duplicate material from the previous presentation by the author, the author stated that both the ASEE and CDIO papers were part of a series of studies centered around a single topic area and that some duplication between papers describing various aspects of the work is almost inevitable.] Abstract Discussions of engineering disasters have been widely used in teaching engineering ethics. However consideration of such disasters can also be used in a number of other ways in engineering education. For example, engineering disasters can be used to discuss operational aspects of engineering which are often not considered in
suggest that institutional constraints on providing equaleducational opportunities can limit women's career advancement in technology fields and affectthe broader engineering sector. The findings of this study show that women's participation andprogress in these fields can be greatly improved through changing information and communicationtechnology policies to better respond to their requirements.Machado-Taylor and Özkanli [28] emphasize differences in academic career developmentbetween male and female academics. They indicate the importance of institutional support toremove these obstacles. Atakan et al. [30] highlight the ethical principles of future managers andshow that female Turkish students adhere more to ethical principles in the
Use the propagation of uncertainty equation IKD HW8 Identify different distribution shapes, including normal, HW 1, 3-9, 11, P3, EU skewed, uniform, and bimodal Q Distributions Explain and utilize the Central Limit Theorem IKD HW4, HW11, P3 Recognize natural limits in a dataset WF Critique the ethics of a particular statistical analysis that Statistical may or may not support the analyst's conclusions (e.g
generative AI while minimizing anynegative consequences. This includes understanding the ethical considerations surrounding AI andteaching students how to use these tools responsibly (Qadir, 2023).ChatGPT can be used in construction engineering education. For example, if project input parametersalong with expectations are given to the tool, then it can produce required documentation for variousaspects of construction. It will be a great AI tool to use for teaching construction engineering because itcan act like a “Construction Management Software Program”. It can help with iterative procedures toimprove the analysis and design of various structures to be built for different projects. Particularly tomake construction reports, it will help on the
Paper ID #38234Engineering Firms as Racialized Organizations: The Experiences of BlackMale EngineersDr. Elliot P. Douglas, University of Florida Elliot P. Douglas is Professor of Environmental Engineering Sciences and Engineering Education, and Distinguished Teaching Scholar at the University of Florida. His research interests are in the areas of problem-solving, cultures of inclusion in engineering, and social justice in engineering ethics education.Erica D. McCray, University of Florida Dr. Erica D. McCray is an Associate Professor of Special Education at the University of Florida. Prior to joining the faculty
objective and politically neutraldiscipline, scholars have recently called for reforms to engineering education that challengetechnical/social dualism by integrating the “social realm” into dominant ways of thinking,knowing, and in doing engineering [1-2]. By social realm, we mean to evoke the waysengineering shapes, and is shaped by, social, cultural, political, and ethical systems, that informwho gets to participate in engineering, how and why engineering problems are perceived andundertaken, the results of engineering work, and who benefits from the outcomes of engineeringwork [1,3]. As scholars become increasingly aware of the role engineering plays in socialsystems, there have been increasing calls for engineering education to center the
-course materials, students in Botswana will complete the eight-week course guided by aproblem-based learning activity wherein students will work to solve an authentic real-worldproblem local to their community. As a part of the learning experience students in Botswanawill also develop 3-D modeling skills and their spatial ability while designing a solution to a real-world problem; students in the US will develop skills in the area of engineering ethics, creativityand problem-solving as they will serve as “consultants'' for student teams in Botswana (Finelliet al., 2012; Guntur, Setyaningrum, & Retnawati, 2021). The ABLE short program offers civil engineering students in Botswana an opportunity todevelop their visualization and 3D
Paper ID #40105Work in Progress: Engaging First-year Engineering Students throughMakerspace Project-based PedagogyDr. Gisele Ragusa, University of Southern California Dr. Gisele Ragusa is a Professor of Engineering Education at the University of Southern California. She conducts research on college transitions and retention of underrepresented engineering students, engineer- ing ethics, PreK-12 STEM education, and also research about engineering global preparedness.Dr. Erik A. Johnson, University of Southern California Dr. Erik A. Johnson is a Professor of Civil & Environmental Engineering at the University of Southern
Cost of production (CoP)scaling strategiesFinancing a business Financing a business (FB)Generating new ideas based on societal needs and business opportunities Generating new ideas (GNI)Innovating to solve problems under organizational constraints Organization constraints (OC)Innovative client centered solutions through design thinking Design thinking (DT)Learning from failure Learning from failure (LFF)Role of product in value creation Role of product (RP)Resolving ethical issues
xmodification, & operation ofengineering tools…Safety. Identify health, safety,and environmental issuesrelated to technological x xprocesses and activities, anddeal with them responsibly.Communication.Communicate effectively x xabout laboratory work with aspecific audience…Teamwork. Work effectively x x xin teams…Ethics in the Laboratory.Behave with highest ethical x xstandards…Sensory Awareness. Use thehuman senses to
knowledge andparticipating in ethically in communities of learning [1]. In previous courses, it was found thatstudents lacked these information literacy skills and needed far more than one library instructionsession and one assignment to master these skills. It was determined that in order to accomplishthese objectives, multiple library information literacy instruction sessions and informationliteracy-based assignments were necessary.Implementation GuidelinesTo prepare for the unit of study, the professor reached out to professors in each of the 11engineering departments and conducted at least one interview with a faculty member about theirresearch. These five-to-ten-minute conversations were recorded on zoom and posted for studentsto watch.Table 1
Comprehension and laws and regulations, and social movements; identify alignments and gaps in Analysis (1) research and (2) practice within this context. Recognize and respect cultural differences and apply relevant skills to 2 Cross-cultural Humility collaborate across cultures, with an emphasis on life-long learning. Examine ethical implications of global research and development, including Global Engineering 3 consideration of power imbalances; recognize the limitations of engineering in Ethics guiding global development
. Figure 1. Desired skills for instructors in COILWithin the socioethical management skills, we have grouped social and ethical skills. One ofthe essential abilities is communication, not only oral and written communication but alsousing distinct channels or tools (e-mail, text messages, or chats). One related skill tocommunication is using comprehensiveness to clarify statements and notes [9], facilitating thestudents' feedback in diverse forms. In this part, ethical and social skills acquire a relevantrole, so communication must be based on respect in a comfortable and sure environmentconsidering cultural differences and institutional policies. Under this last point, instructorsmust also establish course policies and rules for class
to address important ethical considerations that are not frequently addressed intraditional engineering curricula (including within traditional engineering ethics curricula), andwhich center issues of particular importance to our nation’s increasingly diverse body ofengineering students.As a growing number of departments begin to undertake these attempts at curricular reform,there will be (and in fact already is) significant backlash from pedagogical traditionalists, whomay perceive these efforts as “watering down” the technical rigor of a traditional engineeringeducation with elements (e.g., “storytelling”) typically reserved for the humanities or socialsciences. Although the author is not aware of a specific study detailing the prevalence
most likely to be successful.However, there are certain cons of using data analytics in departments: (a) Limitations of data: Analytics relies on the quality and quantity of data available. If the data is incomplete or inaccurate, it can lead to flawed decision-making. (b) Cost: Implementing analytics tools and systems can be expensive, which may be a barrier for some academic departments, particularly those with limited resources. (c) Resistance to change: Some faculty and staff may be resistant to using analytics to make decisions, particularly if they are not familiar with the technology or feel that it undermines their expertise. (d) Ethical concerns: There may be ethical concerns around the use of student
Student Outcome 4). It can be challenging foreducators to find opportunities for their students to develop these skills due to the demands ofteaching the extensive technical material associated with the curriculum. This paper describesour experience using a current event related case study in a technical elective to address ABETstudent outcomes 2 and 4.Case studies involving sustainability and environmental issues provide a unique opportunity forengineering students to tackle technical and ethical issues. Including a role-playing component ina case study presentation provides additional opportunities for students to develop awareness ofsocial justice issues. A wind energy workforce development and engineering education grantprovided an
reported use by course and category is presented. 15 12 9 6 3 0 Math (Calculus Economics, Ethics, Transportation Structures Environmental/ Surveying Geotechnical and Statistics) and Management Water Resources 1 (Extremely low confidence) 2 (Low confidence) 3 (Neutral) 4 (Confident) 5 (Extremely confident)Figure 2: Student self-confidence in their ability to use the FERH to solve FE practice exam problems by topic. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Southeastern Section Conference (A
orally or in writing 9. Learning how to find, evaluate, and use resources to explore a topic in-depth 10. Developing ethical reasoning and ethical decision making 11. Learning to analyze and critically evaluate ideas, arguments, and points of view 12. Learning to apply knowledge and skills to benefit others or serve the public good 13. Learning appropriate methods for collecting, analyzing, and interpreting numerical informationTable 1 shows the distribution of students' self-assessments. The scores range from 1.0 to 5.0 with1.0 intervals for the listed 'No Apparent Progress,' 'Slight Progress,' 'Moderate Progress,''Substantial Progress,' and 'Exceptional Progress' correspondently, and the mean scores of thesurvey results
support ofundergraduate research, the university developed the following six student learning outcomes(SLOs), relative to undergraduate research: 1. Define and/or articulate a research problem 2. Design a course of action to solve a research problem using as appropriate, multidisciplinary approaches 3. Apply ethical principles in research 4. Conduct research independently and/or collaboratively 5. Research decisions or conclusions based on the analysis and synthesis of evidence 6. Communicate research resultsAs part of this project at the Worldwide campus, these SLOs were used to structure the supportnetwork of the Research Scholars Program (Fig. 1): mentoring, workshops, and the independentstudy course.The support network discussed
engineer” QuestionIn a mechanical engineering lab course, students were asked to list the critical characteristics ofengineering professionals. The data collected from Spring 2019 to Spring 2021 were coded toidentify ethical, social, or environmental aspects, and the results are presented in Figure 3.Ethical items have some prevalence of reporting, but environmental and social aspects rarelyappear within the self identification of professional characteristics. The course where thisquestion was administered in, does not specifically cover content that addresses social justiceissues, or more broad social impacts or environmental impacts. A higher prevalence of social andenvironmental professional responsibility would be expected within a course
knowledge to people-oriented challenges in global settings; theseprograms have many names but are known as, Community Engaged Learning, Global ServiceLearning (GSL) [5] or Engineering for Community Development (ECD) [6].The student and community impacts of these types of programs have been widely assessed asprojects have seen success through incorporation of principles such as ethics, social justice, localexpertise and resources, and building trusting relationships with shared goals [7]. There has beenextensive analysis on the use of ECD to develop global sociotechnical competency skills andpositive student learning outcomes [8], [9].However, historically, well-intentioned university-forged relationships with partner communitiesand resultant
represents a vast untapped potential to exponentially increasethe impact of EEC funding and transform engineering education. But tapping this potential hasthus far been an intractable problem, despite ongoing calls for data sharing by public funders ofresearch. Changing the paradigm of single-use data collection requires actionable, provenpractices for effective, ethical data sharing, coupled with sufficient incentives to both share anduse existing data. To that end, this project draws together a team of experts to overcomesubstantial obstacles in qualitative data sharing by building a framework to guide secondaryanalysis in engineering education research (EER), and to test this framework using pioneeringdata sets. Herein, we report on
apply them to solve biomedical problems.(3) enhance oral and written scientific communication skills to facilitate collaboration acrossdiscipline boundaries.(4) instruct students how to conduct research ethically and responsibly.(5) prepare participants to pursue graduate studies and careers in a STEM field.In this paper, we describe our first-year experience running this program, lessons learned, and newpractices we will implement going forward.MethodsRecruitment Targets: All undergraduate applications were considered, with priority given torecruitment of rising sophomore and junior women and URM students, and from institutions withlimited research opportunities. Program targets are ≥ 50% women, ≥ 40% URM, and ≥ 60% fromschools with limited
two campuses to ensure that students have the pre-requisite knowledge to succeed in either program.Table 1 shows the core courses students from Kelowna take on the Vancouver campus whenthey follow the mobility path. In addition to these core courses, these students would take threetechnical electives. As one can observe from the course titles, the focus is on productionmanagement.Table 1: Core courses in fourth year curriculum on the Kelowna campus for Vancouver students Course: Title: MANF 370 Production Management II ENGR 413 Law and Ethics for Engineers MANF 430 Manufacturing Capstone Design Project
Paper ID #38126Who identifies as an engineering leader? Exploring influencesof gender, race, and professional experienceAndrea Chan (Research Associate) Andrea Chan is a Research Associate at the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering | University of TorontoCindy Rottmann (Associate Director Research) Cindy Rottmann is the Associate Director, Research at the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering at the University of Toronto. She conducts research on engineering leadership, engineers' professional practice, and ethics and equity in engineering. She is currently the Program
Competency as “the confident, critical and responsive use of, and engagementwith digital technologies for learning, at work, and for participation in society”. It is listed amongcompetencies such as mathematical competency, civic competency, and literacy competency[20].Knowledge in digital competency is considered a sound understanding of the nature, role, andopportunity given by digital technologies. Skills in digital competency include a range ofapplicable uses of information technology systems. Finally, the attitude of digital competencyrequires a critical perspective, including being ethical and safe with technology applications. TheEuropean Digital Competence Framework for Citizens, (DigComp 2.0) further narrows theapplication of digital
Multi-Disciplinary Design: Implications for CS and Engineering PedagogyIris BaharDr. Omur-Ozbek is an Associate Professor of Teaching in the Department of Civil and EnvironmentalEngineering at the Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO. Dr. Omur-Ozbek’s teaching interestsinclude environmental engineering concepts, environmental chemistry, water quality analyses, ecologicalengineering and environmental and social justice, and engineering ethics. Her research interests includedrinking water quality and treatment, odorous and toxic algal blooms, impacts of toxins on crops andhumans, impacts of wildfires and hydraulic fracking on surface water quality, and affected indoor airquality due to use of contaminated tap water.Ashley
solutionshave been previously addressed in the literature [24] and implementing some of theseinterventions may improve the project experience in core engineering courses such as these.Specifically, groups who develop team contracts agreeing on responsibilities and expectations ofteam members, independent of the project’s technical content, tend to work more efficiently as ateam and have a better experience (i.e. satisfaction).These comments about the course project can also be viewed within the context of Perry’s theoryof intellectual and ethical development [25]. Perry purports that intellectual development starts atdualism, where problems are clearly defined with right and wrong answers. These types ofproblems can typically be found in freshmen and
, analyze and interpretdata, design systems to meet needs, learn from failure, demonstrate creativity, select, modify andoperate tools, work safely, communicate effectively, work effectively in teams, behave ethically,and gather information with their senses.The number of objectives above indicates that laboratories are asked to do many things;however, laboratories represent a small portion of the engineering credit hours within mostprograms. Many programs have several four-credit engineering courses which include one labcredit hour, but the total lab time does not typically exceed four or five credit hours. This paperpresents integrated experiments as a way to make efficient use of scarce laboratory time.Integrated experiments are revisited in
Outcomes 2(an ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs withconsideration of public health, safety and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social,environmental, and economic factors) and 4 (an ability to recognize ethical and professionalresponsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider theimpact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts).Summary Faculty hoping to implement the Solar District Cup in capstone design courses can lookforward to an engaging, detailed design opportunity for students. Faculty using the project in thefall should prepare for some time at the beginning of the semester during which the