19. L. Johnson, S. Adams, and M. Cummins, Mobile apps. The NMC horizon report: 2012 higher education edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium, 2012.20. K. Brennan and M. Resnick, “New Frameworks for Studying and Assessing the Development of Computational Thinking”, Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 2012.21. V. Barr and C. Stephenson, “Bringing computational thinking to K-12