very welcome to manystudents); allowing more time for probing concepts more deeply (e.g., think-pair-share exercises,5 One student reported avoiding the videos entirely (though still had >1 hit on the page), using the book instead, butperformed above average nonetheless, despite being “unhappy” about the course delivery method.open Q&A sessions about concepts); and responding to student requests for (re-)coverage ofspecific material. In short, there is ample room for experimentation with active learningstrategies as well as more traditional worked-problem lectures.Although they were in this execution of this course, it is not necessarily recommended tocompletely silo the theory videos from the example videos. While students watched the
would like to gratefully acknowledge the Ohio Space Grant Consortium for partiallyfunding this work through the Curriculum Innovation grant program.References[1] Fromm, E. (2003), The Changing Engineering Educational Paradigm. Journal of EngineeringEducation, 92: 113-121. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2003.tb00749.x[2] Sala, A. L. (2013, June), Infusing Mechatronics and Robotics Concepts in EngineeringCurriculum Paper presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia.https://peer.asee.org/19765[3] Cherng, J. G., & Li, B. Q., & Natarajan, N. (2013, June), Development of a SeniorMechatronics Course for Mechanical Engineering Student Paper presented at 2013 ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia. https
:23, pp. 2914-2921, 2003.[39] G. B. Lesinski, S. Sharma, K. A. Varker, P. Sinha, M. Ferrari, and W. E. Carson, “Release of Biologically Functional Interferon-Alpha from a Nanochannel Delivery System,” Biomedical Microdevices, 7:1, 71-79, 2005. doi: 10.1007/s10544-005-6174-8[40] M. Wang, and S. Chen, “On Applicability of Poisson-Boltzmann Equation for Micro- and Nanoscale Electro-osmotic Flows,” Communications In Computational Physics, 3:5, pp. 1087-1099, 2008.[41] M. P. Sinha, and J. Houseman, “Miniature Mass Spectrometer for Chemical Sensing in Homeland Defense Applications,” Proceedings of SPIE, 5048:119, pp. 119-127, 2003.[42] M. Q. Patton, “Qualitative evaluation and research methods” (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA
.[20] Y. Kafai, D. Fields, and K. Searle, "Electronic textiles as disruptive designs: Supporting and challenging maker activities in schools," Harvard Educational Review, vol. 84, pp. 532-556, 2014.[21] D. Bertaux, Ed., Biography and Society: The Life History Approach in the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1981, p.^pp. Pages.[22] A. Schutz, Phenomenology of the Social World. Chicago: Northwestern University Press, 1967.[23] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative evaluation methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1989.[24] D. Schuman, Policy analysis, education, and everyday life. Lexington, MA: Heath, 1982.
novice software designers. J Res Comput Educ. 2001;33(3):235 – 250.20. Scott JB. The Practice of Usability: Teaching User Engagement Through Service-Learning. Tech Commun Q. 2008;17(4):381–412. doi:10.1080/10572250802324929.21. Mohedas I, Daly SR, Sienko KH. Requirements development: approaches and behaviors of novice designers. J Mech Des. 2015.22. Mohedas I, Daly SR, Sienko KH. Design Ethnography in Capstone Design: Investigating Student Use and Perceptions. Int J Eng Educ. 2014;30(4):888–900.23. Creswell JW. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2013.24. Mohedas I, Daly SR, Sienko KH. Gathering and Synthesizing Information During
. Res. Math. Educ. 27, 215–240 (1996). 31. Li, Q. Beliefs and Gender Differences: A New Model for Research in Mathematics Education.Interchange 35, 423–445 (2004). 32. Smith, D., Bourne, P. & McCoy, L. Girls and schooling: their own critique. Resour. Fem. Res. 26,55–68 (1998). 33. Shapka, J. D. Trajectories of math achievement and perceived math competence over high schooland postsecondary education: effects of an all-girl curriculum in high school. Educ. Res. Eval. 15, 527–541 (2009). 34. Eccles, J. S. et al. Self-Concepts, Domain Values, and Self-Esteem: Relations and changes at earlyadolescence. J. Pers. 57, 283–310 (1989). 35. Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R. & Watt
Stone. Haptic feedback: A brief history from telepresence to virtual reality. In Haptic Human-Computer Interaction, pages 1–16. Springer, 2001.[21] OAJ Van der Meijden and MP Schijven. The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review. Surgical endoscopy, 23(6):1180–1190, 2009.[22] Richard Q Van der Linde, Piet Lammertse, Erwin Frederiksen, and B Ruiter. The hapticmaster, a new high-performance haptic interface. In Proc. Eurohaptics, pages 1–5, 2002.[23] N. Hungr, B. Roger, A.J. Hodgson, and C. Plaskos. Dynamic physical constraints: Emulating hard surfaces with high realism. Haptics, IEEE Transactions on, 5(1):48–57, Jan 2012.[24] R.Q. van
) Npromoted the concept with his use pof phasors to perform alternating N ⇔ p Log(N)current analysis. While near the 1/q 1beginning of the 20th century, N ⇔ Log(N) qEdison was immorally vilifyingalternating current as dangerous,ultimately economics dictated thatthe national standard of electrical power distribution would be alternating current which ofcourse was found to be not unreasonably unsafe.The study of Euler’s i will be continued in the remainder of this paper by examining
}. The DATA0 state (D0 = 1, D1 = 0) corresponds to a Boolean logic 0, the DATA1 state(D0 = 0, D1 = 1) corresponds to a Boolean logic 1, and the NULL state (D0 = 0, D1 = 0)corresponds to the empty set meaning that the value of D is not yet available. The two rails aremutually exclusive, such that both rails can never be asserted simultaneously; this state is definedas an illegal state. A quad-rail signal, Q, consists of four wires, Q0, Q1, Q2, and Q3, which mayassume any value from the set {DATA0, DATA1, DATA2, DATA3, NULL}. The DATA0 state Page 12.911.4(Q0 = 1, Q1 = 0, Q2 = 0, Q3 = 0) corresponds to two Boolean logic signals, X and Y, where
• PowerBoard™ for PowerPointTM slides • Electronic hand raising, feedback and Q&As • Viewable class lists • Instructor-led floor control • View student screens • Breakout groups • Participation meters • Multimedia courseware with third-party authoring support • Group text chatLearnLinc™ is used for real-time instruction and interaction with the students. This is combined Page 12.579.5with use of the eCollege™ for submission of homework. Assessments in the form of quizzes 3and exams may be conducted either through iLinc or through eCollege
SimaPro 7, version 7.0, Pre Consultants, 2006.7 , Accessed January 17, 2007.8 Patton, M. Q. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2002. Page 12.263.13AppendixCourse Learning Objectives:Having successfully completed this course, the student will be able to: 1. Identify the 4 phases of the life cycle of a product, process, or system 2. Understand the critical role of materials selection in the design 3. Understand the origin and meaning of data used to quantify environmental impact 4. Describe why Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) is a critical skill for engineers in terms of technical, economical, societal
. “Theredoes not exist x in Q such that x2 = 2” is an example of theorem that, if one encounters whilereading and using SRG, should be written in this block.Proof Analysis Proof is a way of communicating a mathematical truth to others. It is a convincingargument in mathematical registers. While reading a proof, it is important to note some of thedetails that were omitted by the author, for some authors either assume that the omitted detailsare obvious or comprehensive to the reader. So doing proof analysis allows the reader to retracethe logics that were put into writing the condense version of the proof. It also brings thetechniques the author used to prove a particular proof to come to the surface, hence making theproof more understandable. In
asked to give personal information aboutyourself or your employee who is a TMP graduate. However, as this is a very short survey, wegreatly encourage you to provide us with any additional information you see fit in Q. # 10. 1. Were you aware of this person obtaining an interdisciplinary, graduate-level certificate in Transportation Management and Policy, in addition to their degree, prior to offering this person a position? (if yes, please answer Q2, otherwise please skip to Q3) Yes, No 2. If you answered “yes” to the previous question, was this a factor in extending this person an offer of employment? Yes, No 3. How would you rate this person’s understanding of transportation policy issues compared to others
, compile data and perform analyses related to the value of agiven technology-based business opportunity as specified by their project sponsor. In additionthey write four formal assessments of current vs. best practice with recommendations, prepareand discuss a mid-term interim findings report, and at end of term deliver a comprehensive reportalong with an extensive presentation with Q&A. The writing professor on our team will consultwith these students as they work on their written reports.Conclusions and ContributionsIt is important for engineers to be able to practice in a global environment. More and moreengineers are going to be involved with companies in other countries. ABET recognizes this isimportant. One of its mandated program
Te Q ar om B on so t Le en ss er C sm rp Le er te th es In O ss AFigure 7. Longitudinal survey results (ETW 1999-2006) regarding how often the skills taught inExCEEd are used.The survey also asked a number of questions about the value of the ETW with
Systems Research, and School of Interdisciplinary Studies andExtended Education. The authors appreciate the valuable research assistance of Jennifer Hayesand Dustin Chaffin. The authors are also grateful for the helpful comments of four anonymousreviewers.References1 http://www.distancelearningnet.com/reports/11/12 http://www.tntech.edu/classsched/07s/webcourse.html3 Hollenbeck, C. R., Zinkhan, G. M., & French, W. (2005, Summer). Distance learning trends and benchmarks: Lessons from an online MBA program. Marketing Education Review, 15(2), 39-52.4 Minh Q., H., Umesh, U. N., & Valacich, J. S. (2003). E-Learning as an emerging entrepreneurial enterprise in universities and firms. Communications of the Association for
and a Q/A session with camp staff and Department faculty, parents metwith counselors from Admission and a local high school. The meeting’s objective was tointroduce the parents to the plan(s) of study that would best prepare their child for successfulstudies in the STEM disciplines at a major research university. The Associate Dean forUndergraduate Studies was also available for questions and comments. The campers made theirfinal preparations for the Challenge while their parents attended this meeting. Reunited in thelargest of the classrooms for the Challenge, families cheered on their campers as the teamscompeted. Media coverage, both print6 and TV7, of Challenge activities in the second sessionadded to the excitement. An awards and
for mathematical reasoning. In L. D. English (Ed.), Mathematical reasoning analogies, metaphors, and images.27. Vosniadou, S. (1995). Analogical reasoning in cognitive development. Metaphor and symbilic activity, 10 (4), 297-308.28. Goswami, U. (1992). Analogical Reasoning in Children. Psychology Press29. SchoolMatters. (2006). Schoolmatters a service of standard and poor’s, a division of the mcgraw-hil l companies, inc. Retrieved on August 26, 2007 from http://www.schoolmatters.com/app/location/q/stid=15/llid=118/stllid=212/locid=1035261/catid=-1/secid=- 1/compid=-1/site=pes. Page 13.1063.13
coursenot all letters will be used.Pa ______ a. (kg-m)/s2 b. 0.75 kWatm ______ c. 0.286 kJ/(kg-K) d. 32.2 lbm-ft/s2Rair _____ e. Btu f. 1 Btu/(lbm-ºR)lbf _____ g. 0.78 Btu/(lbm-ºR) h. 15 kJ/(kmol-K)CP air _____ i. 101 Pa j. 778 ft-lbfR _____ k. lbm-ft/s2 l 0.24 Btu/(lbm-ºR)N _____ m. 2 Btu/(lbm-mole-Rº) n. (g-m)/s2hp _____ o. 10.0 psia p. N/m2kJ _____ q. 5 kW r. 4.4 N1 ft3 _____ s. 7.5 gal
Peterson is Senior Associate Dean in the College of Engineering at the University of Texas at Arlington.She was the 1992 recipient of the Robert Q. Lee Award for Excellence in Engineering Education, and in 1997 wasinducted into the UT Arlington Academy of Distinguished Teachers. Dr. Peterson's research focuses on artificialintelligence applications to medicine, specifically on knowledge discovery in medical databases.CARTER TIERNANDr. J. Carter M. Tiernan is the Assistant Dean for Student Affairs in the College of Engineering and a SeniorLecturer in Computer Science and Engineering at the University of Texas at Arlington. As Assistant Dean, Dr.Tiernan has responsibility for recruiting and K-12 outreach, and coordination of engineering student
Round Tables of Regional or Special Interests, with one table beingopen for initiatives proposed by member organizations outside these areas. The results ofinitiatives or action items for each table were as follows:Group 1. Accreditation Page 14.168.12– led by Iring Wasser (ASIIN), Hasan Mandal (MDTK, GEDC) ̇ Promoting a wider understanding of accreditation ̇ Benchmarking system training of Educators and Accreditors ̇ Overlap with Existing Systems ̇ Accreditation is for Q&A and Recognition but it should serve to facilitate mobility of graduates and studentsGroup 2. Africa– led by Funso
: 2 2 Vin Vout W& elec − Q& + m & in(hin + + gzin ) − m& out (hout + + gzout ) = 0 (1) 2 2If the heat transfer rate and the kinetic energy and potential energy terms are assumed to benegligible then equation 1 is simplified into equation 2. Page 14.1058.6 W& elec = m& outhout − m & in hin = 0 (2
. Rather, a 12-factor model was extractedwith X2 (435) = 921.51, p.80) among the 6 presumed factors, suggesting considerable redundancy among theclaimed factors. In short, the full data set did not support the 6-factor structure proposed by theMCI’s developers.Using a loading criterion of greater than .40, the 7-factor solution showed the simplest and mostinterpretable structure since five of the twelve extracted factors loaded on with single items(factors 6, 9 10 11 and 12). However, noting Table 1, 5 items failed to load on any of the twelvefactors for the varimax rotated factor solutions of less than 0.40 (Q5,Q8, Q16, Q17, and Q22).Some item crossloadings (Q13 and Q 24) making the items somewhat difficult to interpret.Several factors showed
4.7Communicated information effectively 4.6Showed interest in student progress 4.8Student freedom of expression 4.9Course of value to date 4.9Overall course rating 4.7Unofficial Survey Questions:Use of class interaction and Q&A with the professor was at the right level 4.3Class video and guest lecturer enhanced learning and reinforced topics 3.8Use of lecture briefing notes and not a
). The Craft of Scientific Presentations. New York: Springer-Verlag.27 Atkinson, Cliff (2005). Beyond Bullet Points: Using Microsoft PowerPoint to Create Presentations That Inform, Motivate, and Inspire. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Press.28 Doumont, Jean-luc (2007). Creating Effective Presentation Slides. http://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pcs/index.php?q=node/111, audio file. IEEE Professional Communication Society.29 Alley, Michael, Madeline M. Schreiber, Katrina Ramsdell, and John Muffo (2006). How the Design of Headlines Page 14.221.14 in Presentation Slides Affects Audience Retention. Technical Communication, 53 (2), 225–234