P. Sloan Foundation, and industrial sponsors. Dr. Ren has broad research interests in biotechnology and biofilm control. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Promoting engineering education using a state-of-the-art research facility Grace A. Altimus1 and Dacheng Ren1,2,3,4 1 Department of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244, 2 Syracuse Biomaterials Institute, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244, 3 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Syracuse University
also share their plan for the future research.IntroductionThe primary goal of engineering programs is to prepare the engineering students for theirprofessional careers in the global setting 1. Ideally, the educators should teach in a well-managed,student-centered environment with reasonably structured framework. They should stressfundamental knowledge, equip the students with solid skills and expose them to cutting-edgetechnologies 2. It has been found that obtaining practical knowledge from college is morebeneficial to the students’ professional career than mastering any new technology 3. An effectivelearning environment should help the students enhance their ability to solve practical problems 2.Globalization of the engineering enterprise
sufficiently modest—we may have asolution for you! If this describes your motivations, we invite you to read on.Various authors have confronted the problem of semiconductor curve tracing in theundergraduate electronics laboratory and have described their work in ASEE conferences. Wethus turn to the work of those who have gone before, of the giants upon whose shoulders wepropose to stand.A curve-tracing system for pn diodes, NPN and PNP BJTs, and n-channel MOSFETs relied uponLabVIEW running on a desktop computer and laboratory instruments (power supply andvoltmeter) communicating with the program through a GPIB (General-Purpose Instrument Bus)connection.1 While the system was successfully integrated into the curriculum, it had thedisadvantage of being
over the course offive semesters. The research is designed to test two hypotheses: 1. A long-term design project that integrates knowledge from multiple courses strengthens student knowledge retention. 2. A large-scale design project requiring tools from many courses improves student problem-solving and design skills.By integrating five semesters of the mechanical engineering curriculum into a cohesive whole,this project has the potential to transform the way undergraduate education is delivered. Beforeand after testing is being conducted to assess: a) Change in retention between courses and b)Change in student problem-solving and design skills.The centerpiece of the hybrid powertrain is the planetary gearset, which combines
the simplicity to be built by students over the course offive semesters. The research is designed to test two hypotheses: 1. A long-term design project that integrates knowledge from multiple courses strengthens student knowledge retention. 2. A large-scale design project requiring tools from many courses improves student problem-solving and design skills.By integrating five semesters of the mechanical engineering curriculum into a cohesive whole,this project has the potential to transform the way undergraduate education is delivered. Beforeand after testing is being conducted to assess: a) Change in retention between courses and b)Change in student problem-solving and design skills.The centerpiece of the hybrid powertrain is
mention its impact as a source of information. This paper is organized as follows: Section II presents related work. The monitoring system is describedin Section III. The Usage Scenario is described in Section IV. Finally, the results, analyses, conclusions,and future work are presented in Sections V. II. RELATED WORK Projections indicate that by 2012, video use will constitute half the consumption of network resources allover the world, thus surpassing the P2P traffic, currently responsible for the greater part of network traffic.By the end of the decade, projections indicate that this percentage will fit about 90% of the networkbandwidth [1]. With this forecast it is extremely important to
used to describe learners andinstructors in their contexts for optimizing learning and analytics to produce action atinstitutional, regional, and national/international levels5. These statistical analytics have oftenbeen accompanied by the use of visual thinking to illustrate data patterns and insights7, and thesevisualizations come with their own set of unique challenges based on the type of data visualizedand the technique used. Keim8 described six categories of data that can be visualized: (1) one-dimensional data,(2) two-dimensional data, (3) multi-dimensional data, (4) text and hypertext, (5) hierarchies andgraphs, and (6) algorithms and software. Displaying large quantities of these data types can becomplex due to technical
lab hours attended by instructional staff. Students visit theopen lab to work on computer-based assignments, and staff address questions as they arise,thereby providing just-in-time instruction and removing barriers to student progress. We havedeveloped an online queuing system that we use to schedule student assistance in many of ourcore computing courses. While electronic queuing systems have been used in computing labs fordecades, our web tool is instrumented to record a complete historical log of interaction timesbetween students and staff. The analysis presented in this paper is our first attempt to understandwho uses the open labs, and when, and what benefit they receive by doing so.1. Introduction: Dramatically increasing
several of the core themes mentioned inthe list above, to facilitate assignments, projects or self-directed studies in Materials Science andEngineering. A standard materials selection software package was used as a starting point, sinceit offered comprehensive material property databases and the possibility to add tailor-made datarecords and entire data tables. Furthermore, links between, e.g., heat treatments, phase diagramsand micrographs can be set up.In this paper, we report on an initial review of data compilations and tools, the results of a surveyand focus groups responding to an explorative version of a database. We aim to share ourfindings over the materials community hoping to get feed-back and inspire educational ideas.1. Introduction
included three aspects/factors of gendered microaggressions: (1) SexualObjectification, (2) Silenced and Marginalized, and (3) Assumptions of Inferiority. Participantswere asked to identify their position title, position track, age, and ethnicity.The scores on three aspects/factors of gendered microaggressions were calculated by averagingacross items that loaded on each factor with the range of 1~7, with higher scores indicatinghigher frequency of the experience being asked. On Sexual Objectification, 25% of theparticipants who responded agreed they either experienced stereotypes of women or wereobjectified on their physical appearance. On Silenced and Marginalized, 40% of those whoresponded agreed they were either ignored in a professional
by Carberry,et al. was used to assess student attitude about utility, interest, and “cost” of this studentengagement strategy in the following required courses: biomaterials (BM), statistics (ST), andtransport phenomena (TP). Briefly, transport phenomena is a three-credit, flipped course forjuniors. Biomaterials is a traditionally-taught, four-credit course also at the junior level. Aftereach lecture, students submitted both unclear and most interesting concepts through Blackboard.Following feedback, the instructor analyzed the results and created feedback using a differentstrategy than previously employed. At the midpoint and end of the semester, studentsparticipated in the Student Value Survey. Responses were on a Likert scale where 1 is
technical communication. He served for 2-1/2 years as Director of Industrial and Technical Relations for the University of Dayton China Institute in Suzhou, China where he established corporate partnerships and training programs for US companies in the Suzhou Industrial Park, and developed opportunities for UD students to gain inter- national and technical experience in China. He served for twelve years as Chair of the UD Department of Engineering of Engineering Technology, where he was responsible for leadership of five baccalaureate en- gineering technology programs, and approximately 300 full and part-time students. Prior to this position, he spent fourteen years as Program Chair of Biomedical Engineering Technology
single visit to a classroom, while others may include a virtual or on-campus experience of a day, a week, or multiple weeks. In particular, engineering andtechnology summer camps have been shown to improve the confidence, value, and futureintentions of both male and female participants [1]. Informal learning environments like those ofcamps can increase student engagement in STEM topics [2], and hands-on design experienceshave been shown to build confidence and interest in engineering [3]. While there are a greaternumber of science-related summer camps, the number of chemical engineering-specific camps isless prevalent. There are examples of chemical engineering departments that have offered bothin-person and virtual summer high school camps in
socioeconomic factors [1].Title I students often experience a deficit in resources and exposure to post-secondary educationpreparation; the lack of exposure can leave students unaware of the college process as well asunprepared for future careers and classes [1]. This can lead Title I students to being heavilydisadvantaged regarding college readiness when compared to higher-income schools.Understanding the difference between low and high SES will give us a better perspective on theeffects of low income vs. poor educational structure.Research has found that exposing more Title I students to engineering can boost their confidence[2]. Understanding students’ perceptions on engineering from Title I and non-Title I (low andhigh SES) will show how effective
State University (WSU) modelfor engineering mathematics. The WSU approach to engineering mathematics uses anapplication-oriented, hands-on approach which focuses on only the math topics used in coreengineering courses and is taught by engineering faculty [1].Traditionally the course structure at our university includes lectures, studio and lab. The lectureis one hour per week and introduces mathematical concepts as well as describing their relevanceto engineering problems. The studio time is two hours per week and offers collaborativeproblem-solving sessions where students practice applying mathematical concepts to engineeringscenarios. The lab sessions are two hours per week. The labs provide hands-on experience withexperiments and
participantsfelt confident in developing rubrics and providing productive feedback on students' lab reportswith the use of the guides. Respondents suggested extended workshop time, greater variety inactivities, and more diverse examples and samples to provide a broader context. During the opendiscussion, participants raised issues with scaffolding approaches, faculty time, TA support, andgenerative AI as an assessment tool. Overall, the workshop helped establish a sense ofcommunity among participants across the nation, enhancing their interest in lab writing andteaching.1. IntroductionEngineering students often excel in laboratory experiments but face significant challenges in labreport writing [1]-[3]. At the same time, lab instructors, despite being
-12 STEM education, advance engineering workforce development, and foster inclusive practices in engineering education.Adesikeola Olateru-Olagbegi, University of North Dakota ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Exploring Teachers’ Lived Experiences with Culturally Relevant Engineering Design: An Instrumental Multiple Case Study (Work in Progress)PurposeThe Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) [1] emphasize connecting science andengineering to local contexts so that standards are relevant for all students. Yet many teachers lacksufficient training or self-efficacy (SE) with implementing engineering education, leading tosuperficial or
and non-business courses. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Generating Start-up Relevance in Capstone Projects1. IntroductionAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) requires students to complete acapstone design experience that prepares them for engineering practice through team-basedprojects incorporating the knowledge and skills acquired in earlier course work [1]- [4].While capstone course pedagogy differs widely from one program to another, in all cases,students are expected, through the process of completing the capstone project, to understanddesign constraints, such as economic factors, safety, reliability, ethics, and social impact. Inaddition, students are
context.Previous studies have demonstrated that well-planned, student-centered, active, learning modulescan enhance problem-solving abilities, improve academic achievement and create more positiveattitudes toward learning.1-3 Many of these studies have focused on activities such as groupproblem solving, interpreting data or evidence, or engaging in practices of the field. Traditionallytopics in a mechanics/biomechanics course are introduced using derivations with subsequentassignments using the results of these often non-intuitive mathematical procedures. However,few studies have looked at the use of hands-on activities to replace or supplement mathematicalderivations in an effort to connect physical concepts with mathematical equations. Therefore
experience. Those who implement designettes can usethe detailed data provided in this research to determine which approach best matches theircapstone program’s distinctive attributes and goals.1. IntroductionCapstone courses are a part of all Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET)accredited engineering programs. These courses create wonderful opportunities for engineeringstudents to apply the tools they have learned throughout their academic engineering training.Often a capstone experience is the first time that students are applying the design process to areal industry, government, or societal problem with sponsors. This context can result in a lack ofunderstanding of the larger, more comprehensive system design lifecycle when it
assessment data collected so far.1 IntroductionThe goal of this project is to introduce a mechatronics experiential learning element intothe curriculum of the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering (MAE) at theUniversity of Texas at Arlington (UTA). This type of hands-on experience is known to moti-vate students, particularly those from underrepresented groups, in their study of engineering.Dr. Bowling became aware of this when he was faculty advisor for a team of students whoentered the Revolutionary Aerospace Systems Concepts Academic Linkage (RASC-AL) Ex-ploration Robo-Ops competition. The students were required to build a Mars rover, whichwould be transported to the rock yard at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration
“Professional Issues” course to cover topics,such as ethics, which are related to the professional practice of engineering. These coursescommonly utilize case studies focusing on ethics as the basis for student discussions.1 Measuringthe student learning resulting from the case study process is often very subjective, difficult toquantify, inconsistent between evaluators, and costly to administer.2,3 Determining changes instudent learning from freshman to senior year is also different to quantify.Proficiency in engineering professional skills, such as ethics, as described in ABET criterion 3 -student outcomes4, is critical for success in the multidisciplinary, intercultural team interactionsthat characterize 21st century engineering careers. These
, Dr. Quan has a keen interest in employing active learning strategies and inductive teaching methodologies. His educational mission centers around enhancing students’ higher-order thinking skills and self-learning abilities.Jing Wang ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Understanding Epistemic Beliefs of Chinese Students to Bridge the CulturalGaps in Teaching and LearningXinfeng Quan1, a), Jing Wang2, b), Xuan Li3, c), Xi He3, d), Chenhui Zhang4, e)1 Department of Chemistry, School of Science, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China2 Department of Physics, School of Science, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China3 School of Physics, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China4 Independent
in courses and curricula ontheir own campuses. The paper originally was submitted in January 2025. In revising, we haveadded an Appendix that discusses conditions in April 2025, which represent an abrupt change innational conditions related to DEIJ topics as compared to Fall 2024 when the teaching activitieswere conducted.IntroductionEngineering programs continue to adapt to changing stakeholder demands for better integrationof diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice (DEIJ) into both classrooms and curricula. Forexample, ABET’s approved new Criterion 5 will require programs to offer curricula “thatensure[s] awareness of diversity, equity, and inclusion for professional practice consistent withthe institution’s mission” [1] (note that this
The second Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP 2) was initiated by Congress inorder to find solutions to three national transportation challenges: (1) increase highway safety toachieve the target of zero fatality on US highways; (2) increase mobility and reduce trafficcongestion, and (3) how to maintain existing infrastructure through renewal and maintenance ofroads and bridges. Over the course of several years, SHRP 2 has funded more than 100 researchprojects. These projects were developed to address national level transportation challenges usingstate and/or local level case studies. SHRP 2 research results have been disseminated to thepublic through a series of solutions (in the form of guidance documents and/or online/offlinesoftware
, fairness and wisdom.”1 This search for truth means considering whether the data aregathered and presented in a manner that is consistent with the physical world. Fairness considersthe accompanying social relationships: is appropriate credit given where it is due? Are researchsubjects treated humanely? Are funding relationships acknowledged, and is funded research freefrom outside influences? Pimple’s final criterion, wisdom, “concerns the relationship betweenthe research agenda and the broader social and physical world, present and future” and askswhether the proposed research is the best possible use of finite resources.1Within the broader context of RCR are more specific questions about the ethics of collecting,analyzing and reporting data
educators about the process of teachingand the benefits of learning. One effective method comes from the simple Latin Proverb “Welearn by teaching”. This process of learning from teaching is also associated with Kolb’sexperiential learning cycle.1 Kolb’s methods of learning were implemented in a senior capstonedesign class where student learning is assessed. The capstone students are required to identify aneducational need within the mechanical engineering technology program. This need is discussedwith the faculty for the development of a hands-on laboratory instrument that will facilitatelearning in the program. The results from these discussions determine the design requirementsfor the capstone project. These capstone students must also learn the
involves an industry-sponsored event where the entire student cohort participates in a robot competition.For a number of years, anecdotal evidence has suggested that the course sequence has significantpositive impacts on student experience throughout the curriculum. It has been postulated thatthis experience results in significant knowledge gain, reinforces their decision to pursue a careerin electrical engineering, and builds camaraderie amongst the student cohort. A study wasconducted to better understand these potential impacts. Part 1 of the study analyzed grades in theproject course sequence and compared them to another course sequence that also occurs in thefirst and second year of the curriculum. Part 2 was a survey in which students and
Engineering Education (ASEE)among others. In this study, a personal leadership profile instrument was tested that enablesstudents to compare their personalized engineering leadership score with data obtained from aprior study (N=753)1. This establishes a baseline of leadership skills in comparison to one’speers. This paper describes the development of a personalized leadership profile for students thatwould aid them in creating their own leadership plan by comparing their responses with thebaseline. The leadership profile helps to identify areas for improvement and providesrecommendations of relevant courses as a step towards improving upon them. Studentsempowered with the results of their profile could make informed decisions about future
community service byhelping educate future college students - an opportunity all faculty should strive to seize. Lastly,this experience provides students opportunities to take part in educational scholarship.Profiles of Camp ParticipantsThe camp was designed for students ranging from 4th to 6th grade. The summer 2014 STEAMcamp had 60 children between 3rd and 7th grade participate (Table 1). Out of all campers, 29were female, and 31 were male. Campers were charged a fee of $50. Three full scholarshipsand two partial (half-priced) scholarships were given. Out of the 40 campers who provided theirschools districts, eight known school districts were represented (Table 2). Donations from localLehigh Valley businesses helped to fund scholarships. The camp