general and first-generation SVEs in particular. Forexample, because many of these students overcame initial obstacles in higher education, theycould be a potential pool of effective mentors, both to other student veterans and to first-generation students.Women Student VeteransA paper on women student veterans will be presented in the Military and Veterans Division forthe ASEE 2018 Annual Conference.15 A graduate student at Clemson University is leading thiseffort.Preliminary Interview Findings on Women Student VeteransFrom: R. C. Atkinson, C., Mobley, C. E. Brawner, S. M. Lord, J. B. Main, and M. M. Camacho,“I Never Played the “Girl Card”: Experiences and Identity Intersections of Women StudentVeterans in Engineering,” Proceedings of the 2018
acquisition systems home andconduct experiments and design projects. This paper presents the results of a pilot project inwhich a first-year engineering course at a large university was modified to use data acquisitionhardware systems and a graphical programming environment. This paper will discuss thecurricular structure, the implementation of the graphical programming language and hardwarecomponent, examples from the class, and initial assessments from the experience in the form ofclass surveys. Challenges and opportunities are discussed. Overall, students reacted positivelyto the inclusion of the graphical language and extremely positively to the inclusion of thehardware aspect, which allowed for more hands-on activities. The instructional team
well understood that financial aid and academic supports are a large part ofthe retention equation, this study examines the impact of exposure to engineering math asa cognitive support on two successive years of freshmen that matriculated in Fall 2014and Fall 2015. This paper suggests that math remediation is critical, but must be done inan institutional context that successfully leverages student determination to succeed.The traditional faculty-led argument that “we are admitting poorly prepared students”could no longer serve as an explanatory factor, as the university’s undergraduate programadmissions had become increasingly competitive, and were generally more productiveyielding graduates. In the College of Engineering, SAT scores had
Paper ID #37272An Analysis of Low-Scoring Blind and Low-Vision Individuals’ SelectedAnswers on a Tactile Spatial Ability InstrumentDaniel Kane, Utah State University Daniel Kane is a graduate student at Utah State University pursuing a PhD in Engineering Education with a concurrent master’s degree in Civil Engineering. His research interests focus around the study of spatial ability with an emphasis on identifying patterns of spatial strategies and measuring spatial ability in blind and low vision populations.Dr. Natalie L. Shaheen Dr. Natalie L. Shaheen is an assistant professor of blind education at Illinois State
find work and buildprofessional identities. By presenting alumni’s multiple perspectives and diverse life paths,Vision Venture can help engineering students have more informed expectations about life aftergraduation and understand more vividly the flexible and wide range of options open to them withtheir engineering degree.[32] found a disheartening decrease in engineering students’ engagement with public welfareduring the course of their studies, attributed it to “three underlying ideological pillars:depoliticization, the technical/social dualism, and meritocracy,” and used quantitative measuresto make a strong case for these connections. However, the concept of the future self can add aqualitative dimension to this data. For instance, even
engineering-based integrated STEM. Compulsorycoursework driven by a teacher’s need to address specific academic standards in science andassociated with grades for students is likely to create a different environment for studentinteractions than elective, non-graded, informal experiences. In addition, existing studies oftenuse quantitative analyses to investigate associations between motivation, context, andengagement [28]. With small group work ubiquitous with STEM, the affordances and limitationsof small group activities must be considered.This study addresses the gap in the literature to explore the following research questions: 1) What differences, if any, are seen in the engineering practices middle school girls and boys display during
- Life Sciences Education, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 453-461, winter 2010.[8] E. Ince, “An overview of problem solving studies in physics education,” Journal of Education and Learning, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 191-200, 2018.[9] M. V. B. Reddy and B. Panacharoensawad, “Students problem-solving difficulties and implications in physics: An empirical study on influencing factors,” Journal of Education and Practice, vol. 8, no. 14, pp. 59-62, 2017.[10] A. J. Mason and C. Singh, “Surveying graduate students’ attitudes and approaches to problem solving,” Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, vol. 6, no. 2, 020124, 2010.[11] K. Cummings, S. Lockwood and D. M. Jeffrey, “Attitudes toward problem
(9% to 15%) and were enrolled in lessadvanced math classes than their counterparts [26]. Latinx students and other racial minoritizedgroups (e.g., students who are Black, Native American) remain underrepresented in engineering[27] and have lower persistence and graduation rates [28].Previous studies on ME OnlineIn 2018, a brief survey was administered to 340 mechanical engineering students at Cal PolyPomona as part of a pilot study to investigate the impact of ME Online [1]. The vast majority ofstudents felt the video library made a positive impact on their education and helped their gradesin at least one course. However, the survey did not explore the socio-emotional impact of thevideo library on students nor obtain specific recommendations
with industry, providing students with hands-onexperience in this specialized field, but not in an international environment [4], [9], [21] .This study focuses specifically on a subset of the 2023 IRiKA cohort, examining how theirinvolvement in microelectronics research abroad contributed to developing their globalengineering competencies. This study seeks to explore the intricate processes through which globalcompetencies are developed among engineering students at both undergraduate and graduate levelswho possess varying levels of research experience in microelectronics. Through the lens of threeresearch questions, the study examines the influence of the International Research Initiative inKnowledge and Academia (IRiKA) on the global
career attainment, problematizing traditional notions of academic achievement and what is mean to be successful yet marginalized, and STEM identity and identity development in high-achieving students of color. She is currently the PI on two studies funded by NSF, the first of which investigates the causes behind why African Americans remain one of the most underrepresented racial groups in engineering faculty positions. The second study is working toward the design of a holistic racial and gender attentive mentoring program for engineering PhD students of color. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Development of a national survey focusing on the relationships between race
among early career graduates in engineering and taking appropriate steps tosupport continued persistence in the field. Identification of these patterns is also helpful fordesigning a quantitative study that can point to the significance of gender differences in a largerpopulation.IntroductionWhat motivates men compared to women can be studied from a variety of different perspectives.Looking at the autonomy with which both men and women make choices in early career isespecially useful because developing autonomy is a central goal of an undergraduate education1and autonomy plays an important role in predicting stability within a field or career. The higherthe degree of autonomy on which an individual bases important life and career choices
project as there are fewdiscipline-specific studies of student veterans. We are considering the NASPA conference as avenue for future dissemination of project findings to a group of professionals (student affairsadministrators) who have extensive contact with student veterans.We have also begun developing the interview protocol for conducting individual studentinterviews. A similar qualification survey will be used for these interviews as was used for thefocus groups. Three pilot interviews have been conducted at USD and transcribed. We will usethe findings from our focus groups to further develop the final student interview protocol.Significant resultsFrom FIE15 PaperActive military and student veterans navigate engineering education in ways
education for student growth and societal advances. While directing the Micro Medical Device Engineering Research Labo- ratory (M.D. – ERL), she has managed, as PI or co-PI, ˜$13 million, yielding 93 research graduates*, a patent, and >100 publications [*12 PhDs (64% women, 18%UR)]. Her favorite quote is by Ray Mc- Dermott, ”Culture is not a past cause to a current self. Culture is the current challenge to possible future selves.”Sonia Goltz, Michigan Tech Sonia Goltz earned her PhD in industrial/organizational psychology at Purdue University and is the Mickus Endowed Faculty Fellow of Business Impact in the College of Business at Michigan Tech, where she has served as Co-PI on two NSF ADVANCE grants.andrew storer
-view.Methods:Participants. Male engineering students (4 students grouped into 2 dyads) who previously passedor who were concurrently enrolled a Mechanics of Materials course from various disciplines,grade levels, and coursework experiences were convenience sampled from a small summersession of a Mechanics of Materials lab to participate in the pilot study. The study took place at apredominately white Midwest university. Enrollment during the summer session for this coursewas eight students, four of which were either not able to attend the study or data was excludedbased on no gesture or speech during reasoning. In general, the Mechanics of Materials lab offersa hands-on environment to observe and physically experience the concept of torsion, as well asthe formal
these attitudes similar to or different from the majority of engineeringstudents? These questions led to the development of a pilot study with first year students at theUniversity of Colorado Boulder. The next section provides information that grounds the study inpublished literature, which is followed by the research methods, results, and discussion.BackgroundThe Environmental Engineering Body of Knowledge (BOK) discusses the skills and attributesrequired for environmental engineers to be successful and productive professional engineers whoare best equipped to benefit society.12 Sustainability and global issues are specified as outcomes,and interdisciplinary interactions are also discussed in the context of teamwork. These sameoutcomes are
. R. Thorndyke, “Identifying Factors Influencing Engineering Student Graduation: A Longitudinal and Cross-Institutional Study,” J. Eng. Educ., no. October, pp. 313–320, 2004.[8] C. P. Veenstra, E. L. Dey, and G. D. Herrin, “Is Modeling of Freshman Engineering Success Different from Modeling of Non-Engineering Success?,” J. Eng. Educ., no. October, pp. 467–479, 2008.[9] T. Nomi, “Faces of the Future: A Portrait of First-Generation Community College Students,” 2005.[10] J. Ma and S. Baum, “Trends in community colleges: enrollment, prices, student debt, and completion,” Coll. Board Res., pp. 1–23, 2016.[11] K. E. Gerdes, C. A. Lietz, and E. A. Segal, “Measuring empathy in the 21st century: Development
Publication Type Journal, Dissertation, or Thesis Year Year of publication (as opposed to the year of data collection) State(s) State(s) where data was collected from Participants Participants involved in the study Research Focus Focus of the research study (e.g., abilities, motivations) Focus (narrowed) A finer categorization than above (e.g., students’ abilities) Research Methods The type of research conducted (e.g., Quantitative, Qualitative, Both) Sample Size Total sample size of PLTW-affiliated participants Internal Comparison Whether the study compared PLTW internally (e.g., by demographics) If so, what? What were the comparative variables used (e.g
studentsenrolled in the course, much of infrastructure is necessary for maintaining the course. Ourapproach in implementing M&I was to make gradual changes in all these areas.M&I was first offered at Georgia Tech as a small, pilot section of about 40 students, taught by apost-doctoral fellow hired expressly for the purpose of assisting in implementing and teachingthe curriculum. As shown in Table 1, the number and size of lecture sections using the M&Icurriculum have expanded since then. By spring 2008, approximately 30 percent of students Page 13.707.3enrolled in the introductory physics sequence were in M&I-based sections. The number
., 2021b). Figure 1 summarizes ourresearch approach.Figure 1. Study data collection and analysis overview. Recruitment of participants after a 2-part pilot interview yielded 5 student participants. We conducted two semi- structured interviews with each student designed to investigate students responses to the ideas “What is good technical writing?” (Interview 1) and “How are engineering judgments and processes expressed in writing?” (Interview 2). Our interview
, Computing, and Applied Sciences at Clemson University. His work focuses on how technology supports knowledge building and transfer in a range of learning environments. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Examining the motivations and experiences of transfer students participating in an undergraduate research courseAbstractIn this paper, we use both quantitative and qualitative methods to examine transfer student’s in ascholarship program to better understand their university experiences and what drives them tosucceed. The Student Pathways in Engineering and Computing for Transfers (SPECTRA)program is an NSF S-STEM (Award#1834081) that aims to aid students in their transfer fromtwo
especially concerning for female students if perceptions of ability or previous experiencekeep them from claiming or being granted leadership roles on their teams. Prior studies call formore research around increasing team members’ “role repertoires” or the number of different rolesan individual can take on based on what is needed by the team as a potential benefit to teamperformance [9].The connection between increasing diversity in STEM fields, student retention, and students’ability to practice different team roles during their undergraduate careers is worth investigating.According to the University of Colorado Boulder, since 2010 the number of female students inundergraduate engineering degrees has risen while their retention and graduation
Paper ID #27333Partners in Professional Development: Initial Results from a CollaborationBetween Universities, Training Programs, and Professional SocietiesDr. Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University Katy Luchini-Colbry is the Assistant Dean for Graduate Student Services at the College of Engineering at Michigan State University, where she completed degrees in political theory and computer science. A recipient of a NSF Graduate Research Fellowship, she earned Ph.D. and M.S.E. in computer science and engineering from the University of Michigan. She has published more than two dozen peer-reviewed works related to her
, “Putting diversity in perspective: A critical cultural historical context for representation in engineering,” Jun. 2017. doi: 10.18260/1-2--28776.[3] M. Newsome, “Colleges now produce fewer Black graduates in math and engineering,” The Hechinger Report, Apr. 12, 2021. http://hechingerreport.org/even-as-colleges-pledge-to- improve-share-of-engineering-graduates-who-are-black-declines/ (accessed Feb. 15, 2023).[4] S. A. Elkins, J. M. Braxton, and G. W. James, “Tinto’s separation stage and its influence on first-semester college student persistence,” Res. High. Educ., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 251–68, 2000.[5] K. M. Whitcomb and C. Singh, “Underrepresented minority students receive lower grades and have higher rates of attrition
climate change effects their motivations and agency to solve complex global problems for a sustainability in their career.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. She is the recipient of a 2014 American Society for Engineering
selecting one classification over another, and the impact that decision can haveon their research and the populations being researched. They highlight the importance of askingparticipants to choose how they prefer to identify. Hence, we considered that this study cancontinue this conversation by providing an overview of how engineering students identify andreflect on the use of the different terminology.MethodsAs the purpose of this work is to explore the perspectives of engineering students that identify ashaving Latin American origin, regarding the ways in which they identify themselves and howothers seek to label them, this pilot study analyzed both quantitative and qualitative data toimplement the beginnings of a case study. A pilot study
carefully limited in scope to focus on a particular phenomenon or method of interest, and datais specified such that there is only one "right answer". Students have become acculturated to thishighly structured environment, which is not a good representation of real engineering. A primarygoal in this course is the integrated presentation of all the thermal-fluid disciplines, as well asothers such as materials, mechanics and economics, in a project which requires a "systems"treatment. This invariably requires computer modeling of the system to permit parametric analysisand tradeoff studies, both technical and economic. This task is alien to most students at the juniorlevel and many struggle with it, while others relish the challenge. After becoming
Institute of Medicine, Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation: America's Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press, 2011.[2] B. M. Ferdman. (2013, 1 December 2015). Diversity at work: the practice of inclusion in diverse organizations.[3] Cech, E. A., & Waidzunas, T. J. (2011). Navigating the heteronormativity of engineering: The experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual students. Engineering Studies, 3(1), 1-24.[4] Cech, E. A., & Rothwell, W. R. (2018). LGBTQ Inequality in Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 107(4), 583-610.[5] Patridge, E. V., Barthelemy, R. S., & Rankin, S. R. (2014). Factors impacting the academic
unable to meet highexpectations. They tend to demand less academically and behaviorally, which translates intofewer opportunities to achieve and a decreased chance of graduating and going on to highereducation. As an example of this belief system, one teacher at a low-income school once said ofher students [6]: “We need to tell them, ‘You’re not all going to college.’ Some are not collegematerial and we should tell them that. They should set lower goals and follow them.” To combat this issue found in many underserved communities, we designed andimplemented a number of after school programs for at-risk elementary, middle, and high schoolstudents who have expressed or demonstrated interest in any aspect of science, technology,engineering and/or
byextensive field testing, materials design, and a research program, of which this study is a part.The curriculum units foster opportunities for middle-school children in OST settings to becomeengineers and solve problems that are identified as “personally meaningful and globallyrelevant” [20]. Each unit has been developed to include fourteen Curricular Design Principles forInclusivity [21], identified through previous research studies to support student learning, in fouroverarching categories: Set learning in a real-world context, present design challenges that areauthentic to engineering practice, scaffold student work, and demonstrate that everyone canengineer. The Curricular Design Principles are detailed under Findings in Table 3. There
communication, identity, design, and organizational ethics.Mr. Sean M Eddington, Brian Lamb School of Communication - Purdue Sean Eddington is a doctoral student in the Brian Lamb School of Communication studying organizational communication. He earned his B.A. in History from Purdue University, and his M.S. from Northwest Missouri State University. Sean’s research interests exist at the intersections of organizational communi- cation, online organizing, resilience, and gender. He has researched new engineering faculty experiences throughout their on-boarding process, and has been published in 2015 Proceedings of the American Soci- ety for Engineering Education along with his research team. Eddington has also served as a