faculty to learn more of that wisdom and ethics that need to be taught inaddition to the basic material learned. Having the students input has helped understandwhat are their expectations and views on their education.Interactions between students and faculty are primordial in significant learning andstudents have spoken3. In two studies12,13 , these interactions were important; however, Proceedings of the 2011 North Midwest Section Conferencethey were negligible in some cases as was shown in a report from the National survey ofStudents Engagement NSSE9. Pomales-Garcia's study3 showed that under 50% (and evenunder 30% of students in some universities) don’t have interactions with their teachersoutside of the classroom. I know
perspectives that differ fromyour own and integrate your individual expertise and views with those of other people of bothtechnical and non-technical backgrounds(e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems: identify, formulate,articulate, and solve engineering problems; think critically about and reflect on the processes ofproblem definition, engineering design, and project management(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility: understand professional andethical responsibilities as they apply to both particular engineering projects and to the engineeringprofession as a whole(g) an ability to communicate effectively with both expert and non-expert audiences(h) the broad education necessary to understand the
employing in- novative, ethical and inclusive mixed-methods research approaches using AI to uncover insights about the 21st century workforce. Sreyoshi is passionate about improving belonging among women in STEM and Engineering. She was recently elected as Senator at the Society of Women Engineers - a not for profit organization with over 42,000 global members and the world’s largest advocate and catalyst for change for women in engineering and technology. She is also a member of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Learn more about her work and get in touch at www.ThatStatsGirl.com.Dr. Michelle Soledad, The Ohio State University Michelle Soledad is a Lecturer in the Department of Engineering
the challenges faced bya typical faculty, as they are few in number. The following paragraphs discuss the variouschallenges faced by faculty.Faculty experience high levels of stress during their probationary years, working towards theirtenure [2], [3]. Of the many requirements for tenure, the requirement of sufficient publications isa tough one to achieve given all the new teaching assignments, student advising, service,research and more. One of the hurdles faced by new faculty is to publish, hence knowledge ofmechanisms to improve scholarship of publications will aid in achieving their goal to securetenure. In addition, ethical considerations of scholarship of publications has to be taken intoaccount when discussing scholarship of publishing
; economics fluency 4. Communication Automation/robotics Business cycles 5. Computational thinking Business continuity Communication 6. Data analysis Cloud computing Company’s “brand” 7. Data backup and restoration College algebra Confidentiality 8. Data ethics Communication Continuous improvement 9. Data flow: origin to end user Controls Decision making 10. Data fluency/vocabulary Cyber-physical systems Entrepreneurship 11. Data management & storage Digital fluency/vocabulary Ethics 12. Data modeling Digital twins
fulfill their obligation to work sustainably and ethically within the diverse communities of Canada and the world.Ms. Stephanie Diane Shaw, University of Guelph - School of Engineering Stephanie is a Professional Engineer and Ph.D. Candidate in the School of Engineering at the University of Guelph. Her research is focusing on product development of air quality purification technologies for urban environments. Her current degree is in Environmental Engineering, and she previous education includes an M.A.Sc. in Environmental Engineering (renewable energy), from the University of Guelph, and her B.Eng. in Materials Science and Engineering, from McMaster University. Stephanie has been involved with engineering leadership
additional unit on “inclusion” that remains separate from quantitative work.The gap of awareness regarding bias in engineering processesEngineers must be aware of biases and assumptions that shape the products they create, as thishas engineering ethics implications on how their work impacts the world (Dyrud, 2017; Feister,et. al., 2016). Within our own subfield of biomedical engineering, unaddressed biases have led tosituations such as left-handed surgeons not receiving appropriate equipment during training(Adusumilli et. al, 2004), facial recognition systems not registering the pain expressions ofdementia patients (Taati et. al., 2019), and smartphone-based conversational agents havinginappropriate responses to questions about sexual or domestic
: student-centered teaching and learning, pedagogy in design, honors pedagogy and scholarship, diversity and inclusion in higher educa- tion, and ethics in engineering. In the classroom, Mirna strives to encourage students’ intrinsic motivation to learn through modeling authenticity in teaching and learning. Recent scholarships: Nickoloff Scholar in Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Daniels Fund Scholar in Engineering Ethics Recent accolade: University Innovation Fellows (UIF) Mines Faculty ChampionDr. Megan Sanders, Colorado School of Mines Megan Sanders is the Senior Assessment Associate at the Trefny Innovative Instruction Center at the Colorado School of Mines. Using her background in educational psychology, she
, engineering ethics, and environmental justice.Erica D. McCray, University of Florida Dr. Erica D. McCray is an Associate Professor of Special Education at the University of Florida. Prior to joining the faculty, she served as a special educator for students with behavioral and learning disabilities in Title I elementary and middle school settings. Dr. McCray has been recognized on multiple levels for her teaching and research, which focuses on diversity issues. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Work in Progress: An Exploration of the In/Authentic Experiences of EngineersAbstractThis paper is a work in progress
section of the paper provides detail on the experimental design comparing cybersecurityeducation provided in the intensive ‘boot camp’ format to traditional academic semester courseformat and how both qualitative and quantitative data is collected and analyzed.Instructional staff will offer the same cybersecurity curriculum via the traditional academicsemester three credit hour format and an intensive two-week boot camp to provide a directcomparison of strengths and weaknesses of the two course delivery models.Instructional staff will offer cybersecurity boot camps teaching both defensive network securityand ethical hacking. The boot camp cohort will study a minimum of forty hours per week overtwo weeks per subject; defensive network security
Fall 2019,outlined in the lessons learned and discussion section at the end of the paper.Course DesignThe primary lecture course, ENGR 2001: Introduction to Engineering, serves to provide studentswith a background in the engineering design process, project management, engineering ethics, andwritten communication. This course is similar to many such introductory engineering courses, butonly meets for 1 hour per week. In addition to the lecture course, students meet in several 2-hourevening recitation sections. These sections are led by other undergraduate engineering studentsand provide an opportunity for first semester students to get tutoring for Calculus and Chemistry,as well as collaborate with their cohort.Associated with this course is a
programs was phased in asstudents completed the pre-engineering sequence or transferred from junior colleges to enroll inthe programs. The civil engineering program initially shared all lower division generalengineering courses with mechanical engineering, including fundamentals of engineering,computer aided-drafting, statics, dynamics, mechanics of materials, fluid mechanics, engineeringeconomy, and engineering ethics. Civil and mechanical engineering also shared the fluidmechanics course. There was also a partial alignment of the civil engineering materials coursewith the existing materials course for mechanical engineering and engineering technologystudents in order to share lab activities and resources.Civil engineering also initiated three
Summer 1- Cultural Immersion with a community Project in Project & Design 1Community CoreEngagement Year 1- Social Justice, Environmental Sustainability, Sciences Conceptual Design, Community Engagement Design Ethics & Summer Zero Thinking Social Summer 0- Design thinking, Empathy & Design, Team& Empathy Justice Work, Personal Identity as an Engineer
degree inCivil or Environmental Engineering. The goal of sustainable engineering is to create ecologicallyand socially appropriate solutions within the capacity of nature without compromising futuregenerations. This certificate provides students breadth in the areas of ethics and resource equity(HU Elective), interactions between technology and society (SS Elective), engineeringconnections with the environment (CE or BA Elective), engineering materials andwater/sanitation (CE 4900/4905), all at a global perspective. Students begin the certificate withthe colloquium on sustainability which introduces each of these concepts, and finish with theinternational senior design experience that requires students to work on an engineering problemset in the
ideation techniques to process to meet desired needs within realisticx Develop detailed design specifications. explore a variety of alternative solutions. constraints such asx Design to match a set of detailed specifications. economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, andx sustainability Form a team to define and solve an open ended (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teamsx engineering problem. Define their team roles and evaluate their performancex on a team
Assignment: Lab Experiment 2 Justification: Lab Experiment 2 requires the student to (a) set up node-client communication and (b) send the state of a sensor from the node to the client. Lab experiment 2 measures the ability to conduct experiments and perform measurements (PI_6_2), and the ability to develop and conduct appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpret data, and use engineering judgment to draw conclusions (SO_6).SO_4: An ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global
. a. Make connections across math, physics, and engineering courses. b. Re-inforce the importance of developing quality writing skills. c. Show how other subjects such as history, ethics, and musical improvisation may cross paths with or support engineering views and mindsets. 4. Overview of first-year engineering core/foundation courses. a. Share ABET student learning outcomes and expound on expectations. b. Conduct a detailed explanation of common course topics for first-year courses to include expected prerequisite knowledge. c. Identify support resources available to students. 5. Explore industry sectors, highlighting various majors involved in each. a. Link to
proceed- ings. Dr. Tu has over 11 years of college teaching and research experiences in cybersecurity and digital forensics. Dr. Tu is a Certified Ethical Hacker (CEH), Certified Pen Tester (CPT), Certified Hacking and Forensics Investigator (CHFI), & AccessData Computer Examiner (ACE).Prof. Tae-Hoon Kim, Purdue University NorthwestMr. Justin David Heffron, Purdue University NorthwestMr. Jonathan Kakahiaka White c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 PNW GenCyber Summer Camp: Game based Cybersecurity Education for High School Students Ge Jin1, Manghui Tu2, Tae-Hoon Kim3, Justin Heffron4, and Jonathan White5
Physics and interpret data. c An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability. d An ability to function on multidisciplinary teams. e An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems. PSO f An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. a 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 g An ability to communicate effectively. b
to analyze 2. ABET assessment and interpret data c. an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet In spring 2016, 54 students in three sections of the EMT desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, program took EMT 1255, and participated in the READ environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, program. At the end of the semester, 51 students were manufacturability, and sustainability surveyed to determine, if the ABET student outcomes a, b, d. an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams e. an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems
[9] N. Van Tyne and M. Brunhart-Lupo, "Ethics for theprogramming, in part by encouraging whatever progress can "Me" Generation: How "Millennial" Engineeringbe made. An improvement in students’ self-efficacy with Students View Ethical Responsiibility in theprogramming is a potential example of persistence and Engineering Profession," in American Society fortangible accomplishment leading to the acceptance of more Engineering Education Annual Conference andcomplex and less-well-defined challenges such as open-ended Exposition 2015, Seattle, WA, 2015.problem solving. While programming-based careers seem tobe appealing in the current economy, and informationmanagement grows in
first awarded in 2012. This minor in these areas. With a strong liberal arts foundation, the cur- requires 27 credits including chemical engineering, Chemistry 35 riculum provides opportunities for students to develop both engineering, advanced science, and ethics courses. In Other technical (biology, math, phys
fundamental materials course and sporadically during machinedesign. During Autumn 2017, the faculty set out to create a more cohesive materials ‘thread’through the curriculum in order to aid the students in associating the information learned in earlycourses to the latter ones. The specific capstone course outcome this course is laying thefoundation for is to “design systems, components, or processes with realistic constraints such aseconomic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health, safety, manufacturing, andsustainability”. The B ENGR 320 labs were revised to incorporate a second 2-hour materialselection lab to provide students with a more open-ended materials selection module thatencourages the students to research broader attributes of
% Male (%) 20% Total (%) 15% 10% 5% 0%Figure 3. Other factors impacting development of student's successful engineering culture(knowledge, practices, and values) during semester. Gender breakdown.Female students viewed their interaction with others as more important than malestudents, who viewed “real world experiences” as most important. Work in other courseswas seen as important. Personal characteristics and experiences follow and some may bevia extra-curricular activities, clubs, etc. Some of the personal characteristics includepersonal attitudes, work ethic, time management, self-management, other varied personalinterests, learning ability, etc
). properties of materials and other STEM topicsE. Understand the social relevance and ethical The social relevance and ethical implications of Objective met. No recommendations implications of engineering activities related to manufacturing as a sociological phenomenon was manufacturing (human rights, environmental impact, presented and discussed. etc.) (Goal 2). Participants worked as teams within the university Objective met. Consider suggestion regardingF. Share knowledge, ideas and concepts working on hosting sites during which the teams developed grouping participants by background teams with professional and pre-service
interviews followed a semi-structured protocol revolving around questions of: general understanding of the program and thereason for its establishment; potential benefits of the program for the university and the college;concerns about the shift in curriculum model; and views of what constitutes success or failure ofsuch a program. The general methodology for our qualitative interview process follows thatoutlined in by Strauss (Strauss, 1987). An external evaluation center performed the interviewsand small focus groups to avoid ethical conflicts. Ethnographic data has consisted of informal notes and journals kept by members of theFYE team. The goal of such an informal structure is to preserve natural observations (Anderson,2003). Since the
,experience, and practice, is devoted primarily to the implementation and extension of existingtechnology for the benefit of humanity. Engineering Technology education focuses primarilyon the applied aspects of science and that portion of the technological spectrum closest toproduct improvement, industrial practices, and engineering operational functions”4.The CSE defines its commitment “to train leading, analytical, critical and creativeprofessionals with strategic visions and broad ethical sense, capable of designing,implementing and managing computational infrastructure to provide innovative solutions forthe benefit of society, in a global, multidisciplinary and sustainable context”6.Collaborative Cross-border Method Technology development
Science and Engineering MotivationReimagined 1st yearexperience in order to:a)equip students for success in Designing from Day 1: Team presentations on class 2 both the classroom and the engineering professionb)facilitate retention of engineering students, especially of underrepresented groups. Working in teams on their first design challengeThe course content b)Systems Thinking -focuses on: Helping studentsa)Human Centered understand the world as Design & Design interconnected systems. Thinking - a problem c)Professionalism and solving approach that Ethics - Helping enables students to students understand the tackle design
emphasized: 1. “Global problems of the modern society. Culture, cultural value and cultural identity 2. “Technological breakthrough in the context of globalization” 3. “Ethics of communication in the modern society” 4. “Outstanding international scientists” 5. “Tolerance as an essential quality of an individual and a specialist in the modern society” 6. “Specialist of the 21st century”.Using the “Specialist of the 21st century” as an example, this theme can be integrated as amodule in the engineering disciplines. The purpose is to form self-determination, global andsocial awareness, and decision making through the social interactions within a group of highschool students through the completion of the following steps. In the first
research.Different ways of thinking facilitate different strategies and subsequent actions to innovate. Thestudy uses the Sustainability Education Framework for Teachers (Warren, Archambault, &Foley, 2014) that embraces four ways of thinking including futures, values, systems, andstrategic thinking to address complex educational challenges.Futures thinking focuses on working to address tomorrow’s problems today with anticipatoryapproaches to understand and prepare for future changes, problems, and solutions (Warren et al.,2014). Values thinking is about recognizing the concepts of ethics, equity, and social justice(Warren et al., 2014). It involves understanding these concepts in the context of varying culturesand accordingly making decisions. Systems