implementation and instructional practice, as defined byNational Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS), in support of quality classroomindicators for the promotion of student learning. Randomly selected middle school and highschool technology, engineering, and design educators in five states (IL, KY, OH, NC, and VA)served as participants by: 1) completing the T2I2 online professional development materials, 2)submitting artifacts/evidences of practice, 3) administering a student STEM pre-assessment, 4)implementing a single consistent unit of instruction, 5) administering a student STEM post-assessment. Pilot Year 1 (2012-2013 academic year) teacher outcome data, as measured byNBPTS criterion referenced metrics, is analyzed and reported in
instrument.Data CollectionFigure 1 shows what type of data has been collected over four semesters. Student participantstook two computer modules: a learning styles module and a motivation module. The Self-Directed Learning Readiness Survey (SDLRS)1 was taken pre and post as a measure of theimpact of the modules. In the first semester of data collection—Spring 2012—many participantsfailed to complete both the pre and post SDLRS. Thus, for subsequent semesters, participantshave been randomly assigned to take the SDLRS either before or after taking the modules. Fall 2012, Spring 2013, Fall 2013 Spring 2012 Figure 1: Data collection scheme in 2nd year manufacturing class and 3rd year design processes
among others. Members are interested andinvolved with the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL). RLC meetings are held on amonthly basis where topics of interest and discussions regarding ongoing research projectsoccur.The topic of ebooks evolved during meetings of the RLC. For the purpose of this studyterminology clarification of an ebook is “An electronic book (variations: e-book, eBook, e-Book,ebook, digital book, or even e-edition) is a book-length publication in digital form, consisting oftext, images, or both, readable on computers or other electronic devices” [1]. As part of thisstudy, various textbook options were explored that were available and student book buyingpatterns were studied. Ebooks emerged as a relatively new aspect
rarely100% original. Due to the need to refer to previous research results to provide a context forcurrent research,1 academic writing is often inherently intertextual in nature.2 While theboundary line between appropriate source text use and plagiarism may be vague for somestudents,3 the consequences for crossing that line, even inadvertently, are not. Students andresearchers accused of plagiarism can suffer serious consequences.In 2006, 55 theses and dissertations at Ohio University’s Russ College of Engineering andTechnology were investigated due to allegations of plagiarism, with at least one student havinghis degree revoked.4,5 In 2007, a number of papers previously submitted by internationalphysicists to the arXiv preprint server were found
Table 1, Strife et al6, (2013) illustrated the type of outcomes that could be accomplished withALA/ACRL/STS Standards.Table 1. Outcomes that can be accomplished with ALA/ACRL/STS standards.ALA/ACRL/STS Standard OutcomeStandard 1. The information literate student Distinguishes different types of information.determines the nature and extent of theinformation needed.Standard 2. The information literate student Completes exercises using differentaccesses needed information effectively and information types: books, technical reports,efficiently articles and handbooks. Learns how to cite in MLA format
community. However, theirdamaging effects on human lives tend to be the highest in developing countries, while shockingeconomic losses have repeatedly been seen in developed countries 1. It has been shown by recentearthquake devastations that the loss of lives and destructions can only be effectively reducedthrough national awareness, preparedness, and planned response action programs.Approximately 90 percent of earthquake fatalities occur in developing countries 2, where mostearthquake deaths are due to a lack of awareness and preparedness, poor engineering design andconstruction practices and corruption in the construction sector 3. Thus, the Lebanese engineeringcommunity must be properly and adequately educated and aware of the involved seismic
supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1220305. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Page 24.1188.2Science Foundation.IntroductionWith the new Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) [1], elementary teachers are called forthe first time to teach engineering to their students. For the teachers themselves, as well as thoseworking to provide curriculum and professional development to elementary school teachers inengineering, this is both an opportunity and a challenge. Adoption of engineering curricula
plan &summary and both student and faculty experiences when the balance of theory, simulation andprojects was implemented in the course. Valuable information from students’ survey will bepresented and analyzed. According to the students’ survey in our three classes, the majority ofstudents strongly agreed with that the teaching approach “the balance of theory, simulation andproject” was the best one for teaching the course “Design of Machine Elements”.1. IntroductionThe trend in engineering education is swinging from an emphasis on theory to a balance betweentheory and applied design activities [1-4]. There are certainly some gaps or differences betweenthe academic settings and the industrial settings for mechanical engineering programs
, and 14,550square feet of open study space to establish CARE. The space includes 14 group study rooms, 2instructional classrooms, 2 storage rooms, and 1 office utilized by the CARE ProgramCoordinator -- who is funded by the COE. CARE was initially funded by a combination ofLibrary Student/IT Fee money, COE Student Fee funds, and COE foundation moneys. Thesefunds were used for high-end engineering workstation equipment, projection equipment,furniture, digital signage, glass and whiteboard equipment, collaboration furniture, andcomputing equipment.The total seating capacity for the CARE area in the Grainger Library is 472 with an additional154 seats available for overflow. CARE provides academic learning support that primarilytargets the needs
popular “agile” models for which it isn’t obvious how or where best to attemptsolution of the compliance problem. The problem is important regardless of particularsoftware development model context. It is important to software developers becauselengthy software development times, large software development costs, poor softwarequality and high liability risks are very likely if it isn’t well solved. It is important to theend users because this kind of software if properly implemented can greatly reducecompliance and compliance enforcement costs.Compliance software development problem definitionTable 1 below is evidence of the considerable current interest in “compliance” generally.The Google data reveals little about the specific reasons for that
technologies. We do so by 1) explaining what is differentabout emerging technologies when compared to existing technologies and why ethics isnecessary, 2) examining the functions and characteristics of law, regulation, and professionalcodes in engineering education and in providing guidance for practitioners, 3) arguing that law,regulation, and codes are not enough to guide practice, that this is especially true for emergingtechnologies, and thus engineering education must go beyond law, regulation, and codes andfocus on developing skills of ethical analysis and judgment, and nurturing ethical sensitivity,creativity, and wisdom. We conclude with 4) a description of our work in developing twomodular courses that include societal, ethical, environmental
betweenleadership and management, understand and develop ethical principles of entrepreneurialleadership, and recognize various entrepreneurial strategies and apply them as appropriate.MethodsThis course provides an analytical framework to improve understanding of individual and sharedownership models in entrepreneurial organizations, and the way alternative ownership decisionsaffect organizational dynamics. It also looks at the mechanisms that entrepreneurs can use tocreate specific ownership structures and organizational cultures.This course is a half-semester long (7 weeks) covering: 1. Introductions a. Present current state of equity for your project b. Introduction to the pluses and minuses of equity dilution for founders c
present a set of five design problems constructed using the DPF, with three differentversions of each problem statement: (1) a neutrally framed version; (2) an adaptively framedversion; and (3) an innovatively framed version. Three examples of student-generated solutionsare also discussed to illustrate the resulting outcomes. We propose this framework as a guide forthe development of design problem statements for use in education, research, and the workplace.Introduction and BackgroundWhat is the primary problem solved by this framework?The way a problem is structured and perceived by designers impacts the resulting outcomes,whether the context is education, research, or the workplace. In the workplace, the presentationof a problem supports
manufacturing ofwheeled vehicles. Manufacturing, automation and robotics have long been critical components ofa competitive automobile industry and Lawrence Tech has educated engineers in support of theseareas since the school’s creation. Over the years Lawrence Tech has supported manufacturingand automation systems development at Ford Motor Company, Chrysler Corporation, and “thefactory of the future” at General Motors.In the late 1990s various Lawrence Tech faculty members began significant work in robotics,automation, unmanned vehicles and mechatronics. Much of these efforts were in collaborationwith industry partners. In 2000 Dr. C.J. Ching began the Robofest® competition for middleschool and high school students.1 Robofest® is a robotics
to capture the intricacies of aerospace vehicle design. The resulting objectivesdefine that the rubric should be able to: 1. Evaluate how students account for stakeholder considerations during the design process as represented within their design project deliverables; 2. Compare and contrast how students integrate stakeholder considerations within design decisions at different stages of the design process as represented within their design project deliverables; 3. Articulate observable outcomes in a manner that encourages students to apply and document good design processes; and 4. Be flexible, such that it can be easily applied to the conceptual design process of a variety of design projects.To
realistic constraintsas economic, environmental, social, political, health and safety, manufacturability, andsustainability” and “an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility”1. In the UnitedStates, engineering ethics education has primarily relied on three “ethical resources”: codes ofethics, ethical case studies, and ethical theories.2 Teaching “abstract” codes of ethics and ethicaltheories is necessary but not sufficient for improving students’ abilities to incorporate ethicalconsiderations in engineering practice, as engineering practice often involves a variety of“particular” and situational moral judgments. A problem with current case pedagogy is that it is
university education. Perhaps this is most clearly evident in the type ofengineers certain companies employ and perhaps the statistics on employment may show a biastowards employing graduates from particular institutions in specific industry sectors. Educators have reported on the benefits of experiential, hands-on, student-directed learning[1-4] and the effects of design courses in engineering [5]. Engineering educators have used field Page 24.1198.2trips, laboratory investigations, and interdisciplinary activities that enrich and extend thecurriculum [6, 7]. Such designing of authentic experiences into courses and curricula are
. It will be particularly important to examine whetherthere is a correlation between effective or successful design and development of products and theorientation of the program and student.AcknowledgementsThis work was made possible by a grant from the National Science Foundation (DUE-112374). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., & Saleem, J. J. (2007). Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4), 359 -379.[2] Bennett
institutionsinterrelationships.Castellani and Rajaram (2012), in their work on modeling complex social systems, have arguedfor the use of clustering techniques like k-means at different time points to produce comparableTable 1: Description and Summary Statistics of Profile VariablesVariable Name Description 1993 Mean 1993 SD 2004 Mean 2004 SD Institutional Faculty DemographicsFull time faculty Average number of full-time 401 559 434 602 faculty membersPart time faculty Average number of part- 241 316 289 377 time faculty Institutional Student
critical of their instructors than thosewho left.The findings for co-op in this study not only lend support to those who have long asserted thatquality co-ops can enhance undergraduate retention but also demonstrate co-op’s enduringenhancement of students’ work self-efficacy.IntroductionThis study is part of a larger research project, supported by a National Science FoundationResearch on Gender in Science and Engineering program grant # 0827490, designed todetermine the effect of self-efficacy and other factors on retention, especially of women inundergraduate engineering programs. These data represent the pre-survey of the studycompleted in the 2009-2010 academic year (referred to as Time 1), a post-survey follow-up inthe 2010-2011 academic year
with the earlier studies and recommends strategies for using feedback mechanism toimprove students’ learning in designing and simulation-based IT training. I. IntroductionThe Internet, with its distributive architecture, has provided the power to combine a series ofdiscrete, unlinked, and unmeasured activities into an enterprise-wide process of continuouslearning that directly links business goals and individual outcomes.1 Our economic, social, andtechnological forces today are pushing all of us to become more productive in every walk of life,and learning is no exception. One of the learning tools that have become more prevalent in thefield of instructional technology is simulation. The focus of this paper is to understand
increasing density of the dots in the diagrams.The dots represent the dissolved sugar molecules. The undissolved salt in beaker B is shown as adarkened area at the bottom of the beaker.)In the questions below, please circle the correct answer and then give an explanation. 1. Solution A is (saturated, unsaturated, supersaturated). PLEASE EXPLAIN! 2. Solution B is (saturated, unsaturated, supersaturated). PLEASE EXPLAIN! 3. Solution C is (saturated, unsaturated, supersaturated). PLEASE EXPLAIN!Solution A is the supersaturated solution for it has the greatest concentration of salt and noprecipitate has formed. Solution B has a lower concentration of salt compared to Solution A anda higher concentration of salt compared to
student. As theinstructor has likely studied the subject in-depth and taught it many times it can be difficult forthem to recall what was confusing to them when they learned it the first time, while the studentsin the course can be keenly aware of where confusion is arising. Peer tutoring is a practicewhich takes advantage of this to improve student learning by having students learn from otherstudents. It is important to note that peer tutoring can be accomplished in a variety of ways andTopping1 identifies ten dimensions which can be varied depending on the specificimplementation used: 1. curriculum content covered by peer tutors 2. number of tutors and tutees 3. tutor and tutee year(s) of study – tutors could be from same year of study or
investigate. Page 24.1206.2 1 Literature ReviewEngineering education has been in the spotlight for many years, leading to calls for reform, andthese calls have come from numerous panels, commissions and agencies like the AmericanAccreditation Board for Engineering10. So it is not a coincidence that engineering educators aretaking many steps to develop more effective instructional methods that facilitate better learningamong engineering students. The development of new teaching methods however, is not anovelty as there is countless research literature in general
be used forindividual, group, or full-class learning experiences. If the students come well-prepared and theexercises are well-designed, then it is hoped that students will leave the face-to-face time with adeeper understanding of the core concepts, one which they have worked to develop through theirown efforts with the support of their peers and the instructor.The inverted classroom approach has a basis in three well-known principles of the science oflearning: (a) Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development 1, (b) Bloom’s Taxonomy of Learning 2,and (c) “How the Brain Learns” and the retention of core material 3. Lev Vygotsky introducedthe concept of a zone of proximal development (ZPD) to describe the intermediary state betweenthe things a
CoursesIntroductionInstructors of university engineering classes often teach with Microsoft PowerPoint or otherslide presentation software. Slide-oriented teaching permits pictures, videos and othersupporting materials to be shown to the class that would not be possible in a traditionalchalkboard-oriented lecture. Yet, criticisms of slide-based teaching are well-documented [1].In recent years, a number of non-traditional slide presentation approaches have beendeveloped. The effectiveness of these approaches have not been much studied. This paperfocuses specifically on “interactive” slide presentations, which are characterized by theinstructor’s use of a stylus and a tablet computer (e.g. iPad, tablet PC or other device) toannotate and draw on slides during the lecture
of equivalent male-only programs prompted additionalresearch comparing 1) changes in students’ attitudes toward STEM, 2) increases in studentlearning and content knowledge, 3) classroom climate and students' interactions in theclassroom, and 4) students’ perceptions of engineers using the Draw an Engineer Test.Results showed significant increases in students’ content knowledge in all programs from thebeginning to the end of the programs. And although marked differences were found among thedifferent gender grouped programs in terms of classroom climate and student interactions in theclassroom, there were no significant differences between the males and females nor where thereany differences between single-gender and mixed gender programs in
processes. Almost every factor has been analyzed such asstudents, parents, and socio-economic conditions, as well as school curriculum and standardizedtesting. But very little attention has been given to factors affecting the quality of instructionprovided in the classroom. We have examined and revamped curriculums, standardized testing,and methods of teaching; but there has been very little mention of the teachers themselves. Yetteachers are the ones who are with the students for most of their learning years, which amountsto approximately 15,000 hours of schooling [1]. It is important to realize that teachers do matter,but what is ironic, is that there is no reliable or objective way of identifying excellent teachers [2].There are different types
three core objectives: (1) provideengineering research experiences and enhance understanding of the nature of engineering; (2)scaffold teacher development of inquiry-based engineering classroom activities; and (3) improveteacher (and indirectly their students) knowledge about careers in engineering.The E3 program is designed to bring high school science and mathematics teachers to the TexasA&M University campus for a four-week summer residential experience where the teachers arementored by engineering faculty. During the program, teachers are involved in: (1) hands-onparticipation with current engineering research, (2) activities to broaden their awareness ofengineering career opportunities for their students, and (3) development of an