. NCES 2000-601.2. National Science Board (NSB). Science & Engineering Indicators 2008. Arlington,VA: National Science Board (NSB);2008.3. Hyde JS, Fennema E, Ryan M, Frost LA, Hopp C. Gender comparison of mathematics attitudes and affect: a meta-analysis. Psychol Women Q. 1990;14:299-324.4. Sax L. Mathematical self-concept: how college reinforces the gender gap. Res Higher Educ. 1994;35(2):141-166.5. Sax L. Gender and major-field differences in the development of mathematical self-concept during college. J Women Minor Sci Eng. 1995;1(4):291-307.6. Brainard SG, Carlin L. A six-year longitudinal study of undergraduate women in engineering and science. J Eng Educ. 1998;87:369-375.7. Burtner J. The use
need doing: New messages for enhancing public understanding of engineering, Global Strategy Group-NAE.28. Lederman, N. G. (1986). “Students’ and Teachers’ Understanding of The Nature of Science: A Reassessment,” School Science and Mathematics, 86, 91-99.29. Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., and Schwartz, R. S. (2002). “Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire: Toward Valid and Meaningful Assessment of Learners’ Conceptions of Nature of Science,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 6, 497-521.30. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). California: Sage Publication
on a topic oftheir choice related to sustainability. This assignment was designed to evaluate students’performance towards objectives #1 and #7 and to provide an opportunity for students to work indiverse teams, perform independent research, prepare a report, and present their results. Eachteam was asked to submit a 10-12 page report of their findings and to prepare a 15-minutepresentation (including Q&A) to be delivered in the class. Page 14.1110.8The following topics were chosen by the 9 student teams: ocean/wave energy, water resourcesand pollution, sustainable cities, solar energy, trash incinerator power plant
ignited. To analyze the resulting process, launch the premixed closed-process IGcombustion daemon located in the Daemons> Systems> UnsteadyProcess> Specific>Combustion> Premixed> IG Model page. Configure the reaction in the Reaction Panel fortheoretical combustion of octane. Evaluate the reactants state with p1 = 1 atm, T1 = 298 K, andpartially evaluate the products state with Vol2 = Vol1 (for a constant-volume process). In theProcess Panel, load state-1 as the beginning state (b-state) and state-2 as the final state (f-state),and enter Q = W = 0. Click Calculateand then Super-Calculate to obtain thefinal state. The final pressure andtemperature are found in state-2 as1065 kPa and 2911 K, respectively. Inprocesses where a
also lacked this personality style. The team members did not report ahighly uneven distribution of work, although one student stated: “... we had to divide up the workbetween two smaller sub-groups. We were pretty much in the dark to what our subgroups weredoing.” This lack of coordination may have resulted in the poor quality of the final product.Another person stated: “We noticed some possible error in Q 1-5 but not for sure.” So the Page 14.330.12teammates didn’t do a good job of reviewing each other’s parts and/or didn’t necessarily assignquestions in the strength area of each individual.Another set of teams to compare are the three teams
image to havea greater contrast, the students first converted the RGB (red, green, and blue components) colorimage to the YIQ (luminance channel and chrominance channels) format, and then equalized theluminance component Y (which contains 93% of signal energy) only. Notice that the colorcomponents I and Q were unchanged and left as they were. Next, the students repacked the Ychannel back to the YIQ format, and converted the equalized YIQ format back to its RGB colorformat as displayed in Figure 10b. The indexed-color image equalization and enhancement of thecolor image by equalizing each RGB color channel were conducted, respectively, and theircorresponding equalized effects were verified. a. Original RGB color image
that use energy and environmental themes. In Proceedings of the 113th Annual ASEE Conference & Exposition, Chicago, IL, 2006, paper number 2006-262.16. Powers, S. E.; DeWaters, J. E., Creating project-based learning experiences for university-K12 partnerships. In Proceedings of the 34th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Savannah, GA, 2004, on CD.17. Powers, S. E.; Graham, M.; Schwob, T.; DeWaters, J. E., Diversity in K-12 initiatives to attract a diverse pool of engineering students. In Proceedings of the 33rd ASEE/IEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boulder, CO, 2003.18. Patton, M. Q., Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2nd ed.; Sage Publications: Newbury Park, California
the packet Page 14.771.14 (___B5___). What is the application layer protocol of this packet? Answer (___B6___). (Hint: Think about what service is running on the source or destination port.) 6. Press Ctrl-C to stop sniffing. 7. Check the manual about what the switches -d, -e, -v and -L mean by typing man snort 8. Press spacebar to scroll down. Record what “-d” enables (___B7___). Record what “-e” enables (___B8___). Record what “-v” enables (___B9___). Record what “-b” enables (___B10___). Record what “-L” enables (___B11___). (Note: Please remember Linux is case-sensitive.) 9. Type q to exit from man page.C
. Page 11.79.2 y L φa φ(x) φb Ta x a b T q, moment/length b x Figure 2. Material Law Formulas for a uniform shaft with end torsional couples and
Education and Human Resources, June 1996), pp.ii, 2, 4, 21, 41, 51, 65.3. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Project 2061 Update (Washington, DC: AAAS, 2001-2002).4. National Research Council, Evaluating and Improving Undergraduate Teaching in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (Washington, DC: National Research Council, 2003), p. 116,5. Ann Q. Gates, Patricia J. Teller, Andrew Bernat, Nelly Delgado, and Connie Kubo Della-Piana, “Expanding Participation in Undergraduate Research Using the Affinity Group Model,” ASEE Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 88, no. 4 (October 1999), p. 409.6. “The Reinvention Center at Stony Brook,” http://www.sunysb.edu/Reinventioncenter/ (Stony
use ofdemonstrations follow: • “The instructor uses extremely effective learning tools in class, and they really helped me to better understand the material presented.” • “This has been my favorite class…. Even though it was more work than any other class, it really stimulated my learning and excitement of being a Civil major.” • “Good visual aids” • “It was very possible to visualize all the concepts so it was easier to realize what was going on.” • “The models used to illustrate concepts were useful.” • “The material was relative and interesting.” • Q: Strengths of course. A: “The instructor demos and visual aids”; “Practical applications”; “Interesting material, vital to
n br Q ar rs ai O discipline-specific databases and C Li
. 2004. Clustering of bio-products technologies for zero emissions and eco-efficiency. Industrial Crops and Products 20: 169-180.9. Kamm, B., and M. Kamm. 2004a. Biorefinery systems. Chem. Biochem. Eng. Q. 18(1): 1-6.10. Kamm, B. and M. Kamm. 2004b. Principles of biorefineries. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 64: 137-145.11. Ohara, H. 2003. Biorefinery. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 62: 474-477.12. Askew, M. 2005. The biorefinery concept. Renews, Renewable Energy Newsletter, European Commission.13. EIA AEO. 2002. Annual Energy Outlook 2002. U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration.14. US DOE. 2003. Industrial Bioproducts: Today and Tomorrow. Prepared by Energetics, Incorporated
, "Product Lifecycle Managementin aviation maintenance, repair and overhaul," Computers in Industry, vol. 59, no. 2-3, pp. 296-303, 2008.[l2] T. M. Rupp, "Facilitating Collaborative Business Processes in the Aero Engine Industry - Towards Product Lifecycle Management and Beyond," IEEE International Technology Management Conference (ICE), l-8, 2007[l3] K. Y. H. Lim, P. Zheng and C. Chen, "A state-of-the-art survey of Digital Twin:techniques, engineering product lifecycle management and business innovation perspectives," J Intell Manuf, 3l, (6), l3l3-l337, 20l9.[l4] M. Xiong, H. Wong, Q. Fu, and Y. Xu, "Digital twin-driven aero-engine intelligent predictive maintenance," Int J Adv Manuf Technol, ll4, 375l-376l, 202l
state and nextsteps. In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (Eds.) Handbook of Engineering Education Research (pp. 497-518). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. SanFrancisco: Jossey-BassNGSS Lead States (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States.Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Tafoya, J., Nguyen, Q., Skokan, C., & Moskal, B. (2005). K-12 Outreach in an EngineeringIntensive University. In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education AnnualConference & Exposition (ASEE).The National Research Council (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices,crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington
: Strategies for Product Design, 4th ed. West Sussex, England: Wiley, 2008.[34] N. Crilly, “Fixation and creativity in concept development: The attitudes and practices of expert designers,” Univ. Camb. Dep. Eng. Trumptington Str. Camb. CB2 IPZ UK.[35] E. P. Torrance, “Encouraging Creativity in the Classroom,” Duboque Iowa William C Brown Publ., 1970.[36] B. J. Lucas and L. F. Nordgren, “People underestimate the value of persistence for creative performance.,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 232–243, 2015.[37] N. L. Leech and A. J. Onwuegbuzie, “An array of qualitative data analysis tools: A call for data analysis triangulation,” Sch. Psychol. Q., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 57–584, Dec. 2007.
perceptions, whichwe believe warrant serious consideration when recruiting and designing programs for supportingtheir transition into higher education. ReferencesAgar, M. (1994). Language shock: Understanding the culture of conversation. William Morrow& Company.Bloome, D., Carter, S. P., Christian, B. M., Otto, S., & Shuart-Faris, N. (2004). Discourseanalysis and the study of classroom language and literacy events: A microethnographicperspective. Routledge.Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Easton, J. Q., & Luppescu, S. (2010). Organizingschools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. University of Chicago Press.Castanheira, M. L., Crawford, T., Dixon, C. N., & Green, J. L. (2001
Libraries’ Efforts in Inclusion and Outreach Activities Using Social Media,” LIBRI, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 34–47, 2015.[11] B. M. Moskal, C. Skokan, L. Kosbar, A. Dean, C. Westland, H. Barker, Q. N. Nguyen, and J. Tafoya, “K-12 Outreach: Identifying the Broader Impacts of Four Outreach Projects,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 173–189, 2007.[12] M. Borrego, “Development of engineering education as a rigorous discipline: A study of the publication patterns of four coalitions,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 5–18, 2007.[13] E. Specking and R. Almaian, “An Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach to Engineering Outreach Decisions,” in IIE Annual Conference. Proceedings, 2013, p. 1078.[14] S. H
as 2008 Beijing Olympic stadium (Bird’s Nest), the Great Wall and Three Gorges Dam; 2. Cultural sites with engineering significance including the Terra Cotta Warriors, the Forbidden City and Tiananmen Square; 3. Businesses sites including DuPont, GE, HP, AECOM, IBM, Lenovo, Air Products & Chemicals, and Shanghai Xin Tai Printing Company; and 4. University sites including Southeast University in Nanjing and the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China in Chengdu.When visiting a company, students often attended a presentation and a Q&A session led by thehost to discuss what the business does, how the business works in a global environment, and whatimpact the business has on China and on the
workshop.- Student topics. This activity was rated as highly rewarding by students. Most of the students (undergraduate and many graduate) had not yet had an opportunity in their academic career to organize and lead a classroom discussion. Feedback from students was overwhelmingly positive. Students appreciated the opportunity to work through the process of organizing and leading a facilitated discussion and noted the boost in confidence this activity provided them for general public speaking skills. Students also noted value in the expectation that they were to provide questions of other student presentations. Students liked having the limits of a 30- minute period for the presentation and Q&A with a buffer for the instructor to fill
, aspects of teamwork, or work that is not deemed to use or be a direct precursor to CTconcepts (e.g. statistics). The pedagogical approach used a semi-flipped classroom whereinstudents are expected to engage in the materials and come to class prepared. The typicalsequence of assessment is shown in Figure 1 and as follows.Figure 1 Pedagogical overview of HFYE 1. Reading – The course is supported by an online textbook which includes programming exercises. Problems are assigned from the text book weekly. 2. Q&A – Each class starts with a question and answer session based on the readings to focus the class session. 3. Readiness Assessment Test (RAT) - Students take this initial quiz to assess their self- guided learning
that programsmeet and surpass the standards necessary for technical fields; and that programs are “leading theway in innovation, emerging technologies and anticipating the welfare and safety needs of thepublic”9. One of many papers written that discusses the designing and teaching of courses tosatisfy ABET regulations was presented by Richard M. Felder and Rebecca Brent10. Topics suchas ethics and technical skills are readily available, but there is room for growth in the area of lifeand soft skills for engineering graduates. As far back as 1998 where Duyen Q. Nguyen wrotethat engineering careers remain technical but are shifting towards soft-engineering due to themultidisciplinary nature of the changing workplace11. The two areas he included
, 82(3): 330-348.[9] Cross, N. (2000). Engineering design methods : strategies for product design (3rd ed.): Wiley.[10] Neeley Jr, W. L. (2007). Adaptive design expertise: A theory of design thinking and innovation. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.[11] Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social science research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.[12] Foster, C., Lande, M. & Jordan, S. (June, 2014). An Ethos of Sharing in the Maker Community. Proceedings of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education (DEED Division); Indianapolis, IN[13] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2002
out of male-dominated occupations? In Eds. H. M. G. Watt & J. S. Eccles, Gender and occupational outcomes: Longitudinal assessments of individual, social, and cultural influences. Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association.16. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68-81.17. Brown, P., & Matusovich, H. (2013). Unlocking student motivation: Development of an engineering motivation survey. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA, June 23-26.18. Li, Q., McCoach, D. B., Swaminathan, H., & Tang, J. (2008). Development of an instrument to measure
argument. New York, NY: Cambridge UniversityPress.24. Moore, T. J., Glancy, A. W., Tank, K. M., Kersten, J. A., Smith, K. A., & Stohlmann,M. S. (2014). A framework for quality K-12 engineering education: Research anddevelopment. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 4(1), 1–13.25. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: SagePublications, Inc.26. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). ThousandOaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
revolution, continued: Librarians lead the way with open educational resources. Library Issues. 35(5):1-4.11. Jensen K, West Q. 2015. Open educational resources and the higher education environment A leadership opportunity for libraries. College & Research Libraries News. 76(4):215-218.12. Mitchell C, Chu M. 2014. Open education resources: The new paradigm in academic libraries. Journal of Library Innovation. 5(1):13-29.13. Okamoto K. 2013. Making higher education more affordable, one course reading at a time: Academic libraries as key advocates for open access textbooks and educational resources. Public Services Quarterly. 9(4):267-283.14. Pitcher K. 2014. Library publishing of open textbooks: The Open SUNY
, the quality of the analysisprocedures was not the focus of this study.After applying the designed criteria to the assigned game products, the two teams gave theirrecommendations to improve the products. Since both teams have a positive outcome in terms oflearning effectiveness (education perspective), neither of them recommended changes on thefundamental designs related to the education. For example, all the game products included somequiz questions for the end users to answer, but neither team actually made changes, such aschoosing different questions, to the Q&A section. One exception is that in the Avenger gameproduct from Case Study 1, the original game includes one-coin flipping section to help endusers understand the distribution
; Mohammed, S. (1994). Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? Journal of Management, 20(2), 403-437.McIntyre, R. M., & Salas, E. (1995). Measuring and managing for team performance: Emerging principles from complex environments. In R.A. Guzzo, E. Salas, & Associates (Eds.), Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations, 149-203. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Nguyen, D. Q. (1998). The essential skills and attributes of an engineer: A comparative study of academics, industry personnel and engineering students. Global Journal. of Engineering Education, 2(1), 65-75.Nurmi, N., Bosch-Sijtsema, P., Sivunen, A., & Fruchter, R. (2009). Who shouts louder?: Exerting power across distance and culture. Proceedings
Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 34 (2), S. 329-344. DOI: 10.1016/S1369-8486(02)00074-2.Rüdig, W. (1991). Green party politics around the world. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 33(8), 6-31.Sarnoff, D. (1941, July). A new world? The Scientific Monthly, 53(1), p. 37.Sheng, H., Ricci, P., & Fang, Q. (2015). Legally binding precautionary and prevention principles: Aspects of epistemic undertain causation. Environmental Science & Policy, 54, pp. 185-198.Sociovision, S. (2010). Die Sinus-Milieus. Update. HeidelbergVDI [Verein Deutscher Ingenieure] (1991). Technikbewertung - Begriffe und Grundlagen (Richtlinie 3780