. Being able to see a person use their designand improve the quality of their life provides enormous satisfaction to the groups. Theyfeel that they have made a difference for someone, and they see the results of their work. Page 9.1092.2“Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright 2004, American Society for Engineering Education”8. Student reflection is more global. All students who take the capstone design courseare required to write a section entitled, “Lessons Learned.” In this section, students areasked to reflect on the quality of their learning experience in the course. For
whiteboard. All students can see thescreen and when given permission, students can take control of the whiteboard to write,draw or type on the screen.Application SharingWith application sharing, the instructor can share anything that is running on his/hercomputer with the students. This feature allows the instructor to bring up an applicationsuch as Excel and create programs or manipulate data as the students watch on theircomputer monitors. As with the whiteboard, the instructor can pass control of theseapplications to the students. The students do not have to have the same applicationsoftware resident on their computers.Weekly Class SchedulesAs previously stated, problems with study at home courses arise when students takeadvantage of the self
of cities between which a line can’t be constructed.Design teams were asked to investigate the proposed system to see if there were any constraintviolations. If there are any violations, teams were asked to develop a system expansion plan(additional transmission lines) that would eliminate the violations and propose a finaltransmission system with no violations. Teams were also asked to write a formal reportexplaining team’s findings about the original system, the approach they used in solving anyviolation, and the final recommended system with its cost implications.Design Project 2. This design project was assigned to student teams in EE3410, which is thefirst power course in the curriculum. The design involved the study of the voltage
improvements that could improve the general flow of the class.Students were evaluated based on their 3 reports. They get a team grade as well as individualgrade for each write-up and the presentation for content, knowledge, visual aids and preparation.A grade sheet was given to each student with the project assignment sheet. The students knewwhat they would be graded on. On the whole, 90% of the student knew exactly what to write ortalk about. As a result, there were no surprises and the grades were fairly high. Each person isalso rated for his/her participation during the term. In addition, peer grading was taken intoaccount although the students were very generous with each other. The assessment surveysshowed that students were enthusiastic about
learning module on Partial Fractions in College Algebra and most of the students were able to perform the exercises correctly. 6. Extra care must be observed when writing modules especially with the solutions and answers to the illustrative examples and practice exercises. Any error present in the module will lead to confusion and may result to lack of interest on the part of the learner. Credibility of the author is highly at stake.There is one area that has become a matter of concern to peers at the ES Department. They worrythat evaluating and marking Unit Assignments is an exercise in futility because of the highprobability of students merely copying someone else’s work. The authors contend that while it istrue
in the author’sopinion. The classes prepared and taught by the participants allowed them to apply the theories,teaching techniques, and assessment tools discussed in the seminars and demonstrated in themodel classes. The classes were also videotaped, and assessed by the participant, their peers,and the ETW mentors. In the author’s opinion, a large amount of learning took place at the ETWduring the application of the techniques taught (much like a typical engineering classroom).IIIB. The “ExCEEd Model”The majority of the information presented at the ETW represented explanations anddemonstrations of the techniques used to apply the “ExCEEd model” for teaching. Thesetechniques, and the “ExCEEd model” itself, are consistent with the
Page 7.655.3the preparation of project report. Unlike a general-purpose language, Matlab Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ã 2002, American Society for Engineering Education Session 2793development goes much faster and the corresponding source codes are dramaticallyshorter.Typical programming environment requires a process of writing the program,compilation of the source code, viewing the results, and debugging. This process isrepeated in a loop until satisfactory results are obtained. After the results are generatedthey may be exported to another environment for
in the BSE program, with 1 or 2 non-engineering students per year.Class size ranged from 26 to 36 students. The MEE405 classes ranged in size from 5 to 10 andwere all senior students in the mechanical engineering concentration.Project ObjectivesThree of the objectives1 of the Geneva College engineering program are:• To train students in the design process, so that they may formulate problems, select appropriate design criteria, generate creative ideas to achieve workable goals, analyze proposed solutions appropriately and accurately, make design decisions with informed judgment and with a view to implementation, and communicate their designs and decision processes effectively, both orally and in writing.• To train
. Examples of student designs are presented.I. IntroductionOur world is becoming ever more complex. It is no longer possible to cope by relying onexpertise from a single discipline. Freshmen in engineering schools must come aboardthe “speeding train of runaway information overload” and be able to sort out what is andwhat is not relevant. They must be able to work in multi-disciplinary teams and be ableto present their activities to peers as well as supervisors. To this end PolytechnicUniversity teaches EG1004, Introduction to Engineering and Design, that providesfreshman students with an overall perspective on engineering, and useful tools and workmethods that will be of great utility to the students in the years to come.II. Background to the
dedicatedconnection over which they can communicate. During the connection process, the client isassigned a local port number, and binds a socket to it. The client talks to the server by writing to Page 22.778.8the socket and gets information from the server by reading from it. Similarly, the server gets anew local port number (it needs a new port number so that it can continue to listen for connectionrequests on the original port). The server also binds a socket to its local port and communicateswith the client by reading from and writing to it. The client and the server must agree on aprotocol-that is, they must agree on the language of the information
). Page 25.299.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Change in Elementary Student Conceptions of Engineering Following an Intervention as Seen from the Draw-an-Engineer TestAbstractChange in elementary students’ conceptions of engineering has been studied using the Draw-an-Engineering Test (DAET) prior to and following a curriculum intervention. This instrument asksstudents to draw an engineer doing engineering work and then write about what the engineer isdoing, typically in a sentence or two. Children in participating grade 2-4 classrooms completedthe DAET in a pre-post fashion during academic year 2010-2011. Classrooms were chosen basedupon teacher participation in professional development
AC 2012-4042: DEVELOPING EXPERIMENTS FOR THE VIBRATIONCOURSE WITH MINIMAL EXPENDITUREDr. B. S. Sridhara, Middle Tennessee State University B. S. Sridhara is a professor in the Department of Engineering Technology at Middle Tennessee State University. He received his B.S.M.E. and M.S.M.E. degrees from Bangalore University and Indian In- stitute of Science, Bangalore, India. He received his M.S.M.E. and Ph.D. degrees from Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, New Jersey, and Auburn University, Alabama. Sridhara has published sev- eral peer-reviewed articles in the areas of acoustics, vibration, finite element methods, and engineering education.Mr. Daryl Hunter White, Middle Tennessee State University Daryl
AC 2012-5155: DEVELOPING INQUIRY-BASED LABORATORY EXER-CISES FOR A MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CURRICULUMProf. Sriram Sundararajan, Iowa State University Sriram Sundararajan is an Associate professor of mechanical engineering at Iowa State University. He is currently the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Programs and oversees curricular and program matters including assessment and continuous improvement efforts. His research areas encompass scanning probe microscopy, multiscale tribology (friction, lubrication and wear), and surface engineering. More recently, he has focused on atom scale mapping of thin film material systems using 3D-atom probe microscopy. He has authored over 50 articles in peer-reviewed journals and
of the topics they are about to learn. The learning begins withresearch, teacher lectures, group discussions, and revisions to the original ideas of the unit. Nextis a section of the Legacy Cycle called “test your mettle” in which students are required to showwhat they have learned. This can be accomplished in a tradition paper and pencil test format orcan be explored through projects, papers, or presentations. To finish out the Legacy Cycle, thestudents must “go public” with what they have learned, presenting their findings in front of theirschool or community through the format of a newspaper article, poster, or presentation. This willforce the students to be accountable for their learning to their peers and community. Knowingthat they
development, university and departmental idiosyncrasies, professional development, and various practical issues.The SUNY Albany program was deemed a success. It was particularly helpful for young facultyjust starting their academic careers. Mentors and protégés agreed that there is need for basicstructure, content, and guidelines for the dyad meetings. Mentors and protégés were pleasedwith assigned mentors as long as the assignments were made according to similarity of interests.Elmes-Crahall (2) writes about the Wilkes University voluntary mentoring program for newfaculty. It consists of inviting experienced faculty members to volunteer to serve as mentors andthen providing a list of the volunteers to new faculty members who are responsible to
another is creating patterns. For example, in module 4,students are asked to calculate the pi using the Wallis formula, which involves the addition of 1or more terms. Therefore, in the code, the user is asked how many terms they want to use tomake the calculation (e.g., 500), and the code will generate the output using the number of termsthe user provided as input (for 500 terms, the output is 3.14002068). Similarly, in module 5, for-loops, the student must write code that calculates the factorial of a number (they cannot use thefactorial function pre-defined in MATLAB; these series in module 6 are more complex becauseof the use of nested loops. The other kind of problem is patterns. In this area, students are askedto create different shapes
engineering practices (SEPs)in NGSS. Participants were given “post-it” notes and told to write one word that describes whatscientists and engineers “do” on a note. After a few minutes, participants then placed their notesunder a poster listing each of the eight science and engineering practices. Teachers were able tosee that each of their words could fit under one of the practices and it was noted that they wereable to successfully identify many activities conducted by scientists and engineers. Participantsthen broke into groups of three or four and were assigned one of the eight SEPs to closelyexplore. Explanations of each practice from the standpoints of “science’ and “engineering” wereprovided to each group. The groups were assigned the
. For instance: as a personal tutor, aSocratic opponent, a reflective study buddy and idea generator, or an explorer [9]. Moreover,Stanford’s Center for Human-centered Artificial Intelligence (HAI) purports benefits of ChatGPTsuch as allowing teachers and instructors to scale their learning, adapt to individual interests, andimprove learning accessibility—all without fear of peer judgment [10]. Of course, though,students can use ChatGPT to cheat. Whether writing essays or answering homework questions,students may be passing off generated text as their own [2], [8]. This requires caution, but thisdisruption can lead to an exciting foray into new skills, new domains, and new meaning behindlife, work, and education [11].3. Conceptual FrameworkThis
held in person inthe United States for the first time since 2020, and was distinguished by a record number ofabstract and paper submissions and the highest number of attendees. Several changes were madefor the first time this year, including the creation of 1) videos to explain the differences betweenpaper categories, 2) distinct detailed rubrics for the variety of different submission types, and 3)streamlined tracks and sub-tracks using the Engineering Education Research (EER) taxonomy[1]. We updated the review process to engage peer reviewers at the abstract review stage ratherthan wait until the draft paper review stage. We also accepted abstracts with minor revisions andprovided them with necessary guidance if needed. We created a poster
wide-access Internet-based e-Infrastructure for K-12 education. His research interest includes learning personalization, cognition and metacognition, multimedia content, e-Learning standardization, and distance learning.Raymond E. Boyles, Utah State University Raymond Boyles attended California University of Pa. where he received two degrees; BA in Information Science: and a MS in Technology Education. He also attended Pittsburgh Institute of Aeronautics where he received an Associate degree in Avionics. He has professional experience as an engineering assistant, computer programmer, and a Robotics instructor, as well as volunteer experience as a teacher, advisor, peer counselor, and a special needs coordinator. He
Basic Engineering Statistics - 3 15SPRING SEMESTERARE 4740 Mech. Sys. Design Project - 4 ARE Mechanical Course (ARE 4430 or 4490) - 3 3 Mechanical Option Elective - 3ENGL 4010 Scientific & Technical Writing WC 3 1 Univ. Studies * 3
and writing for academic purposes,and research papers preparation. Furthermore, in order to facilitate the transition of the 1+2+1students to EWU the ELI and the International Education Office provide the possibility to matchthe 1+2+1 students with International Peer Advisors, Cultural Mentors and InternationalAdvisors. One of the approaches taken to enhance the learning experience of the 1+2+1 studentsis a high level of cooperation with native speakers. Towards this end, 1+2+1 students areencouraged to partner with American students in the various laboratory classes. It was noted thatthere was a significant improvement in the academic performance both of the 1+2+1 studentsand the native speakers. One of the intangible benefits is the
polymer processing.Lab ImplementationEach lab took approximately two hours for the students to complete. For many of the labs, therewas only one instrument available, so the six lab sections had to meet at different times duringthe week. A graduate teaching assistant along with graduate and postdoctoral research associatesfrom the instructor’s research group assisted with running the multiple sections of the same labthroughout the week. There were 12 lab reports written by each four member lab section (Lab12 and Lab 13 required a joint report). Four of the reports required a “Formal Lab Report”format, four required a “Memo Lab Report” format, two were in the form of a PowerPointpresentation, and two were to be webpage reports.The write-up
Paper ID #11041Use of a Virtual Multifunctional X-Ray Diffractometer for Teaching Scienceand Engineering CoursesDr. Yakov E. Cherner, ATEL, LLC Dr. Yakov E. Cherner, a Founder and President of ATEL, LLC, taught science, engineering and technology disciplines to high school, college and university students. He has extensive experience in writing curric- ula and developing educational software and efficient instructional strategies. Dr. Cherner introduced an innovative concept of multi-layered simulation-based conceptual teaching of science and technology. He also proposed and implemented the pioneering concept of
signals from the two services previously mentioned. InPracticum #4 the students set up an outdoor antenna specifically designed for the 137 MHz bandused by the Polar-orbiting satellites from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration(NOAA). These satellites are almost sun-synchronous which means that they will be visible in aspecific location on the Earth’s surface at approximately the same time every day. The NOAAsatellites that were operating with weather images in the VHF band are NOAA-12, NOAA-14and NOAA-15 although at the time of writing this paper NOAA-14 is experiencing technicalproblems with the onboard imaging scanner giving very low quality images. The orbital periodof these satellites causes them to pass at a specific location
which engineering faculty are referring toother people’s research when describing their own teaching. The results from this study wereutilized to design a workshop to bring educators and researchers together.In this paper, we report the results of our citations analysis. This includes a description of ourmethod for exploring what sources people are referencing when writing about engineering designeducation, a summary of our findings, and implications for design education.BackgroundWe believe engineering research should inform the engineering design education community.Other educational communities (such as science education) effectively utilize research in theirteaching practices (e.g., McDermott & Redish, 1999; McDermott, 1997; Hunt &
PowerPoint) to their peers, andsubmission of electronic/paper lab reports. Periodically a project progress report is given. Allthese activities are graded and the students get immediate feedback about their performance.Technical writing specialists from the Humanities department act as writing consultants, playinga crucial role to help improve both the written and oral presentation skills of the students.III. Overview of Course Content and GoalsLectures are given weekly by experts in the fields and vary somewhat from semester to semester.Typical lecture topics are:· Introduction to Course / Engineering Disciplines· Robotics· Safety & Reliability· Large Software Projects· Civil Infrastructure· Aerospace, Apollo, and the Lunar Module
engineering students have little exposure with the use of multimedia software and hardware6.3. Poor oral and written communication skills amongstst ME graduates despite their introduction into the curriculum1,2.4. A need to attract more students, especially from diverse populations, into engineering7.The Creative Design Workshop (CDW) described in this paper, addresses each of the problemsenumerated above.2.0 Creative Design WorkshopThe CDW is based on an existing learning model that currently operates on virtually alluniversity campuses – the college newspaper. What better way to train future journalists thanhave them work in a real newspaper environment, honing their interview and writing skills,while at the same time providing an invaluable
questions of this very skeptical old professor, and as those questions rapidlyaccumulated without any definitive answers, we as a faculty simply said as a body, “we’ll makeit work,” and sealed the commitment to offer the programs. This approach to design is truly anengineer’s dream and an educator’s nightmare. It is a challenge for any engineering educator. At the time of this writing, the department is completing its second year of web-basedinstruction following four years of two-way audio/video distance education instruction. Thedepartment policy requires that resident and non-resident students must receive the sameeducation. Consequently, we have a basis for comparing these student groups, and the initialresults might be surprising. Though the
, with examples in writing tutors (Kim, 2023) and software tutors (Prather, 2023).Whether tutoring provides a desired tool or is deployed well remains up for debate (Engle,2023). The overall risk-benefit analysis affects policy making (Office of Ed Tech, 2024), butthere is promise for increasing educational equity (Sylvestre, 2023).Human-Computer Interaction: The general area of best practices for interacting with a chatbot istermed “prompt engineering” (Reynolds, 2021). Prompt engineering entails users tailoring theirquestions to the chatbot to task-specific domains, such as medicine (Heston, 2023), engineering(Velásquez-Henao, 2023), science education (Cooper, 2023) and image generation (Liu, 2022).Overall, prompt engineering provides another