earlier DLR grant and to develop a general education infrastructure compa-nion course for all students, which became the I&S course.As completed under the grant funding, the I2I course is a two-credit course with four lecturesdevoted to introducing five sub-disciplines of civil engineering (transportation, construction,geotechnical, structural, and environmental). The remainder of the course covers broader themessuch as the economic significance of infrastructure, infrastructure planning, teamwork, ethics,etc. Within this course, students work in teams to assess five infrastructure components from thesurrounding campus and community. The I2I course has been piloted three times and will betaught for a fourth time in the spring 2012 semester
AC 2010-1248: DEVELOPMENT OF CORE CONCEPTS AND LEARNINGOUTCOMES FOR THE INTRODUCTORY TRANSPORTATION COURSEKristen Sanford Bernhardt, Lafayette College KRISTEN L. SANFORD BERNHARDT is an Assistant Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Lafayette College, where she teaches courses related to transportation, civil infrastructure, and engineering ethics and researches issues related to infrastructure systems modeling. Dr. Sanford Bernhardt received her Ph.D. and M.S. from Carnegie Mellon University and her B.S.E. from Duke University, all in Civil Engineering.Steven Beyerlein, University of Idaho STEVEN W. BEYERLEIN is a professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Idaho
reference their work. We further assert that methods described herein beconsidered as an additional criterion for ABET accreditation.Literature ReviewA variety of information literacy assessment techniques have been developed to meet thegrowing demands of accountability in library instruction. Indirect assessment strategies such asinterviews, focus groups and surveys have been used by some institutions to gain practicalinsights into student research behavior. Typically, since library instruction occurs in a “one-shot” class session, librarians often employ some form of direct assessment, mainly selected-response (multiple choice, fill-in-the-blank, or true/false) assessments focusing on library skills,the appropriate and ethical use of information
,economic, political, moral/ethical and social factors impacting the problem among other factorsin order to develop the most effective systems solution. Page 15.603.7The Systems Engineering CurriculumThe Systems Engineering major program of study at West Point is one of the most popularmajors because cadets understand the practical application of what they learn to life after WestPoint. The curriculum is designed to help cadets understand systems engineering as aninterdisciplinary, life-cycle approach to the design, development, and deployment of complexsystems, processes, or operations to meet the effective needs of users and stakeholder groups in
. Oral presentation using PowerPoint summarizing accomplishment and significance of the completed project.#3 Academic Academic Argument Project Planning.Argument Formal Proposal for Argument Project. Continued development of relevant specialized second research tools.The space race Deliverable – a position paper: science, technology, and major social problems.“debates”#4 Group/team 1. Breadth of Knowledge – Humanities, Social Sciences, Sciences, and Business.discussions 2. Best Practice and Ethics – focus on the NSPE Code of Ethics.Implications forspace explorationEnrichment Representative Lectures:Activities A Local Small
and bythe electronic and press media, particularly in Brazil. More specifically, such considerationscould enlarge students’ attitude towards this subject, providing them with a more criticalview on that. We believe that any new solution has to go through an initial brainstorming.Next, we present a conceptualization of consumerism and its consequences, Postman’s viewof Technopoly and ethical and humanistic values that could help to find solutions. In the end,we make some considerations summarizing the main points that were approached. Page 9.1085.1 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &
personnel.Instill an understanding of professional and ethical Case histories reveal ethical dilemmas in credible andresponsibilities, both in education and in practice dramatic detail, especially when the client wants to do something that is ill-advised, unsafe or against the public interest.Expose students to contemporary issues pertinent to the Cases included introduction of new national standardspractice of civil engineering for water treatment, the latest construction methods for soft-ground tunnels
global society and culture.5. Graduates understand and can use the engineering method.6. Graduates have a strong foundation of engineering fundamentals and a strong technical competence in at least one focus area.7. Graduates understand and can apply ethical principles8. Graduates have the ability to create, manage, and work on successful interdisciplinary teams.9. Graduates have the ability to learn and use industry contemporary technical tools (e.g Labview, CAD).10. Graduates are proficient in the application of computers and other information technology as engineering tools (especially for design and simulation).11. Graduates are self directed learners.12. Graduates understand the entire life cycle of engineered artifacts.13. Graduates
resulted in the set of civilengineering programmatic objectives presented below.Objective 1 - Engineering Design - Graduates solve engineering problems and developexecutable designs. They combine their understanding of technical, ethical, economic, andenvironmental issues to efficiently solve engineering problems and develop designs that areexecutable and realistically constructible.Objective 2 - Project Management - Graduates include in their problem solving process theconsideration of business and management principles, primarily budget, schedule, and cost. Theywork effectively both as an individual and on teams.Objective 3 - Communications - Graduates have the ability to communicate, in a professionalmanner, their designs and processes to a
List of Requirements______________________________________________________________________________ a) Ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering b) Ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data c) Ability to design a system, component or process to meet desired needs d) Ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams e) Ability to identify, formulate and solve engineering problems f) Understanding of professional and ethical responsibility g) Ability to communicate effectively h) Broad education to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context i) Recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning j
Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationlogically, the designer has no ethical responsibility for how the product is used or abused. Underthis view, the engineers, manufacturers, and distributors need not worry about the social impactof their products. If the product is neutral, then no user can rightly complain about an unsafeproduct, and no seller would be liable for any damage or harm caused by use of their product.Thus it is essential that students understand the non-neutrality concept and its implications.Some preliminary work has identified pedagogical approaches to instilling better understandingof non-neutrality in the classroom10, including use of descriptive yet simpler
mostvaluable lesson that is learned in FIRST Robotics Competition. In most of projects, engineers arechallenged to put together different systems. FIRST Robotics provides an excellent opportunity toexplore this. For example, students must analyze the rules of game and then agree on a realisticdesign concept to meet their goals. Then several systems, such as mechanical arm, electricalcontrols, and motors are assembled together following the constraints on weight and size.III. ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF SENIOR DESIGN COURSE-At Miami University, the senior design project assimilates engineering design, analysis, and liberaleducation concepts such as cost/benefit analysis, environmental issues, and ethics 4,5. Firstdeveloped in 1996 by the Department of
technical reports. In addition students should begin to appreciate that the medium is as important as themessage. The non-technical aspects of communications, such as politics, aesthetics, style, andtechnique should be recognized.5. WORK RESPONSIBLY 5.1 Responsibility in engineering practice Graduates must be prepared to practice engineering responsibly, i.e., make decisionsbased on personal and professional codes of ethics with the understanding that they areaccountable for the outcomes of these decisions. Graduates must be sensitive to local and globalissues in order to act ethically in their particular society and for humanity in general
Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Educationthe program by requiring that new material be incorporated into the coursework i.e. ethics,environmental issues, contemporary issues, economics and others. The traditional approach ofadding another “patch” or another course in the program is no longer sustainable. This is why adifferent (systems) approach is necessary. Another sector of academia on the other hand aremore familiar with the business perspective, while conducting contractual research, thestatements of work detail the degree of accountability required to satisfy the contract in terms ofdeliverables.In any event, achieving change in educational practices is not
follows. Students need morethan the computers and their programs. This article presents information about a 21st centuryprogram created in 1996: a comprehensive engineering program at Madison West High Schoolwithin blocks of the University of Wisconsin in Madison, Wisconsin.I. IntroductionCourses including Principles of Engineering 1&2, Materials Science, and Computer AidedDesign, including mechanical design, 3D solid modeling and 3D animation, are the make-up ofthis 21st century high school engineering program.Students in engineering courses participate in at least fourteen different case studies. These casestudies are diverse in nature in order to give the students just a taste of many different types ofengineering. Engineering ethics
feedback from others. structured programs.System Thinking Skills Self-learning Skills Ability to: understand how events interrelate; syn- Ability to: learn independently; continuously seek to thesize new information with knowledge from pre- acquire new knowledge; acquire relevant knowledge vious courses and experiences. to solve problems.Ethics and Professionalism Business Skills Ability to: understand and demonstrate professional Ability to: accurately estimate production costs; cal- and ethical behavior; understand social and ethical culate the cost effects of
the instruction of the concrete physical processes thatwere chosen as fundamental biology knowledge. The concrete processes chosen include: • biological information storage and processing (the central dogma) • genome organization and genomics • biological system integration at the cellular, tissue, organism, and ecosystem levels • disease and etiology • evolution / diversification • biological energy conversion and utilization (bioenergetics) • biological signaling and communication • legal, ethical issues related to biotechnologyHaving outlined the course strategies and content, the instructors then chose the “problems”;settings that would fit within their expertise and integrate the course themes and
requirements and pros and cons of different sources of capital. 5. Abilities to apply knowledge about intellectual property to strategically create barriers to entry for competitors. 6. Abilities to plan and manage a design project to complete specified deliverables within allotted time and budget. 7. Abilities to organize, improve, and contribute effectively to a multidisciplinary project team. 8. Abilities to access, learn, process, and demonstrate knowledge competence to advance a team-based entrepreneurial engineering project. 9. Abilities to explain and demonstrate ethical and professional responsibility in the context of team interactions, class assignments, client interactions, and professional
more sustainable electric toothbrush (with lessenvironmental burden), and culturally and economically appropriate coffee-maker re-design forthe Japanese kitchen were included as projects.Assessment:Following the implementation of the modifications in the classroom setting, using parts of theE2020 national student survey (developed as part of a separate NSF project #0550608) alongwith some course specific questions, assessment of the introductory design course occurred inthe spring 2010 semester. The assessment tool asked the students to evaluate the emphasis andimpact that all their engineering courses have had on the following: • ethical issues, • professional skills, • systems thinking, • life long learning
). The departmental criteria forevaluating the proposals as suitable capstone projects are below. Project-related criteria 1. The number and variety of different disciplines the project will involve, such as structures, geotechnical, environmental and water resources, transportation, sustainability, construction and public policy. (ABET5 “multidisciplinary teams”) 2. The real-world constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, constructability and sustainability.5 In essence, the Page 25.309.3 benefits to society from doing the project. 3
provide a detailed description of a three week core module which can becompleted in two lecture hours and seven lab hours in addition to brief descriptions ofsupplemental activities that can be used to expand the unit, including biostatistics and ethics. Forthe core module and each supplemental activity, the time and materials resources required willbe indicated, as well as the ABET criterion that are addressed. Finally, we will report on ABETand student assessment relating to the unit, and end with some discussion and conclusions.Core ModuleThe core module consists of two hours of lecture and seven hours of lab. In our course, thiscovers three weeks of class – one week of lecture followed by two weeks of lab; however,supplemental activities used
AC 2012-4167: ADAPTING CURRICULAR MODELS FOR LOCAL SERVICE-LEARNING TO INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITIESJames L. Huff, Purdue University James L. Huff is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University as well as the Assistant Education Administrator for EPICS. He earned his BS in Computer Engineering at Harding University and an MS in electrical and computer engineering at Purdue University. A member of the engineering faculty at Harding University, he is on an academic leave to pursue his Ph.D. in engineering education at Purdue University. His research interests include ethical reasoning and social responsibility in engineering, human-centered design learning and assessment, cross-cultural
Economics and Management of 1 CPE312 Computer Organization 3 ETHICS Integrated Studies In Comp 3 CPE315 Digital Design II with Laboratory 4 FREELE Free Elective One 3 CPE387 Embedded System Design 3 HUMC20 Introduction to Humanities I 3 CPE408 Operating Systems 3 HUMC20 Introduction to Humanities II 3 CPE410 Introduction to Computer 3 MATH10 Precalculus Mathematics 4 CPE447 FPGA Design 3 MATH11 Calculus and Analytic Geometry I 4 CPE448 Introduction to
; Reich1991). Engineering Cultures takes a small step in this direction by striving to enable engineeringstudents to understand themselves as holding perspectives by systematically challenging them torecognize and explore perspectives other than their own.The course emerged from a research project sponsored by the Ethics and Values Studies program(now Societal Dimensions of Science and Technology) at the National Science Foundation. Aftercompleting undergraduate degrees in engineering, both authors went on to conduct ethnographicand historical work in the social studies of technology and engineering (e.g., Downey 1998a;Downey and Lucena 1994, 1998; Lucena 1996). With NSF support, we conducted a three-yearethnographic study of how engineering
to different views on accountability from students and professionals, which arestrengthened further by the fact the student is a customer, whereas the employee is not.Accountability is not only found across several sections (e.g. Clients & Employers, Peers) of theAmerican Society of Civil Engineers Code of Ethics [12], but is an essential part of leadership –engineering or otherwise.Fairness, or the perception of, is also different between the two settings. In classroom, fairness isoften viewed as equal work distribution on a specific team project. In an engineering firm, oneteam member may have an essential role on the project, whereas another team member may beless frequently involved – yet they are still contributing, and valued team
experiential activities often lead to situations known as ‘disorientingdilemmas’ [4] compelling learners to critically reflect on their preconceived notions andassumptions. This reflection results in modifications to their established meaning perspectivesand the development of new frames of reference through a transformative shift in perspectives[26].A learner’s frame of reference comprises their habits of mind, shaped by life experiences,previous education, personal interests, and social influences [27]. Cranton [28] categorized theseinto six dimensions: Philosophical (dealing with transcendental worldviews), Moral and Ethics(related to conscience and morality), Psychological (pertaining to self-concept and personalitytraits), Sociological (involving
ethics to mobile technology. A multitude of “how to write a teachingcase study” guidelines are available, including in construction education. However, literature thatprovides insights into developing a specific case study in construction engineering andmanagement is scarce. To fill this knowledge gap, this paper presents the dynamics ofdeveloping an educational case study to explore the implementation of target value design(TVD). This case study was developed for engineering and construction management students toformulate, discuss, and decide on strategies, actions, and solutions to provide the best value tothe project owner when implementing TVD. This work-in-progress paper focuses on the pilottest when developing the case study. Pre-class
preparingstudents for the complexities of modern engineering roles is an imperative shift recognized acrossacademic and industrial spheres (Queiruga-Dios et al., 2021). This transformation is driven by thegrowing demand for engineers who are not only technically adept but also possess a broadunderstanding of the environmental, societal, and ethical implications of engineering projects (deVere et al., 2009; McGinn, 2018). A key aspect of this educational reform is the emphasis oninterdisciplinary learning and the application of knowledge to real-world problems, fostering ageneration of engineers equipped to tackle global challenges with innovative and sustainablesolutions (Jamieson & Lohmann, 2009; Froyd, Wankat, & Smith, 2012). Pedagogical
can plan my office hour effectively’, ‘I can create instruments forevaluating group performance in a collaborative activity’, ‘I understand in what situationsimplementing a group activity is more effective than implementing an individual activity’, etc. Atotal of six factors emerged from the EFA, however, the scale ‘Harnessing the Power ofTechnology’ did not make it to final factors and a new factor was suggested ‘Ethical Practices’.The factor loadings of the final factor structure are shown in Table 4. The factor loadings for thefirst factor (F1) ranged from 0.56 to 0.8, second factor (F2) from 0.58 to 0.77, third factor (F3)from 0.54 to 0.84, fourth factor (F4) from 0.54 to 0.78, fifth factor (F5) from 0.42 to 0.81, andsixth factor (F6
Review Board (IRB) conducts ethical reviews on all researchproposals involving human research participants, including the use of their personal data.Once the list of relevant stakeholders was finalised and IRB approval was granted, the secondphase began. To gather input from the stakeholders, survey forms and several focus groupdiscussions were originally planned. Unfortunately, Covid-19 pandemic struck and restrictedour approach to mainly online surveys. As such, survey forms were prepared and sent torespondents using “Verint” online survey system that allowed each respondent to receive aunique survey link via email. The response generated from each link was stored on thesystem safely.Despite the challenges presented by the pandemic, relatively