Session 3692 The feminist engineering classroom: a vision for future educational innovations Alice L. Pawley The Delta Program for Research, Teaching and Learning University of Wisconsin-MadisonAbstractIn the quest for the gender equalization of the engineering profession, a variety of strategies arebeing developed and used in daily engineering education practice. Colleges and universities arerecruiting girls and women in increasing numbers into the so-called “engineering pipeline” byusing camps, special
Undergraduate Engineering Students: Preliminary Assessment. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exhibition, ASEE, Montreal, Quebec, 2002.2. Egan, K. The Educated Mind; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, 1997.3. Tuckman, B.W. Conducting Educational Research, 3rd ed.; Harcourt Brace Jovanovich: San Diego, 1988.4. P. R. Pintrich, D. A. F. Smith, T. Garcia, and W. J. McKeachie. A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ), University of Michigan.5. Goldberg, L.R. “International Personality Item Pool” http://ipip.ori.org/ipip/ (last accessed Sept. 13, 2001).6. Roedel; Schraw; Plake. Validation of a Measure of Learning and Performance Goal
application of mathematics and science to solve engineering problems.The modern engineer is dedicated to developing solutions to problems that directly impact thetechnical infrastructure of civilization and thereby not only the quality of life but life itself.Because the impact of engineering has been so great, the profession has developed highstandards of ethics and professional excellence. It is with these standards in mind that the Page 7.480.2 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright @ 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationeducation of
Section 3575 Learning to Juggle: A Model for New Engineering Faculty Development Rose M. Marra, Thomas A. Litzinger The Pennsylvania State UniversityIntroductionNew faculty are faced with many challenges, not the least of which is learning to juggle themany aspects of their new careers. While many universities and colleges offer new facultyorientations, many such activities feature an endless array of “talking heads” fromadministrators, or perhaps “how to” lectures on the mechanics of pedagogy. Having discussedsuch workshops with other new faculty (and, we admit
. Page 5.42.6The "On-site Company Training" workshopThe "On-site Company Training" workshop is an enriching form of partnership for both thestudents and the companies. These internships prepare students for the engineering profession byallowing them to gain practical hands-on job experience. They gain insight on how companiesfunction and favor their integration to the labor force. Companies determine the content of theinternship while keeping in mind the student’s level of knowledge attained in the program. Thetasks entrusted to students are related as closely as possible to those of an engineer. An engineerin the company must supervise the trainees.Partnerships with companies - a successAmong the first 33 students that registered in the autumn
Session 2358 Practical use of Multimedia in an Undergraduate Engineering Technology Program Geoffrey Wood State Technical Institute at MemphisI. Introduction to multimediaMultimedia, as a buzzword in education, has been pushed to the point of becoming cliché. Theword invokes images of flashy interactive video and sound, promising brain candy for the MTVgeneration. The "flash," however, is usually the product of a professional multimedia publisher.Expert graphic designers, programmers, and editors work in teams armed with the latesttechnology. The
Session 2793 INTEGRATING PROCESS AND PRODUCT: IMPROVING ENGINEERINGEDUCATION THROUGH THE TEAM EXPERIENCE Robert D. Knecht, Donna M Carlon Colorado School of Mines/University of Central OklahomaAbstract – This paper examines a teamwork model based on transport theory consisting ofinput/output conditions and external functions as an effective tool to assess performance of first-year engineering design teams. By comparing final attitudes with expectations, this studysuggests factors that influence team decision-making processes. Key among these are the taskand
submits that in most classes, some degree of direct instruction is necessary to “actively”engage the student’s minds, particularly in introducing new material, but also insists that student-based class activities are essential to reinforce and “connect” this knowledge. Materials sciencenaturally lends itself to a variety of interesting and exciting activities that allow the student tointeractively learn about the world of engineering materials. Some of these activities arediscussed in their application to atomic structure, diffusion, strengthening mechanisms, failuremechanisms, and ferrous and nonferrous materials.I. IntroductionIn a typical college-level engineering materials science class, which is part of an accreditedmechanical engineering
. Involvement in local museum activities,community science centers, and university/college summer engineering programs is important tofoster an attitude that technology and science are fun and intriguing. Local libraries can alsohelp. They provide free books and magazines that give exposure to science concepts forinquisitive minds. In addition, parents can check out science books from the library to conduct"do it at home" science experiments. Research shows that this type of cooperative learningreinforces scientific concepts and has a positive impact on the student. Parents can alsoencourage interest in math and science is by increasing active involvement as children watchtelevision and critically discuss the merits of a program. Watching programs such
theengineering fields so our students are engaged and excited about their chosen field of study byseeing and discussing the end product of the industry‟s efforts.Collaborating with engineering success coursesIn reflecting on the Freshman Career Exploration Evening, it occurs to us that the event seems tohave taken place in a vacuum with little actual and deliberate ties to other experiences that our Page 22.768.10engineering freshmen encounter. With this in mind, the Engineering Career Center is developinga multifaceted freshman career exploration curriculum that will be plugged into the engineeringsuccess courses starting the fall of 2011. The Freshman
AC 2011-2443: INCORPORATING ENTREPRENEURSHIP INTO MECHAN-ICAL ENGINEERING AUTOMOTIVE COURSES: TWO CASE STUDIESGregory W. Davis, Kettering University Dr. Gregory W. Davis is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Kettering University, formerly known as GMI Engineering & Management Institute. Acting in this capacity, he teaches courses in the Auto- motive and Thermal Science disciplines. He also serves a Director of the Advanced Engine Research Laboratory, where he conducts research in alternative fuels and engines. Currently, Greg serves as the faculty advisor for one of the largest Student Chapters of the Society of Automotive Engineers(SAE) and the Clean Snowmobile Challenge Project. Greg is also active on
AC 2011-1660: TIPS FOR SUCCEEDING AS A NEW ENGINEERING AS-SISTANT PROFESSORStephan A. Durham, University of Colorado, DenverWesley Marshall, University of Colorado Denver Wesley Marshall is currently an Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering at the University of Colorado Denver and co-director of the Active Communities Transportation (ACT) Research Group. He specializes in transportation planning, safety, and sustainability as well as urban design, congestion pricing, and parking. Recent research involves defining and measuring the street network and an empirical study considering the role of street patterns, connectivity, and network density in road safety and sustainability. Having spent time with the UConn
AC 2011-2026: VISUALIZATION AND MANIPULATION OF NANOSCALECOMPONENTS INSTRUCTION FOR ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY STU-DENTSSalahuddin Qazi and Robert Decker, State University of New York, Institute of Tech, Utica, New York andMohawk Valley Community College, Utica, New York Salahuddin Qazi holds a Ph.D., degree in electrical engineering from the University of Technology, Loughborough, U.K. He is currently a full Professor and past chair of electrical engineering technol- ogy department at the SUNY Institute of Technology, Utica, New York. He teaches and conducts research in the area of fiber optics, wireless communications, nanotechnology and alternative energy. Dr. Qazi is a recipient of many awards including, the William
Paper ID #7483Mentoring Minority Students in Biomedical Engineering: An Engaged Ap-proachDr. Christine S Grant, North Carolina State UniversityDr. Tuere Bowles, NC State University Dr. Tuere A. Bowles is an Associate Professor in the department of Leadership, Policy, Adult and Higher Education. Professor Bowles’ research specializes in: adult learning and development, equity issues in education (race, ethnicity, gender and social class), assessment, workforce development and women’s learning and development. She received her B.A. in English at Spelman College, an M.Div. in the ITC/Morehouse School of Religion and a Ph.D. in
: Prentice Hall.14 Rizzoni, G., Principles and Applications of Electrical Engineering. 5'th ed. 2005, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Science/Engineering/Math.15 Bransford, J.D., A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School, ed. J.D.B. M. Suzanne Donovan, and James W. Pellegrino. 2004, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.16 Pintrich, P.R., Marx, R. W. , Boyle, R. A., Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 1993. 63(2
gaining a study partner or study group to having an opportunity to clear up ‘muddy’ points in course content.• Having access to other like-minded students in and out of class was encouraging.• SI provided an informal, encouraging, and non-threatening learning community.Surveys, interviews, and other feedback mechanisms will continue to be included in the on-goingassessment process.Developing and implementing SI on your campusSelling the concept of the Supplemental Instruction program model can be a difficult task. Thereare two distinct groups who need to buy into the program to result in a successful semester of SI.Both faculty and students must completely understand and believe in the SI approach. Initially,College of Engineering SI was
changesoccurring in the social system, the changes in the needs and wants of the “end user” (consumer),and the changing needs and desires of the engineering professionals. All of these variables placefundamental constraints on the continued development of the engineering education program,and specifically on the engineering design element.In the past, students graduating from traditional engineering programs were generally wellfounded in math and physics, and possessed reasonable procedural engineering analysis skills.They had been exposed to some liberal arts, and may have had some teamwork experiences insome type of engineering capstone design course. The educational process however wasfundamentally directed at using the student’s mind as a “storage
andrepresentatives from these firms participate in the evaluation process. The projects are eithercurrent projects the firms are working on simultaneously or are projects the firms have alreadycompleted. Students must prepare engineering plans, specifications, cost estimates, and writtenand oral project reports. Because the course extends over two semesters, an attempt is madeplace issues such information collection, planning and preliminary or concept design during thefirst semester with more detailed design during the second term.The Design Project course was designed with the ABET 2000 criteria (ABET, 1999) and theconcerns of industry in mind. Some of these concerns include lack of team skills, poor writtenand oral communication, lack of ability to
Session 3551 Using Research Projects to Enhance Environmental Engineering Laboratory Course Victor F. Medina, Valarie Akerson Washington State University, Tri-Cities Nina Wang Merrimac SystemsAbstractThe current paper describes a qualitative research study of an Environmental EngineeringLaboratory Course taught to a group of graduate students in the Spring of 1999. Thecourse structure was changed from a traditional mode of instruction to a project-basedcourse that allowed students to design and carry out a
Session 3657 Improving Quality in Introductory Industrial Engineering through Case Studies and Communication John Birge, Shane Henderson, Leslie Olsen University of Michigan AbstractWe describe an introductory course in industrial engineering that uses case studies, teamwork,public policy issues, and a focus on the communication demands on engineers to provide —atthe beginning of a student's career—a synthetic view of the role of industrial engineers in society.The course covers typical industrial engineering
Session 2344 Design for Society – An Innovative Multidisciplinary Course for Engineering Technology Andrew S. Lau Penn State HarrisburgABSTRACTThis paper is an overview of an innovative multidisciplinary course that has been offered sincethe spring of 1996 at Penn State Harrisburg. In addition to reviewing the nature of the course asit is being taught in spring 1997, the paper follows the development of the course and theauthor’s interest in the broad area of engineering for a better future. The course is innovative fora combination of factors
, that he seeks to temperand correct. Indeed, he precedes his critique by making some concessions to the work of C.Daniel Batson, originator of the “empathy-altruism hypothesis”—a common foundation forresearch on the development of empathy in engineering students. [13] [14]Such research often illuminates the question that animates both Bloom’s work and the responsesto it. Empathy is traditionally understood primarily as a feeling—but models like Batson’sencompass a range of cognitive as well as affective experiences, from “theory of mind” to“empathic distress.” [13] [14] As a result, contested definitions and distinctions create complexlines of disagreement about which types of other-oriented perceptions or sensations count as“empathy” and which
the 126th ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, 2019.[11] J. Rohde, L. Musselman, B. Benedict, D. Verdin, A. Godwin, A. Kirn, L. Benson, and G.Potvin, “Design Experiences, Engineering Identity, and Belongingness in Early Career Electricaland Computer Engineering Students,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 62, pp. 165-172,2019.[12] H. Darabi, E. Douzali, F. Karim, S. Harford, and H. Johnson, “Life after University forEngineering Graduates ASEE,” in Proceedings of the 124th ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Columbus, OH, 2017.[13] C. Carroll, S. Sell, and M. Sabick, “Introduction to Entrepreneurial-minded Learning forFaculty of Foundational STEM Courses Using the KEEN Framework,” in Proceedings of the126th ASEE Annual
Paper ID #42499Engineering Education in Times of War, Upheaval, and RevolutionProf. Amy E. Slaton, Drexel University Amy E. Slaton is a Professor Emerita of History at Drexel University. She writes on issues of identity in STEM education and labor, and is the author of Race, Rigor and Selectivity in U.S. Engineering: The History of an Occupational Color Line .Prof. Sepehr Vakil, Northwestern University Sepehr Vakil is an assistant professor of Learning Sciences in the School of Education and Social Policy at Northwestern University. Previously he was Assistant Professor of STEM Education and the Associate Director of
anticipated due to new infrastructure investments. Bycapturing the imagination of young minds and equipping them with a foundational understandingof civil engineering, the summer course is not just educating future students; it is contributing tothe development of the workforce that will shape tomorrow's infrastructure.Past students have gone on to enroll in civil engineering as well as other engineering programsin college. While further research and time is needed to assess post-graduation outcomes and thetypes of engineering careers these students ultimately enter, the initial indications are promising.These findings support the replication and adaptation of this model across other institutions,suggesting that such educational interventions can
Page 22.1036.2mainstream K-12 education, not merely as an elective or extracurricular activity. We haveposited that engineering: (1) presents opportunities for students to acquire critical 21st centuryskills, such as problem-solving, creativity, innovation, and teamwork; (2) provides relevantproblems and contexts which will motivate students to more deeply learn and apply science andmathematics; (3) promotes habits of mind, such as analytical thinking, that can be applied acrossa variety of problems, disciplines, and contexts; and (4) is a misunderstood and little-knowncareer path that provides opportunities for intellectually and financially rewarding careers thatcan help society and improve quality of life.The 2010 report Strengthening STEM
AC 2011-2054: SIGNIFICANT FACTORS IN SUCCESSFULLY MATCH-ING STUDENTS TO BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH LABO-RATORIESJonathan Sanghoon Lee, University of Virginia Jonathan S. Lee is currently an undergraduate in Biomedical Engineering at the University of Virginia.Mr. Shing Wai YamWilliam H Guilford, University of Virginia Will Guilford is an Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Virginia, and the current Undergraduate Program Director. He received his B.S. in Biology and Chemistry from St. Francis College in Ft. Wayne, Indiana and his Ph.D. in Physiology from the University of Arizona. Will did his postdoctoral training in Molecular Biophysics at the University of Vermont under David
AC 2011-940: PROMOTING FACULTY ADOPTION OF TABLET PCS INUPPER LEVEL ENGINEERING COURSESJames E. Lewis, University of Louisville James E. Lewis, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals in the J. B. Speed School of Engineering at the University of Louisville. His research interests include paral- lel and distributed computer systems, cryptography, engineering education, undergraduate retention and technology (Tablet PCs) used in the classroom.Jeffrey Lloyd Hieb, University of Louisville Page 22.1196.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011
Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2000, 165-169.2. Hake, R.R., “Interactive-engagement vs. traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses”, American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 1998, 64-71.3. Klosky, J.L., and Schaaf, R.V., “Hands-On Demonstrations in introductory mechanics”, Proceedings ASEE Annual Conference, 2002, 1815.4. Keller, F. S., “Testimony of an educational reformer”, Engineering Education, 1985, 144-149.5. Dareing, D. W. and Smith, K. S., “Classroom demonstrations help undergraduates relate mechanical vibration theory to engineering applications”, Proceedings ASEE Annual Conference, 1991, 396.6. Hata
ofChitkara University has said,16 “...for several reasons, India missed the Industrial Revolution –However, we are determined to do what is required to not miss the Silicon Revolution … a key step ischanging the pedagogical paradigm from what to think and learn by listening to how to think and tolearn by doing.”One hundred and fifty years ago William Barton Rogers founded the Massachusetts Institute ofTechnology (MIT),17 with the motto of “Mens et Manus” (i.e. Mind and Hands). MIT's 150 year-oldmodel for successful engineering education has been driven by a close coordination of theoreticalconcepts and laboratory exercises incorporating industrial best practices. During the past decade therehave been a proliferation of well funded national and even