validate the drones’ performance in GPS-free environments. • Applying real-time navigation algorithms and analyzing flight data to optimize performance. • Manufacturing drone components using Fairfield University’s 3D printing facilities, emphasizing cost efficiency and customization.Figure 2 illustrates key stages of the drone navigation project, including drone assembly, sensorintegration with IMU and optical flow sensors, and outdoor flight testing. These images highlight thehands-on nature of the project and the students’ active involvement throughout the process.Figure 2: (a) Drone assembly process. (b) Sensor integration setup. (c) Outdoor flight testing.This project not only demonstrated the students
Paper ID #47602Implementing a Tool for Structured Roles in Hybrid Collaborative LearningEnvironmentsMr. Chenyan Zhao, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Master of Science student in Computer Science at University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Research interest in Automatic Short Answer Grading using AIMr. Yuxuan Chen, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Yuxuan Chen is a Master of Science student in Computer Science at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. His primary research interests focus on computer science education and artificial intelligence. He is dedicated to enhancing student learning experiences
Instructional Innovations Program (SIIP) for the funding for thisproject.References[1] P. Bambrick-Santoyo, Driven by data 2.0: A practical guide to improve instruction, 2nd ed. Jossey-Bass, 2019.[2] O. Viberg, M. Hatakka, O. B¨alter, and A. Mavroudi, “The current landscape of learning analytics in higher education,” Computers in human behavior, vol. 89, pp. 98–110, 2018.[3] V. Park and A. Datnow, “Ability grouping and differentiated instruction in an era of data-driven decision making,” American Journal of Education, vol. 123, no. 2, pp. 281–306, 2017.[4] L. Sanchez, J. Penarreta, and X. Soria Poma, “Learning management systems for higher education: a brief comparison,” Discover Education, vol. 3, p. 58, 2024.[5] K. Ahmad, W. Iqbal, A. El
Engineering Mathematics Education," [Online]. Available: https://engineering-computer-science.wright.edu/research/the-wright-state-model-for- engineering-mathematics-education. [Accessed May 2021].[10] B. P. Self and J. M. Widmann, "Demo or Hands-on? A Crossover Study on the Most Effective Implementation Strategy for Inquiry-Based Learning Activities," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, 2017.[11] E. P. Douglas and C. C. Chiu, "Implementation of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) in Engineering," Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 3, no. 3, 2013.[12] E. Davishahl, T. Haskell and L. Singleton, "Getting your Hands Dirty in Integral Calculus," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition
Paper ID #47802Improving Employer Engagement in a Manufacturing Professional WorkforceDevelopment ProgramDr. Zhen Zhao, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Zhen Zhao is a Postdoctoral Associate at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. His research interests include developing scalable, collaborative, hands-on engineering curricula, skilling up manufacturing workforces, and growing engineering student competencies in mentorship and leadership.Dr. John Liu, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Dr. John Liu is the Director and Principal Investigator of the MIT Learning Engineering and Practice (LEAP) Group, which
Construction Practice.[9] Shaurette, M. (2010). Faculty internship in demolition management: Advancing and reinforcing construction management education. Paper presented at the Associated Schools of Construction, Proceedings of the 46th Annual Conference.[10] Manion, W. P. (2016). A Faculty Summer Internship Case Study. Paper presented at the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[11] Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. In: Sage.[12] Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
accreditation challenges and ensure educational excellence. It also opens new pathways for fostering global partnerships and shaping policies that promote innovation, quality, and equity in education across borders.. References[1] M. Iqbal Khan, S. M. Mourad, and W. M. Zahid, “Developing and qualifying Civil Engineering Programs for ABET accreditation,” Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 1–11, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jksues.2014.09.001.[2] J. A. Memon, R. E. Demirdöǧen, and B. S. Chowdhry, “Achievements, outcomes and proposal for global accreditation of engineering education in developing countries,” Procedia Soc Behav Sci, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 2557–2561, 2009, doi: 10.1016
, we found that QISE knowledge is perhaps its own form of networking;students indicated that what you know was more important to them than who you know. This caninform future QISE outreach efforts to focus outreach efforts on concentrated learning programs.We hope our insights will lead to scalable programs that can bring QISE to everyone. References[1] R. Peng, B. Dorn, A. Naeemi and N. Jafarinaimi, "Interactive visualizations for teaching quantum mechanics and semiconductor physics," 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings, Madrid, Spain, 2014, pp. 1-4, doi: 10.1109/FIE.2014.7044207.[2] L. Nita, N. Chancellor, L. M. Smith, H. Cramman, and G. Dost
work will utilize statistical techniques to mitigate theeffects of these missing data. Additionally, the surveys will be shortened significantly for ourfuture iterations, as many students reported that the length of the survey caused them to struggleto complete it.Our future work will also include further quantitative and qualitative analysis that goes further indepth on each of the mental health categories included in the survey and comparisons acrossyear, section of the course, instructor, and demographic information.References[1] Y. Ganesan, P. Talwar, N. Fauzan, and Y. B. Oon, “A Study on Stress Level and Coping Strategies among Undergraduate Students,” Journal of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 37–47
Evaluation of Students’ CAD Models,” Educ. Sci., vol. 11, no. 4, Art. no. 4, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.3390/educsci11040145.[13] H. E. Otto and F. Mandorli, “Dormant deficiency: a novel concept to direct cause–effect CAD model analysis,” Res. Eng. Des., Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s00163-023-00423-5.[14] L. W. Anderson, D. R. Krathwohl, and B. S. Bloom, A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives, Complete edition. New York: Longman, 2001.
," Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 186, pp. 604-612, 05/01 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.001.[7] B. N. Geisinger and D. R. Raman, "Why They Leave: Understanding Student Attrition from Engineering Majors," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 29, pp. 914-925, 2013.[8] A. L. Campbell, I. Direito, and M. Mokhithi, "Developing growth mindsets in engineering students: a systematic literature review of interventions," European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 503-527, 2021/07/04 2021, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2021.1903835.[9] J. Xu and W. Xu, "Hot topics and frontier evolution of growth-mindset research: a bibliometric analysis using CiteSpace %U
students in learning activities?,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 5034–5038, Jan. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.816.[8] E. Alpay and S. Gulati, “Student-led podcasting for engineering education,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 415–427, Aug. 2010, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2010.487557.[9] T. Lucas, B. Kotla, and L. Bosman, “Creating a Nature-Inspired Entrepreneurially Minded Manufacturing Podcast to Bolster Technical Communication Skills,” presented at the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2023. Accessed: Dec. 21, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/creating-a-nature-inspired-entrepreneurially-minded- manufacturing-podcast-to-bolster-technical
refine our iterative research design to better support studentlearning outcomes. This work aligns with the NSF's focus on improving the quality ofundergraduate education and preparing students to meet the complex demands of the engineeringprofession with both technical expertise and ethical insight.AcknowledgementsThe author would like to acknowledge the anonymous reviewers and ASEE session chair fortheir time and input into this paper. This work is supported by National Science FoundationGrant #2314334. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] D. A. Martin, E. Conlon, and B. Bowe, “A Multi
deeper insight into how assessmentformats shape learning experiences. Accordingly, these findings contribute to ongoing efforts todesign assessments that not only evaluate knowledge but also foster problem-solving andteamwork skills essential for engineering practice.References[1] B. Gilley and B. Clarkston, “Research and Teaching: Collaborative testing: evidence oflearning in a controlled In-Class study of undergraduate students,” Journal of College ScienceTeaching, vol. 043, no. 03, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.2505/4/jcst14_043_03_83.[2] P. G. Zimbardo, L. D. Butler, and V. A. Wolfe, “Cooperative college examinations: moregain, less pain when students share information and grades,” The Journal of ExperimentalEducation, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 101–125, Jan
survey of the research,” in 2013 ASEE annual conference & exposition, 2013, pp. 23–1200. Accessed: Jan. 02, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://aktuelt.osloskolen.no/SysSiteAssets/laringsteknologi/dokumenter/the-flipped- classroom-a-survey-of-the-research.pdf[3] B. Kerr, “The flipped classroom in engineering education: A survey of the research,” in 2015 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), Sep. 2015, pp. 815– 818. doi: 10.1109/ICL.2015.7318133.[4] C. K. Lo and K. F. Hew, “The impact of flipped classrooms on student achievement in engineering education: A meta-analysis of 10 years of research,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 108, no. 4, pp. 523–546, 2019, doi: 10.1002/jee.20293
of a Middle School Engineering-Education Program,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, American Society for Engineering Education, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://asu.elsevierpure.com/en/publications/learning-through- engineering-design-and-practice-implementation-a-2 [4] M. K. Daugherty and V. Carter, “The Nature of Interdisciplinary STEM Education,” in Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series, Springer Science and Business Media B.V., 2017, pp. 1–13. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-38889-2_12-1. [5] S. Foroudastan and B. Prater Thompson, “Experimental Vehicles Program Research and Innovation Prepares Students for Challenges of
participants exhibited gains in their skills along with enthusiasm and motivation toundertake further global engagement. To a practitioner in the field of global engineeringeducation, this is exciting. However, gateway course students are a subset of a significantlylarger population of global experience alumni (at the Pennsylvania State University’s College ofEngineering and across peer engineering colleges). Thus, a question remains: How can theenthusiasm of global experience participants be harnessed into scalable, sustained momentum toforge global leaders?References[1] M. E. Mendenhall, B. S. Reiche, A. Bird, and J. S. Osland, “Defining the 'Global' in GlobalLeadership,” Journal of World Business, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 493-503, 2012.[2] N. A
Learning: A Sourcebook for Higher Education. National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment, University Park, Pa., 1992.[20] Sebastian Deterding, Dan Dixon, Rilla Khaled, and Lennart Nacke. From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification”. In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, MindTrek ’11, page 9–15, New York, NY, USA, 2011. Association for Computing Machinery.[21] Beth Hurst, Randall Wallace, and Sarah B. Nixon. The impact of social interaction on student learning. Reading Horizons, 52(4):375–398, 2013. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol52/iss4/5 (Accessed August 2018).[22] Kamaruzaman
(MoMoTech). Heidelberg: Springer.[15] van Tuijl, C., & van der Molen, J. H. W. (2016), Study choice and career development inSTEM fields: An overview and integration of the research. International Journal of Technologyand Design Education, 26(2), 159–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9308-1[16] Krüger, H. (1992), Vorberufliche Sozialisation. German Journal of Research in HumanResource Management, 318-341.[17] Ivemark, B., & Ambrose, A. (2021), Habitus Adaptation and First-Generation UniversityStudents’ Adjustment to Higher Education: A Life Course Perspective. Sociology of Education.https://doi.org/10.1177/00380407211017060[18] Papadakis, S., Vaiopoulou, J., Sifaki, E., Kalogiannakis, M., & Stamovlasis, D. (2021).Attitudes towards
. DOI:10.1177/03064190231169129.[22] V. Souitaris, S. Zerbinati and A. Al-Laham, "Do entrepreneurship programmes raiseentrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspirationand resources," Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 22, pp. 566–591, 2007.[23] J. Mattioli and B. Braunschweig, "AITA: AI trustworthiness assessment," AI Magazine, vol.44, (2), pp. 202, 2023. DOI: 10.1002/aaai.12096.[24] G. Verhulsdonck et al, "Incorporating Human Judgment in AI-Assisted ContentDevelopment: The HEAT Heuristic," Tech. Comm., vol. 71, (3), pp. 60, 2024. . DOI:10.55177/tc286621.[25] M. Flaherty. (Sep. 12). Q. What does OneSearch search?. Available:https://libanswers.quinnipiac.edu/abl/faq/411035.[26] Y. Engeström
Paper ID #49524Implementing an Interdisciplinary Senior Design Approach Within a TraditionalDepartmental FrameworkDr. Michelle H. Rosen, The Cooper Union Dr. Michelle H. Rosen is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at The Cooper Union, where she joined the faculty in 2021. Her research focuses on the mechanical design of bio-inspired robotics as well as hands-on engineering education. Dr. Rosen earned her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Harvard University in 2018. After her Ph.D., she served as a Lecturer at Harvard where she taught both introductory and senior design courses. Dr. Rosen is dedicated to
Education, 111(4), 770–791. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20474 Murzi, H. G., Chowdhury, T. M., Karlovšek, J., & Ulloa, B. C. R. (2020). Working in Large Teams: Measuring the Impact of a Teamwork Model to Facilitate Teamwork Development in Engineering Students Working in a Real Project. International Journal of Engineering Education, 1(B), 274–295. https://www.ijee.ie/1atestissues/Vol36-1B/02_ijee3872.pdf Rodríguez-Simmonds, H. E., Godwin, A., Langus, T., Pearson, N., & Kirn, A. (2023). Building Inclusion in Engineering Teaming Practices. Studies in Engineering Education, 3(2), 31–59. https://doi.org/10.21061/see.84 Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2021
/TSSJ.V17I1.2752.[9] B. G. Glaser and A. L. Strauss, “Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research,” Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, pp. 1–271, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.4324/9780203793206.Appendix 1WPI IRB Approval and ExemptionAppendix 2Copilot Prompts and ResponsesTeam 3 Team PerspectivesPrompt 1: Analyze the emerging themes for the 6 decolonization questions and present your analysis withclear summary of how themes emerged for each question I upload 3 set of these question and theiranswers.Thank you for sharing the questions and answers. I'll analyze the emerging themes for each question andprovide a clear summary.1. Who is driving this process?Emerging Themes: • Responsibility and
development of a systematic approach for the integration of generative AI tools in thecourse development process. This study focuses on the effect of generative AI tools on theefficiency of course development projects and their subsequent student learning outcomes.Specifically, the research aims to answer the following questions: 1. How does the use of generative AI affect the efficiency of the course development process and the quality of the content produced? a. What are the perceptions of the subject matter expert regarding the use of generative AI tools in course development? b. What are the perceptions of the instructional designer regarding the use of generative AI tools in course development
necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation.References[1] G. Miller, H.M. Jerónimo, Q. Zhu, Editors’ Introduction to Thinking through Science andTechnology: Philosophy, Religion, and Politics in an Engineered World, edited by Miller,Jerónimo, and Zhu, 1–10. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2023.[2] C.E. Harris, S. Pritchard, J. Ray, E.E. Eanglehardt, M.J. Rabins, Engineering Ethics – Conceptsand Cases, Sixth Edition, Cengage, Boston, MA, USA, 2019.[3] S.J. Bird, A. Briggle, “Research Ethics.” Ethics, Science, Technology, and Engineering: AGlobal Resource, edited by J. B. Holbrook, 2nd ed., vol. 3, Macmillan Reference USA, 2015, pp.584-592.[4] D.H. Guston, T. Kowall, “Research Integrity.” Ethics, Science, Technology, and
. Wireless Pers Commun 108, 363–388 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06407-w[4] L. C. B. C. Ferreira, O. C. Branquinho, P. R. Chaves, P. Cardieri, F. Fruett and M. D. Yacoub, "A PBL-Based Methodology for IoT Teaching," in IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 20-26, November 2019, doi: 10.1109/MCOM.001.1900242.[5] Gemini Developer API. [online]. Available at: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs. (Accessed: January 9, 2025).[6] C. Grabowski, M. Rush, K. Ragen, V. Fayard, and Karen Watkins-Lewis, “Today’s Non- Traditional Student: Challenges to Academic Success and Degree Completion,” Inquiries Journal, Vol. 8, No. 03, pp. 1-2, 2016. [7] K. Habib, E. Kai, M. Saad, A. Hussain, A. Ayob and A. Ahmad, “Internet
menagerie of media to solve problems and deliver creative, unexpected, solutions that are rich in play and story. Kent also celebrates teaching in the Design Department at the University of Kansas, as well as working with the Lawrence Arts Center, VanGo, Percolator and other fine organizations. Smitty loves super-heroes, ninjas, monkeys, UFOs, cryptids, robots, ray-guns, and romance. He is always up for creative adventures and hopes you will come visit Smittytown whenever you need a fantastic escape, ridiculous adventure, and fun solutions for your creative needs. Smittytown.com instagram.com/smittytownart/ facebook.com/KentSmithIllustration/Prof. Mark B Shiflett P.E., The University of Kansas Mark B. Shiflett is a
https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-of Team Member Effectiveness (CATME) assessment tool for engineering students. accrediting-engineering-programs-2019-2020/Starting in 2003 Matthew Ohland led a team from multiple universities whodesigned CATME. A Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale (BARS) of five factors fit the Beigpourian, B., Ferguson, D. M., Berry, F. C., Ohland, M. W., & Wei, S. (2019). Usingdata best. The five behaviors are
interest and support for the innovation project,3. Motivation of project members to innovate,4. Wide promotion of innovation success stories, and5. Image Construction of being and becoming “innovative” Figure 1: TTA Full story told in six academically referred papers (Aliedeh, M. A., 2015 a, b, c, 2016, 2017, 2018 a)Narration of TTA Full Story: From Conceptualization to Integration In the last ten years, TTA solution passed the critical point by passing four important stagesstarting by conceptualization, publishing its newly developed frameworks, processes, tools andproducts in a six academically peer-refereed papers, as visually illustrated in Figure 2. These sixpapers cover nearly all
necessity of shifting from deficit toassets-based approaches to engaging communities of color and to push researchers, practitioners,and policymakers to expand beyond practices that broadly position Whiteness, maleness, andcapitalism as the norm. For example, (a) Critical Race Theory [14], which explores theintersections of race, power, and privilege in engineering education; (b) Culturally Sustainingand Revitalizing Pedagogies for integrating cultural identities and linguistic practices in fosteringinclusive educational environments [15]; Culturally responsive pedagogy [16,17]; or Reciprocity[18] which emphasizes mutual engagement and respect between institutions and communitiesthey engage with to name a few. However, as we went about this work