, Howard T., 1983. Ecological and General Systems, New York, Wiley.39. Odum, Howard T., and Elisabeth C. Odum, 2000. Modeling for All Scales, New York, Academic Press.40. Odum, Howard T., and Elisabeth C. Odum, 2001. A Prosperous Way Down: Principles and Policies, Boulder, University Press of Colorado.41. Hall, Charles A. S., and Kent A. Klitgaard, 2011. Energy and the Wealth of Nations: Understanding the Biophysical Economy, New York, Springer.42. Meadows, Donella, Dennis Meadows, and Jorgen Randers, 2005. Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update, White River Junction, Vermont, Chelsea Green Publishing.43. Meadows, Donella H., 2008. Thinking in Systems, White River Junction, Vermont, Chelsea Green Publishing.44. Naess, Arne, 1973. The
username, password and SSN. All of theconfidential information collected by the “Phisher” can be used to damage Internet business.4.3.2 Threats of 2014As Internet service industry is expanding, new threats are surfacing regularly. In an article titled“10 top security threats of 2014 (so far)”, author [7] reported that top three threats of the year are(i) 2014's threat theme: White-knuckle flaws in TLS/SSL protocols: Goto Fail, Heartbleed,POODLE, WinShock, (ii) Mega Retail Breaches, and (iii) Shellshocks. Experts are developingpreventive measures of these threats, however, they are not fully implemented as of today, also,outcome of the implementation is not yet verified, and discussion of some of these measures area bit more technical.5. Protecting
Engineering Education Pipeline. Proceedings: 2011 American Society of Engineering Education Conference and Exposition, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, June 26-29, 2011.7. Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachandran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press. (Reprinted in H. Friedman [Ed.], Encyclopedia of mental health. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998).8. Baldwin, J. A., Ebert-May, D., & Burns, D. J. (1999). The development of a college biology self-efficacy instrument for nonmajors. Science Education, 83(4), 397-40.9. George, K. (2013) Evaluating the Impact of ECS Academic Catalyst for Excellence (ACE) Scholarship Program. Proceedings: 2013 American Society of
tomorrow’s ethical innovators and storytellers.9. References1. R. Taleyarkhan, M. Behbehani, J. M. Santiago, M. Diaz, and S. Hummel, “Work in Progress: Impact onStudents’ Dropout Rates of Introducing a First-Year Hands-On Civil Engineering Course,” Proceedings ofthe ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2013.Available: https://peer.asee.org/work-in-progress-impact-on-students-dropout-rates-of-introducing-a-first-year-hands-on-civil-engineering-course.pdf2. B. M. Olds, R. L. Miller, and R. M. Felder, “Engineering Attrition: Student Characteristics andEducational Initiatives,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2004.Available: https://peer.asee.org/engineering-attrition-student-characteristics-and-educational
. Norton & Company, 2024.[10] O. Gambelin. Responsible AI: Implement an Ethical Approach in Your Organization. New York, New York: Kogan Page, 2024.[11] NSPE. “NSPE Code of Ethics for Engineers,” 2025. [Online]. Available http://https://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics[12] University of Kentucky. “AI Course Policy Examples,” 2025. [Online]. Available https://celt.uky.edu/ai-course-policy-examples[13] E. Mollick. “AI has a strategy,” 2022. [Online]. Available https://www.oneusefulthing.org/p/ai-has-a-strategy[14] A. Narayanan and S. Kapoor. AI Snake Oil: What Artificial Intelligence Can Do, What it Can’t, and How to Tell the Difference. Princeton University Press, 2024.[15] M. Wheatley
what extent How well did the How well satisfied regularly were the did assignments exam(s) measure were the were have you objectives of contribute to your how much you course you with attended the course overall learning learned in the objectives this this SECTION RATE defined? in the course? course? achieved? course? class? Excellent 46.9% 50.0% 25.0% 34.4% 37.5% 87.5% Good 40.6% 31.3% 43.8% 40.6% 37.5
andscience in their degree programs, connections with local artists and community members, andconnections with local, state and federal legislatures.Acknowledgements Funding for this work was provided by the University of New Mexico Grand Challengeon Sustainable Water Resources.References[1] D. Buffalari et al., “Integrating Research into the Undergraduate Curriculum: 1. Early Research Experiences and Training,” J. Undergrad. Neurosci. Educ., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. A52–A63, Dec. 2020.[2] S. Pierszalowski, J. Bouwma-Gearhart, and L. Marlow, “A Systematic Review of Barriers to Accessing Undergraduate Research for STEM Students: Problematizing Under- Researched Factors for Students of Color,” Soc. Sci., vol. 10, no. 9, Art. no. 9
participation andprofessional development rather than assuming that This HSI Pilot Project: Fostering Hispanic Achievement inprofessional skills have already been developed by graduation Computer Science and Engineering with Affinity Research(Buket et al., 2023). To show the university's commitment to Group Model (Project Achieve) is supported by the Nationalthe initiative beyond grant funding, the newly developed Science Foundation under Award Number FAIN-2150048.course, Introduction to Scientific Research. was supported by Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendationsa $3,000 donation from the School of Engineering to expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do
Thinking, Teaching, and Learning.", Journal ofEngineering Education, vol. 94, pp. 103-120, 2005.[6] S. A. Ambrose and C. H. Amon, "Systematic Design of a First-Year Mechanical EngineeringCourse at Carnegie Mellon University", Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 86, pp. 173-181,1997.[7] L. Gentiles, L. Caudill, M. Fetea, et al. "Challenging Disciplinary Boundaries in the FirstYear: A New Introductory Integrated Science Course for STEM Majors." Journal of CollegeScience Teaching, vol. 41, pp. 44-50, 2012.[8] Catamount Data Center, “Program-Level Enrollment, 2011-2021”, University of Vermont,Office of Institutional Research [Online]. Available: https://www.uvm.edu/oir/catamount-data[Accessed Sept. 3, 2021].[9] Center for Project-Based Learning
, Atlanta, GA. vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1-18, June, 2013.[10] N.J. Mourtos, “The nuts and bolts of cooperative learning in engineering,” Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference - FIE '94, San Jose, CA, USA.[11] Motaref, S., “The Evaluation of Different Learning Tools in Flipped Mechanics of Materials”, 2020 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Virtual Conference, paper no. 35317, Montreal, Quebec, June 20-24, 2020. https://peer.asee.org/35317.
Academy, 2010.[4] National Center for Education Statistics, “Table 306.20. Total fall enrollment in degree- granting postsecondary institutions, by level and control of institution and race/ethnicity or nonresident status: Selected years, 1976 through 2022.” 2023. Accessed: Aug. 09, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d23/tables/dt23_306.20.asp[5] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, “Environmental Engineering for the 21st Century: Addressing Grand Challenges,” National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, DOE-NASEM--0016218, 1494822, Jan. 2018. doi: 10.2172/1494822.[6] G. Light, S. Calkins, M. Luna, and D. Drane, “Assessing the Impact of a Year‐Long Faculty
, 2002. [9] Houghton Mifflin. Project-based learning: Background knowledge & theory, 2003. http://www.college.hmco.com/education/pbl/background.html.[10] M. Fasli and M. Michalakopoulos. Supporting active learning through game-like exercises. In Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, pages 730–734. IEEE, 2005. doi: 10.1109/ICALT.2005.159.[11] R. Lawrence. Teaching data structures using competitive games. IEEE Transactions on Education, 47(4):459–466, 2004. doi: 10.1109/TE.2004.825053.[12] S. Lam, P. Yim, J. Law, and R. Cheung. The effects of classroom competition on achievement motivation. In Proc. of Annual Conference of the American Psychological Association, 2001.[13
wouldalso be valuable. Lastly, future research could explore how giving students the autonomy toselect their scenarios influences their motivation, engagement, and overall learning experience.References[1] J. D. Ortega-Alvarez, C. Wallwey, B. D. Chambers, D. Newcomb, and D. Gray, “Stakeholder-Informed Review of a First-Year Engineering Program,” Montreal, Canada, Jun. 22, 2025.[2] B. D. Chambers, H. Murzi, M. James, D. Gray, and H. M. Matusovich, “Course Development in a First Year Engineering Program: The Interplay of Autonomy, Peer Relationships, and Content,” development, vol. 10, p. 11, 2021.[3] M. Seren Smith, S. Warnes, and V. Anne, “Scenario-based learning,” in Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Perspectives from UCL
. doi: 10.1007/s11569-010-0100-0.[7] J. Flaig, "How AI is already changing engineering – and the role of the engineer,” Engineering News, Institution of Mechanical Engineers, April 18, 2023. Available: https://www.imeche.org/news/news-article/feature-how-ai-is-already-changing- engineering-and-the-role-of-the-engineer[8] S. D. Mohaghegh, “Ethics of artificial intelligence plays a role in engineering,” Journal of Petroleum Technology, October 4, 2021. Available: https://jpt.spe.org/ethics-of-artificial- intelligence-plays-a-role-in-engineering[9] National Academy of Engineering (NAE), Emerging Technologies and Ethical Issues in Engineering, Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2004.[10] National Academy of
into a Week-long University-based Summer Program,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings, Virtual On line: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2020. doi: 10.18260/1-2--35137.[8] J. N. Patel, A. L. Rutledge, J. M. Cellitioci, and R. A. Moore, “The Impact of Invention Education Participation on Students’ Confidence and Anxiety in STEM,” presented at the 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, OR, Jun. 2024. doi: 10.18260/1-2-- 48111.[9] S. Newton, M. Alemdar, R. Moore, and C. Cappelli, “An Investigation of Students’ Experiences in a K-12 Invention Program (Evaluation),” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Salt Lake City, Utah: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2018. doi
helpful forparticularly long, cumbersome or multi-step problems.Future research work should focus on measuring the short and long-term impact ofindividualized problem sets utilizing AI and similar types of assessment. Specifically,it could focus on determining course and learning outcome specific improvementsusing a pretest/post-test quasi-experimental design.References[1] G. Hendry, “Constructivism and Educational Practice,” Aust. J. Educ., vol. 40, pp. 19–45, Apr. 1996, doi: 10.1177/000494419604000103.[2] P. Gruba and H. S⊘ndergaard, “A Constructivist Approach to Communication Skills Instruction in Computer Science,” Comput. Sci. Educ., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 203–219, Sep. 2001, doi: 10.1076/csed.11.3.203.3833.[3] B. Briede, R, “A
; Chirikov, I. (2020). The role of the first-year experience in student attrition. Quality in Higher Education, 26(3), 307-322.[4] Kerby, M. B. (2015). Toward a new predictive model of student retention in higher education: An application of classical sociological theory. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 17(2), 138-161.[5] Belfadel, D., Zabinski, M., & Munden, R. (2020, June). Walking on Water Term Design Project in Fundamentals of Engineering. In 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access.[6] Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. 1989, 18(1), 32-42.[7] Brallier, C. (2020). The effects of student engagement on academic
through class lectures, it is not a mandatory design constraint within this project. This decision acknowledges the inherent variability in students' technical skills, background knowledge, and the limited time frame of a one-credit-hour course. • The assembled wind turbine must fit within the dimensions of the KidWind Tunnel [4], a 48” x 48” enclosure equipped with four industrial fans generating an average wind speed of 3.6 m/s at 30 cm from the tunnel opening. • The wind turbine must be designed to generate power irrespective of its orientation within the wind tunnel. • Total project cost is limited to $25, including the $6 generator. Free components require instructor
Instruction: Game-based Methods and Strategies for Trainingand Education, San Francisco, CA, USA: Pfeiffer, 2012.[7] K. Squire, Video Games and Learning: Teaching and Participatory Culture in the Digital Age, New York, NY,USA: Teachers College Press, 2011.[8] E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, “Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, andhealth,” Can. Psychol., vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 182–185, 2008.[9] S. Nicholson, “A recipe for meaningful gamification,” in Gamification in Education and Business, T. Reinersand L. C. Wood, Eds. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2015, pp. 1–20.[10] D. W. Johnson, R. T. Johnson, and K. A. Smith, “Cooperative learning returns to college: What evidence isthere that it works?” Change, vol. 30, no. 4, pp
Educational Development, 31(5), 425-432.Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom‐based practices. Journal of engineering education, 94(1), 87- 101. 16
reforms and pedagogical innovations,” ArXiv:1811.09676 [Physics], 2018.[9.] J. J. Selingo, “The Future of Gen Z: How Covid-19 Will Shape Students and Higher Education for the Next Decade," Chronicle of Higher Education Report CHE-R-FGZ-21-7-D 32, 2021.[10.] K. Moore, C. Jones, and R. S. Frazier, “Engineering education for Generation Z,” American Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 8 no. 2, 2017, pp. 111-125. 11
-Miguel. Implementing the sustainable development goals in university higher education: A systematic review. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 18(6):1769–1776, 2023. 4 S. Lee and D. Shapiro. Completing college: National and state report with longitudinal data dashboard on six- and eight-year completion rates. (signature report 22),. Technical report, National Student Clearinghouse Research Center, Herndon, VA, 2023. 5 A. Valero and J. Van Reenen. The economic impact of universities: Evidence from across the globe. Economics of Education Review, 68:53–67, 2019. 6 M. Hanson. College Graduation Statistics. 2023. EducationData.org. 7 B. Yoder. ASEE Retention and Time-to-Graduation
: challenges and strategies. 2022. [7] Dorottya B Noble, Simon GJ Mochrie, Corey S O’Hern, Thomas D Pollard, and Lynne Regan. Promoting convergence: The integrated graduate program in physical and engineering biology at Yale university, a new model for graduate education. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 44(6):537–549, 2016. [8] Alice Y Kolb and David A Kolb. Learning styles and learning spaces: A review of the multidisciplinary application of experiential learning theory in higher education. In Learning styles and learning: A key to meeting the accountability demands in education, pages 45–91. Nova Science Publishers New York, NY, 2006. [9] Convergence Accelerator, Dec 2021. URL https://new.nsf.gov/funding/initiatives
Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 144(2), 04017017. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000360Cardon, M. S., Gregoire, D. A., Stevens, C. E., & Patel, P. C. (2013). Measuring entrepreneurial passion: Conceptual foundations and scale validation. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(3), 373–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.03.003Cox, D. (2017). Development of Hands-on Laboratory Resources for Manufacturing Engineering. Annual Conference and Exposition. American Society for Engineering Education.Da Silva, G., De Barros, M., & Costa, H. (2015). Entrepreneurship in Engineering Education: A Literature Review. International Journal of Engineering Education, 31(6A), 1701–1710
professional skills in engineering job advertisements. Journal of Engineering Education, 2024, Vol. 113, Issue 2, pp. 251–279.[10] Y. Y. Koh and P. L. Chong, “Incorporating student feedback into curriculum review according to outcome based education philosophy,” Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 541-556, 2019.[11] N. B. Robbins and R. M. Heiberger, Plotting Likert and other rating scales: Proceedings of the 2011 Joint Statistical Meeting, Section on Survey Research Methods, American Statistical Association, 2011, Alexandria, Virginia. pp. 1058–1066.[12] S. E. Harpe, “How to analyze Likert and other rating scale data,” Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, Vol. 7, Issue 6
). Annenberg Institute at BrownUniversity[28] Xu, Zeyu, and Ben Backes. (2022). Linkage Between Fields of Concentration in HighSchool Career-Technical Education and College Majors. (EdWorkingPaper: 22 -613). Retrievedfrom Annenberg Institute at Brown University: https://doi.org/10.26300/h0ab-e718[29] Poiner, Jessica. “CTE and Non-Cognitive Skills: A Match Made in Heaven?” The ThomasB. Fordham Institute, The Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 16 Feb. 2008,[30] Stringfield, S., & Stone, J. R. (2017). The Labor Market Imperative for CTE: Changes andChallenges for the 21st Century. Peabody Journal of Education, 92(2), 166–179.https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2017.1302209[31] Lindner, Attila, et al. “The Employment and Distributional Impacts of Nationwide
ball must be directed down different paths.• Hopper: While a single collection hopper is not strictly required, all 12 bearing balls must eventually re-converge onto the same path at the location of release. The location of release is synonymous with the location where the bearing balls are cycled to the state of highest potential energy, and where the cycle rate is measured.• Complex Feature: Separate and distinct from the cycle and sort function(s), there must be a complex feature along 1 or both of the travel paths that obviously changes the direction and velocity of the bearing ball. No two teams may utilize the same complex feature.Note that the list of parameters are representative
. Balgopal, and L. Sample McMeeking, “Building professional identity: STEMteacher educators' growth through community,” International Journal of Science and MathematicsEducation, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 1–19, 2021.[8] R. L. Kajfez and H. M. Matusovich, "The role of identity in understanding graduate teachingassistants: A mixed methods analysis," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 36,no. 3, pp. 1049-1061, 2020.[9] S. E. DeChenne, L. G. Enochs, and M. Needham, “Science, technology, engineering, andmathematics graduate teaching assistants teaching self-efficacy,” Journal of the Scholarship ofTeaching and Learning, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 102–123, 2012.[10] X. Zhou, L. Shu, Z. Xu, and Y. Padrón, “The effect of professional development on in
theLinkages*. Res High Educ 47, 1–32 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9[3] F. E. Causer, M. Baranowski, A. V. Masters, and A. M. Williams, "Quiet eye training: Reviewand future directions," Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 13, Art. no. 840180, 2022. [Online].Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.840180/full.[4] Cerbin, W. “Improving student learning from lectures.” Scholarship of Teaching andLearning in Psychology, 4(3), 151–163. (2018) https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000113[5] Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Shneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. Student engagement inhigh school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2),158–176. (2003) https://doi.org/10.1521/scpq
Education, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 617-639, 2010.[9] T. R. Kelley and J. G. Knowles, "A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education," International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 11, 2016.[10] A. J. Meadows and J. S. Levenson, "Social responsibility in science," Science and Public Policy, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 49-55, 1975.