” – those foundational concepts you want the students to retain even 2-3 years after they complete the course. What knowledge and skills (including critical thinking) should the students master? What is worthwhile for the students to know? What are the “big ideas” underlying the topic? Stage 2: Determine Acceptable Evidence The educator determines what constitutes acceptable evidence for indicating those results have been achieved. In this approach the assessment is planned before the classroom instruction is planned. Stage 3: Plan Learning Experiences and Instruction The educator now plans the learning experiences and instruction to meet the goals.It is sometimes referred to as “backward design” because it
institution, what programs had you heard of?” Inresponse to this question, students ranked the entrepreneurship LLC fifth (n = 141) among thetop ten programs identified, Table 1. Table 1 Response to freshman questionnaire: “Prior to coming to our institution, what programs had you heard of?To amplify our in-person marketing effort, we plan to enlist current program participants asguides for tours with prospective students and parents. This may increase the eventual numberof applications if more students join our institution specifically because we have this program.The freshman survey sought to address the issue of program attractiveness with the question,“Which of the following programs had an impact on your decision
inthe College of Engineering, Mathematics and Science (EMS). UW-Platteville is a medium-sized,primarily undergraduate, public institution with a total undergraduate enrollment ofapproximately 8,000. Many of the university’s STEM degree programs, including sevenengineering programs, computer science, and chemistry, are housed within the College ofEngineering, Mathematics and Science (EMS), which has an enrollment of approximately 2,700students. In 2013, the team obtained a National Science Foundation STEP grant (#1161180College of EMS Recruitment and Retention Program). The primary purpose of the grant is toincrease undergraduate student engagement and to plan, market, and advance programs thatsupport recruitment and retention efforts in STEM
Afghanistan. During his work, he worked very closely with the Ministry of Higher Education (MoHE) and Kabul based universities. He was a visiting scholar at Virginia Polytechnic, Institute and Sate University in the USA in 1991 – 1992. ———————————————- Dr Judith Watson has been a senior research fellow at the Univer- sity of Brighton in England since 2001, where she conducts research in education studies, particularly the geography of education and training. She has conducted numerous projects for governmental and NGO bodies in the UK on educational eval- uation and planning. She currently runs the only course in the geography of education currently offered in a UK university at undergraduate level, and is preparing a
describes progress on the expansion of the Network during 2015 and plans forcontinued expansion in 2016. Support for this work comes from a grant by the National ScienceFoundation.5 In addition, our efforts continue to be influenced by our participation in the NSF I-Corps workshop.6 This paper begins with a discussion of how the NSF I-Corps continues to influence theEngineering Ambassadors Network. Next, we discuss the onsite and online training forEngineering Ambassadors. After that, the paper describes efforts in 2015 to assess the effect ofthe Engineering Ambassadors Network, especially the effects of the training and outreach on theAmbassadors themselves. Finally, this paper provides a summary of what occurred in 2015 andwhat we plan for
Admission Compact The GMU-NOVA Dual Admission Compact for Mechanical Engineering is designed tooutline a pathway from a successful completion of the Associate of Science (A.S.) degree inEngineering to the Bachelor of Science (B.S.) degree in Mechanical Engineering. Dualadmission status consists of non-degree status at GMU for students who are full-time degreeseeking students at NOVA. Access into the Compact is established using the followingeligibility requirements: 1. Plan to earn an Associate of Science (A.S.) degree from NOVA Community College 2. Plan to pursue the Bachelor of Science (B.S.) degree in GMU School of Engineering within one year of completing the A.S. degree 3. Have earned 18 or fewer transferable college credits
textbooks and discussing with classmates or friends during self-study for theircomprehensive examinations. There are minor variations in this pattern between the freshman (first year) andother students. The major contribution of the paper is to analyze students’ use of resources for their self-study for the comprehensive examinations so that teachers can plan their teaching and administrators andlibrarians can plan their resources. The next section outlines the research design that includes analysis andinterpretation of the collected data and concluding remarks.Research DesignOur study analyzed resources that undergraduate engineering students use while doing regular study forcomprehensive examinations. We have outlined the overall research design
activity stations were successfully included in the Marchworkshop, and the teachers’ self-reported learning CS and engineering content as well as gainingconfidence in CS use. Over half (n=6) of the 11 participants planned to incorporate the NetLogosimulations, and almost as many (n=5) identified the Robot Turtles board game and the What iscoding? post-it activity as new ideas that they planned to use with their K-12 students. Thoseparticipants who offered explanations mentioned that these activities helped make lessons “moremeaningful” for students by connecting ideas with games, engaging students “to visually see andexperience” coding, helping them understand “how a computer works,” and “how and why wewould use code.” Other individuals mentioned
from the National Science Foundation Advanced Technological Education (NSFATE) program. The program is now completing its second year and graduating a first group ofwell-prepared photonics technicians ready for employment in the growing photonics industry inthe state and across the US. The second year marked the successful completion of the programcurriculum and further development of the Optics and Photonics Laboratory. Outreach activitiesincluded summer programs for high school and middle school students. The paper describes theoutcomes of the two year project in relation to the objectives of the NSF ATE grant. Challengesand lessons learned along the way are discussed, together with plans for sustainability and futureexpansion of the
. This includes a demonstration of the ability to comprehend and apply a codified body of knowledge at the forefront of the practicing community. 2. 25-30 credits of capstone projects in which they undertake research, rather than investigative projects. 3. 5-15 credits in which a range of contextual skills include for example, working with other disciplines, ethical reasoning, impact of engineering on the community and a possible component based in industry1.To rationalise and introduce new papers, the offering of management papers was reviewed.AUT has for some time included engineering planning, ethics and sustainability in itsprogrammes. However the decision was made in 2011 to review the management papers inthe
Paper ID #11093A Holistic View of Building Information Modeling Education in Post-SecondaryInstitutionsDr. Namhun Lee, Central Connecticut State University Dr. Namhun Lee is an assistant professor in the department of Manufacturing and Construction Manage- ment at Central Connecticut State University, where he has been teaching Construction Graphics/Quantity Take-Off, CAD & BIM Tools for Construction, Building Construction Systems, Heavy/Highway Con- struction Estimating, Building Construction Estimating, Construction Planning, and Construction Project Management. Dr. Lee’s main research areas include Construction
earlierinterdisciplinary efforts. The EnGAGE project was used as an innovative way to promotecollaboration between the two classes while achieving traditional course goals in each. Studentswere involved in all aspects of the project, including site assessment, design, planning and willbe an integral part of construction of the garden. Participants completed short pre and postsurveys during various phases of the project, and will be resurveyed at the project conclusion aswell as asked to write reflections on their to gain qualitative and quantitative data regardingproject success.Introduction:Entry level engineering courses are beginning to emphasize production of a more well-roundedengineer through service and community involvement. Interest in outside of the
in table 2supports the previous statement. With this in mind, the next step would be to evaluate theassignments that the students worked to compare against their survey responses as is planned infuture work.The CaseA simulation for a mass casualty event caused by a tornado hitting the community was plannedand executed by the Nursing department at TSU. The initial goal was for the Nursing departmentto provide a simulated experience in mass casualty treatments for their students. As the Nursingstaff proceeded to plan for the event they came to the point where they asked for help from otherareas to support their activities. Faculty and students from the Engineering Technologydepartment participated in the simulation that was run in real time
duration. The author therefore decided on a hybrid sabbatical model that combined one longer placement and a number of short visits, thus ensuring both deepdive and broad exposure. Sabbatical Planning The first step in coordinating the yearlong sabbatical, as discussed above, was determining the general structure: in this case, one faculty internship placement for four to six months at one company (for depth) and multiple short visits (one to three days each) to a wide range of companies (for breadth). Having established this framework about a year in advance of the sabbatical, the author prepared a cover letter explaining her role at Smith and technical background, her goals for the sabbatical, and how companies could benefit (versatile
-based public discussion and inform publicpolicy.1The SRN model incorporates public stakeholders into the research throughout the project forresearch activities, rather than peripherally for broader impacts goals. Hence, the tasks ofeducation, outreach and outcomes assessment assume a larger role than in some NSF projectsand are envisioned to work closely with researchers to foster relationships with stakeholders thatbenefit both research and broader impacts goals.Outreach in STEM fieldsThe National Science Foundation emphasizes education and outreach activities in its science andengineering awards through its required broader impacts section in all submitted researchproposals. Funded researchers are required to make a plan for sharing results
research on team learning processes in engineering student project teams. Additionally, she has co-developed a framework for measuring and in- terpreting an array of team dynamics. An online assessment tool has been created based on this framework which allows teams to diagnose and improve the ”health” of their team. She is passionate about her area of research and plans to continue conducting research on factors that contribute to effective teamwork.Ms. Genevieve Hoffart, University of Calgary Genevieve is completing her honours degree under the supervision of Dr. Thomas O’Neill at the Uni- versity of Calgary looking at the influence processes in teams. She has been working with the Schulich School of Engineering for
) A. Six sigma and organizational goals B. Lean principles in the organization C. Design for six sigma (DFSS) methodologies II. Define Phase (23 Questions) A. Project identification B. Voice of the customer (VOC) C. Project management basics D. Management and planning tools E. Business results for projects F. Team dynamics and performance III. Measure Phase (23 Questions) A. Process analysis and documentation B. Probability and statistics C. Statistical distributions D. Collecting and summarizing data
Conference (HI-TEC).A web page was created to allow applicants to see the research projects, mentors, and activities.The application package needed to include (1) a personal information data sheet, (2) an essaydescribing the applicant’s curriculum design experience, and (3) a recommendation letter. Thepersonal data sheet allowed the project director to group applicants based on their researchinterests. The project director then worked with each individual mentor to select participants.General Program InformationAs described earlier, the program’s goals included: (1) to participate and learn about a researchproject with a graduate student and mentor; (2) develop a lesson plan for disseminating theresearch experience into the classroom. To achieve
&M University and a Bachelors in mechanical engineering from P.S.G. College of Technology, Bharathiar University, India. He has written 6 books on quantifying the value of distribution, profitability, and best practices. Page 26.1442.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015Supply Chain Management: Is It a Must Course for ManufacturingEngineering Technology?Abstract:Manufacturing organizations in the twenty first century are much more distributed than those ofnineteenth century where companies used to be mostly vertically integrated. This has made themanufacturing planning
the three-time National Championship SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Team and is a Fellow of ASME. Dr. Den Braven joined SCGSSM in early 2014 as the director of the GSSM residential engineering program and Accelerate, the new virtual engineering program for gifted high-school students in the state.Dr. Elaine R. Parshall, SC Governors School of Science and Mathematics Elaine R. Parshall is the Academic Coordinator for Accelerate, a blended online high-school engineering program offered to students grades 10-12 around the state. Her current responsibilities include course integration, planning summer camps and Saturday experiences, working with faculty, and general trouble- shooting for this new program. Formerly, she
progress and planning for the future.”SummaryStudent and faculty survey responses indicate that both groups view as effective strategies to Page 26.423.9increase graduate students' research knowledge and skills. The most common experiences notedwere research experiences with Center faculty, being mentored by them, and attending and/orpresenting at seminars and conferences. Student ratings (on a scale of 1 to 5) indicated that theirskills and knowledge had increased most in terms of their ability to work independently in a lab(mean = 4.22); knowledge of areas of research related to bioenergy (mean = 4.11); datapresentation skills (mean = 4.00); and
limits resulted in the removal of five credits from the manufacturing plan of study andseven credits from the mechanical plan. Ensuring that graduates continue to be well prepared forengineering technology careers within the constraints of reduced curricula requires betterlearning and more effective corresponding instruction. Lower than desired manufacturing andmechanical engineering technology retention rates juxtaposed against national calls forincreasing the number of engineers and other STEM professionals also point to a need forinstructional change.4. For these reasons, effective educational innovation must happen inengineering technology education. The strategic question of how to connect innovation inteaching with the creation of learning
steps which begin with the identification of the problem,followed by postulating and evaluating possible solutions. Engineering is Elementary3 expressesthese steps as Ask, Imagine, Plan, Create, Improve, Figure 1.Figure 1. Engineering Design Process Figure 2. Text of the first Design Challenge.Within the context of the collaborative work of university education and engineering faculty anda local school district on an ongoing grant focused on improving teacher preparation forapplication of common Core standards and Next Generation Science standards, a liberal studiescourse was designed to introduce undergraduate students interested in entering the teachingprofession with engineering design experience. While courses for non-engineering
week class is a week-long research based course designed to enhance the students’ learning experience inbusiness research methodology. It is offered in early August on campus as a part of thesecond year MID curriculum. In this course, students learn how to perform a literaturereview, prepare problem statement, design an unbiased data collection plan, and identifyan appropriate analysis methodology. While the focus of the course is primarily on theapplied research problems facing the distribution industry, students are allowed to choosetheir own research problem depending upon their interest and organizational background.The course is divided into two phases. Phase I represents (pre-residency week) activitiesin which students prepare a pre
Survey Question All Business Engineer Extrinsic Chances for promotion are good 4.33 4.35 4.20* Intrinsic See results of what you do 4.31 4.31 4.31 Intrinsic Learn new things, skills 4.25 4.23 4.32 Long Term Good health care, benefits 4.24 4.27 4.03** Long Term Predictable, secure future 4.17 4.21 3.87** Long Term Good retirement plan (e.g., 401K) 4.09 4.13 3.85** Extrinsic Chance to earn good deal of money 4.07 4.10 3.87** Supervision Supervisor supports personal commitments
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Mentored, Unpaid Design Team Internship ExperienceAbstractAn international team of 7 undergraduate interns working pro bono during the summer madesignificant advances in several areas of Space Solar Power. Distinct from a capstone designeffort, this study group revived the practice common in the 1970s and 1980s of consideringbroad topics of high relevance to public citizens and elected decision-makers. Significantobstacles to success included lack of research experience, lack of motivating paycheck, and ahighly-complex system under study. Each student was assigned a mentor from the aerospaceindustry or academia to guide the creation of a research plan, and to periodically
Paper ID #22461Increasing Student Construction Interest by Engaging Elementary Studentsin an Inquiry-Based 3D Modelling After School ProgramDr. Geoff Wright, Brigham Young University Dr. Geoffrey A. Wright is a professor of Technology and Engineering Studies in the Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering and Technology at Brigham Young University.Dr. Justin Earl Weidman, Brigham Young University Justin Weidman is an Assistant Professor in Construction Management at Brigham Young University. He earned his PhD from Virginia Tech in Environmental Design and Planning. c American Society for Engineering
briefly present the salient features of the IFYEP model as manifestedin a pilot program at SBC.IMPLEMENTATION OF IFYEPFor purposes of comparison, we briefly indicate the structure of the first semester at SBC beforethe implementation of the IFYEP. Students typically had a fixed schedule of classes their firstsemester, with some divergence (depending upon degree plan) taking place in the secondsemester. For example, first semester students take courses in student success (PSYC 100),computer skills (CSCI 101), composition (ENGL 110), and math (MATH 099 thru 103) inalignment with their placement test. The classes and the instructors more or less operatedindependently, with few students ending up in multiple classes together.The development of the
programs offered. The research instituteinitiated a Diversity and Inclusion Seed Investment funding program. Starting in fiscal year2017, $203,480 was invested in 20 faculty to assist them with establishing and solidifyingHBCU-MSI partnerships. Feedback has been continually collected to improve the program, nowin its third year. In this paper, we first describe the original intent of the funding opportunity,how the opportunity has changed since its inception and how impactful this investment modelhas been. Preliminary findings will be presented, major criteria for funding will be explained,and outcome measures will be explored to assess the effectiveness of the program. Lastly, wepresent our plan for a more comprehensive assessment strategy, which
Electric Power Distribution System Reliability and Outage Costs: An Undergraduate Industry CollaborationAbstract:This paper describes an undergraduate, cross-disciplinary research into the economic effects ofpower system outages, with a focus on the Pacific Northwest region. The results of this researchare useful for utilities in their planning and assessment of electric grid reliability. The PacificNorthwest region of the United States experiences a temperate climate with brief summers andlong-lasting winters. Generally, the highest electricity demand for the region occurs during thewinter months, when heating is turned on. Therefore, an outage that occurs during winter monthsresults in additional non-financial