important role in the success of our studentsin their future careers with blurred lines in diverse teams, and numerous studies show that it is askill that cannot be taught, rather developed through experiential learning in a curriculum thatvertically integrates problem-solving [16].Another challenge introduced by Industry 5.0 is that instead of designing a full discipline-specific product, engineers are increasingly acting as system integrators; therefore, engineersmust possess the ability to quickly learn and adapt material from other STEM and non-STEMfields. Industry 5.0 projects are complex, multidimensional, and fast-evolving, requiring criticalthinking and problem-solving abilities from engineers beyond their STEM foundation. Theengineers of
programs in the EAC have to compete withother engineering disciplines, making it more challenging to attract students compared tosurveying programs in the ETAC and ANSAC. Arcidiacono et al. [13]; Wiswall and Zafar [14]found that earnings expectations and ability / aptitude perceptions have a critical role majorselection. Of note is that surveyors have one of lowest median pay among the architecture andengineering professions [15], making it extremely difficult to persuade students to follow a majorthat has the same mathematics requirements and settle for a considerably lower salary.The choice of career selection for students entering college is a combination between theirpersonal interests, abilities / aptitudes, and limitations / needs of the
support of their career readiness. He has helped to lead research funded by NSF (award # 2024973) to examine the potential benefit of using critical narratives as a pedagogical tool in the professional formation of engineers.Aishwary Pawar Aishwary Pawar is a doctoral candidate in Industrial & Systems Engineering at the University of Michigan-Dearborn. His main research interest centers on investigating the factors that influence undergraduate enrollment, retention, graduation, and dropout. For his master’s thesis, Aishwary researched how student demographics and background characteristics lead to a more comprehensive understanding of a student’s enrolment and retention at an undergraduate college. For his Ph.D
Engagement with College Student MentorsAbstractResearch on gender differences in career interests has found that by adolescence, girls arereported to be less interested in science and engineering than boys. The leaky pipeline is apopular simplified metaphor to describe the reasons for the observed gender disparity, slowlyremoving potential candidates from science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)as they age through the academic system. Although numerous formal and informal programshave been developed to “plug” this leak with role models, what is not well understood is thepotential role models’ effect on student’s STEM attitudes over time. To address this limitation, along-term continuous mentoring and tutoring program was developed
Paper ID #37180Call without Response: Faculty Perceptions about Diversity,Equity, and InclusionKaitlyn Anne Thomas (Student) Kaitlyn is an engineering education doctoral student at the University of Nevada, Reno. Her background is in civil engineering. Her research focus is women in engineering and mental health.Derrick Satterfield Derrick Satterfield is a doctoral candidate in Engineering Education at the University of Nevada, Reno. His research focuses on engineering graduate students' experiences and motivation centered on career planning and preparation.Jeanne Sanders Jeanne Sanders (she/her/hers) is a
Post-course Both survey survey surveys Career Scholars Fall 2020 4 7 3 Global Disaster Resilience Fall 2020 9 11 9 Scholars Global Service Learning Fall 2020 6 6 6 Global Sustainability Scholars Fall 2020 6 7 4 Virtual Svc Learning Projects Spring 9 15 10 2021
two workshops conducted in 2022 with 56 participants as examples. Thefirst workshop was for a group associated with 9 North Carolina State University CollegeAdvising Corps (CAC) members, recent college graduates who may or may not have a STEMdegree. These CAC advisors with high school students in rural parts of the state to advise themalong career pathways. The second workshop was for 49 teachers in a K-8 STEM schoolneeding to understand integrated STEM instruction and get ideas for nearly immediateimplementation in their classrooms. Both groups needed orientation with regards to authenticengineering for K-12 students, as well as an understanding of engineering careers. Bothworkshops included hands-on engineering activities, discussion of
we take a different tack, wanting to identify the nexus, or common ground, ofInnovative and Entrepreneurial self-efficacies, and Innovative and Entrepreneurial behaviors.Thinking about common ground is a useful lens with which to look at the intentional or focusedcreativity of engineers, whether they are working in new or existing enterprises. First, we showthe development of this intersectional/nexus concept (which we call Embracing New Ideas, ENI)in terms of measures of self-efficacy (ENI-SE; consisting of six items, with a Cronbach’s Alphaof .85) and behavior (ENI-B; consisting of five items, with a Cronbach’s Alpha of .80). Thenbased on Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT), we model ENI-B (our dependent variable) asa function of ENI-SE
the collegiate competition’s first evervirtual semester – “Career Connected Learning.” Career Connected Learning was a five-partvirtual initiative providing students with resources to excel in the competition, collaborate withother universities, and meet stakeholders’ expectations. This dynamic initiative tailored activitiesto universities’ unique circumstances and was praised by all stakeholders.This case study reviews the competition organizer’s successful implementation of thecontingency thinking process. As this was the first time the organizers implemented a highlyadaptive process, the organizers faced many challenges including a compressed timeline, everchanging constraints for planning events, and the impacts of COVID-19 on team
or four-year higher educational institution.Now they must learn to be students within their new environment as they work to fully engagewith their studies [4]. However, differences in both technical and non-technical courserequirements may produce a “transfer shock”, resulting in lower grades during the first semester[4]. If transfer shock persists, it can lead to academic disengagement through a questioning ofcompetence for one’s chosen major program or career path as a result of receiving poor grades[16].Two-year transfer students had attended a two-year institution prior to transfer, while four-yeartransfer students had attended a four-year institution. While both two-year and four-year studentsmay experience transfer shock at their new
Paper ID #34079An NSF-LSAMP Model for the Successful Transition of UnderrepresentedStudents into STEM Majors and BeyondMrs. Lauren J. Donovan, Stony Brook University Lauren Donovan is Assistant Director for STEM Smart programs. After graduating from Stony Brook University with a BA in Anthropology, Lauren’s career in higher education began in the non-profit con- servation organization within the Department of Anthropology, Stony Brook University. This environment grew Lauren’s proficiencies for grant proposal and research, and program development. After a decade long tenure in Anthropology, Lauren transitioned to the
Paper ID #32323An Overview of the Hornet Leadership Program in the College ofEngineering & Computer Science at California State University, SacramentoDr. Harindra Rajiyah, California State University, Sacramento Dr. Harindra (Raj) Rajiyah’s career spans six organizations from Academia to Industry. He currently teaches as an adjunct faculty in the college of engineering & computer science at CSU. • Raj started his career at Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta as an Assistant Professor in Engi- neering Science and Mechanics. He taught 5 undergraduate and graduate level courses, mentored graduate students and
learn the necessary skills to begin careers in their chosen fields. Those individuals that are preparedwell have had a range of experiences to use as they navigate the workforce. A lot of attention in highereducation is given to the curriculum and faculty and staff expertise, but there are other factors that helpprepare students. In construction education, students often rely on co-op or internships to hone vitalskills. This paper examines what occurred when community-engaged learning components, includingreflection and reciprocity, were emphasized in the co-op experience. By the intentional way theseexperiences are structured, students can further develop essential skills and build social awarenessregarding how their work affects the larger
a Mathematician and Computer Systems Analyst for the U. S. Department of Energy as well as more than 25 years of experience teaching mathematics, statistics, computer science, and first-year engineering courses in higher education institutions. Currently, she leads a team of faculty who are dedicated to providing first year engineering students with a high- quality, challenging, and engaging educational experience with the necessary advising, mentoring, and academic support to facilitate their transition to university life and to prepare them for success in their engineering discipline majors and future careers. American c Society for Engineering
introduced to courses, programs or curricula,often from the perspective of instructors and educators. Research on student learning andassessment typically examines engineering students’ learning experiences and perceptions, andcontributing factors to their learning outcomes such as academic achievement and competencydevelopment. Research on retention and diversity of engineering students addresses how toretain engineering students in their engineering studies, particularly female and other minoritystudents. Other possible research areas include paradigms, methodologies and communities ofengineering education research itself; academic and career pathways of engineering students;admission process of engineering students; engineering workplace practice
dependent students receive support from their parents, limiting their need to work,whereas upper-income independent students fall into that income category precisely becausethey are working. As one might expect, younger dependent students work less than olderindependent students [7]. A more recent survey of 1,182 undergraduate students in Englandshowed that 68.1% of students took jobs due to the need of “pay for social, leisure or luxuries”,while the needs for “career related experience” and “degree related experience” counted for only15.6% and 8.9%, respectively [8]. The changes in student’s lifestyle and consumptionpreferences play a significant role in making the employment decisions.How working during their university studies affect student
; offers peer-reviewsof paper submissions; proposal writing guidelines and instruction; and affords undergraduatestudent team members of any level with the opportunity to engage in relevant scientific research,hands-on discipline-related design, career information, opportunities in meeting presentation andeducational outreach.IntroductionSponsored as part of a NASA Workforce Development initiative since 2002, the TSGC DesignChallenge [TDC] has continued to deliver a unique academic experience to the undergraduatestudent teams that participate: the opportunity to propose, design and fabricate a mission-relevant design solution for NASA. Design Challenge project topics are submitted to TSGC fordesign team consideration by engineers and scientists
, particularly from underrepresented groups, to pursue IT andengineering degrees and careers. A deliberate effort was made to enlist the participation ofdifferent types of teachers—general science, physics, engineering, technology education, andcomputer teachers—from a varied socioeconomic and academic group of schools across NewJersey in order to understand how the project can be implemented in a range of environments.Data from teacher and student surveys, student pre- and post-tests, and teacher follow-up surveysare being gathered and analyzed. The model and effectiveness of the summer institutes isdescribed, as are the varying implementation models, challenges, and successful classroomstrategies.IntroductionBUILD IT is a three-year National Science
ticking, and you’re getting antsy. You’ve delayed starting a family because youwanted to get settled into your academic position; however, that doesn’t seem such a good ideanow that you’re approaching your mid-30’s. What factors should you consider in making thedecision to start your family? Once you’ve decided to take the plunge into family life, what arestrategies you can use to strike a balance between your family and career? Here, personalexperiences of several female engineering faculty members from the University of Iowa will beshared, along with tips from other resources. Topics include: (1) Negotiating with your supervisor [how will baby’s arrival affect your contributions to the department/college?]; (2
Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) programs shows that thevast majority of these research experiences are provided to junior and senior students.Developing successful research programs is particularly challenging in community colleges,most of which do not have on-going research programs.This paper is a description of how a small engineering transfer program at a Hispanic-Servingcommunity college in California developed a three-tier research internship program suitable forcommunity college students at different stages of their academic careers. The first part of theprogram is a two-week Winter Research Scholars Program held during the winter break forstudents in the beginning stages of their studies. The second part is a ten-week Summer
Paper ID #18879Inspiring Future Engineers: Teaching Basic Electronics to Create Theremin-Based Musical InstrumentsDr. Benjamin Reed Campbell, Robert Morris University Ben Campbell holds a BS in physics and MS in electrical engineering from Penn State and a PhD in en- gineering from Robert Morris University. For the first decade of his career, he worked as a laser engineer at the Penn State Electro-Optics Center. In 2011 he joined Robert Morris University as an Assistant Pro- fessor of Engineering. He has been supporting RMU’s mechatronics minor and also teaching dynamics, circuits, and introduction to engineering. Since
on professional identity creation, educational text and data mining, and technician education improvement. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Comparing Florida’s Advanced Manufacturing Curriculum Framework to the Department of Labor Competency ModelIn this research paper, we compare the alignment between advanced manufacturing (AM)competencies in Florida’s Career and Technical Education (CTE) AM Curriculum Frameworkand the U.S. Department of Labor’s Advanced Manufacturing Competency Model. AMeducators are guided by state department of education documents that specify program content,while employers track the knowledge, skills, and dispositions that AM technicians require
(IBBME), University of Toronto. In addition to instruction, she has acted as the Associate Director, Undergraduate Programs at IBBME as well as the Associate Chair, Foundation Years in the Division of Engineering Science. Currently an Associate Professor, Teaching Stream, she serves as faculty supervisor for the Discovery program and is program co-director for the Igniting Youth Curiosity in STEM Program. Dawn was a 2017 Early Career Teaching Award recipient at U of T and was named the 2016 Wighton Fellow for excellence in development and teaching of laboratory-based courses in Canadian UG engineering programs. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Discovery
the UK campus. This program provides over 550 engineering students annually the unique opportunity to reside in a specifically allocated residential hall to house these highly motivated academic scholars. Students are provided STEM-focused study/review sessions, career programming, and specialized opportunities to further their engineering/computer science journey. Tony also provides guidance and direction to the Scholars in Engineering And Management (SEAM) honors pathway allowing students the option to com- plete their honors requirements through a defined curriculum combining engineering and business focused course work. Lastly, Tony provides administrative and logistical support to the Dean’s Leadership course
EduGuide systems.As a key component of our work in STEMGROW [4], this technology-driven application is anevidence-based online training program aimed at strengthening non-cognitive, core learningskills for students from middle schools to college grade level. It is introduced as acommunications mechanism to facilitate mentoring and grow student awareness and mindset.Supported by Duckworth’s research, EduGuide [2] asserts that: “A student’s level of grit — the measurable ability to focus on long term goals and overcome obstacles along the way — is a better predictor of success in school and careers than IQ.”EduGuide is a comprehensive nonprofit program that includes: A web-based app students and staff
Professor Pascal Bellon is Professor In the Materials Science and Engineering Department at the Univer- sity of Illinois at Urbana-champaign. After earning a PhD in Materials Science from University of Paris 6, France, he worked for 7 years at CEA-Saclay, France, before joining the Department of Materials Science and Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign as a tenure-track Assistant Professor in 1996, where he was promoted to the ranks of Associate Professor in 2002 and Full Professor in 2009. He received an NSF career award in 1998 and awards from the Academy for Excellence in Engineering Education from the University of Illinois in 1998, 1999 and 2000. He received the Don Burnett teaching award
(1985-1998; Vicks- burg, MS). He has authored/co-authored over a hundred technical papers and reports during his career in private industry, government and academia. His current research interests are nearshore wave trans- formations, coastal structures, tsunami inundation, hurricane surges, high performance computing, and engineering education.Prof. Ismael Pag´an-Trinidad, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus Ismael Pag´an-Trinidad, Professor (1982-date) and Chair (1994-date), Department of Civil Engineering and Surveying, University of Puerto Rico at Mayag¨uez (UPRM); Principal Investigator/Program Man- ager of the Educational and Research Internship Program (ERIP) under the UPRM-ERDC (US Army Corp of
level of expertise not perceived asbeing as strong.In a 2007 PES experts panel discussion, it was noted that • in the sequent 10 years power engineer needs would increase • the number of power students was on the rise • there was an aging workforce in industry and academia, and industry research funding for university power programs had fallen significantly over the previous decade and increased government funding was matching this decrease • focus on the capacity of power engineering programs to educate students for future needs was needed • there was a need to attract students to the power career option and the vital role played by faculty5Out of this same concern, the power industry itself has
provides insight to the up and coming technology. Ms. Monereau, presently is an active member of the Associated General Contractors (AGC), American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), the National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE), and the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE). Through her tenure within these organizations she has served on the Board of Directors for NSBE, and multiple leadership roles throughout her undergraduate career with AGC and ASME. For more insight into her research, review her paper: Reality in the Nuclear Industry: Augmented, Mixed, and Virtual (https://peer.asee.org/?q=monereau).Dr. Makita R. PhillipsMs. Arielle M. Benjamin
quantitative study, Espinosa8 looked at the effects of pre-collegiate activities,experiences in college, and institutional setting on the persistence of females (N=1385) incollegiate STEM majors. Espinosa’s8 research revealed that females were more likely to enrollin and persist through collegiate STEM programs if they had the opportunity to engage with theirpeers and participate in STEM-related student organizations, and if they were made aware ofaltruistic career opportunities. The findings from the study called for developing cohort STEMprograms that provide female students with a greater sense of community, increasing the numberof student organizations related to STEM fields (e.g., Society of Women Engineers), andproviding female students with