relationships can be included.In summary, their formalism consists of the following relationships†: GDF = M×N + MFlows + NRates (2.a) GSC = MStreamConstraints + NBalances + RRR (2.b) PSC = F + C + NR + NOC (2.c) from which DF=GDF-(GSC+PSC) (2.d)where M is the number of streams, N is the number of molecular species in the systems, MFlows isthe number of stream
outcomes of testing such as feature not working, expectedBugs Revealed results not observed, missing or inaccessible features (optional field) Figure 1. Test case development template.The benefits of developing the template for a case study are twofold: (a) template provides astandardized way to document the background information, description and objectives of casestudies and (b) facilitates identification of any missing information or gaps of knowledge for the Page 26.332.6students as they attempt to solve the questions based on the case study. This allows improvingthe description contained in the case study
occurrence of thesefast motions within their sport that results in injury of the forearm muscles. After somebackground on the problem, it is recommended that the biology of the muscle be discussed, witha focus on explaining that tendons carry tensile forces from muscle to bone, with the collagenfibrils contained within tendons accounting for the mechanical resistance to tension.15 Finally,a See example introduction presentation in the supporting information (S1).b If the activity is used for women outreach purposes the project can be shifted to create an implant for female Page 26.1.3athletes.depending on the group of students, the
shift, manny CEM proograms havee introducedd BIM intoundergrraduate and graduate edducation. As A BIM pracctices emergge and becoome codified, it is clearrthat CE EM program ms in higher education needn to playy a vital rolee in BIM edducation. To o reflectthe grow wing demannd for BIM in the consttruction inddustry, CEM M programs have been trying t toteach BIM B skills annd VDC knowledge to students, inntegrating with w traditional or main nstreamcoursess more broaddly.To introoduce BIM within the existing
learned a lot about engineering education research from this program. Many studentsexpressed their desire to purchase further graduate studies, or teaching, in the development oftheir professional careers.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.DUE 1262806. Graduate students Mr. Andreas Febrian, Mr. Moe Tajvidi, Mr. PresentacionRivera-Reyes, and Ms. Ting Song are acknowledged for their efforts in mentoring REU students.The project external evaluator Dr. Margaret Lubke is also acknowledged for her efforts inconducting independent evaluation of this program.Bibliography[1] Hathaway, R. S., Naqda, B. A., and Gregerman, S. R., 2002, “The Relationship of Undergraduate Research
, Upper Saddle River, NJ.[4] Barrett, S. F., LeFevre, E. W., Steadman, J. W., Tietjen, J. S., White,K. R., and Whitman, D. L., 2010, Using the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) Examination as an Outcomes Assessment Tool, National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying, Seneca, SC.[5] Streveler, R. A., Geist, M. R., Ammerman, R. F., Sulzbach, C. S., Miller, R. L., Olds, B. M., and Nelson, M. A., 2006, “Identifying and Investigating Difficult Concepts in Engineering Mechanics and Electrical Circuits,” Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, IL.[6] Cornwell, P. J., 2000, “Dynamics Evolution – Change or Design,” Proceedings of the 2000 ASEE Annual Conference
students to focus on surface details andspecific solution methods but miss the bigger picture or underlying concept. To draw an example Page 26.1618.3from math, students are taught in high school algebra to multiply a pair of binomials, e.g.(a+b)(c+d), using the “FOIL” method – First, Outer, Inner, Last. Most students fail to realize thatthis is a specific application of the distributive property of mathematics, and when faced with asmall variation, e.g. (a+b)(c+d+e), they are lost. In an engineering setting, a student may be veryadept at applying mesh analysis to find the currents in a branched resistive network, but thatsame student will often
pressure in the system? Person B: Why is there pressure? Interviewer: Yeah. Person B: Because the water’s flowing through it, and [pause]. I don’t know how to think about this. [long pause] Person B: Because the rate that the water’s flowing through the pipes is going to provide a force on the [pauses, laughs]. So you have a pressure, you have a velocity, and you have an elevation head, but I don’t [pause]. Everything has to equal, so if you increase your velocity on one side, then that would have a lower pressure, but they’ll be [pause] I think it [pause] yeah, I honestly don’t know. I don’t know where the pressure comes from. I just think of it in terms of Bernoulli’s equation.Frank
) G v + (G − G )E , if v ≥ E . b R a b 1 R 1Although the schematic of Figure 1 is drawn in a fashion such that it is easy to comprehend how (1)and (2) arise from the shown interconnections, it is not obvious how to physically realize the circuitsince some components may not be readily available off-the-shelf, e.g., the nonlinear component ofthe circuit, the Chua’s diode. Moreover, as previously indicated, the implementation of an inductor-gyrator is preferred in lieu of an inductor. We implement the Chua’s diode schematic presentedby Ref. 7 and the inductor-gyrator presented by Ref. 5 as shown in Figure 2. In most literature,the instructions for building a
, the class was divided into two parallel sessions: Session A andSession B. The Session A enrolled 16 American, 16 Israelis, and 32 Indian students, and theSession B enrolled 16 American, 16 Chinese, and 16 Korean students. The class was divided into16 multicultural virtual project teams, each with 7 members (i.e., 2 American, 2 Indian, 1 Israelis,1 Chinese, and 1 Korean students). In terms of participant’s disciplinary backgrounds, they majorin a variety of different engineering disciplines such as mechanical engineering, industrialengineering, civil engineering, electrical engineering, etc. In addition, some participants in theUSC and PKU classes were further recruited from the business school and the liberal art school.Table 1 summarizes
Midwest Sections)Table 1: Background questions asked of participants.. # Questions: H1 I have read the informed consent and certify that I am 18 years old or over and give permission for my survey data to be used for research purposes. o Yes o No H2 Inside Clemson University, which college are you enrolled in? A. College of Agriculture, Forestry, and Life Sciences B. College of Architecture, Arts, and Humanities C. College of Business and Behavioral Sciences D. College of Engineering and Science E. College of Health, Education, and Human Development H3 What class are you in? A. Freshman B. Sophomore C
enteringthe university. The City of Laredo sits on the boarder of Mexico and has a much lower per capitaincome when compared to both the state and national averages. Data from the U.S. CensusBureau 2010 and the 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates shows that theCity of Laredo has the following characteristics: (a) The Hispanic population is 95.41% (b) The per capita income is $15,114 compared to $53,042.0 nationally. (c) The percent of residents living at or below the poverty income level is 29% compare to 14.5% nationally. (d) Over 22.5% of the population has less than a 9th grade education compared to 6.4% nationally. (e) Only 12.8% hold a Bachelor’s degree compared to 17.4% nationally. (f) Only 5
Figure 4(a),which was used to produce various parts and components using a MakerBot 3D printer. Ourlegged robot utilizes the Arduino board with an AtMega328 microcontroller. The Atmega328microcontroller allows the user to add multiple sensors and actuators to the robot. The robot alsohouses a Raspberry Pi, which acquires commands from the user via a network connection andsends serial commands to the on-board Arduino. See Figure 4(b) for the fully assembled leggedrobot. Once the server running on the Raspberry Pi receives the user’s C-code, it commands theArduino via UART serial communication protocol. Upon receiving serial messages relating tothe robot motion, the Arduino board executes the motion sequence to appropriately control theservo
math course that you have completed? Do you have an engineer in your family? When were you exposed to Civil Engineering? The figures below indicate the freshmen student's to the survey. It is clear from the resultsthat a majority of the students surveyed were mainly interested in structural engineering andindicated minimal understanding and/or knowledge of the other sub-fields within the CivilEngineering profession as shown in Figure A. In addition, most students became engineersbecause they liked the sciences or liked to construct things as shown in Figure B. Since manystudents are from first generation college families, they had limited opportunities to meet withother engineers, practitioners, or mentors. This was clearly
and that feedback given to students must beinterpreted by students themselves and internalized before it can impact on students’ learning andfurther study9-11. Guided reflective thinking can often be used to guide students through self-assessment activities. Guided reflective thinking is a systematic way of thinking about one’sactions and responses such that future actions and responses can be improved12. Dewey13 describesa reflective operation as having two essential elements “(a) a state of perplexity, hesitation, doubt;and (b) an act of search or investigation directed toward bringing to light further facts ….”. Otherestablished approaches for promoting reflective thinking include prompting students withquestions and worksheets to identify
2008. Licensed as a professional civil and structural engineer in California and Wash- ington. Seven plus years of industry experience in the field of structural engineering. Approximately 13 years of teaching experience in undergraduate engineering. Page 26.776.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Incorporating the Finite Element Method with Photoelasticity as a Useful Modern Engineering Tool to Enhance Learning of Deformation Concepts Qin Maa, Louie Yawb a, b Edward F. Cross School
; Exposition, Charlotte, NC.3. Morrell, D. (2007). Design of an Introductory MATLAB Course for Freshman Engineering Students. Paper presented at the 2007 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, HI.4. Naraghi, M.H.N. & Litkouhi, B. (2001). An Effective Approach for Teaching Computer Programming to Freshman Engineering Students, Paper presented at the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, New York.5. Solomon, J. (2004). Programming as a Second Language. Learning & Leading with Technology, 32(4), 34-39.6. Tran, L. (2014) Computer Programming Could Soon Be Considered a Foreign Language in One State. Retrieved March 7
electricalcircuit concepts.90 Figure 38070605040302010 0 Page 26.256.5 q6_Y q6-N 5Some sample results to question Q7, the students comments regarding the use of the online tool,mastering engineering, is given in appendix B.Figure 4a and 4b are based on the data showed in the appendix B. Three main elements weregraphed for each homework assignment: the number of homework problems, average time spentfor a problem, and the total time spent for assignment. Figure 4a, is the bar
, inaddition to an improvement in the average FC grade, the range between the minimum andmaximum grade for each exam reduced, highlighting a positive impact on student learning. Inaddition, the grade distribution in Fig. 3 shows that, the number of A/A-/B+ grades increased atthe cost of B/B-/C+, and number of C-/D+ grades increased at the cost of E grades, furtherdemonstrating the profound impact of the FC framework. Table 3: Statistical Analysis of Examination Grades (N=Number of Students) Std. Group N Mean Min Max Dev Traditional: Midterm-01
learning activities within technology education. Theauthor concluded that the highest ranked strategy was the one with product-oriented andlaboratory-based content. The second highest rank was for strategy using technology focus, andthe lowest was for strategy that relied heavily on classroom orientation.Having hands-on laboratory is one condition, but the laboratory practices should be relevant toprepare graduates for their manufacturing career. Miller3 surveyed 25 department heads of USmanufacturing programs and concluded that an exemplary manufacturing program should: a) Require more technical coursework, b) Require or strongly encourage cooperation with industry, c) Maintain closer relationships with industry, d) Has more manufacturing
administrative duty of the instructor. Thus, the evolution of course structure has steadilymoved from lecture intensive with graded homeworks to incrementally broader adoption of thestudent-led example exercises with the final iteration including a flipped classroom. Discussions will focus primarily on the present course structure, with contextualizationsand justifications for activity optimizations based upon experiences in the three prior years.Students receive daily guide to accompany each lecture that includes a) an updated outline of thecourse topics completed and forthcoming, b) a list of suggested homework problems that are notcollected or graded, and c) three to four test your knowledge questions. The test your knowledgequestions from the
participants, 7were male and 4 were female.During the bridge program, students took Pre-Calculus II and Intro to Theology, allowing thosewho completed both courses to enter their first year not only on track, but one course ahead.While Pre-Calculus II was a necessary course offering, due to the fact that students are expectedto be in Calculus I at the start of the engineering program, Introduction to Theology was selectedin order to a) provide a balance in course work for students in the program, b) to give studentsthe opportunity to hone their writing skills, and c) to help students complete one of their requireduniversity core courses.Outside of their two courses, students attended presentations by various student support offices
Paper ID #12186Concepts in roundabout resources: A comparison between academic andpractical text using content analysisLauren Suzanne WallaceFloraliza Bornilla Bornasal, Oregon State University Floraliza B. Bornasal is a doctoral candidate in the School of Civil and Construction Engineering at Oregon State University. Her research explores engineering practice and learning in workplace contexts. She received her bachelor’s degree in civil engineering from Saint Martin’s University and her master’s degree in civil engineering - with a focus in transportation - at Oregon State University. Address: School of Civil and
26.899.6 (a) (b)Figure 1. Total percentage of reported attendance at events based on the convenience level for (a) 2012 and (b) 2013.In total, 1,396 Engineering Explorations were assigned to the sample group (4 events per personin the sample group). Therefore, it’s important to see what categories were most popular amongstudents. In 2012, Category 4 (Career Center Events) had the highest percentage of totalattendance across all 3 study groups. This categorical dependence is shown for the 2012 cohortin Figure 2 below. This is likely in part to the early fall career fairs that were marketed heavilyto the students and had a large time frame for
(n=24 students) and (B) stress relaxation lab (n=28students). Both post-tests scores were significantly higher (p<0.05) than the respective pre-test scores. The errors barsrepresent the 95% confidence interval.6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1245595.7. REFERENCES1. Williams D. The Williams Dictionary of Biomaterials. Liverpool: Liverpool UniversityPress; 1999.2. Polymer Characterization Techniques.247-56.3. Ratner B, Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ, Lemons JE. Biomaterials Science: AMultidisciplinary Endeavor. Biomaterials Science: A Introduction to Materials in Medicine. SanDiego: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004. p. 1-9.4. Moss A. Use of Selected
the simplicity to be built by students over the course offive semesters. The research is designed to test two hypotheses: 1. A long-term design project that integrates knowledge from multiple courses strengthens student knowledge retention. 2. A large-scale design project requiring tools from many courses improves student problem-solving and design skills.By integrating five semesters of the mechanical engineering curriculum into a cohesive whole,this project has the potential to transform the way undergraduate education is delivered. Beforeand after testing is being conducted to assess: a) Change in retention between courses and b)Change in student problem-solving and design skills.The centerpiece of the hybrid powertrain is
. Page 26.1670.8Appendix A: K-12 Outreach instructionsOutreach Activity: Robotics andControl using LEGO MINDSTORMSNXT Activity 1:Objective: Build and program a robot (wheeled car) to drive into a space and exit asquickly as possible without touching the wall.1. Build the basic configuration. (see attached instructions). Connect the motors of the wheels through a cable to the motor ports (A, B, or C)2. Decide which sensor(s) your robot will need to complete the task. A description of each sensor and its function is attached. Connect the sensor through a cable to the sensor ports (1, 2, 3, or 4).3. Get into the “NXT program” on the panel. a. Turn on the panel by pressing the orange button b. Scroll right until you get to
design process will require many iterativesteps requiring applications of higher order skills in the cognitive domain of Bloom’sTaxonomy1, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation, or in revised form of Bloom’staxonomy2, apply, analyze, evaluate, and create. The revised form replaces noun in each skilllevel to the corresponding verb form and exchanges the places of top two levels. Both originaland revised taxonomy are shown in Figure 1. (a) (b) Figure 1 Original (a) and revised (b) Bloom's taxonomy3 A capstone design course, a culminating course designed to showcase students’ ability toapply engineering design process, is a required course in every engineering
presence.Teaching presence is available to the instructor and the students. It is created through the design,facilitation, and direction of cognitive and social processes such that personally meaningful andeducationally worthwhile learning outcomes are realized. See Appendix B for a chart of courseactivities.Ensuring educationally worthwhile outcomes in engineering education requires usingpedagogical methods that are instructional themselves. According to Yigit, Koyun, Yuksel, &Cankaya (2014) 16, “algorithmic thinking abilities of students who enrolled in the Algorithm andProgramming course in blended and traditional education are close” (p. 1). While not specific toengineering curriculum, these thinking abilities emerge in the learning environment and
, safety, and productivity while reducing life-cyclecosts. Module/lecture provides a brief description of lighting systems, characteristics, and retrofitoptions. The module outline, objectives and goals are: 1. Learn and understand of lighting systems & components, their performances and characteristics 2. Understand the importance improving lighting system efficiency and energy usage for residential, commercial and industrial facilities 3. Lighting System Types and Characteristics: a) Lighting System Components; b) Lamp Types, Ballasts; and c) Luminaires/Fixtures 4. Lighting System Needs & Requirements 5. Maintenance, Lighting System Surveys and Monitoring 6. Regulatory Issues, Potential EMOS Identification 7